The New York Daily News’ headline on the flaming out of Donald Trump’s debate: “I’m fired!”
The Wall Street Journal on the latest NBC/WSJ poll: “Republican voters now heavily favor Newt Gingrich over Mitt Romney as the party's nominee, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey, but the poll also found deep unease with Mr. Gingrich among independents and swing voters who normally decide presidential elections.”
The Boston Globe looks at the roots of the Romney-Gingrich rift: “The defining moment of the current Republican presidential campaign may have come 17 years ago. In his unsuccessful 1994 bid for a US Senate seat, Mitt Romney wooed Massachusetts moderates by famously declaring: ‘I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.’ Less remembered, but perhaps even more relevant today, was how he labeled Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America ‘a mistake.’ Gingrich, meanwhile, used the contract to lead a GOP revolution that took over the US House. Casting himself as a loyal disciple of Ronald Reagan, he won and became speaker.”
GINGRICH: John Rocker likes Newt Gingrich. The New York Daily News: “[T]he former Atlanta Braves relief pitcher who notoriously compared Queens to Beirut while slandering a slew of ethnic groups, said Tuesday he’s supporting the former House Speaker.” Rocker said on a sports talk-radio show: “I love to hear him talk. I love to hear his commentaries on whatever forum I can find him on, for God, the last 10-15 years. I mean, he is an absolute genius — just a marksman in historical value of pretty much anything you want to discuss.”
“Top Republican strategists are increasingly worried that a 2012 ticket led by former Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) — instead of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney — could hurt the party downballot, especially in the Northeast,” Roll Call writes.
“Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) said that despite different historical theories about Palestinians, they ‘are a people today’ and need to be treated as such to solve enduring conflicts,” The Hill writes.
“Newt Gingrich's political director in Iowa has resigned over comments he made disparaging Mitt Romney's religion,” The Hill writes. “Craig Bergman told a focus group on last Wednesday that Mormonism is a ‘cult’ and implied it could hurt Romney in a general election against President Obama, The Iowa Republican reported.”
He leads in Pennsylvania: “[A] new Susquehanna Polling and Research poll has Gingrich at 35%, followed by Romney at 18%, Santorum at 18%, Paul at 8%, Bachmann at 6%, and Perry at 2%,” Political Wire writes.
PAUL: Ron Paul’s economy: Under his plan, a lot of federal government workers would lose their jobs, and that’s OK with him… “Some would be laid off, but economically there’s a big difference between a bureaucrat who hinders productivity than people in the workforce who actually produce goods and services,” Paul said, per the Boston Globe.
PERRY: Rick Perry blamed his back surgery for his poor debate performances yesterday on Hannity, NBC’s Carrie Dann reports.
“On the presidential campaign trail, Gov. Rick Perry has explained his much-maligned effort to make the human papillomavirus vaccine mandatory for school-aged girls by saying he hates the cervical cancer it causes and will ‘always err on the side of savings lives,” the Texas Tribune writes. “Yet he gets some of his biggest applause in early primary states when he brags of signing a state budget that largely defunds Planned Parenthood — which provides four times more cervical cancer screenings every year in Texas than abortions.”
The Austin American-Statesman’s Embry table-sets Perry’s bus tour through Iowa: “Gov. Rick Perry will start a 42-town bus tour around Iowa today in what might be his last chance to rejoin the top tier of Republican candidates before the state's Jan. 3 presidential caucuses. The tour will allow Perry to engage in the kind of face-to-face campaigning that impressed observers on his initial foray into Iowa four months ago.”
ROMNEY: Three-time failed Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell endorsed Romney, NBC’s Anthony Terrell reports.


Three-time failed Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell endorsed Romney, NBC’s Anthony Terrell reports.
Her rationale for the endorsement?
"That’s one of the things that I like about him — because he’s been consistent since he changed his mind."
Will she sky write that on her broom stick?
I don't know Phine, but if I were Mitt Romney I'd be concerned she might turn me into a Newt.
nisl,
I saw O'Donnell on the TV machine this morning endorsing Mittens...talk about a nail in his coffin!
With friends like O'Donnell, who needs enemies? Damn!
Mitt-Romney rift? I'm guessing FR made a typo in the headline, and meant to say Gingrich-Romney rift, however, it may be a Freudian slip. Romney certainly is two-faced.
Actually, I thought the headline was correct. Monday's Mitt does not agree with Tuesday's Romney.
I'm amazed Mitt has any support now that his claims of being a progressive have come to light.
I'm kidding, Mitt will be the Republicans nominee. As a liberal I wish it were going to be Newt, but there is no way the Republican establishment will let that happen.
nisl,
Totally agree with your hope that Gingrich gets the nomination.
it will be interesting to see if the republican establishment has any power left. I think the GOP has been highjacked by the RWNJ.
It was a typo. Thanks for the catch!
Mark, I repeat myself, I thought the headline was accurate. Mitt arguing with Romeny is totally apropos with his positions on the issues of the day. LOL
You're welcome. Nice avatar Mark!
FYI, the Donald did not fire himself - I did, using the powers of Ms. O'Donnell (oo-eee-oo)
Ladies and Gents, please bear with me I'm in a historical mood....
Back during the 1800 election, John Adams was having a difficult time with one pesky opponent in the election, his opponent went so far as to accuse him of being a Xenophobic Hermaphrodite! Politically speaking of course. Reading this column of comments kinda reminded me of this and it struck me on how it related to the current situation in today's republican nomination race.
Newt Romney and Mitt Gringrich fit this mold to a "T" (you can even throw the Donald in here if you want) they are both Xenophobic Hermaphrodites.
But for those of you out there that were born into the 60's or 70's political spectrum, I'll put it into terms you will understand. How about Ego-maniacal, Paranoid Transvestites! Now doesn't that fit to a "T"?
Of course everyone out there doesn't have the benefit of a classical education so I'll again restate it for those of us who need a more contemporary understanding....
How about Self-absorbed, Scared Witless Flip Floppers?
Now tell me, is that a fair description of Newt, Mitt and the Donald? (John Adams is pretty good company don't you think?)
I'm just enjoying the spectacle of both major parties seemingly losing influence over their members.
Yep, watching both sides scatterfire is quite amusing... better than anything on TV for entertainment!
I'm just enjoying the spectacle of both major parties seemingly losing influence over their members.
Mitt needs to quit acting incredulous when people say he flip flops. He needs to find a way to own his change in positions. He needs to make his biggest weakness, flip flopping, his strength. However the second thing he needs to rid himself of is his disingenuous personality. That's much deeper and harder to reverse.
If Republicans plan to attack Obama on the individual mandate and the Affordable Healthcare Act, they will have to nominate Gingrich. As Bachmann recently pointed out, the individual mandate in RomneyCare was used as a template for the one in ObamaCare. Are Republicans really so hypocritical they would ask Romney to criticize Obama for getting more people covered by health insurance?
Mitt and Newt both promoted the "individual mandate". Romney succeeded where Newt failed. So it doesn't make a difference which one they nominate. I prefer Newt. Would be a much more colorful general election with many bombastic moments from Newt. Do you see the double standard in this society that thinks Newt is aggressive for calling Democrats unAmerican and even treasonous yet calls Michelle Bachmann an airhead for the very same comments? Chris Matthews himself is guilty of this and so are almost all media outlets. Hate double standards! Have been living within them all my life.
Gingrich had a convoluted reason why it was OK he once came out for the individual mandate, I forget what it was. At least with Romney, there is actual legislation with his signature on it, Democrats can point to whe republicans make their "it's socialism!" argument.
Romney and Newt are both like fish out of water a flippin' and a floppin'.
It appears that Newt's call for a positive campaign (yeah, right) from both sides going forward falls on deaf ears.
Surprise, surprise...
yep Positively negative.....