ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Oh-eight (D): Battling for Buffett

Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:15 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

The Boston Globe writes that Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (D) will introduce the Democratic candidates at the Howard University debate in DC tomorrow night.

CLINTON:

Last night's Warren Buffett event raised the campaign at least" $1 million, according to the Washington Post. Now Buffett has NOT endorsed Clinton. “But he has already donated the maximum $4,600 allowed by an individual to Clinton's presidential campaign. Buffett called Clinton ‘the person to run the country.’ He has not donated to any other candidate, according to public records, although he has said he would also support Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) in a similar event.”

NBC’s Lauren Appelbaum adds that Buffett said the American public will make the choice between Clinton and Obama. "I don't want to turn my back on either one of them. I think they're both terrific people," Buffett said, "but I think Hillary would make a wonderful president of the United States." Buffett did not answer yes when asked if Clinton is good for business, but he didn’t say no, either. "I think Hillary Clinton is good for America. Anybody that's good for America is good for business." He continued to talk about Clinton's assets. "I've known her for a long time. I've admired her brains. I've admired her energy. I've admired the way she has carried out her job in the Senate. I think she would make an absolutely first class president. When she asked me if I would participate in an event like this, I jumped at the chance."

Newsday has followed up on blog reports about supposed push-polling (more like message testing) from the Clinton campaign via pollster Mark Penn, noting examples in Iowa that tested negative messages against Obama and in New Hampshire that tested Edwards negatives.

A quick follow-up to a post yesterday about Bill Clinton's fundraising email on behalf of his wife: We observed how Bill mentioned that Hillary turned down high-paying jobs out of law school to help children, which we noted is similar to what Obama says in his new TV ads. The Clinton campaign points out to us that Bill had said this about his wife earlier this month.

EDWARDS: Here’s the transcript of Elizabeth Edwards calling into Hardball yesterday to take on Ann Coulter.

After taking her star turn on Hardball, she campaigned and raised money in Portland, OR.

OBAMA: Michelle Obama addressed the experience issue yesterday -- a day after Barack Obama himself addressed it. “‘For people who say that Barack Obama is not experienced … I can't wrap my head around that,’ Michelle Obama told hundreds of people crowded into the offices of the nonprofit Our Children's Foundation in Harlem. ‘Yes, he's ready to lead,’ she said. ‘The question is: Are you ready? … Will you move out of fear, or will you move out of possibility?’” Michelle Obama added, “’What they are counting on is for us not caring . . . [and that voters will] stay at home.’”

It looks like the Obama camp wants some help from Buffett, too: "Warren Buffett is a great friend and an important force in the global economic community. We look forward to him helping out our efforts," Obama spokesman Bill Burton told the New York Daily News.

The GOP state senator who appears in Obama's first TV ads is getting a cold reception from some Illinois GOPers, the Chicago Tribune reports. But Dillard said he’s not bothered. “’My caucus should thank me,’ [he] said, ‘for the last 48 hours of media attention, whether they realize it or not.’”

By the way, Obama quietly revised one of his new TV ads because Chicago-based Tom Balanoff, the president of SEIU Local 1, was in the original version of the ad. But Balanoff was worried his presence implied a national endorsement of Obama by SEIU and asked to be taken out. The campaign complied. 
 

RICHARDSON: Here’s an excerpt of the governor’s speech today on Iran: "As we know from the Cold War, deterrence is above all a matter of clarity and credibility. We need to be absolutely clear that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, and we need to be absolutely credible when we say what we will do about it if the Iranians continue to disregard the will of the international community. The clear message must be this: develop nukes and you will face devastating global sanctions. Desist from developing nukes and you will receive meaningful rewards, including robust security guarantees and guaranteed supplies of nuclear fuel from abroad."

Richardson held one of his "job interview" events in eastern Iowa yesterday. He outlined what he would do in his first six days in office. "From day one to day six, he vowed to introduce plans to remove troops from Iraq after de-authorizing the war, mandate a reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions, ensure universal health care, update education curricula, reinvigorate the U.S. economy, and recover the America he claims ‘we've lost.’”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"I think Hillary Clinton is good for America. Anybody that's good for America is good for business." this statement from mr. buffet should scare hell out of anybody that's thinking about voting for clinton, she's part of the problem, not the answer, make another selection for the nations sake  
No wonder Buffett is getting rid of his money, Hillary and the democrats are going to tax him big time, so now is a good time to donate and keep it out of the goverment's greedy little hands.
As long as Buffett is holding that door open, Obama would be a fool not to step through. Kudos to the Clinton campaign, for seemingly coming close to closing this deal on an endorsement. Its the closest non-endorsement I recall ever seeing.
I, too, noticed the ongoing obsession of Barack Obama that the clinton's have.  Everything is geared to whatever obama does, says, and may think.  Hillary44 for example is a site obsessing on the man.
Now they are trying to lift Obama's bio from him.
It is beginning to look like the the viral video, Crush on Obama, was more about the Clintons obsession than a girl.
but but but all rich white people support Republicans, and it's a total lie what the right wing PBS show NOW reported that two thirds of hedge fund money managers donate to democrats. Next thing you know we'll find out that more Liberals hire illegal immigrants than Republicans. The Imus story proved the real racist in this country hide under Liberal sheets.
Mmmmm 5 posts all negative...mk,Mo jerry, Paul Miller,
diane, Dave,Tn
My momma said You are judged by the company you keep."
I'll pass.
HP, how was my post negative? I wasn't being tongue in cheek - the Clinton campaign deserves kudos for getting this level of support from Buffett. It carries a lot of weight with folks like me and the 40 million others who are trying to figure out how to make our 401(k)s perform like Berkshire Hathaway.
H.P. is about as negative as can be, she makes me look like a liberal so her comments are about as worthless as Elizabeth Edwards.
Eh, I'm already getting a bad taste from Clinton supporters. On another thread I was called jealous and insecure because I'm not supporting her. Now I can't even give her campaign a compliment (I've given her campaign plenty, because I'm impressed with how its performed so far) without being lumped together with others by someone who obviously didn't bother to read my post. This is all too reminiscent of Bush supporters, who called us unpatriotic without bothering to read what many of us were actually saying. You seem intent on having your candidate viewed as the new Bush.
I should have said all negative but you Paul. I didn't s'plain the jab at the BAD company YOU were keeping. I do ask your forgiveness.

jerry you could not be said to have one iota of liberal in you!  Why don't you look liberal up in the dictionary. You will see that it is not YOU.

Do not dare to speak ill of Elizabeth Edwards,you are not fit to type her name!
Thanks HP - forgiveness given. And sorry I went off on you. I actually was irritated about the other part; how I was an insecure member of my gender because I'm not supporting a candidate from across the 'real' aisle. I love the process and didn't expect to be backing anyone so soon. But I am backing Obama, though my support is soft. I do think it would be a trick to get me into Clinton's camp for two reasons. One, I don't think she can win the general election. And two, if she could, that fact would only perpetuate the degenerating political discourse. We could use a president who is less polarizing. Its time for someone outside these two families, I think. I also think the thing propping up Clinton is an understanding by some of her supporters that nothing would be a harder kick in the shins for Republicans than her election. We need to break that vindictive cycle. However, and back to the topic here, the Buffett move is a good one for her. If (and I doubt it) she can find a way to defuse this reaction she causes Republicans to have, I'd be more receptive.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=240062

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google