ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts

Posted: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:17 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Domenico Montanaro, and Carly Zakin
*** Is He Real Or Is He Memorex? A day after making his earmark requests public, Obama this morning gives a speech on government reform in Manchester, NH -- the same place where Clinton gave her speech on the topic back in April. Since filing his paperwork to form an exploratory committee, Obama has presented himself as a different kind of politician who practices a different kind of politics. But will this be voters’ dominant image of Obama come January 2008? Or will it be one shaped more by (Clinton campaign?) reminders of Rezko, intercepted oppo documents, and a new 527 group (see below)? The answer for Obama, even as he trails Clinton in the national polls, could end up deciding his fate in the early nominating contests.  

*** Start Spreading The News: So Edwards goes to New York to give a speech on the “Two Americas” and his vision for “One America,” and what does he get in return? A front-page New York Times story on how the anti-poverty, non-profit organization he created after 2004 mainly benefited himself and his political profile. The piece is not very helpful to Edwards in that he's desperately trying to stay competitive on the fundraising front with Clinton and Obama. And the Times, more than any other publication, has major reach in the Dem donor world. By the way, just noticing, but by our count it’s the second time in the last two weeks the Times has run a front-page investigation into one of Clinton’s rivals.

*** Romney 911: Just how bizarre is this story that Romney’s staff may have made an illegal traffic stop of New York Times reporter Mark Leibovich? It gets another day of play in the news. And apparently there are not one -- but TWO investigations (one related, one unrelated) -- into the security staffer who pulled over Leibovich.

*** Non-Executive Privilege: So, apparently, Cheney is not that interested in fixing his own poll ratings. The news that his office is not an entity within the executive branch seems to have collectively outraged the media. This new revelation is likely to become fodder for Democrats to hit the Administration again on secrecy.

*** On The Trail: Clinton speaks at the National Conference of US Mayors in Los Angeles; Huckabee has a slew of events in South Carolina; Richardson makes three stops in Iowa; and Romney speaks to the Officers Convention of the Montana Republican Party before heading to Idaho. Also the wives are mobilized… Michelle Obama makes two stops in Iowa; Barbara Richardson attends a memorial service for the fallen firefighters in South Carolina; and Elizabeth Kucinich moderates a panel at Hiram College in Ohio.
 
Countdown to CA-37 Special Election: 4 days
Countdown to the Ames Straw Poll: 50 days
Countdown to MA-05 Special Election: 72 days
Countdown to LA GOV election: 120 days
Countdown to Election Day 2007: 137 days
Countdown to LA GOV run-off (if necessary): 148 days
Countdown to Iowa: 216 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 227 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 501 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 578 days

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"Men are not prisoners of fate but only prisoners of their own minds."-FDR
Obama needs to brush off any questions of him not being this new, nicer type of politician. He needs to be himself when he can and tough when he has to be. He's going to face a slew of dirty tricks (like this South Asians for Obama back-stabbing?), and he needs to answer them quickly and decisively - not return the dirty tricks but make himself immediately available for talk shows to set the record straight and even counter, by asking whether there isn't a depth his primary competitor won't sink. If I were him, I'd note what Bush did to McCain in South Carolina eight years ago, and remind Democratic primary voters how that worked out for the country at large. And if he doesn't want to play that tough, then I hope he enjoys his time in the Senate.
Well now that the Dick is not part of the executive branch, his office is not a holy shrine, let us go get the pig fodder.
<i>By the way, just noticing, but by our count it’s the second time in the last two weeks the Times has run a front-page investigation into one of Clinton’s rivals.</i>

Even the most cursory review of the NYT coverage of Clinton reveals an overwhelmingly anti-Clinton bias on the part of Patrick Healy and the NYT.

The same critique applies to you, too, Chuck Todd.

Being Irish-Catholic myself, I am ashamed of the misogynist leanings of the straight Irish-Catholic male cabal that includes Healy, Matthews, Barnicle, Todd, et al.   I am completly bewildered why you boys get so incensed by the idea of a strong, smart, woman who handily bests her male opponents in fundraising, debates, and polls.

Me thinks it can all be traced back to your parochial days where you boys had one-too-many knuckle rappings (or worse) by the strong and smart Sister Mary Cathrines of your youths.

Get over it.  You boys are getting to sound like a bunch of whiny b*#ches!
Roamany really thinks he is JESUS CHRIST SUPER STAR!
Joe, my hero you always say just what I am thinking.
Bravo!
rudy has been married more times than mitt has been hunting.
Cheney leaves you no choice but to assume he is hiding documents that would send him and probably Bush to prison. I think anyone who comes to any other conclusion is a crook in cahoots with him or one who has a tenuous grip on reality, such as a simpleton who has his thinking chores farmed out to FOX News. When dealing with such pigs, a reasonable civilization would consider someone given over to this kind of behavior guilty until proven innocent, except that the likes of Cheney wouldn't occur in a reasonable civilization. His behavior brings to mind Mafia figures in court who cynically plead the fifth, and took advantage of flaws in the legal system to defeat justice. Cheney does worse by attempting to trample laws on the books that would put him away, something that wasn't available to the Mafia.
desmond, people in this country may not be a prisoner in the sense they are restrained in an iron barred cage, but most are prisoners of this fasocapitalist nation, people are very much prisoners by the wealthy elite who have lured the less fortunate into borrowing money they knew could never be repayed, and adjusted the legal system so that the masses will remain owned by the company store until they die, continue to keep wages stagnate while taking away insurance or pricing it out of reach to further the working classes hopeless attempt to make ends meet, continue the flood of cheap labor from down south to insure that wages and benefits never make any kind of an upward trend, keep paying for the farce in iraq on essentially a credit card so future generations will be kept in check having to repay an overwhelming dept that will be used as an excuse to stop future social security and medicare benefits, which will make it impossible for the vast majority in this country to ever be dept free, but on the bright side if you happen to be rich your sure to get a whole lot richer, god bless america
It occurs to me that we all seem very ready to accept that Obama himself has had nothing to do with the situations in which his campaign has played the game dirtier than usual.  I have not looked into it, but I am wondering if we have any proof of that.  He seems like a nice guy, but let's not forget...so did Bush in 2000.  If we have learned anything since then, it's never to take any politician at face value.
JoeCHI, Chicago, IL-- "a strong, smart, woman who handily bests her male opponents in fundraising, debates, and polls."  

DEMOCRATIC fund raising, DEMOCRATIC debates, DEMOCRATIC Polls. The party loves her, but she can't win without the center and it is not clear at all that the center loves her. She also will have to bring to the party enough people who love her to offset the disgruntled conservatives who hate her. Conservative voters that she will energize who might just stay home or even vote for a DEM candidate they find more palatable. Do we really want to field another Clinton into a race that doesn't have anyone named Bush running? There are two years to go.  Do you really think that people won't begin to realize that two families have held the executive branch for 20 years and that their vote for Hillary might just make that 28 years?! I believe Hillary would make a wonderful President but she has to get elected first.  
"IMPEACH BUSH/CHANEY" AND HAVE A NICE DAY!
if a politicians lips are moving, they are lying
If Cheney has declared that he is not part of the executive branch, then executive priveledge does not apply. Congress should investigate and subpena him now. He can't hide anymore.
Carrie... you're right about not taking anything at face value, however you can judge the man's character by the way he has conducted his life up to and including being in politics.  Obama walks the walk and talk the talk.  If people had paid attention to how Bush had lived his lfe prior to running for president and examed his failed businesses, they would have known that he was all talk.  just saying.
Cheney should spend the rest of his life in prison.  And to punish him, his roommate should be The Decider.  These two and their cabal are the largest threat to America.  Ever.
Carrie if you really want to know who is probably really behind a lot of this  ( on both Edwards and Obama)read Peggy Noonan's article and go to  Hillary's new website Hillaryis44.org and you will see
"Mitt's Private Traffic Cops" sounds like the MO's of the guys in the White House at the moment.  Just what we need, four more years of GOParanoia.
I think we can all agree that our Constitution provides for three branches of government: Executive, judicial and legislative.  If Mr. Cheney claims to not be a part of the executive branch, which of the other two is his office a part of?  
scott-winona, mn...
why not send both to Gitmo?  that would be poetic/ironic justice.
and why isn't there a discussion thread on the "historic low poll numbers" for the shrub of 26%? that's even below Jimmy Carter! when did first read turn repug?
Mr. Cheney claims to be within the legislative branch because he chairs the Senate, I imagine. Mary from Illinois makes a good point; if he cannot claim executive privileges, it's time to go for him. However, I'm afraid the legislative branch will have some sort of umbrella coverage too.
Like them or hate them, at this point in their elected terms, do any of you really think that Bush and Cheney give a rat's a-- about Democrat originating opinion polls?

Let's all get real for a change.
jus sayin: EXCELLENT political comment: sharp, clean, truthful, to the point, and devoid of the usual character smear/assassination of your fellow  bloggers, including me.

You are a pleasant respit among the dull, "beat a dead horse", Soros-mantra-chanting, mindless robots
whose opines of "impeach Bush: RIGHT NOW!" make for great sleep-inducng reading material.

I shall endeavor to keep my comments as sharp and pithy as yours.
Interesting that Murray and Todd haven't reported the Clintons sleaziness with InfoUSA.  Nor Bill Clinton's gala last month hosted by the rightist thug Colombia president, Uribe, in DC seeking more egregious free trade agreements.
And Hillary's chief strategist - free trading union buster, Mark Penn, schedules her speeches to union members on workers' rights.
But Murray and Todd are silent...
Perhaps it has something to do with News Corp's HUGE fundraiserS for Hillary.
What's really interesting about the selection of candidates in this round of elections is this: There's not a single one of them I would vote for. I want my president to have pretty significant experience in elected office (scratch Obama, despite his charisma and good looks), not be tied too closely to shady land deals (sorry, Mrs. Clinton), not be crazy (leaves out Kucinich) and not be a Republican. (I used to like Giuliani, but not anymore. Ditto McCain). Sad this is the bunch we have to pick from. Not a single one of them, perhaps beside McCain (he actually fought in a war!) has any backbone to stand behind their ideals. And even McCain has wobbled of late, allying himself too much with conservatives.

No wonder I hear people say my generation (I'm 27 and politically independent) isn't engaged politically. The only options are frightening: A fascist Republican state ruled by greedy, power-hungry warmongers who send our best and brightest off to die or a crooked Democratic administration ruled by greedy, power-hungry wimps who allow the Republicans to send our best and brightest off to die (and haven't fielded a decent national candidate since John F. Kennedy, who wasn't perfect, but at least had guts.)

Sad also that the last halfway-decent Republican politician in the United States was Dwight Eisenhower. And before him, there hadn't been one since Abraham Lincoln, from whom Bush and Cheney could learn a few things, like dignity and humanity and grace.
Romney 911 - What's bizarre about the Romney staff/reporter story is that this is a story at all, much less an investigation.  There's much more important stuff to talk about and investigate.
Dave, Kent, How about Edwards?
So sayeth jtb, a dull, "beat a dead horse", Limbaugh-mantra-chanting mindless robot.  Keep endeavoring.

"Mr. Kettle, It's Mr. Pot again."
DAVID S....Big story...investigation..very important.

His guys think they are still State troopers, not!
Scott: I included myself in my comment. I cannot claim to be as clear and concise, as "jus sayin", all the time: It is, as you know, difficult to refrain from barb throwing. Such is the arena of politics, partisanship, and opposing ideologies, as it was dating back to Jackson's Presidency.

I'd like to think that passionate political discourse is a much better alternative to the single episode in American history when men abandoned words, as in 1861.

Dave, Kent, Ohio--Excellent analysis of a sad situation. Hopefully, with as mch time is left, we will see some one enter the race that will excite a firm majority. We can't afford another photo finish.
Lyn - I have checked out that website.  Obviously you haven't, or you would not refer to it as "Hillary's new website"...because it quite clearly states the following:  "We are not affiliated with the Hillary For President Exploratory Committee, or any official Hillary Clinton organization in any way."  
Amy B: Edwards thinks big (health care for all, volunteerism, fighting poverty, all of which I agree with) but it's one thing to think big and another to get anything done about it. Despite his impressive track record as a trial lawyer, he's got a long way to go to prove himself, something you really can't do in a single six-year term in the Senate.

If he were to give Washington a few more years, and if Hilary and Obama weren't in the running, and if he could actually get politicians of both parties to come together for a common goal such as fighting poverty or universal health care, I think he'd have a shot at earning my vote and the nomination.
JoeCHI: Maybe the venom that Hillary faces has NOTHING TO DO WITH BEING A WOMAN !!! Maybe it's because SHE VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR !! What part of that don't you understand ?? SHE VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR !! She voted against Sander Levin's amendment requiring Bush to try all diplomatic means before going to war. WHY, JoeCHI?? Why did she vote for the Iraq War, JoeCHI ?? You're trying to claim misogyny hinders Hillary. Maybe it's Hillary's opportunism.
What do you think, JoeCHI? Why did she support the Iraq War ? Why won't she admit her mistake ?
I guess there are really THREE americas in John Edwards land.  Your's our's and his. i thought the new York Times loved liberals, I guess in the land of the new york times, there are two liberals.
"Men are not prisoners of fate but only prisoners of their own mind"-FDR
and when Cheney's at bat, three balls is a walk, four strikes and he's out
Sierra, Please remind me who DID NOT vote for the IRAQ WAR. Please tell me who DID NOT vote for Levin's
amendment.
Is sorry really good enough?
Are the lies and hysteria we succumbed to any excuse?
Is there anyone we can trust and vote for?
How do we go on now that the fan is on high and the
shit is everywhere?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=233069

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google