ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Tsunami Tuesday

Posted: Friday, March 16, 2007 12:02 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
California has now moved up its presidential primary to Feb. 5, raising the prospect that as many as 20 other states -- including giants like Florida, Illinois, New York, and Texas -- will hold their nominating contests on this date. We're calling it Tsunami Tuesday. So which candidates will Tsunami Tuesday end up benefiting? What will it all mean? A few notes on the impact in California:

-- Independents. According to the state parties there, political independents will be able to participate in the Democratic primary, but not in the Republican one; it is open only to registered Republicans. That could potentially hurt GOP candidates like McCain or Giuliani, who appeal to these kind of voters. There is a growing effort to open up the GOP primary to independents, but the California Republican Party will need to change its bylaws to do that -- and the state party's next bylaw meeting, we're told, doesn’t occur until after voters are supposed to be registered. As for the Democrats, John Edwards was considered the candidate independents helped the most in 2004. For this cycle, no one Democrat seems to have made appealing to independents a priority. Will that now change?

-- Ballot Initiatives. Expect to see ballot initiatives included in the California primary. As we know, California ballot initiatives can have lives of their own. (imagine what an immigration-related init could do to the GOP primary, for instance) There is already one proposed init for Feb. 5, per today's Los Angeles Times: "An advisor to Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles) has submitted a proposed initiative that would change California's term-limits law, allowing current lawmakers to stay longer but reducing the number of years permitted for those who come later."

-- Hispanics. This really hasn't been talked about, but the prospect that California, Florida, and Texas could all hold their primaries on Feb. 5 suddenly puts the Hispanic vote in play, especially on the Democratic side. Could this benefit someone like Bill Richardson? Probably -- but he first has to survive to get to Feb. 5….

One last thing to chew on: According to its Secretary of State's office, California voters are allowed to submit absentee ballots 29 days before an election. That would mean that Californians begin voting well before the Iowa caucuses, which are slated for Jan. 14. Of course, if New Hampshire leapfrogs Nevada (as many speculate), then Iowa would move up a week as well. Still, absentee ballot programs by all the campaigns would have to begin in California well before Iowa and New Hampshire.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

You forgot the big winners: the infotainment monopoly. The big TV networks will get millions in political attack ads. Governor Gonad the Barbarian pushed this because he's backing Guiliani. The Democrats went along because they want to run an initiative to modify term limits before the real June primary. the big money boys and their candidates Guiliani and Clinton will benefit. Don't Californicate the primaries. Anybody But Clinton.
I do not live in a state with early primaries. Guess that leaves me out in the netherlands.
This init limits candidates to only those with big money. With the previous small states, NH and IA, all candidates could afford to campaign and test their platforms. This is not good.
I do not live in a state with an early primary. The primaries should all be held at the same time same as the National election. Get rid of the Electorial College and let popular vote elect politicians. Maybe this would eliminate high dollar elections that are getting out of hand.
Independents deserve the chance to vote where we want. We should not be discriminated against and not allowed to vote in primaries just because we have not sworn fealty to a ruling party.
I agree, we need to become a true democracy and let popular vote prevail. Get rid of that Electoral College and let the people speak for themselves!
I agree with Connie from Tennessee. Chage the Constitution and get rid of the electoral college. Popular vote is really the fair way to elect a president.
Or maybe if King George "decides" we need to elect everyone, including president, by popular vote, maybe he will just decree that it be so. Everyone write the President!
I'm sure if you held a national referendum, we would vote to ditch the Electoral College... and we would end the tyranny of the past primary system, which is antithetical to true Democracy. Lets have all votes count!! About time we had a revolving list of state primaries...why in heck should IA and NH be ordained to have outsize influence?
I think its very wrong of you guys to use Tsunami Tuesday as a name for Super Tuesday.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=92225

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google