ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



A matter of conscience

Posted: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:11 PM by firstread

From NBC's Chip Reid
Sen. John McCain was rushing to catch a plane Friday afternoon, but he stopped in a Senate hallway long enough to give me his response to the President's press conference on interrogation of detainees.  McCain has been one of the leaders of the "revolt" against the president's interrogation policy.

He clearly wasn't persuaded by anything the President said.  "This is a matter of conscience," he said.  And anyone who's followed McCain over the years knows that when he says something is a matter of conscience, that means he's not in a compromising mood.

"They want to amend the Geneva Conventions," he said, sounding exasperated. "The question here is whether the United States will challenge this long-standing treaty, and  encourage other nations to do the same."  He gave this example: Imagine that a member of the U.S. Special Forces is captured while snooping around a suspected Iranian nuclear research site.  If nations have the right to re-interpret the Geneva Conventions as they please, he said, then Iran could interpret Article 3 to allow pulling out two fingernails during interrogation, but not three.

Perhaps not a likely scenario, but the point he says is that we can't just focus on the battle with al Qaeda.  The U.S. will, in all likelihood, find itself be in a conventional war again someday.  And U.S. troops will be taken prisoner.  He says he's fighting this battle now so U.S. troops will be protected by the Geneva Conventions then.

McCain says he is not trying to stop the CIA interrogation program, that he favors amending the War Crimes Act to make sure that interrogators are protected from civil suits and criminal charges.  Sounding a bit angry, or at least deeply frustrated, he told me it's "unfair of the them (the Administration) to say that under my plan we'd have to shut down the CIA interrogation program."

At times he sounded like reluctant warrior, forced into battle by conscience and principle. "I don't want a fight with the President. I don't seek a fight with the President. I want us to work it out", he said.  No, he hasn't spoken directly to the President, but he has been in touch with others in the White House.  And while he says he'd like to find a compromise, he said at this point "it's hard to figure a way" to get there, at least on the Geneva Convention issue.

Just about every article on McCain and this issue reminds readers that he was brutally tortured during his years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, the suggestion being that it's a reason, or perhaps the reason, he's in this fight. But when I asked him if his personal experience with torture contributed to his strong feelings on this issue, he replied: "No. No more than Colin Powell or  Gen. Vessey (another former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs who supports McCain in this effort), or anyone else who has been to war and commanded troops."

As he walked away (his staff hurrying him along, nervous he might miss his plane) I asked if he's worried about this hurting him on the Presidential campaign trail.  He simply shook his head and kept walking.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I think the President's stand on the interrogation issue makes compromise seem unlikely. The Supreme Court has decided against our breaking the rules of the Geneva convention to preserve the safety of our own military. hopfullily the president will reconsider. McCain and others are absolutely correct in their thinking.
Thank God some of our elected representatives understand that the changes President Bush is asking for will destroy our moral standing in the world and fundamentally change the soul of our country. Whatever laws we enact about detainees or terrorism must not be hostage to politics or hurried to make it easier for one party or the other to "win". Sen. McCain (along with Sen.'s Warner, Graham and Collins) need to be commended and supported rather than vilified by their own constitutents.
What proof does President Bush have that the "Information Obtained by Torture" regarding the "WAR" on terror could not have been obtained legally by following the Geneva Conventions?

One of my life-lessons has been that if you cannot explain an issue to someone in a way that convinces them that you are right, you probably are wrong and should re-think your idea.

Our esteemed president seems to be unable to explain his issues in such a way that most Americans, including some Republicans, are willing to believe him.  Re-thinking is in order for Mr. Bush.
Don't think for a minute that if we change the rules of the Geneva Convention that other countries will abide by those very rules that we want changed just for the U.S. We should do everything in our power to find these terrorists and stop them, but we also need to remember that we are a civilized country. It will be 1000x worse for our guys if they get captured and then Mr. Bush will be screaming about the rules of the Geneva Convention. I don't think we should let these guys get off light, but there are other ways we can interrogate them. Round up their families for one, threaten them. Since Mr. Bush has no problem with torture, I'd say let the Air Force test their non-lethal weapons on him and his family first. (I know entirely different subject, but still...)
This isn't so much the high moral ground as it is the high human ground. The good guys have always been identified with fighting the noble cause, with laws that guaranteed the rights of all, with civilized and fair treatment. If this distinction is blurred, we'll still be able to identify the bad guys, but we'll become more and more just a bigger, stronger bully and guarantee an unending military-political cycle, just like the middle east has been for 14 centuries.
Would it not make more sense to ask the ICRC for clarification of the parts of the Geneva Convention that the President feels are ambiguous. While the Geneva Conventions were approved by our Congress, we were not the ones to design or write them. The only body that should be amending the Geneva Conventions is the body that created them. If they decide to change the standards, they will still be standards that everyone must follow. If we amend the Geneva Conventions as we see fit, we completely invalidate them by giving every other nation of the world the right to do the same.
why is the President fighting so hard, in spite of the Supreme Courts ruling, for changing the Geneva convention? What IS the CIA doing that needs to be outside the rules, so the rules must change to allow it. It must be horrendous to think of. This President has reniged on every decent treaty that has been made in 10 or maybe more years. Why not treaties with Germany, Native America, Japan, France etc.?
Why stop at Kyoto?
Torture gets people to talk, but they say whatever they think you want to hear, it does not get good information.   John McCain understands this and he also understands that if we lower the standards it will give our enemies justification to lower the standards when it comes to treating our people.  
It speaks volumes that the individuals who have actually served their country in uniform, are behind McCain.  Those who have not, are the very individuals supporting the President.
If Bush believes the Supreme Court is wrong in their decision supporting the Geneva convention; can we all agree that the Supreme Court was wrong in "appointing" him President in 2000?
What will the president do next? This last attempt to rewrite law to suit his own chicken hawk extemist hypocritical views only makes me think that HE'S THE FASCIST!!!!!!!!!!!!
We are supposed to be the good guys. We should be the moral as well as the military leaders. If we are not better than the other guys, why do we deserve to win? Is it our ambition to be as evil as tyrants?
I cannot believe that a "born again Christian", could even suggest that torture is even a consideration for treating another human being. The end has never justified the means,and lose the moral
ethics of this country.
Can we make the world any worse place for Americans than it already is?  Thats what we would be doing if Congress went along with the President.  Finally enough Senators have a backbone to standup and be counted for what is right and block the President.
It seems that in all of the rhetoric over this issue something is tremendously conspicuous by its absence:  The U.S. (read: CIA) has already committed tortures and other violations of the Geneva Accords and Bush's overly aggressive push to redefine the Accords is a blatant attempt to absolve those acts retroactively.  That's why Bush is saying the trials can't go forward unless we first get his interpretations passed into law.

How about if NBC, MSNBC, and First Read look into that angle?
There he goes again with his so called Christian values. He is a typical CEO president he will do to America what Ken Lay did for Enron.

I love my country, but I'm ashamed of my President.
I don't see how the Geneva Accords can apply when the other side in the fight, hasn't signed them or has signed them but doesn't abide by them. I also don't see you you can keep control of or get information from a population of prisoners who are more afraid of their former colleagues than they are of their guards and interrigators.
In few years Senate will apply much more harsh rules than Bush asks now, after several thousand of Americans will be killed here because of their stupidity. Vote for Democrats and wait what will happen.
I question McCain's motives in this stand against Bush's tactics. I'd rather think the moral tone from the Republicans is better defined by Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins. I detect greater humanity in them. In his own way, I think McCain actually agrees with Bush on the use of torture -- If this is the spearheading of a mission to redeem our moral compass, I do not trust it in McCain's hands alone. Americans of solid moral fiber should beware of the senator from Arizona.
I "rough" interrogation is accepted for non citizens, it is just a short step to acceptance for our citizens.
What people dont realize is that the changes that Bush is trying to make have more to do with the fact that the adminstration has already violated the Geneva convention and these changes will retroactivly abslove them from wrong doing.  The administration realizes that there are a lot of scholars and other countries that are beginning to see that Bush has committed war crimes and he may face prosecution.  Most the of specific changes will make the laws they have already broken null and void.  This has more to do with Bush trying to protect himself than fight terrorism.
I want to make sure I have this right:
Members of this administration--none of whom  
who actually found the time to serve in the
military, and after doing such a bang-up job of winning the peace in Iraq--believe they have
more credibility on this issue than
McCain and Powell, guys who actually know how
to put on a uniform?
This article reinforces the Republican idea "I don't like the rules, so I am going to change them."  Maybe more people in this country should pay attention to the number of protections they have lst or are losing because of the beliefs of this particular administration, and its cronies.
JOHN MCCAIN REMINDS ME OF A SHORT POEM I LEARNED ABOUT DRIVING DEFENSIVELY.I AM WRITING THIS WITH REGARD TO WHETHER WE SHOULD GET THE CONGRESS TO HELP THIS PRESIDENT PROTECT US FROM POSSIBLE WMD ATTACKS. " HERE LIES THE BODY OF JONATHAN GREY, WHO DIED DEFENDING THE RIGHT OF WAY.HE FELT HE WAS RIGHT AS HE DROVE ALONG, BUT HE'S JUST AS DEAD AS IF HE'D BEEN DEAD WRONG.WE ARE NOT IN SOME GAME HERE DEALING WITH ENEMIES WHO PLAY BY THE RULES, OR ARE NATION STATES.I BELIEVE THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS ABSOLUTELY ON POINT! WE ARE IN A STRUGGLE FOR THE SURVIVAL OF CIVILIZATION, AND WE ABSOLUTELY MUST USE EVERY LEGAL (BASED ON OUR CONSTITUTION ) MEANS TO "WIN" THIS TERRIBLE CONFLICT.
I am appalled that someone that has never been to war himself, has never been tortured, or held prisoner, has the audacity to think he has the right to change anything concerning the rules of engagment of war, little lone the Geneva Convention of Nations.
President Bush recently announced on WORLD WIDE TELEVISION that we have been holding
detainees from the Afghan and Iraq "WARS" in secret prisons around the world. He also stated that
tough interrogation procedures were being used. He would not detail the procedures other than state
they were beyond the Geneva Conventions agreements and they were justified.
Our GI's are now at SERIOUS RISK of INHUMANE TORTURE  if captured in Afghanistan, Iraq or any future WAR anywhere in the world.
President Bush has THROWN THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OUT THE WINDOW!
Our GI's will suffer horribly as a result since no other nation will now feel obligated.
Our GI's will have the fingernails and toenails ripped out. Their GENITALS will be connected to electrodes
and high voltage applied. Their eyes will be slowly pierced with sharp objects. If you can think of a
torture that might make someone talk our enemies will now consider it fair game. Bush's zeal to do
everything possible to fight the war on terror is going to come back to America and haunt us for generations. Now he wants Congress to POST DATE a law
allowing the torture to continue.What proof does President Bush have that the "Information Obtained by Torture" regarding the "WAR"
on terror could not have been obtained legally by following the Geneva Conventions?
I seems to me Bush is after CYA Post Dated legislation to help prevent him and the CIA TORTURERS
from being tried as WAR CRIMIALS, Convicted and sent to one of the "SECRET PRISONS".



some of u people make me sick and havent even read the geneva i bet not of u have kids in iraq  let me tell u about mccain the pompous one he goes to iraq for five minutes he walks right by the average soldier like they are nothing  when rummy or bush goes they make sure they talk to the privates the enlisted ones mccain is not doing this for the soldiers  a slap is not torture  a dog in the face is not torture if that then i guess we should arrest our cops who uses dog in that way all the time  if u are not in uniform u are not protected by the geneva  if u are a terrorists not fighting fora terrorists attack u are not covered by the geneva in fact u can legally be shot by not being in uniform why dont u people talk to americans soldiers who are in iraq and ask them what torture is  my son carry one extra bullet he aint letting them get him at all he will kill himself first some of u people should see what they do to our americans soldiers contractors then compare a slap to a beheading  better yet watch nick berg video that is torture we will never beat these guys if u dont give our guys the right to fight the right to interrograte my son is right over there fighting for your right to bash the military when in reality none of care because u were not directly effectd by 911 it didnt happen to me so iw ill defend terrrorists rights and hand tie our military  
First of all, the fact that these "high value" individuals were held in secret prisons outside the US and were, in the President's words, subjected to alternative forms of interrogation suggests that they were tortured.  The president's proposal to allow hearsay evidence and evidence obtained through coercion also points to the same thing, as does his request to have the interrogators made immune from prosecution.  Obviously, the government couldn't bring in men who had provided evidence against the accused under duress and expect them to give the same testimony on the witness stand.  Since they can't very well torture them in the courtroom, prosecutors would be unlikely to get the same story at the trial.  Therefore the President wants this evidence to be presented in the form of hearsay.
I'm glad McCain is his own person again.  I can respect that.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=4070

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google