2012: A cheap primary (so far)

"Even as experts predict that the 2012 presidential race will be the most expensive in U.S. history, a funny thing is happening on the way to the Republican nomination: It’s becoming one of the cheapest primaries in a more than a decade," Bloomberg reports. "The top nine Republican candidates spent $53 million through September, compared with $132 million spent at the same time four years ago. The sum is even lower than totals reported during the same period in the 2004 and 2000 primaries -- when most candidates still were abiding by campaign spending limits in order to receive public matching money."

AP looks at some of the best, er, worst GOP presidential campaign flubs this cycle.

CAIN: He declared yesterday, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over!’ And it ain’t over yet,” NBC’s Jo Ling Kent reports. But he said he acknowledged he hadn’t yet talked to his wife face to face about the latest allegations of an affair and that he would make a final decision on whether he stays in the race in a few days, after he sees his wife Friday.

The AP picks up on that this morning: Cain “says a heavy emotional toll on his family -- particularly his wife, Gloria, who he has not seen since the charge surfaced -- could force him to call it quits. The shift comes as a growing chorus of would-be allies suggests he is no longer a viable presidential contender and Cain himself says fundraising has suffered.”

The New York Post: “Supporters are leaping off the Herman Cain train, but the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO insists he’s moving forward with his run for president.”

GINGRICH: Gingrich said on FOX of who’s more conservative between him and Romney, per GOP 12: "I'm clearly the more conservative candidate by any rational standard… Take whatever your list of conservative is. There are places in my career where I've done that stuff, and I've been consistent about it. I was for Ronald Reagan long before people began just to quote him. So that part of it -- there's no contest."

Conservative Andrea Tantaros, writing in the New York Daily News, backs Gingrich for his position on immigration: “[T]he former speaker is right. This country has become the greatest in the world thanks to immigrants who left their nations in search of America's promise. If you want to come here and work hard, there should be a process in place for you to do that. And if you've been here for, say, 25 years and pose no threat, you should be allowed to stay, not forcibly be sent back.”

“Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are nervous about Newt Gingrich’s rise in the polls, with one member saying, ‘Newt’s hand is always six inches from the self-destruct button,’” The Hill writes.

Richard Land wants Gingrich to apologize for his marital infidelity and give a speech about it. Gingrich’s biggest problem, Land writes, if with Evangelical women, who seem to be far less forgiving on the subject than Evangelical men. “You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others including your former spouses,” he writes, adding, “Such a speech would not convince everyone to vote for you, but it might surprise you how many Evangelicals, immersed in a spiritual tradition of confession, redemption, forgiveness and second and third chances, might.”

HUNTSMAN: At the New Hampshire state House yesterday, Huntsman said, “Did I tell you we’ve changed our campaign motto to ‘live free or die?’ … I want your vote. And if I don’t get your vote, I want a fee for services rendered.”

Jon Stewart pranked Huntsman on Twitter. Huntsman took questions via Twitter with the hash tag, “#Q4Jon” yesterday. So Stewart Tweeted the hash tag out to fans telling them to use it to ask Mad Men actor Jon Hamm questions. Huntsman even replied to question for Hamm: “Asked whether he sees himself following actors George Clooney's or Tom Selleck's career path, Huntsman replied,” per The Hill, “ ‘I definitely want Clooney's career path. But I think that Q was for Jon Hamm.’” He also tweeted, “Funny prank @TheDailyShow!”

ROMNEY: After downplaying the Iowa caucuses, Romney is set to begin airing his first ad there. “The former Massachusetts governor's decision to start spending money on paid advertising in Iowa five weeks before the Jan. 3 caucuses signals a belief that he can fare well in Iowa even though the state tripped up his 2008 bid,” AP writes. “The move comes as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has emerged as the chief GOP challenger to Romney nationally and in Iowa.”

More: “While advisers say Romney's increasing Iowa presence is part of a long-planned effort to surge heading into the must-win New Hampshire primary, the ad and a more aggressive December campaign schedule in Iowa come as the race for the caucuses has remained fluid.” And: “In addition to accepting invitations to Iowa's Dec. 10 and 15 debates, Romney also dispatched his son Josh to Iowa and is sending New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to campaign in the state next week.”

“Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney says his faith’s prohibitions on premarital sex, alcohol consumption, and caffeine use have had a ‘liberating’ effect on his life rather than an inhibiting one,” the Boston Globe reports of Romney’s interview with PARADE. “In a companion interview, his wife reveals his vice: chocolate milk. And when he needs to kickstart his day, he resorts to hot chocolate, she says.”

And he declared: “Americans have looked to people like Dwight Eisenhower, F.D.R., and the Kennedys, who all had unusual experiences that were needed for the times they served. In the US, the very poor are provided a safety net, which must be maintained. The very rich are doing fine. The middle class is suffering. It is for the great majority of Americans, the 90 percent in the middle, that I’m running for president.” He also insists that his wife pushed him to run this time and that he was “reluctant after 2008 to run again.”

FOX’s Brett Baier said last night that Romney – twice – told him how unhappy he was with his interview Monday night: "He just made it clear at the end of the interview. We had a little talk. He said he thought it was overly aggressive.... after we finished, he went to his holding room; then came back and said he didn't like the interview and thought it was uncalled for."

Discuss this post

This may end up being a very expensive Presidential race, but in the end you cannot hide failed policy behind a stack of cash. BHO will raise his funds to run the race, but money cannot hide fact. And the fact is he is the worst President in modern history.

ABO 2012

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:23 AM EST

In your dreams!!

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:31 AM EST

Auntie,

BHO and his supporters are dreaming or dillusional if they believe you can wash away the past 4 years by raising cash. How is money going to eliminate the past? All the TV ads attacking others will do nothing to hide the inefficiencies and destructive policies of this current President.

And when the rubber hits the road, any vote will b e a vote for more of the same or a vote for no more of the same. And I suspect a great deal of votes will go into the later column.

ABO 2012

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:43 AM EST

dsdsherm:

You should be careful about bringing up the past. It was the 6 years of total repub control that got us into this mess in the first place, and we've had 30+ years of trickle-down evidence to show that IT does not work either.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:21 AM EST

bleary,

Yes, and we got BHO as a result of those years. That election was won or lost based on the economic climate of the day.

And this one will be as well. BHO had the majorities required to do almost anything he wanted to do to fix things so it would not be so bleak when 4 years were up. But in his arrogance, he preferred to concentrate on an unpopular healthcare overhaul and payoffs to donor in the form of "Stimulus".

So now he gets to face the music for not making any improvement. And maybe it is not because he did not try to make improvments. Maybe it is because his methods to improve the economy just dont work.

Either way it is regardless. 4 years are past and things are worse, not better. We have spent enormous amounts of cash and have little resources to throw at the mess. And we now are saddled with a new governement regulation/cost/tax burden in Obamacare.

The past is the past and the price has been paid for the previous administration. It has been a very expensive pricetag, as the cost was having BHO for 4 years.

But now the shoe is on the other foot, and there is a price to be paid. And I suspect you may need to get used to saying President Gingrich. The conservative movement realizes we have been presented a very special and unique gift in the fact that we do not have to prop up a Rino or moderate to get elected. The Anti Obama vote is plentifull, and close swing states have buyers remorse. So a more conservative candidate will be put forth than Romney. And they will win.

ABO 2012

    #1.4 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 11:15 AM EST

    The reason Obama focused on Health Care is because he is intelligent enough to know that without curbing the rising cost of Health Care, no matter what else we do, we will never get our economy under control. It isn't high taxes that are causing businesses not to hire, it is the high cost of Health Insurance. Republicans are so short sighted that they can't see that connection, so they will continue down the road to economic collapse. There is a confluence of dysfunctional policies that is driving the US off a cliff, and it looks like the rich Repubs think that somehow they won't go over it with the rest of us.

      #1.5 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 4:11 PM EST
      Reply

      More like my nightmares. And he certainly has been a nightmare....

      ABO 2012

        Reply#2 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:38 AM EST

        Geez, Mitt, if you think the lap dogs at FOX NEWS are tough, you're obviously unready for the task at hand! Wait'll your critics analyze how many people lost their jobs due to your machinations at Bain Capital! You'll think Brett Baier is an angel of mercy!

        So Herman's gotta talk to the missus to see whether or not to continue the campaign? Here's a hint for ya - if she meets you at the door with something in hand that might inflict blunt force trauma, IT'S OVER!!! Don't expect me to cry over the emotional toll this has inflicted on you. You brought it on yourself. It's not like someone wished death on your family, as happened to President Obama!

        • 2 votes
        Reply#3 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:39 AM EST

        "It seems that Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) could very well end up running for governor in 2013."

        Left out of this analysis: Governor Bob McDonnell will be Vice President of the US in 2013 (you heard it here first).

        Therefore Lt Gov Bolling will be the incumbent Governor, giving him a boost in a potential 2103 matchup.

        Cuccinnelli should go after a Senate seat in 2014 instead.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#4 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:16 AM EST

        Well bless your heart. Such hard hitting commentary should be on fixed news. You have that mentality.

        • 1 vote
        #4.1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 11:04 AM EST
        Reply

        Whats a holding room? Did he need a hug?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:17 AM EST

        Dear Mrs Romney:

        Hot chocolate has caffeine in it, same as coffee. What else is Mitt Romney fudging on? You know, some men think cyber sex isn't adultery. Better check his computer.

        regards, a Citizen Concerned with Mitt's "liberation"

        • 2 votes
        Reply#6 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:20 AM EST

        It's been a cheap primary so far, but the real money will start next year. All the publicity so far has been at the expense of the trailing TEA-GOP-Republican candidacy and their continued tripping and stumbling. It's been a hoot with the Texas Streaking Turkey realizing he cannot fly on the national scene. And we can't forget Elvis' birthday bumble from some one who hasn't bumbled yet, ask her. And we have "Pizza Supreme", whose private life, ain't no more! There are others slowly moving up and down with one steady runner still trudging along at a steady 25! This has been one heck-ova entertaining Republican primary!

        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:41 AM EST

        The candidates don't need to spend a lot of money because they have all their corporate masters to spend huge amounts to get them elected. This article talks about the amounts the candidates have spent, but what is the total amount spent by anyone?

          #7.1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 4:14 PM EST
          Reply

          One cycle doesn't make a trend, but there's some odd and interesting things happening this time around. Ground presence seems to have little bearing on polls (I still suspect ground presence will play a huge roll when it comes around to GOTV time). There's no indication that any media buys have made any difference.

          Maybe we're seeing the beginning of the end of retail, hand to hand politickin' as other forms of information exchange and social media really take over. And of course, this would be a hopeful development for the less well funded candidates of the future.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#8 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 1:18 PM EST

          ǝlɔıʇɹɐ uʍop ǝpısdn ɹǝɥʇouɐ without mention of the only conservative in the race.

          ████aul 2012!!!

            Reply#9 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 9:46 PM EST

            There should be onely one day for primaries and caucuses in June of electiion year. Candidates should have one month prior to spend a specific, limited amount however they see fit and then starting in September get another set amount start campaigning for the general elections. If a candidate can't tell us who he is in that time or spend the money wisely maybe we don't need him. I know political junkies would be bored most of the year but it would save everyone from the non-stop nonsense and millions spent by losers. Sure those millions give jobs to people but if the candidates are serious about job creation that won't matter. Those are only temporary jobs anyway.

              Reply#10 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:23 PM EST
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.