ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First Glance

Posted: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:10 AM by Huma Zaidi
Filed Under:

From Elizabeth Wilner, Mark Murray, Huma Zaidi, and Jennifer Colby
At this rate, maybe it won't take Republicans too long to win their way back to majority status.  For their part, they aren't lacking for ambitious colleagues like Sen. John McCain and former Speaker Newt Gingrich who are looking to lead them out of the wilderness under the banner of reform.  For Democrats' part, their contest for House majority leader has posed an unexpectedly big distraction which has temporarily undercut their efforts to look like the clean alternative to the recently ousted GOP. 

It hasn't helped Democrats that incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi's endorsed candidate for leader saw his brush with the old Abscam scandal all over the news, then was quoted calling ethics reform "total crap."  Addressing a group of moderate Democrats on Tuesday night, Rep. John Murtha said, "Even though I think the ethics bill is total crap, I'm going to work to pass it anyway because that is what Nancy wants." 

"There's a lot of crap going on in Congress all the time," Murtha told MSNBC's Chris Matthews yesterday by way of explanation.  "Guys violate the law, some do.  But the problem we have is a few people violate the law and then the whole Congress has to be changed."  He added, "I agree with what Nancy's trying to do...  What I said was,... it is total crap that we have to deal with an issue like this when we've got a war going on..." 

That, after Democrats campaigned against a "culture of corruption" throughout 2006, after they pledged to pass substantial lobbying and other ethics reforms during their first 100 hours in the majority, and after fed-up voters registered their agreement by ousting the GOP from the majority just nine days ago, citing corruption as a top reason why.  Implosions in politics are often temporary (just ask Trent Lott), but first impressions are often lasting.  Now's the time when Democrats, who were elected not so much because of their own ideas as because of Republicans' problems, should be treading extra carefully.

Both Murtha and current Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer claim they have the votes to win the job, which will be awarded by secret ballot.  The Murtha-Hoyer bout is the only significant leadership contest on a day when Pelosi will easily get elected the first female Speaker-designate.

Meanwhile, McCain addresses two key conservative groups today.  The Federalist Society's convention theme is "limited government," while GOPAC's website notes, "Many political observers credited GOPAC with being a key catalyst of the Republican Revolution that stormed the nation in 1994."  Mixed in among more conventional appeals to the party base -- maybe some talk of judicial nominees with the former, and some visionary/big-picture stuff in the latter -- will likely be efforts to set himself up as the reformer.  McCain also will file "John McCain 2008 - The Exploratory Committee" today.

Another Republican believed to have his eyes on the presidency who's now offering advice is Gingrich, who sent the House GOP ranks an unsolicited memo that is full of mentions of "we" and "us."  Among the proposals he lays out: "focus on the country first and on Washington and the Congress second;" team up with the Blue Dog Democrats "to form a working majority and pass an agenda;" and, "establish new principles for appointing people to the Appropriations Committee.  Nothing infuriated the Republican base more than the continued process of earmarks, set asides and incumbent-protection pork.  There is no reason for the House Republican conference to reappoint a single appropriator unless they agree to be part of the Republican team."

Eric Wortman, spokesman for the Blue Dog Democrats, commented to NBC's Mike Viqueira about the memo, "We are not going to secede from the party...  There isn't going to be a governing majority" of Blue Dogs and Republicans.  On the other hand, one fairly senior Republican member tells First Read that he and, he thinks, some of his colleagues are paying attention to what Gingrich has to say.

McCain may be looking to another old hand to help him get his agenda through: just-elected Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, who returned to the leadership yesterday with McCain's help.  NBC's Ken Strickland and Tony Capra report that McCain said yesterday that one of the reasons Republicans "suffered" in the midterms was because their leadership didn't get things done, and that Lott is "a result-oriented politician, probably the most result-oriented politician I have ever known."  More: "We feel that one of the reasons why we suffered at the polls is that we didn't act on immigration reform.  We didn't pass the appropriations bills.  We didn't extend the taxes, do the things that people expect us to do." 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

wow, its amazing to see so many whiney democrats, urinating in their bloomers about the obvious fact that THEIR side is just as corrupt as the supposed "culture of corruption" they replaced on Nov. 7th. I like the other blogger's (from Indiana) suggestion: Military coup, and let the military make the problems in Washington "disappear".
Independent - if you ask any economist or analyst what the rate of return for the stock market has been since X year they will tell you Y%. Y is not adjusted for inflation. I can't recall it ever being adjusted for inflation. Now when it comes to saving for retirement, I completely agree that it would be in investors best interest to get a 3% or higher annualized rate or return so that your investment outpaces inflation. Over the past 25 years the S&P 500 has returned an annualized gain of 11.7%, well outpacing the low inflation enviroment of the past two+ decades. Now, you are right that Clinton did happen to be president during the best 4 years that the market has ever had 95-99. I'm not sure how much credit he deserves for that. I suppose he deserves credit for not mucking it up and staying on the sidelines and signing the tax cuts in 95 that reversed his tax hikes in 93. It has also been well documented that the economy was imploding well before Bush even won the election in 2000. In the 3Q of 2000 and the 1Q of 2001 there was negative GDP growth. Now, I'm not necessarily blaming Clinton for that negative growth but it would be unfair to put the blame for the 2000-2002 stock market implosion and subsequent slight recession on Bush.
If anything is "crap," it's this piece. Are you trying to tell us that the Republicans have never argued over leadership positions and that the Dems are going to self-destruct over this one? Your bias is showing, SCLM.
I second Jim in Santa Cruz, "...keep covering Katrina..." The election has been over for more than a week and the "good guys" (which I mean figuratively because it includes women) won--yet there still has been nothing on NBC Nightly about Katrina recovery. I'm afraid that if this unconscionable lack of news coverage out of New Orleans, Louisiana's other storm-ravaged parishes, Mississippi's Gulf Coast, and the rest of the storm zone continues, even the Democrats regarding whom I've had high hopes for renewing a focus on Katrina recovery will either keep the subject on the back burner, as has the GOP, or drop it. After all, there was no coverage of Katrina as a campaign issue before the election--which would make it easy for anyone with the attention span of a flea to lose sight of its importance. I hope Steny Hoyer's election will put the foofaraw over Murtha to rest--but I find it hard to be optimistic when the media's probably going to dig up some sort of celebrity garbage such as O.J.'s new book to put the spotlight on the way NBC Nightly did last night. Meanwhile the poor people of the Katrina-stricken parts of Louisiana and Mississippi struggle on to rebuild their homes and lives amidst immense hardships when an apathetic mainstream media has washed its hands of them and turned the cameras off. The consequences of this appalling lack of compassion and caring on the part of the news media are truly tragic. Here's an example: Habitat for Humanity in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, had over 2000 volunteers working on projects several months ago; currently, less than 40 are working on projects. This in spite of the fact that that part of Louisiana is still in a world of hurt with lots of still-homeless people who are even waiting for FEMA trailers. And here's something even more heart-wrenching: Louisiana is being tortured by an agonizing epidemic of depression and anxiety. This is statewide because when evacuees fled New Orleans for Baton Rouge, Shreveport, etc., they carried their traumas and losses with them, for which they now need help. Also, in Orleans Parish, the rate of suicide has tripled. And even worse, she has insufficient resources to ease the pain of the suffering--and those who would comfort and protect Louisiana's afflicted are also in desperate need of help--neither mental health professionals nor police officers tormented by memories of having had to rescue people from rooftops and floodwaters and patrolling lawless streets have been able to obtain the help they need. I wonder what the drive-by media's interest is in maintaining this news blackout now--it certainly is no help to the agonized storm survivors of Louisiana and Mississippi.
Elections-controlled by those in pwoer- are not term limits. some folks needto research term limits and figure that no incumbenent will ever vote for them. Curb Prez power, but Congress-sheesh you'd cut off the golden calf!
Has MSNBC completely forgot what the point of a free democracy is? Are you seriously complaining, after six years of Republican lockstep and rubber-stamping, backdoor dealmaking with no debate or oversight or accountability--leading to a situation so dangerous the locksteppers were voted out of office--that Democratic debate, disagreement, and hashing out of issues in a public forum is a bad thing? Weren't you bemoaning all that unified rubber-stamping with no accountability before the elections? Wasn't that uniformity precisely the reason America voted the Republicans out of office? The Bush adminstration seduced the American people in 2000 and 2004 with the primitive notion of fixed ideas: we never change our minds, we don't "flip-flop" over issues, we remain inflexible in the face of change. But as America finally discovered, all these supposed virtues are not only immature politics, disallowing the higher functions of the brain (flexibility in the face of complex situations, the capacity to adapt and change), they are the anithesis of democracy. The result: an administration that brooked no dissent--from Congress, citizens, the press--taking swift revenge on dissenters. And after all this, MSNBC is seriously suggesting that we once again demand lockstep uniformity in our lawmakers or they somehow are incompetent? We should be rejoicing that Democratic lawmakers are openly debating issues and power positions in our democracy. Isn't that the point? Are you saying Pelosi would be a better speaker if she forced everyone beneath her to conform to her wishes so she could demonstrate her power? You mean, like Tom DeLay? What are you advocating here--a Congressional monarchy? We just had six years of that and how did it work out? Are you saying there should be no diversity in Congress? Unity is not achieved by enforced uniformity and agreement. That would be totalitarianism. Democratic unity is achieved by reasoned and often heated debate on issues by diagreeing parties in public until the bad ideas are weeded out and some sort of workable solution remains. We don't get there by squelching dissent--in the ranks of Congress or in the American electorate. Could you please give us mature and sophisticated journalists to cover our democratic politics in Washington, people who understand how our political system works and are not concoting sensationalist mountains out of everyday molehills. Even experienced Republican commentators are saying a power struggle for a new Congress in its first week is no big deal. What, I wonder would be your motivation in repeating this non-starter all day, when no one else, even the Republicans, seem to be buying it? Nancy Pelosi/the Democrats are in trouble because they had a public difference of opinion and a power struggle in the first few days of office? No--we're finally watching the beginnings of a real democracy, in all its diversity, unfold.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=14908

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google