ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First Glance

Posted: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:10 AM by Huma Zaidi
Filed Under:

From Elizabeth Wilner, Mark Murray, Huma Zaidi, and Jennifer Colby
At this rate, maybe it won't take Republicans too long to win their way back to majority status.  For their part, they aren't lacking for ambitious colleagues like Sen. John McCain and former Speaker Newt Gingrich who are looking to lead them out of the wilderness under the banner of reform.  For Democrats' part, their contest for House majority leader has posed an unexpectedly big distraction which has temporarily undercut their efforts to look like the clean alternative to the recently ousted GOP. 

It hasn't helped Democrats that incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi's endorsed candidate for leader saw his brush with the old Abscam scandal all over the news, then was quoted calling ethics reform "total crap."  Addressing a group of moderate Democrats on Tuesday night, Rep. John Murtha said, "Even though I think the ethics bill is total crap, I'm going to work to pass it anyway because that is what Nancy wants." 

"There's a lot of crap going on in Congress all the time," Murtha told MSNBC's Chris Matthews yesterday by way of explanation.  "Guys violate the law, some do.  But the problem we have is a few people violate the law and then the whole Congress has to be changed."  He added, "I agree with what Nancy's trying to do...  What I said was,... it is total crap that we have to deal with an issue like this when we've got a war going on..." 

That, after Democrats campaigned against a "culture of corruption" throughout 2006, after they pledged to pass substantial lobbying and other ethics reforms during their first 100 hours in the majority, and after fed-up voters registered their agreement by ousting the GOP from the majority just nine days ago, citing corruption as a top reason why.  Implosions in politics are often temporary (just ask Trent Lott), but first impressions are often lasting.  Now's the time when Democrats, who were elected not so much because of their own ideas as because of Republicans' problems, should be treading extra carefully.

Both Murtha and current Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer claim they have the votes to win the job, which will be awarded by secret ballot.  The Murtha-Hoyer bout is the only significant leadership contest on a day when Pelosi will easily get elected the first female Speaker-designate.

Meanwhile, McCain addresses two key conservative groups today.  The Federalist Society's convention theme is "limited government," while GOPAC's website notes, "Many political observers credited GOPAC with being a key catalyst of the Republican Revolution that stormed the nation in 1994."  Mixed in among more conventional appeals to the party base -- maybe some talk of judicial nominees with the former, and some visionary/big-picture stuff in the latter -- will likely be efforts to set himself up as the reformer.  McCain also will file "John McCain 2008 - The Exploratory Committee" today.

Another Republican believed to have his eyes on the presidency who's now offering advice is Gingrich, who sent the House GOP ranks an unsolicited memo that is full of mentions of "we" and "us."  Among the proposals he lays out: "focus on the country first and on Washington and the Congress second;" team up with the Blue Dog Democrats "to form a working majority and pass an agenda;" and, "establish new principles for appointing people to the Appropriations Committee.  Nothing infuriated the Republican base more than the continued process of earmarks, set asides and incumbent-protection pork.  There is no reason for the House Republican conference to reappoint a single appropriator unless they agree to be part of the Republican team."

Eric Wortman, spokesman for the Blue Dog Democrats, commented to NBC's Mike Viqueira about the memo, "We are not going to secede from the party...  There isn't going to be a governing majority" of Blue Dogs and Republicans.  On the other hand, one fairly senior Republican member tells First Read that he and, he thinks, some of his colleagues are paying attention to what Gingrich has to say.

McCain may be looking to another old hand to help him get his agenda through: just-elected Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, who returned to the leadership yesterday with McCain's help.  NBC's Ken Strickland and Tony Capra report that McCain said yesterday that one of the reasons Republicans "suffered" in the midterms was because their leadership didn't get things done, and that Lott is "a result-oriented politician, probably the most result-oriented politician I have ever known."  More: "We feel that one of the reasons why we suffered at the polls is that we didn't act on immigration reform.  We didn't pass the appropriations bills.  We didn't extend the taxes, do the things that people expect us to do." 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How do we get the congress to behave, stop bickering, bilking and porking and work? Just as you would influence others. Take away their goodies till they straighten up. Start a petition to suspend their pay and benefits until some of our work is accomplished. The petition may not really have teeth but the fact that so many people are displeased with congressional results may have some influence. After all, we do pay their salaries and benefits and should expect some results for that. We the citizens are their bosses. Would you carry on as they do in your workplace? If so, would you continue to be able to hold your job?
Huma forgot to mention that Murtha stated he wasn't interested when confronted with a $50,000 bribe and was acquitted of any wrong doing. Six years of corruption within the Republican party and this is all you got? Get a life Huma. If you are going to be an investigative reporter, start investigating.
More: "We feel that one of the reasons why we suffered at the polls is that we didn't act on immigration reform. We didn't pass the appropriations bills. We didn't extend the taxes, do the things that people expect us to do." But they did pass the "get out of jail free card" for Bush, and his regime. Now he can torture more people, and not face WAR CRIMES.
dean - he may have been acquitted but he initially said that he was not interested for the time being. I'm pretty sure he alluded to the fact that there needed to be more time to build the relationship and then he might be more interested. Also I believe that later on in the tape Murtha and his assistant or staff member that is with him leave and when they come back the staff member alludes that it would be fine to give him the contents of the briefcase and Murtha doesn't object to that. Anyway, we're bringing up this story agian when he did or did not do something illegal 26 years ago. I would be more interested in his most recent ethic flaps, if there are any, rather then talking about something that has been well documented and discussed during several campaigns since then.
This piece certainly reads like a Republican press release. Disappointing.
John Bush (McCain) is so busy kissing butt all he can see is the moon shining. He definitely had a plan in mind when he supported Lott and it seems to be the Democratic plan as well "saddle up the old farts and ride em until they drop" (WE NEED TERM LIMITS to remove stagnation and complacency). Let's see now "ethics reform bill","minimum wage","Iraq war solution and funding","social security and Medicare reform ","national health care","immigration reform","Iran and North Korea nuclear weapons","Katrina reconstruction","tax reform", these are all important matters but if you've noticed the politicians that are suppose to be working for the American people are still "all" interested in one thing "me, me, me, me". Everyday its the same old song and dance me first, then the party, and last but not forgotten, the people who voted to put us in office. These political eggheads still have not realized they are pushing the American people to the limit and we are ready for change, not next year or the year after but "NOW".
Lots to do on both sides, but the fossils have locked themselves into power places and cannot be forced out. And you folks THOUGHT that Democrats would be different once back in power? Did you look at the 40 plus years they were in power and all the scandals, porkplumping, ethical crap that went on or is history to be ignored? LBJ and Jim Wright- two names linked to scandlas and graft. Hey- here is some history for you folks- Brown& Root, the Houston construction, financed LBJs ENTIRE politcal career, helped him purchase radio stations, supplied him cash for his Senate run. This company grew into Kellog, Brown and Root (KBR), was bought by Halliburton and Cheney got into it. so, what goes around, stays around. Read the history of politics...it aint going to change!
I watched the Chris Matthews Rep. Murtha interview, and Murtha is out of touch, clearly, with the frustration of the people when he can call ethics reform, "crap." Murtha' whole attitude in that interview was demonstrative of his pompus attitude. The Republicans must be secretly praying for Murtha's election to leadership, as it will only be a matter of time before Murtha brings down the DEM's and provides fodder for the Reps to fuel the re-taking of congress.
Was this sent out by the RNC? It leads off with a completely biased and capricious statement, "at this point it won't take long for the GOP to get back to the majority," (what? Dems didn't figure it all out 9 days from the election, when they are still the minority party? throw the bums out!) Then there's the fallacy that "Dems won because of Republicans' problems rather than their own ideas." What problems would those be? That their White House launched a deceitful and unending war that has killed and maimed thousands of Americans? That they never caught Bin Laden and thus didn't have his head to hold up in triumph to voters? That they refused to practice any oversight, not at least in part because they were lining their own pockets with K Street project money? That Bush's cronyism came back to bite him in the azz when frat boy #24601 was hit with the worst national disaster in recent memory, and bungled it iin a display of protracted incompetence to the point where even Fox News called out the Admin? (not even to mention the hundreds who died in Katrina, at least some of whom would have been saved by a reasonably competent govt response). If the Dems have no ideas to: illegally invade another country, redistrict the country to ensure a permanent majority, gut important govt positions to install unqualified pals, rewrite our Constitution, and further propogate the Big Brother surveillance plan, then count my vote as actively in support of the party with no ideas! You can continue to parrot the Fox News talking points, but I know I will be celebrating the historic appointment of the first female Speaker and feeling cautiously optimistic that at least one Democrat wants to tackle the albatross of Iraq instead of a self-serving, straw man issue like don't steal from the taxpayers.
Democrat or Republican....there may be a "new" party in control but, to quote Abscam Murtha, it all sounds like the same "crap" to me.
Our goverment is a failed experiement. It's time for coup, violent or otherwise. Establish a smaller group of people to run the country, elected by larger regions of the country rather than this slicing and dicing of states. My reason for this is plain and simple: We have too many "cooks" in the "kitchen". Stream the goverment, stream line the laws, and put an end to pointless struggle with a failed experiement.
The Dem's are just as bad as the Republicans...even worse - they can't even agree. Pelosi is a joke. Her actions make the Democratic leadership of the House look inept.
We already have term limits. They're called elections. What really needs to be changed is the seniority policy for committee chairmanships and membership. This is where term limits would be most effective. I would favor a selection process based upon rotating state membership for each committee with the committee members electing their chairperson.
This is a dissapointing Post. I would have figured after yesterday's revlations about the fox news memo you guys would stop parroting their stories. This whole thing started in the American Standard and went straight to Fox News. Then it went to you. I have watched the Abscam tape. Twice Murtha refused the bribe. Just because he was polite to the under cover agents and didn't storm out of the meeting the MSM has decided that he might as well have been convicted. How many times must we remind you HE DID NOT TAKE THE BRIBE!!!!
Oh, please, drop the drivel about term limits. We have term limits -- they are called ELECTIONS. If the American people want to hold their elected officials accountable, all they have to do is to do it! If we saw Congress changing hands every few years, we'd get a lot more responsiveness. So stop carping, drop the partisianship, and show up at the voting booth to do your job -- vote the bums out if they are not working for you! And if you keep someone in office because of all the earmarks they get for your state, don't cry about busted budgets.
Butch, this is "fair and balanced" reporting here. See, we numskulls in the ignorant proletariat need to know the deep truth that the Democrats are just as bad as the Republicans. This is what they teach you these days in Journalism 101 about "fairness." Fearless fairness, another juvenile attempt on the part of what passes for journalism in this country to sell words and move product. Pathetic.
Thanks for being objective. It seems some folks can "dish it out", but sure can't take it. If you know what I mean. There are bad Republicans and there are bad Democrats. If we could get past that & work on getting this country more unified we might get somewhere. Find the things everyone can agree on, hopefully there are still a few,like freedom, and let's get somethnig done to keep this the great country it has always been!
This is so funny to listen to ... the Democratic pot calling the Republican kettle black ... let's look at all of the members of congress that have screwed up ... like Kennedy when he ran the car off the road ... why is he not gone, Murtha and his Abscam issue ... "not right now ..." Its time to clean house on both sides, reform the election laws, limit terms and prevent dynasties from occuring ... and have the congress have the same type of "benefits" and "retirement" as the rest of us workers ... not paying them bundles after they retire. As i read the constitution they elected officials are to represent our interests NOT theirs.
Bottom line is the democrats have to act in a positive direction and do it in a timely manner. Part of the republican agenda is to distract the demos from the job at hand. It seems as is they are doing just that. For the demos to successfully extract themselves from the "same old song" government that has being playing for the last six years, the demos need to bear down on their agenda. If they do that then the american people are smart enough to see the republicans antics for exacty what they are.
So let me get this straight. A couple of Democrats are trying to establish themselves as second in command in the House and that's bad for America? Are you serious? There are far more things that should be talked about that are FAR more important that this. Which do Americans care more about, politicians that lie and are corrupt, or politicians running for a job? Seriously.
If John Murtha is elected, its just one more reason why the Democratic Party, now in power, will avoid tackling the ethics of earmarks. The Republicans deserved to lose the house, and it will be a long while before they can earn the trust to win it back with any sort of useable majority, but that doesn't mean the Democrats won't botch it in their own special way. With committee chairs leftover from the Great Society days, support from public sector unions and trial lawyers driving their agenda, I expect a much narrower Democratic majority in '08 and another Republican president.
It is about time for Murtha to back away from his own ego and work for the party. He was never convicted but his sheets are soiled. Right now the dems need to speak to the ehics of congress as well as the bigger issue of the war. Are the dems waiting for a miracle with baker coming to the rescue? They should listen to Joe Biden about 3 states with a Federal government in Iraq. The Iraqis need to be split up for their own good. Nothing else will stop the violence. Jim W. Milwaukee
Bottom line is this - Both parties stink! I couldn't even read all of these posts, they are so predictable. Can we not get some leaders in power who will govern from the center. That is where 80% of the country is. The 10%ers on either side of the politacal spectrum are nuts. That is what we need and that is what I was hoping for, but I guess we'll just have to deal with another 2 yrs of nothing getting done. Oh well.
Cool it, everybody. Heck, the Dems haven't even been sworn in yet and you're grumbling. Stand back a little and let's see if they can get something accomplished that Bush doesn't veto. As an Independent, I could care less which party is in control of either house or the presidency as long as there are competent people there. But, it never seems to work when both houses and the presidency are of the same party. With each major party holding at least one of the houses or presidency, nothing really bad ever happens and only the really good things get through. Let's give it a chance to work this time.
Ryan, The person accompanying him was NOT an aide, but a lawyer he was introduced to that day to take him there. Testimonies revealed that this other person EXPECTED to pick up the "walking around money" for the other congressmen at that meeting. Murtha knew this- and then he declined his take- jeopardizing the whole payoff. When you see him say "at this time" in the video- watch who he's talking to- both the lawyer and the briber. He just royally pissed in the lawyer's coffee cup and is trying to soothe things out. (That doesn't make him totally without fault- he didn't report the incident.) As for what he's done recently: this was a VERY negative re-election campaign (I'm in his district) and this was the nastiest they had to focus on (aside from the war opposition).
Joe, say it again! Craig, you're right, but what have you to say about the Democratic antics prior to the Republicans losing control of Congress? Surely the Republicans aren't the only ones on Capitol Hill engaging in antics. Then again, some people call it politics.
Is MSNBC going to bring up McCain's ethical lapse with respect ot the Keating five affair - especially since McCain's running for President - of course not !!!! The media is McCains lapdog (or female dog - I cant use the real word 'coz they will censor me out !!) On another note I did hear Lester Holt asking on MSNBC today morning if the Democrats victory was a fluke - they need to send this dolt to college to take a poli sci course and learn how democracy works !!!
Paw makes some good points about the mindset of most politicians. I would add that the trend seems to be political longevity leads to an exponential increase in self preservation and/or corruption. It also seems that the people become more accepting of the corruption as their minds are numbed by arguments between individuals who are likely both wrong. I am personally disappointed in the election results but I also find it laughable that the Democrats would potentially waste their "big opportunity" on people the likes of Murtha. It would seem that "more of the same" is to come. Dean, the technicality of his aquittal does not sway us all.
All the politicians are so busy living in their own little world and stoking their own egos, they've completely lost touch with reality and the common man who elected them. I say knock 'em back to the same salaries and benefits the everyday people have to live with/on and see what happens. I can dream, can't I?
we're revamping stay the course,standup/standown,to standby/stoodup. abizaid wants to standby current troop levels to await the same old standup/standown policy which hasn't worked in 3 yrs. we've stoodby and been stoodup waiting for our date to materialize for going home. its time to change the menu of our course if we're going to haqve to eat it lets get started.
The Republicans deserved losing both houses; However, if President Bush had begun bringing our boys home from Iraq, the Republicans would have won. Why? Highest stock market in history, lowest unemployment, & people having more money in their pocket. Iraq was the issue
What really frosts me about these clowns we have in Congress is the way they exempt themselves from complying with the laws they pass and expect all of us to comply with. They are exempt from Social Security taxes and have set themselves up with an unbelievably cushy pension plan that they are fully vested in even if they only serve one term! If they get in trouble and resign without impeachment they STILL get their pension. Talk about hypocrites.
Nancy is in a win-win situation. If Murtha loses, she still shows her loyalty to him without having to explain his baggage. She will work well with Hoyer. If Murtha wins, he gets what he wants but then he will be indebted to Nancy and give her everything she wants. She wins either way!! Am I right????
Murtha should just shut his mouth and bow out of the race. He's nothing but a Republican Party talking point at this point and a distraction for the Democrats who need to move forward on a new agenda for this country. The Republican Party propaganda machine had this campaign ready to go since the day after the election. For the past two days Sean Hannity has been playing Murtha's Abscam tape on his radio and tv shows. It's a typical smear campaign orchestrated by the Republican Party. The problem is the Abscam tape does not cast Murtha in favorable light despite his acquittal. Murtha looks like someone who would sell his vote to special interests. The Democrats don't need this and more importantly, the country doesn't need this. Congress needs to focus on the serious issues facing this country. Republicans, on the other hand, want to focus on character debates -- they will resurrect and rehash stuff from 26 years ago. I suppose Democrats will now rehash the stupid statements of Trent Lott from several years ago now that Republicans elected him to a leadership position in the Senate. In the end, these character assasinations get us no where. We will still have the war; we will still have a spiraling deficit; we will still have a dwindling social security trust fund; we will still have millions without health care; and we will still have an immigration/border control problem . . . . If Democrats want to succeed, they are going to have to avoid these traps being set by the Republican Party. Instead they walk right into them every time. It's very disappointing.
We need term limits, the longer these guys are in goverment the worse off the country is. It's ridiculous that the only body that can impose term limits are the people it would affect. They also are the only ones who can authorize their own pay raises. The Dems are no cleaner than the Reps. With slime like Murtha, Harry Reid and Alcee Hastings, the real culture of corruption is all legislators.
It is just all politics. Nancy Pelosi owed a favor and John Murtha has asked for the debt. She probably knows he does not have a chance, so now he has cashed in and he will be off her back.
Do Do - I'm not sure why you are so critical of Lester Holt. I think he's a pretty decent newsperson and the idea of a fluke congressional win is not out of the realm of possibility. In the modern two party (Republican/Democrat) system a "fluke" congressional election has happened twice. Once in the 1888 elections where the Republicans took control of the house only to loose it again in the 1890 elections, and it happened again to Republicans in the 1946 elections, they became the new majority party for only 1 session then in 1948 the Democrats booted them out and held control for 40+ years after that.
I agree with Rep. John Murtha that it is a bunch of crap that the incoming Congress should have to rewrite laws dealing with the behavior of elected officals. We are referreeing a civil war in Iraq. We have allowed the invasion of privacy by the NSA. Habeas Corpus has been suspended. We have no oversight on no-bid civilian contracts concerning Iraq. We have hired gunslingers from private security businesses that are headquartered in the U.S. and Australia and not answerable to military authority in Iraq. Now the incoming majority party wants to argue over whether it is ethical to have lunch with a lobbist. Yes it is a bunch of crap!
This brief note is intended as a sincere expression of appreciation to all the leftists, quislings, and liberals for providing sources of outrageously obscene humor, the likes of which would make Borat blush. Pelosi, as the shrill, hysterical, anal retentive control freak, paired with Sluggo-thuggo Murtha, and the plethora of other tainted leftists guarantee that the next two years will be fodder amply harvested for a congressional reversal in 2008. Again, thank you losers.
Roy, you're mistaken. The stock market isn't at its highest point if you take inflation into account. It was at its highest point in January 2001 when "W" took office. It's taken almost six years to get back to a few points below what it was (considering inflation.) Unemployment figures are a joke in that they no longer count those unemployed who have used up their 26 weeks of unemployment insurance, but still don't have a job. It also doesn't take into consideration people who are working part time or in lower paying service jobs earning far less money than when they were in manufacturing. By every financial criteria, the rich have gotten a lot richer under this administration, the middle class exists only where the husband and wife are both working and the poor have increased substantially in numbers. Plus, health and educational costs have skyrocketed. Those have little affect on the rich but are getting out of reach for others. In every instance in which the Republicans have controlled congress, they have shown a great ability to get elected. But, like the dog chasing a car, have no idea how to govern when they get into office. Once there, their only priority if more power and reelection.
"At this rate, maybe it won't take Republicans too long to win their way back to majority status." Gee, with the corporate media shilling for the Repubs like you people are, no, it won't take any time at all. The Repubs could probably stage a coup d'etat and you'd blame it on the Democrats not being strong enough to govern. And why haven't you attacked McCain for his own ethical lapses? Unlike Murtha, McCain gave into temptation, but you'd never know that from the sycophantic coverage you've given him.
In response to Dean and Dems like him: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. You want to talk about the last 6 years? I'm not going to defend the Republicans who committed these scandals. They messed up and they had to go. But, the Dems have been getting away with this stuff for the past 30 years. Keep this in mind - while I go through this, Dems were in power for 18 of those 30 years while they were doing this stuff. Let's get on with it. Where do I begin with the Democratic Party? I direct your attention to a recent NBC article, most recently published today - "Hastings is also one of fewer than a dozen federal judges in U.S. history to be removed from office by the Senate in an impeachment trial. He was a federal judge appointed in 1979 by President Carter. In 1989 the Democratic-majority House impeached him and the Democratic-majority Senate tried him on charges of conspiring to extract a bribe from two drug dealers in exchange for reducing their sentences. The Senate voted to remove him from the bench." Now he represents us in Congress? Go figure. Let's talk about Chappaquidick, shall we? Ted Kennedy. That was like pre-OJ Simpson the way he was let off the hook. I'm sure his family name didn't help him out at all. Or, how about we speak the truth about Murtha. He didn't shy away from the possibility of accepting bribes in the future. He said "I'm not interested...AT THIS TIME." That's not a strong denial. Nor, is it a solid ethical stance. In fact, he basically said that all options like this were still on the table. Wow, that's character for you. Or, how about Gerry Studds. I'm sorry to step on a man's grave, but Dean opened this can of worms everybody. He was censured. CENSURED!! That's it? Dems never gave him the boot for having SEX with an underage male in 1983! On the other hand, Foley just sent a few emails to a paige and he got tossed. Regardless of content, he didn't physically defile the boy. Now, again, I'm NOT defending what Republicans like Foley and Bob Ney did over these past 6 years, but at least we held them accountable and we threw them out of office, ASAP. The Democratic Party only slaps their bad boys on the wrist while the media looks the other way or avoids coverage altogether. Or, the Dems play spin doctor with the law: "It depends on what the definition of is...is?" Are you kidding me? Or, in Hastings case, they throw their support to him in an election and he becomes a leader in Congress after being booted from the bench. I can almost count on my fingers how many times a Federal Judge has been given the boot in our country's 200 plus year history. Oh, by the way, wasn't there some guy re-elected somewhere in Louisiana after he was caught with like $90,000 in his freezer this past year or so? I can't remember his name. William Jeff...William Jeffer....Can anyone help me out? Yeah, that made headline news for about 3 minutes. I'm tired. If you want to really get into it I can go on and on and on and on. In the end, is Bob Ney in office? Is Foley in office? Is Tom Delay in office? Are the Republicans in power? No. Precisely because we held our people accountable. Now, ask yourself these questions? When does the statute of limitations on immorality and unethical behavior run out? When do these examples become cold cases? How do people like Dean quantify it? For starters, as far as I'm concerned, many of these officials are still in power and for that very reason it is still free game. I don't care if it is 6 years, 26 years, or 56 years. In comparison, what about slavery? I mean, by Dean's apparent benchmarks, we shouldn't be talking about that still, right? Should we disqualify that from our discussions or our text books just because its been out of practice since the 1800s? I don't think so. Now, can we all get off our high horse? No one owns stock on morality. It's not a Democratic thing or a Republican thing. It's an individual thing. There were people in the Republican party that screwed up and it cost them. So be it. I'm not going to get into this issue anymore. I've said enough. This whole "my mom is better than your mom" discussion is getting ridiculous and has been way overplayed. Let's take the record player off repeat and get some things done for the American people now, shall we?
BAsin RAnge------- THE CATALYST FOR EVERY SINGLE FUNNY JOKE IN THE PAST SIX YEARS IS GEORGE AND THE REVERSAL HAS JUST HAPPENED.....
Helene from Hoboken, nice clear thought process. Intelligent analysis. Your post demonstrates a level of perception that transcends the ability and inclination of most of the so-called journalists invading our mind-space. That is why, Helene, you are writing on a board few will read and we may never hear from you again. Most certainly, you will never make it as a pundit, you will never be paid for writing of the sort you demonstrate here. You see, it is moderate, indicates a bright, thoughtful mind and makes a certain self-evident sense. Helene, to be heard over the incessant din, you gotta shout, strut, grimace, and finally, grovel. You did not ask for advice, but if you are ever going to be on the payroll of the corporate news dragon you need to STOP MAKING SENSE.
Independent - When measuring the stock market performance inflation is never taken into account. That is not a valid argument. Now, I will say that Roy uses the term "stock market" loosely. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which is composed of 30 stocks, is at an all time high. However, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ are not. The S&P I believe is still 9-10% off its high and the NASDAQ is about 53% off its dot com bubble high. 6 years to get back to a high after a recession and deep deep sell off in the broad markets is really not that unreasonable. After the run on the banks in October of '29 that sparked the Great Depression, I believe it took something close to 25 years to get the DJIA back to its previous high. Now, of course the 2000-2002 sell off and slight recession was nowhere near the Great Depression I'm just pointing out that 6 years is a reasonable amount of time... You are correct in your comments about the unemployment figures but another aspect that is often understated in the unemployment figures is small business owners and thier employees. I agree with you that the healthcare crisis in America is very serious and something needs to be done about it. I believe that a combination of lawsuit reform and implementation and education around Health Savings Accounts could dramatically improve the healthcare situation here; but I'm sure there are many other good sound arguments out there for other ideas.
After trying to think what my Ethics Class Professor, Dr. Joseph Fox, (the most brilliant man I've ever known, a decorated WWII vet, and a cross between John Carradine and Boris Karloff) would think about Congressional Ethics, I've come to this conclusion. He would agree with Murtha. It is total crap and should be trashed completely. Start all over with a blank piece of paper...and keep it short. But do it after the Iraq thing is sorted out.
BTW: This article is a good example of why the Fairness Doctrine needs to be reinstated; the media simply can't report the news honestly otherwise.
Wow, what a huge and incredibly presumptuous statement in the very first sentence of your article. The democratic party is not going to lose the majority in the House of Re's over the election of the Majority Leader! That's a shallow and ridiculous analysis! In just a few weeks, this entire "inside the beltway" melodrama will have been forgotten. The election of 2008 will hinge on many variables, such as Iraq, the war on terror, the economy, who is heading the national tickets, and probably several factors that have not happened yet. It's incredibly silly to assume that something that doesn't effect anyone outside the Democratic Caucus in the House will be a significant factor in the voting two years from now. These guys have not even taken their oaths of office. Let's give thme a chance to either succeeed or fail at governing.
Murtha is absolutely right - too much time being spent on this meaningless crap. The media has no "news" now that the election is over so they pump up the squabble over majority leader. BFD. Over at Fox News they're dusting off OJ and Abscam for reruns in prime time. Hey Fox while you're at it, how 'bout a rehash of your boy Oliver North and the Iran/Contra scandal. How about Buchannan and Nixon's politics, should be some juicy stuff there as well. Look you news media idiots, we need to move forward - keep covering Katrina and Iraq and the real news that matters and quit trying to brainwash people otherwise we're all going to tune in and watch SpongeBob with our kids.
Ryan, you say that inflation is never taken into account in judging the stock market. That is a bunch of baloney! In retirement dollars, consider what your 401K has done in the last 6 years. If it hasn't kept up with inflation, you lost. Another way of looking at the stock market is comparing the last six years with the 8 years before that under Clinton. From 1992 to 2000 the market went from 4000 to 11000...six years later in 2006 it finally got to 12000.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=14908

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google