ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama’s foreign policy

Posted: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:40 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
As promised, here are some key excerpts in Obama's just-published article in Foreign Affairs.

On Iraq:
“We must first bring the Iraq war to a responsible end and refocus our attention on the broader Middle East... The best chance we have to leave Iraq a better place is to pressure these warring parties to find a lasting political solution. And the only effective way to apply this pressure is to begin a phased withdrawal of U.S. forces, with the goal of removing all combat brigades from Iraq by March 31, 2008... This redeployment could be temporarily suspended if the Iraqi government meets the security, political, and economic benchmarks to which it has committed.”

“[W]e must launch a comprehensive regional and international diplomatic initiative to help broker an end to the civil war in Iraq... To gain credibility in this effort, we must make clear that we seek no permanent bases in Iraq. We should leave behind only a minimal over-the-horizon military force in the region."

On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:
“Changing the dynamic in Iraq will allow us to focus our attention and influence on resolving the festering conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians... Our starting point must always be a clear and strong commitment to the security of Israel... [W]e must strive to secure a lasting settlement of the conflict... Sustained American leadership for peace and security will require patient effort and the personal commitment of the president of the United States.”

On diplomacy:
“[W]e must harness American power to reinvigorate American diplomacy. Tough-minded diplomacy, backed by the whole range of instruments of American power -- political, economic, and military -- could bring success even when dealing with long-standing adversaries such as Iran and Syria.”

On Iran and North Korea:
“[W]e should not hesitate to talk directly to Iran.”

“[W]e must develop a strong international coalition to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and eliminate North Korea's nuclear weapons program... I will not take the military option off the table.”

On Syria:
“Diplomacy combined with pressure could also reorient Syria away from its radical agenda to a more moderate stance -- which could, in turn, help stabilize Iraq, isolate Iran, free Lebanon from Damascus' grip, and better secure Israel.”

On the military:
“[W]e must immediately begin working to revitalize our military... We should expand our ground forces by adding 65,000 soldiers to the army and 27,000 marines.”

On the use of force:
“I will clearly define the mission… I will not hesitate to use force, unilaterally if necessary, to protect the American people or our vital interests whenever we are attacked or imminently threatened… We must also consider using military force in circumstances beyond self-defense ... to support friends, participate in stability and reconstruction operations, or confront mass atrocities.”

On nuclear proliferation:
“America must lead a global effort to secure all nuclear weapons and material at vulnerable sites within four years... This will require the active cooperation of Russia... We must also work with Russia to update and scale back our dangerously outdated Cold War nuclear postures and de-emphasize the role of nuclear weapons. America must not rush to produce a new generation of nuclear warheads. And we should take advantage of recent technological advances to build bipartisan consensus behind ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty... I will work to negotiate a verifiable global ban on the production of new nuclear weapons material.”

On terrorism:
“We must refocus our efforts on Afghanistan and Pakistan -- the central front in our war against al Qaeda... [W]e need to invest with our allies in strengthening weak states and helping to rebuild failed ones.”

On Pakistan:
“I will join with our allies in insisting -- not simply requesting -- that Pakistan crack down on the Taliban, pursue Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants, and end its relationship with all terrorist groups.”

On the UN:
“[T]he United Nations requires far-reaching reform... Yet none of these problems will be solved unless America rededicates itself to the organization and its mission.”

On climate change:
“… I intend to enact a cap-and-trade system that will dramatically reduce our carbon emissions... I will invest in efficient and clean technologies at home while using our assistance policies and export promotions to help developing countries leapfrog the carbon-energy-intensive stage of development. We need a global response to climate change that includes binding and enforceable commitments to reducing emissions, especially for those that pollute the most: the United States, China, India, the European Union, and Russia.”

On Guantanamo and secret prisons:
“[W]e must first behave in ways that reflect the decency and aspirations of the American people. This means ending the practices of shipping away prisoners in the dead of night to be tortured in far-off countries, of detaining thousands without charge or trial, of maintaining a network of secret prisons to jail people beyond the reach of the law.”

On global poverty:
“[T]he United States has a direct national security interest in dramatically reducing global poverty and joining with our allies in sharing more of our riches to help those most in need…. I will double our annual investment in meeting these challenges to $50 billion by 2012... I will capitalize a $2 billion Global Education Fund that will bring the world together in eliminating the global education deficit.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Domenico, Where's your picture? Didn't know you started work already -- nice work on the post. Will there be any analysis of these op-eds?
You go Obama, you'll open our check book and double or triple our financial commitment(healing the world's troubles as if we weren't already spending beyond our means). You'll make a commitment to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq but we may keep a few over the horizon(how many is a few and where is the horizon). You'll assume a diplomatic posture and see if you can't totally piss off Iran and Syria by trying to change their governments(let them have their nuclear power(we have ours)and run their own government if the people don't like it let them change it). Did you say you were going to insist or just invade Pakistan to search for Bin Laden? You'll broker a peace agreement between Isreal and the Palestinians(If Isreal wants to end it they should go ahead and start by establishing a Palestinian State). Guantanamo, did you say shut it down, I didn't hear you? Last but not least you're going to walk softly but carry a big stick(just in case they don't agree with your plan you'll beat them into submission). If you really want to make a change start by reducing the size of our federal government, take care of the American people and let these other countries and governments do what they've done for hundreds of years. You want to help these other countries do it with food, clean water, but cut off all financial aid supporting corrupt governments.
Hey Paw Paw, Eliminating the $200-300 Billion, we spend on the Iraq War each year will put us in a net positive position to Obama's ideas here. Funny that republicans don't have a problem spending $300 Billion a year to kill people but scream when some one wants to spend $50 billion to feed the hungry.
Or, Nick, why do they scream about aborting a health-threatening, pending birth, when we can keep killing all the humans that don't believe like we do, and Praise God that He's on 'OUR side' while doing so.
In addition to Nick's comments I'd like to point out the international isolationism worked REAL well in the early 1930s. :roll eyes: Like it or not we are part of a global system. The best way to work within that global system is by using diplomacy and financial aide. It's cheaper than randomly invading a country and it pays huge dividens in the long run.
It's amazing the edge democrats have over Republicans on foreign diplomacy when almost half the country isn't so eager to take blame for all that is wrong with the world.
For a country that is attacked so much by liberals all over the world and having Miss USA booed in Mexico and all these people just praying every day for our destruction, they sure are trying every means of transportation to get here. I seem to remember everyone saying that we needed diplomcy to work a deal with Saddam and all the 20-30 resolutions that were sent to Saddam demanding he abide by the Cease fire from the first gulf war and the united nations demanded this and the united nations demanding that and we sat back and watched while Saddam and the UN management got filthy rich with oil revenues and it finally took a man like President Bush to do something about it. Now we have a problem with Iran. The United nations is going right into passing resolution after resolution to demand Iran stop building up their nuclear plants and they are giving everybody in the west the middle finger. Just like that potbelly little four eyed dweeb in North Korea. This time, we are just sitting back and doing nothing. But when push comes to shove and the UN is looking to America to dig the world out of the hole they dug, I think we should just say NO!
Our President does not take responsibility for any of his mistakes.
Our president is an arrogant, narcissistic man who is slowly unraveling in front of our eyes. Our county is also unraveling.We need an intelligent peacemaker and diplomat in office, not a simpleminded, self-centered, fake macho fool. Obama might be the right man for this country.
I'm with Desmond. Recently I read a New York Times article about how, since its efforts in Iraq are failing, the Bush Administration is attempting to shift the blame for this failure onto the Iraqis. For me, this is a chilling reminder of Katrina, when BushCo, having showed incompetence every step of the way in the face of New Orleans' flooding, shifted the blame onto that city's and Louisiana's governments.
Olivia That is very lame. Ray Nagin had the chance to use all those school buses to get more and more people out of New Orleans but failed to do so. The people that wanted to stay were just the hoodlums that wanted to get a piece of the action. I still have a good laugh about that video of the black people pushing that wide screen TV thru about 2 feet of waterthat they stole from an appliance store. While goverment has some problems, the main problems were invented by people themselves. If you cannot handle your own problems. don't expect the goverment to save your miserable souls. My game plan is set for this hurricanse season, is your's Olivia?
Jerry it must be fun complaining about liberals every waking hour of your life.
When you see people using the word “liberals” like it is a pejorative, you know they don’t have any cogent arguments to make. Iraq was a monumental failure, engineered by the Neo Cons of PNAC. We need someone fresh, without the K street baggage, to right this ship. I’m an independent so I look to both parties to see who is the man, or woman to do the job. I like Obama, since he strikes me as a straightforward, no nonsense kind of guy who doesn’t let his ego take over, but carefully considers all the realistic options, and is decisive enough to make good decisions. I see no other candidate on either party better than Obama. The only question in my mind is who would make an ideal VP for Obama?
well, CJ, the liberals do come up with the dumbest of ideas. Socialized medicine? Carbon Credits? Oil free in 30 years? Some of thse liberal candidates must really have some primo grass to dream up stuff like this.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=210037

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google