ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Kucinich is baaaaaaaaack

Posted: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:31 AM by Elizabeth Wilner
Filed Under:

From CNBC's Karin Caifa
As soon as news hit the wires yesterday afternoon that Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D) would make another bid for the presidency in 2008, I was immediately bombarded with e-mails, text messages, and instant messages. Most of them to the tune of, "He's baaaaaaaack," or, "Are you ready for your second tour of duty?"

I covered Kucinich's 2004 campaign for NBC and MSNBC. Hey, everyone has to start somewhere. In retrospect, at 24, I was lucky to be covering any presidential campaign at all. Even one that consistently polled somewhere between zero and 2%.

I spent about seven months touring the traditional campaign states -- Iowa and New Hampshire -- and some not-so-conventional primary territories like Maine and Texas, in the Kucinich campaign minivan. No, not campaign plane. Not campaign bus. Campaign minivan. The 2004 campaign was no-frills, buoyed by financial support from an eclectic mix of peace activists, Kucinich longtime friends, and Hollywood star power (Sean Penn, Joaquin Phoenix and Danny Glover were among those who contributed their time and/or money). With help from federal matching funds, Kucinich managed to take his campaign all the way up to the nominating convention in Boston, dropping out barely before Democrats named Sen. John Kerry as their man. I, however, dropped out after the Super Tuesday primaries made it abundantly clear that the party had their nominee… and it wasn’t Kucinich.

It certainly wasn't fundraising cash or poll numbers that generated headlines out of the last campaign. Looking back on the experience, I'm astonished at how much curiosity the assignment piques among my fellow journalists and political junkies even now. I suppose I can't blame them. It was quite a journey. While other reporters were digging through FEC filings, I was following the heated competition to win a date with the then-bachelor candidate. Sparked by comments Kucinich made before a New Hampshire forum, some 80 women entered their names. The online contest ultimately inspired a "Dating Game" sketch with Jay Leno on "The Tonight Show," where a good-sport Kucinich chose between three lovely ladies. The winner of the Leno contest was actress Jennifer Tilly, which I thought a good fit. (Kucinich must have thought otherwise; he remarried in 2005.)

Every day I met more quirky Kucinich fans, from all parts of the country and all sorts of backgrounds, united by their fierce loyalty to the same guy from Cleveland. One young musician penned a polka just for the campaign, singing her heart out as she accompanied herself (and dozens of others) on the accordion. Another couple drove themselves from California to Cleveland in a modified Mercedes-Benz outfitted to run on soybeans.

With those kinds of supporters, you can bet Kucinich events were a little different from the average candidate speech and rally. While other contenders chose rollicking rock-and-roll for their entrance themes, the Kucinich campaign chose John Lennon's "Imagine," as their anthem. At a Washington, DC, event, Kucinich leaped up on a chair to lead the crowd in a sing-along of "This Little Light of Mine." In San Francisco, Kucinich supporters packed a candlelit church to hear serene speech from the Congressman and Pulitzer Prize winner Alice Walker. And in Austin, TX, thousands attended a fundraising concert headlined by Willie Nelson. I even faced my fear of clowns when the real-life Patch Adams joined Kucinich on the trail. (Good golly, the things we do for our careers.)

I am sure the Kucitizens will immediately spring back into action at today's announcement, at least those who have not spent the last two years clamoring for this second presidential bid from the former Cleveland mayor. Kucinich is getting an early jump on things this time around, like other longshot candidates testing the waters over a year before those first Iowa caucuses. They face an uphill climb, including Kucinich, with one national campaign under his belt. The competition within Kucinich's own party could be packed with charismatic, superstar candidates named Obama, Edwards, and of course, Clinton.

I must admit the unwavering support of the Kucitizens in 2004 was somewhat refreshing after watching staff and supporters jump from one primary candidate to another as the field got smaller. I do, however, expect that the outcome for Kucinich will be much the same this time around. That same fervid support from a rather small core, and single-digit finishes in most primaries. Taking encouragement from the outcome of the recent midterm elections, Kucinich is seizing on his strong anti-war belief to garner support. But overall, even with the voters' criticism of the way the GOP administration has handled the Iraq conflict, we saw from last month's midterm elections that the climate favors moderate candidates on both sides of the aisle. Kucinich's ideas are still a bit too left of the mainstream.

But every four years, we do get to have these amazing debates and dialogues as to which direction the country should head and who should lead us, and all kinds of voices deserve to be heard, even those tagged as longshots. So you can't fault a guy for trying. It's like Kucinich notably said at his congressional swearing-in in 1996, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try, try, try again."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Oprah for VP. I'm in.
Kucinich is the best candiddate sofar. He has even visited our hometown of Roseburg, Oregon. I weas impressed with his honesty and straight forward thinking. He can solve the world problems if he can somehow defeat the ruling classes in America.
I think I speak for many of his constituents...you know...those he's BEING PAID TO REPRESENT,that we'd like him to get beyond this ego-driven "crusade" and actually DO something for his district.
The Granola Candidate.
The reporter should not be the news, the candidate is the news. Who CARES what the reporter did while reporting on the Kucinich campaign. A man who is unafraid of taking unpoular stands and unwilling to sell his soul to big business, is running for President against all odds. THAT's the news. If the reporter wants to be the news or even part of the story; she should do something noteworthy. To bad a fluff piece is what we got!
If Congress would pass real campaign reform including among other things, free and equal advertising on both television and radio for all candidates seeking federal offices, stricter limits on campaign contributions banning all corporate and PAC donations, mandatory spending limits and public financing for all nominees in the general election, a guy like Kucinich would have a serious shot at the office. As it currently stands, PAC and Corporations really buy the candidates considered front runners. This has served to erode democracy in the Republic and limits the voters choices to business and special interest picks. With rare exception, the candidate that raises the most money wins. It is a sad commentary on America. A nation that represents itself and its values as a beacon to the world.
He's serious and an important voice. It's too bad the mainstream media will marginalize him from the start. Things are different than they were 4 years ago, and an unabashedly antiwar candidate like Kucinich might well get more traction than last time if treated seriously. How can we afford not to give a serious hearing to anyone who is truly committed to getting us out of this quagmire? Not to mention the long list of solutions he proposes to the real and growing list of problems faced by regular Americans.
It never fails to amaze me how these ego-driven ne'er-do-wells decide to muck up the works for a field of viable candidates. Kucinich is an even bigger nut case that Nader. Those types alway make a circus of political debates. In my view, unless candidates poll over 10%, they shouldn't be allowed to participate in the debates. GO HOME DENNIS, and stay there.
Yay! I have hope again!
You have the right program for America!I recommend you to Move On.Org!Only progressive candidates who care about America should win in ,08.
It's amazing how many people discount a presidential candidate for being normal. This guy isn't a war monger, or a liar, or a thief and he still can't get votes to save his life! The American people are too hard to please and that is why we end up with murdering Capitalists!
Get as many kooks as possible in on the Democratic side. The goofier they look, the better. Obama and Miss Rodham, step aside - make room for the K-Man.
I was a Kucinich delegate last time and I still think he's the best on the issues. Problem is he gets very excited and people like a smiling corpse better. I'm thinking Obama in '08.
NO BODY SEAMS TO BELIEVE THIS GUY AND IN ALMOST EVERY INSTANCE HE HAS BEEN RIGHT... HE IS THE BEST PERSON SO FAR FOR THE JOB....
I used to live in Rep Kucinich's district in Ohio and he did alot for the district. I supported him for president last time and will proudly do so again this time. Way to go Dennis! Give em hell!
The problem with Kucinich is that he will drive "real" candidates to the left in the primaries, to appeal to the radical base. Then, after his or her nomination, said "real" candidate will have to try to explain away the very left wing stands he or she took during the primary season, but this time against a much more mainstream Republican opponent, who will likely demagogue the rhetoric. In this sense Kucinich will do a disservice to the party's chances at the White House.
He's got my confidence, willin to step out of the mainstream, has guts for speaking out against the military industrial complex.
You want to talk about kooks, how about the religious kooks that sprout up as republican candidates. How about religious kooks like Sam Broback, Santorum, Bush and so on, that want to use government to force their religious views on people. These people want government to control people because they can not control themselves. Religiuos kooks want the government in your bedroom to make sure you are following their way of thinking. Religious kooks want government to tell people what to do and which religion should be in charge. Religious kooks scare me ten times more than any democrat can. Religious kooks do not need facts to make decisions, they use God. That is what our fearless leader used to justify invading Iraq. Remember when Bush said a higher father told him to invade Iraq. This what scares me more than any democrat. He based his decision on God talking to him. This should scare everyone when facts are irrelevant and god makes the final decision by talking to our president. Yeah the democrat party has kooks but they beleive in peace and letting people live their own lives. It is nothing compared to the religious kooks that want to use government to control your behaviors and your decisions.
Dennis is the cure. Our military and military aid to others should be abolished. Let the coast/national guard,protect us. The only way to keep us safe is to stop imposing our beliefs and interests on others. When our country stops using bombs and torture the world will be a better place. This is the only solution, it's noble and needs to be set in place now. Peace is the word!
Even though I am not eligible to cast vote, from what I have read and seen, I think that both Dennis Kucinich and Russ Feingold at least have backbone to express view that may not very popular at that time. Alas people like these never have a real chance, and flip flopper like Kerry is deemed more "electable". What a tragedy.
Kucinich was willing to stand up when no one else was brave enough to do so. He has been on the side of peace before the start of thie illegal war. Kucinich is a man that gives hope to America and the rest of the world. Even my Republican friends have said that he is the only real candidate in the race. Thank you Dennis for running again...I would be more than happy to stand beside you in the struggle for peace.
Here we go again,...he bankrupt Cleveland, he is always on a crusade of some sort, only if there is TV cameras around, he huffs and puffs about injustice and helping the little people demanding investigations and when the camera's batteries go dead, away he goes. God help us...
Yay! I also have hope again. KUCINICH spoke to a packed house (ok church) on Long Island New York. He is right on the money on so many issues - starting with health care for all and troops out of Iraq. And I also agree the reporter is not the news - Congress is. We are also loosing one of the bravest Congress people - Cynthia McKinney - Hopefully the people will push HR 1106 to Impeach the worst president of the US, George Bush.
i will vote for him
Kucinich as Mayor put Cleveland into bankruptcy...let's see what he can do as President!
Geoff, so what is different between Kucinch bankrupting Cleveland then Bush bankrupting the federal government. If you look at it that way then Kucinch would be a perfect republican candidate. Geoff when was the last time a republican president submitted a balance budget. Name the last republican president that did not have a recession happen on his watch. Screwing up government is what republicans do best. Wait, they spend money like drunken soldiers. No disrespect to the soldiers, Reagan bust the bank as well as Bush 1. We finally get a surplus and GW Bush squanders it away and now we will have to get out of the debt this president created. Why do republicans preach small government but when they take charge they only create bigger government. I saw statistic where Clinton ran a lean and mean government. Since GW Bush has come into office over a million new federal jobs have been created. What does that tell you about small government. Remember republicans will say anything to get your vote, but only do what they want to do. If you do not know the last republican president to submit a balanced budget was Nixon. The last republican with out a recession was Eisenhower. Take out Eisenhower and you will have to got to the early 1900's for a republican president that did not have a recession. Remember the republican president during the depression years of the late 1920's and eary 1930's. As usual a democrat follows these republican idiots and have to get the country back on it's feet: Roosevelt,Kennedy, Carter, Clinton.
He's better than any of this right G-d fearing wing-nuts. However, the country likes to vote for wing-nuts. It's ok, once Sam BroBack gets into power, we will be fighting more wars in the name of G-d....I mean oil...
Way to go BobF, though one thing, Eisenhower did have recession on his watch. Kucinich is definitely right on a lot of issues, but the prob is he's a zealot. This is the same guy who was a sponsor of a Constitutional amendment to ban abortion (yes, it's true!). I think he is, along with Kerry and Hillary, clearly unelectable. Give me Edwards or Obama.
Too bad Caifin had to sit in the cheap seats reporting on a candidate who's a "bit too left" because he opposed the Iraq war. If she works real hard, maybe she'll eventually get to the big time, where she can help enable another rightwing whacko of Bush's ilk in starting a disastrous and unnecessary war. Recent history has shown that that's what "serious" journalism is all about, after all.
Thanks Tom G, I thought Eisenhower had a recession but I was not 100% sure. I wanted to highlight what the last few republican presidents have accomplished. Why do the republicans spend so much money for themselves and not for the rest of america. Bush's latest tax cuts are a perfect example. Only if you paid income taxes did you get a tax rebate. The rebate was proportional to your income. In other words the more money you make the higher tax rebate you got back. If you look at the numbers closely approximately 70% of the tax rebate went to the top 30% income earners. Remember 50% of americans did not receive any tax rebates because they did not pay taxes. Their income was to low. That is why a milionare on average got 200,000.00 back on their tax rebate and the poor ,less than 15,000, got 0.00. Remeber who Bush said were his people and funny they benefit the most and the poor get nothing. This is republicanism at it's best. Remember republicans blame the poor for being poor but give tons of money to their rich cronies. I have so much more of the self destructing ways republicans govern,especially at the fedreal level,that is for another time. I have to go home and hug my 10 year old son and wife.
Whatever you may think about Kuchinich, at least you know where he stands on the issues. He tells you exactly what his position is and he does not change it at a later date.Wish all candidates would do the same.
"No problem can be solved by the same level of consciousness that created it." Albert Einstein I think it's time we elected leaders with a new level of consciousness. Kucinch is one of the very few candidates who has exhibited that new level. Yes, that makes him "kooky" by mainstream standards. But every great thinker/leader was initially dismissed, marginalized, and/or condemned by the conventional pundits of the day. Their "quirky" followers were just the early adopters of new-found wisdom. Eventually, the rest catch on to at least bits and pieces. But since we now have such dangerous "toys", we need to grow up and wise up a whole lot quicker --before we completely destroy ourselves and our planet.
It is unfortunate that candidates like Kucinich become quickly marginalized by the media, immediately dubbing them as "quirky" or "irrelevant" because they are deemed unable to win. In 2004, reporters from major news organizations were pulled from covering Mr. Kucinich's campaign early on in the nominating process, despite his willingness to seriously address issues of war and peace,propose reasonable solutions for our chronic failure to provide universal health care, etc. Indeed, candidates with creative ideas that can bring about real change are typically excluded from public discussion so that voters are often left to choose amoungst candidates whose primary agenda is to maintain the status quo. Once again, Dennis Kucinich offers us the opportunity to consider new solutions to what have become seemingly intractable problems. Hopefully, the media will provide him and others with a forum in which to propose and openly discuss a greater range of ideas than is typically available. Branding Mr Kucinich a "kook" is ultimately a disservice to him and to the democratic process.
When will we stop killing people for our national security? The best plan is for peace which begins with an end to to military spending. Children deserve the best,.
While Kucinich may be unelectable, his message isn't. He, and others like him, are a breath of hope for our future. Consider the total debacle of our current administration. Who can still defend the "Uneducated bully of the block" Bush/Republican mentality? We know it doesn't work- but America is ego driven. When Americans start to consider education/intellectuallism cool, only then will we elect a progressive president who will look to the scientists, the health-care researchers, the pure business modelers, the people who value America's future as their best interests also. Why don't our current leaders lead? For example, discuss the importance of an educated, progressive society and use the media on every opportunity to get that message out.? It's obvious, it would undermine what they truly hold dear- greed, self-reward, bigotry, you surely know the rest.
Its too bad a candidate is automatically discounted because he looks like an elf. If you look at the things he was ridiculed for saying years ago (like the war in Iraq was a mistake), he has been repeatedly vindicated. We would be much better of with a serious and passionate President Kucinich than an intellectually lazy, and incompetent President Bush. Too bad the most qualified are rarely ever considered "electable."
bobf: Let me see if I understand you. You said that only if you paid income taxes did you get a tax rebate. It you paid no tax you got no rebate. And, you said that the size of the rebate is proportional to your income. And that is wrong? So, are you saying that if I pay no taxes I should get a bigger tax rebate. This seems like a math problem. I contribute nothing (pay no taxes) yet, I should get a big tax rebate. A rebate from what? A rebate from nothing paid is still nothing unless my math is all wrong. And to further muddle the math problem, you say that the family that pays higher taxes should get a smaller rebate. what's wrong with this picture?
Not many know this - but when Dennis Kucinich was an impressionable teenager, he was an avid viewer of a black and white TV series, The Twilight Zone. His political philosophy was strongly influenced by that series, the creator of which, Rod Serling, was a liberal (if you'll excuse the expression) who wrote many of the progressive story lines for those weekly programs.
I am looking all over TV, and I haven't seen a word about his announcement. True to for, the misreable mainstream media is showing its true colors, it is not on the side of the people. Most Americans want the troops to come home. Kucinich is the only true antiwar and the ONLY Democrat that is running on a platform to actaully end the war. Here is a man that is representing what most people want and the media doesn't even reportit for the most part.
I'd vote for him in a heartbeat. Who cares if he is another nut (I don't think he is all that crazy), we need something DIFFERENT! I'm tired of un-supported claims that 'if we don't do as we've always done, bad things will happen!'
It's time we had true campaign finance and election reform. If we eliminate TV commercials and mass media expensive campaigning - and just allow real candidates to run we will get the democratic government we want and deserve. Right now, we only get multi-millionaires with huge war chests as "viable" candidates. I don't think the founding fathers could have foreseen what has happened to our process of choosing representatives. And along with the campaign finance reform, we need to guarantee "fair" elections - we need to be able to do a recount in every district in the country and we need to have confidence in the process.
dennis kucinich is electable it just american people cant stand the true .
You people from other states should pay attention to what the folks from Ohio are trying to tell you,....he is a caped crusader that has done nothing but blow harder that the tornado in the Wizard of Oz...he is always screaming for investigations over things that are none of his business and will show up at rallys long after the damage has been done to tell the people he is looking into it a wisks away, he is the poster boy for reactive as opposed to pro-active. His administration in Cleveland was a joke and is still laughed about today. Be careful what you wish for.
1. Universal Health Care - 45million don't have access to healthcare including 10million children. 2. International Cooperation: US out of Iraq, UN in 3. Jobs and Withdrawal from NAFTA and WTO 4. Repeal of the "Patriot Act" 5. Guaranteed Quality Education, Pre-K Through College 6. Full Social Security Benefits at Age 65 7. Right-to-Choose, Privacy, and Civil Rights 8. Balance Between Workers and Corporations 9. Environmental Renewal and Clean Energy 10. Restored Rural Communities and Family Farms How are these issues - hokey or 'unelectable' or nutcase antics - if you truly are tired of paying the high costs of insurance. If you truly are tired of this illegal war. It is said that the only cure for poverty is education - and those in poverty of course can't afford a good education; and millions of AMERICANS live in poverty, then why don't we help those at home before helping those outside our nation, why not give them free paid education k-college. Kucinich's view may be too...intelligent and wise for some to follow, after all - the education system in America does rank 13th in the world.
Dennis Kucinich is the best candidate now running...and he'll continue to be the most creative, most passionate, and most courageous candidate even after the Hillarys, the Kerrys, the Obamas, the Bidens, and other calculaters enter the running. It's time we considered candidates based on their positions on issues and their personal character, rather than on how much support they will receive from corporate special interests. It is heartening to see so many posts here from people who see political campaigns as something more than a horse race, beauty contest, and fund-raising game. Let's hope the 2008 campaign can break through the media's never-ending prognostications and the trivia about which candidate "looks" most presidential. It might not be as exciting for the gossip-hounds and gotcha journalists; but these elections are serious and they deserve to be about serious ideas.
Americans love their TV's their sports' teams, their Hollywood celebrities. They believe the commercials, and he who yells loudest is listened to (talk radio). If you have a pretty face, you are appealing and believable. What Americans don't like is facing the facts and real dialog. Just tell them where to go, how to get there, and lead the sheep to slaughter. Politicians and their handlers are laughing all the way to the bank. Let them marginalize, demonize and shut down Kucinich again. It's what we deserve, because we believe our economy needs wars to prosper. Our hungry, homeless, and disadvantaged do not have a voice, while our middle class is shrinking, and our rights are dissolving. Yes, people, let the media and the PAC's stay in control of your thinking and your power to change the direction we are heading. It's easy and it's effortless. It's the American way.
How about it people? Do we believe our economy needs wars to prosper? http://www.yourfreepoll.com/ijmgkcrjsp.html Poll: Do we believe our economy needs wars to prosper? Let's check back on that after a while and see what it says.
Anyone for a new American way, of Peace, and Accountability, where our elected officials are not the right hand of organized crime? Don't let anyone control your thinking and make you feel powerless. You always have power to effect events you are part of, if you remember to think critically and to be true to yourself.
www.kucinich.com
The lack of mainstream coverage of Kucinich's announcement is indeed appalling -- this "article" was one of the few that weren't pulled straight from the wire! It appears that once again the media is choosing to handicap the 2008 elections from the start, and there's nothing you or I or the millions of others can do to change the image that the media projects (or rather, doesn't project) of Dennis. The concept of "electability" is absurd. I can't count the number of people I talked to in 2004 who supported more "electable" loser candidates while admitting that they actually agree with Kucinich the most on the issues.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=20012

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google