ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



John Edwards: Coulter's 'crazy'

Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:32 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
A day after his wife Elizabeth called in to MSNBC’s “Hardball” to confront conservative commentator Ann Coulter, Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards made his own appearance on the show.

He dismissed Coulter, calling her “mean-spirited,” having no shame and being “crazy.” He defended his wife’s efforts to ask Coulter to drop her personal attacks, saying, “You have to stand up to them.”

“I don’t think [Coulter] has any shame; there’s no doubt about that,” Edwards said. “I think that's just the way she behaves. That's who she is. And I think that's a lot of what we see from these people who are just -- that are crazy.”

Below is the transcript from today’s Hardball. Click here for video.:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Last night, Ann Coulter responded to Elizabeth Edwards with a question.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
 
ELIZABETH EDWARDS, WIFE OF FORMER SEN. EDWARDS: It debases political dialogue. It drives people away from the process. We can't have a debate about issues if you're using this kind of language.

(AUDIENCE MEMBER SHOUTING)

ANN COULTER: Yes, why isn't John Edwards making this call?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, I guess the question last night was why didn't you make the call, rather than Elizabeth, to Ann Coulter on the "Hardball" set?

J. EDWARDS: Well, the simple answer to that is Elizabeth, I guess, heard her and knew she was on, and called in. So I thought it was appropriate that I come on today.

MATTHEWS: OK. Did you talk with your wife, Elizabeth, beforehand about this, her decision to call in to the program?

J. EDWARDS: Elizabeth made this decision on her own to call in, I guess based on what she was hearing from Ann Coulter and I think something Ann Coulter had said a couple of days before.

MATTHEWS: Right. Well, what is your reaction to what you heard last night and heard today about what happened last night?

J. EDWARDS: I applaud Elizabeth. I think that when people like Ann Coulter -- and it's not just her, unfortunately, it's her and people just like her, Karl Rove and all those people. I mean, when they engage us in this kind of hatemongering, you have to stand up to them. You have to stand up to them. They start this fight, but we have to be willing to be strong and to fight back. Because if we don't, Chris, what happens is all the important things: men and women dying in Iraq, those who don't have health insurance, et cetera, their issues don't get heard. Instead, it's this -- it's this low-level dialogue with this name-calling, which is what we see.
 
MATTHEWS: Well, what do you make of the role of trash talk in politics generally, this willingness on the part of partisans to enrage the other side by going over the top? I mean is that a smart tactic? Does it work? Does it debase the politics?

J. EDWARDS: Oh, it clearly debases the politics. There's no doubt about that. It makes it very difficult to talk about issues that affect people's day-to-day lives. And it's why when this kind of hatemongering and this hate language is used -- and I just, I feel the need to point out, this woman didn't just use it against me. I mean, the things she said about Senator Obama; the things she said about Senator Clinton -- they all fall in the same category. And they're calculated to create an emotional response. They're calculated to make people hate. And if you don't speak out against it, then that means you're tolerating this kind of language, and it means you think it's OK. It's not OK.

MATTHEWS: What do you make of someone who's a person who writes a column, went to Michigan Law School, has a fine education, apparently, from what I can tell, who is quite a writer, a good writer, uses comments like, "I hope that the terrorists kill this guy," things like that.
What do you make of that stuff? Where does it come from?
 
J. EDWARDS: Well, it means a couple things. Number one, she's smart enough to know better. She knows exactly what she's doing. She's not alone. I mean, if you look at what she's doing and you look at what's happened in the past; for example, the Swift Boating of Senator Kerry, I mean, I think a lot of this is very coordinated, very calculated. They intend to create a result. And what they hope is that we won't say anything; we'll just let them continue this hateful dialogue, and we'll try and hope that the country will hear us talk about important things, issues that affect the lives of Americans every single day. But we have to fight back, Chris. We have to be strong. We have to speak up. That's what Elizabeth did yesterday. And I'm proud of her for it.
 
MATTHEWS: Elizabeth had one -- I think Elizabeth may have made one strategic error last night. That's assuming that she could get Ann Coulter to express shame.

J. EDWARDS: I don't think she has any shame. There's no doubt about that. And her response to any effort to raise the dialogue, to talk about things that people care about, is to attack in a mean, hateful, mean-spirited way. I think that's just the way she behaves. That's who she is. And I think that's a lot of what we see from these people who are just -- that are crazy. I mean...

MATTHEWS: Yes.

J. EDWARDS: I mean, there's nothing remotely mainstream about them. And normal people are repelled by them.

MATTHEWS: Well, how do you explain that you see people with good educations walking around the streets of New York and Wall Street, people with big business jobs in equity firms -- hedge fund people -- all buying books by Ann Coulter? How do you explain the fact that even last night's fight involving your wife Elizabeth and Ann Coulter probably helped her sell some more books to these kind of guys?

J. EDWARDS: Because I think there is a segment of the population that responds to this sort of hateful craziness. It's always been true, Chris. It's been true my whole lifetime. When I was young, growing up in the South, people were very responsive to name-calling of African-Americans, prejudice and discrimination against African-Americans. And people would say the most outrageous, demeaning things about good human beings. And there would be a response.

And so there's always been hateful language, hate-mongering in this country. It's been true for as long as I've been alive and it's still true today. But that doesn't mean we have to tolerate it. We have to speak out about it. We have to stand up.

MATTHEWS: Can you dismiss this as hate speech and negativity and debasing of the political process and at the same time have your campaign use the comments made by Ann Coulter to raise money? It's clearly part of your Web site e-mail campaign solicitation effort now. Two e-mails have gone out now to raise money off of Ann Coulter's attacks on you and your family. Do you think you can do both, attack her and exploit her?

J. EDWARDS: Here's what I think. I think that we can say to America that we're not going to tolerate this kind of behavior, we're not going to tolerate this kind of hate language and we're going to stand up and we're going to fight. And if we ask Americans, other good Americans to join us in standing up and being strong, there's nothing wrong with that. And that's exactly what we're asking them to do. And I hope there'll be lots of people who will join us in standing up and doing the right thing.

MATTHEWS: Have you raised a great deal of money? There was a report today that you've had your best, most successful e-mail hitting back at Ann Coulter that you've (inaudible) so far?

J. EDWARDS: We are raising money. I don't know the numbers. I hope they go up. I hope we get more and more people who join us in this cause, because this is important.

MATTHEWS: Do you think people should buy Ann Coulter's books?

J. EDWARDS: No.

MATTHEWS: OK. We'll be right back. That's a good answer. John Edwards. We'll be right back with John Edwards, who's coming on tonight to follow up on that incident here last night involving Ann Coulter and her very strong words, many people believe over the line, against the Edwards family. We'll be right back with John Edwards.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MATTHEWS: We're back with Senator John Edwards talking about what happened last night involving Elizabeth Edwards and Ann Coulter. How's Elizabeth doing?
 
J. EDWARDS: She's actually doing real well, Chris, but thanks -- first of all, thank you for asking. She's...

MATTHEWS: Well, you know we love her, or I love her personally, because she's the greatest person in the world and she battles with you as to who's the best of the two of you. She is a piece of greatness, I think. But that's my opinion.

J. EDWARDS: Well, I'm a little biased. I share your view. But she's doing real well. She's on her treatment. It seems to be going well. We're staying on top of it and monitoring her. She's out on the campaign trail, working hard.

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about how you explain this kind of -- it wouldn't be a tit for a tat -- this nastiness the other night, to your older daughter, your college-age or actually law school-age daughter, Kate. How do you explain these kinds of things that happen in politics?

J. EDWARDS: You know, I think the truth is, Chris, I don't need to explain it to Kate. I mean, because I think she's extraordinarily mature for her age. She understands that these sort of things go on in politics, that you have to -- if you care about what we're doing -- as to what we've always -- Elizabeth and I have always taught our children: If you care about what you're doing, if you want to make the lives of other people better, sometimes, if you're going to do it politically, which is what we've chosen to do...

MATTHEWS: Yes.

J. EDWARDS: ... you're going to have to endure some attacks and be willing to stand up and fight back.

MATTHEWS: Yes. Have you heard from any of your colleagues? I mean, they're your colleagues, but they're also your rivals for the nomination. Has anybody stood up and said to you, "Don't let her get away with that," meaning Ann Coulter?

J. EDWARDS: No, but in fairness to them, I've been almost -- traveling almost nonstop since this happened yesterday. So I'm confident they will. I mean, as I said earlier in our discussion, the things that this woman has said about some of the others for the nomination are outrageous and have to be rejected.

MATTHEWS: Yes, what did you make of her attack on Hillary? She made fun of her build, her weight. She made fun of a couple of things. She made fun of Osama -- Osama, I'm sorry -- of Barack Obama's middle name, Hussein. What do you make of that, that sort of general invective you get from her now?
 
J. EDWARDS: Well, I think, first, as to Senator Clinton, this is demeaning and offensive to women at large. It's offensive to Senator Clinton, who's a terrific senator and a great leader in this country and a great role model for a lot of women. And for her to demean her that way is completely unacceptable. And Senator Obama -- I mean, here's an African-American man who's running for president of the United States who is in many ways a role model for a lot of young African-Americans in this country. And for her to make fun of -- first of all, it's something he has no control over, his name...

MATTHEWS: Right.

J. EDWARDS: And to make fun of and demean him in that way is just -- it's completely consistent with what we see from these crazies. And somebody has to speak out about it and stop it.

MATTHEWS: Yes. If we want everybody in the world whose name's Hussein to be our enemy, we are really stupid. Because there's millions of people with that name. Anyway, thank you. By the way, what's the reaction out on the road now? You've been campaigning, as you said. Are people rooting for you in this regard, are they mentioning it or what?

J. EDWARDS: Oh, yes. Yes. I've heard it a lot just since yesterday. People are very excited about the fact that we're standing up and speaking out about this hate-mongering. They want to see strength. They want to see us standing up and fighting back.
 
MATTHEWS: OK. Thank you very much. Senator John Edwards. Please come back. You're always welcome on "Hardball," as is the lovely Elizabeth. Thank you for joining us tonight.

J. EDWARDS: Thanks, Chris.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I wonder if this'll bring over a thousand comments...
To Anne Coulter:

YOU GO GIRL, Elizabeth Edwards is full of it.
I like Edwards alot more now.  Thanks Ann!
When I first heard Coulter would be on Hardball, I asked them a simple question. If Coulter was making the same kind of hateful remarks to minorities as she does to "liberals" (read anyone who disagrees with her) would MSNBC being giving her a megaphone to spew her invective?

I never got an answer. (Surprise)

I told MSNBC that if they aired Coulter, I'd boycott every show on MSNBC except for The Countdown!

I hope all readers of the MSNBC and their friends join me in the boycott.
Ann Coulter is a perfect example of how the lose of compassion has affected American politics.
Ann Coulter is an ugly excuse for a woman.  The Republican men use her to throw grenades for them and she is stupid enough to think they like her, duhhhh, she's just being used.  She is out of control and so arrogant she has no idea why no one would want her.
Hey, Chris Matthews,
You still suck.
Love,
Ron
   I don't think she's crazy. I do think she's silly.

Russell L. Lee
Ann Coulter makes my blood boil for the things she says.  She shouldn't be given the time of day by any news outlet.  She is so very hateful.  She must have had a very bad childhood and life.  What she is doing by spouting her hate is driving more people to take the opposite side - Is she too dumb to realize this?

Please promise not to let that hateful Ann Coulter on MSNBC again.  She is the worst hate mongerer in the history of politics.  NBC does not need to give her a platform.
Please promise not to let that hateful Ann Coulter on MSNBC again.  She is the worst hate mongerer in the history of politics.  NBC does not need to give her a platform.
i, as mother resent the statment miss coulter made im outraged, how dare she, elizabeth is a good desent, law abiding citizen,a wonderful mother, wife and  an AMERICAN, MY HEART GOES OUT TO YOU,MRS EDWARDS, YOU ARE WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILD FOR, GOD BLESS YOU.SHELLY M.
Why do you allow Ann Coulter on the air.  By giving her hateful and untrue nonsense a forum, you appear to endorse her views.  Send her back to Fox.  You are better than that.
Many mean things have been made about Bush and the Republicans. If Sen. Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, can't take this little bit of heat, they won't be able to stand up to the pressure of the White House - which says a lot. Or, they are so far behind in the race that they are looking for any excuse, including using the comments by Ann, to try to garner attention to their campaign. Edwards can't get away from the view that he is an empty suit with high-priced haircuts, a house the size of Manhattan, and the money he has accrued from being an ambulance chaser. Sorry, Elizabeth, you are wrong on this one - take the heat or get off the campaign for being First Lady.
It is time to stop giving AIR TIME to mean, hateful frauds like this women. While one can not prevent her from spilling such sewage from her well made up lips, we can limit our exposure to such toxic commentary. Let the righ wing Neo_cons cough up more bllod money at a fundrising dinner to relish in her words. Keep our airways free of her. It is time for MSNBC and other other resposnisble media outlets to finally...JUST SAY NO!!!
thank god for ann coulter, she calls the two faced, talk out of both sides of their mouths democrats out on the carpet about all of their pork barrel, lying, play politics at whatever the cost bull and catches them at it...john edwards is nothing but a pantywaisted baby that is hiding behind a cancer stricken wife...why isn't elizabeth the one that is running...she obviously has bigger and better brass ones than he has anyway...
thank god for ann coulter, she calls the two faced, talk out of both sides of their mouths democrats out on the carpet about all of their pork barrel, lying, play politics at whatever the cost bull and catches them at it...john edwards is nothing but a pantywaisted baby that is hiding behind a cancer stricken wife...why isn't elizabeth the one that is running...she obviously has bigger and better brass ones than he has anyway...
Ann Coulter's trash belongs on a street corner somewhere, not on TV. Goodbye MSNBC, Goodbye Chris Matthews.
Please thank Ms. Coulter for helping the Edwards - I will double my contribution to the opposite thinking candidate to her each time she opens her mouth...
As a long time viewer of MSNBC I am baffled why MSNBC, and Hardball particularly, continues to provide a forum for Ann Coulter's delusions, personal attacks and lies . I cannot fathom how your presumably reasonable and well-educated producers and hosts can justify continuing to cover the latest "books" and rantings of such a truly vile person, which are clearly intended to inflame and shock your audience (at least those who are still capable of being surprised by her trash).  Since her fellow Republicans lack the integrity to distance themselves from her, the least MSNBC could do is to stop legitimizing her existence.  No respectable media outlet should still be talking about or to Ann Coulter.

Your viewers (and frankly most Americans) are sick to death of her.  

Kindly knock it off.

Thanks

P.S. Thanks be to God for Keith Olbermann.
Matthews should watch the Coulter clip!  She does not engage in hate speech she was using what Bill Mahrs said about VP Cheney "that he wished he would be killed in a terrorist attack" as an example of what is allowable speech in the main stream media and that perhaps she should use that as well.  You should all be ashamed of yourselves for allowing Edwards to say otherwise.
The fact that Ann Coulter is representative of the support of the current Administration in Washington is all you need to know on Election Day 2008.  
Why didn't Senator Edwards ask Mathews: Why do you have her on your show and give her a platform... Mathews appears to be agreeing with Senator Edwards that Coulters speech IS hateful.. if so why does he have her on the show?  
The grace and dignity of the Edwards family is inspiring.  Ann Coulter should be ashamed, but I am sure that is an emotion she is not familiar with.
Coulter really is a no talent hack who can get things going by being outrageous, that is how she got her job to begin with. She was a reporter talking to a Vietnam vet, said something totally hateful and outrageous, was fired, and then a couple years later she's doing book deals and such. Her hatemongering appeals to the people who feel the same way deep down but don't say it themselves. She symbolizes a 100% pure version of hate that a lot of people feel in the guts of their stomaches.
The excerpt reads like a product placement for "ANNE COULTER" whose full name gets mentioned 15 times in the transcript above. I guess, they both use her full name because to use only her first name would lend an air of familiarity they want to avoid. Funny nevertheless.
Mean spirited?!?  Wasn't it John Edwards who outed Dick Cheney's daughter on national television during the debates of 2004?

Neither Ann Coulter or the Edwards take the high road.
Anne Coulter is hateful, spiteful and filled with malice. A person can disagree without being so filled with hate. Perhaps Ms Coulter can learn a lesson fro someone like Pat Buchannon. He can give a right wing point with out spewing hatred.
Shame on Chris Matthews to even have Ann Coulter on. He was very cozy with her. He is no better than she is. He was a suck up. I always watch hardball but am getting disgusted with Chris. He better get to confession because he has lost his moral compass.
He is turning a lot of my friends off. I am a senior 64 and I want to see a person with real core values. Chris has lost his.
If Ann Coulter were to say about John Edwards if he were president, that she wished that he would have been killed in a terrorist plot, she herself would be thought of as a terrorist.
What is the religious right saying about her and the vile filth that comes out of her mouth? She wears a cross around her neck!! Is this something they advocate since they're not standing up against it??
Ann Coulter is a pathetic person who, instead of speaking in an intelligent manner, resorts to, as Randi Rhodes put it, "fourth-grade" name-calling tactics. When Ann Coulter calls John Edwards a "faggot," perhaps it doesn't occur to her (does anything occur to her?) that, in fact, there ARE gay Republicans. The only kind of people in this world called "faggots" are gay men. More importantly, what is Ann's point? So, she thinks John is a faggot and therefore by using that hateful word, she is showing the world how good, smart, intelligent she is? What a pathetic, hateful loser.

It isn't the use of "faggot" that is upsetting so much as the fact that she is given a platform to spew her hatred to the world. Any word that derides a person's race, age, weight, or sexuality should be relegated to schoolyard bullies -- whom will be taken aside, have their mouths washed out with soap, and then be forced to write on the board 100 times, "I respect all people." Ann is incapable of respecting others and is also incapable of commenting on the real topics, so she's reduced to calling people names. What a wasted life.
Thank you both John and Elizabeth Edwards for standing up to EVIL.
If you're reading this on the web (apparently you are) then it should be easy to go to the Huffington Post and read what Robert L. Borosage has to say about Coulter.  It's good.

If John Edwards is attempting to be the Democratic candidate for President in 2008 then there's a lot of good questions he could be asked.  These aren't questions about Ann Coulter, anyone like her, or what Ann or anyone like her says.  Hardball has wasted two programs: one in which Coulter said nothing of substance and continued to debase political debate and a second, in which John Edwards appeared and wasted his time (and that of the viewers) by discussing an appearance that should never have happened.  Net result: Coulter wins, Coulter keeps the discussion away from the issues and the ways in which the government acts to assist or to injure the people of the US.  
Ann Coulter should be banned from being on National Television and the radio. How much is the Republican party paying her to spread this nonsense? I got sick of watching her run her fingers through her hair. Tell her to go get a decent hair cut. She is an absolute BITCH! How dare she say that John Edwards should be assinated!! John Edwards is a good, intelligent man who wants the best for us American people. I really like Chris Matthews, but I'll be really disappointed if she appears on Hardball again!
Ann Coulter, demogogue:
 
The early 20th century American social critic and humorist H. L. Mencken, known for his "definitions" of terms, defined a demagogue as "one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." (Is that why she's always on Fox???)
Though this definition emphasizes the use of lying and falsehoods, some point out that demagogy does not require such, but that skilled demagogues often need to use only special emphasis by which an uncritical listener will be led to draw the desired conclusion himself, seeding a belief that is self-reinforced rather than one based on fact or truth.
Demagogues may make use of logical fallacies, though persuasion may require no use of logic. While it may not rely heavily upon outright lies, the use of half-truths, omissions, and distortions are what define demagogy — it is, in essence, giving bad-faith arguments for the purpose of political gain.
I have had it with Ann Coulter!  I have always been a staunch Republican and I see her as an embarrassment to our party.  She is an absolute nut case.  She doesn't care about either party she only cares about selling her books.  Please don't give her anymore air time!!!
It is so very sad that people like Ann Coulter have any influence in America at all.  I feel ashamed for Republicans that someone so hateful represents their party.  They should be censoring her instead of letting her speak.  There is absolutley nothing Christian about Ann Coulter.  I simply can't believe that she wears a cross around her neck.  She is the most hateful, mean-spirited woman I have ever encountered.  Jesus said to love your neighbors as yourself.  Also to love your enemies.  She needs to re-read her Bible.  She also needs to take that cross off and be what she truly is - the most hateful woman that ever lived.  
"Matthews- Well, how do you explain that you see people with good educations walking around the streets of New York and Wall Street, people with big business jobs in equity firms -- hedge fund people -- all buying books by Ann Coulter?"

Huh? Since when is a fancy education an indicator of character, empathy,
and common sense? How silly. I mean honestly...doesn't GW have
an MBA?
Yes,
 Ann is crazy. She has gone too far out there.
I'm on Edwards side on this one.
 Is this the downfall of Ann C.?
Thank You
 John H.
Chris
Today about 20 people at work spoke about your obvious bias to Ann Coulter and setting her up.  You were killed by her and 19 out of 20 thought so.  You got your clock cleaned and you were so upset when the audience was on her side.  I watched you many times telling us that the crowds behind you were great  when they agreed with you.  Watch yourself again and see how left wing you are.  I went out and bought Ann Coulters book to see what you are afraid of.
OK
Eat something Ann, you'll feel better!
Ann Coulter should be ashame of herself. She has no class.
I'm not a John Edwards fan, and I don't consider myself a liberal - but people like Ann Coulter make sure that I do not consider myself a conservative as long as that word means Ann Coulter and her hate filled rants.  Jokes about the sick and the dead are not funny, and are poor substitutes for a cogent discussion of our country and how to make it better for all of us.
In a philosophy class, long, long ago, I learned there are two types of beliefs--mediated and immediate.  Mediated are the ones you arrive at from logic and thought.  Immediate beliefs are those you believe just because you believe--a leap of faith.  The belief in God is a classic example of an immediate belief.  Mediated beliefs can be changed if you can communicate a better thought process, better evidence, better logic, etc.  Immediate beliefs cannot be changed by logic or communication.  You don't arrive at immediate beliefs through a logical thought process; you can't be led away from immediate beliefs by a logical thought process.

People of Ann Coulter's ilk that believe the world is black and white and everyone who disagrees with them is wrong are not operating in a world of logical thought processes.  You may as well beat your head against the wall as to try to have intelligent discourse with them.

John and Elizabeth, save your efforts for those who might benefit from it.  Ann Coulter is wasted effort and if you continue to try to battle her, you are being just as illogical as she is.  She is simply not worth it.
I'm with Edwards..parade Coulter out for all to see. The Republicans have been hiding their ideological extremists for years...this proves the party is slowly moving out of the mainstream. This is the face of the Rush's, the Hannity's, the Savages people....now tell me who has the moral high ground.
I wouldn't call Ann Coulter crazy.  She has a crazy personna that is her shtick for attracting and entertaining readers and listeners.
She is cleverly marketing herself to the childish, adolescence in otherwise mature adults.  The Homer Simpson side.
I listen to her, Rush Limbaugh, Howard Stern, etc., for entertainment purposes only, not for guidance.
So, Ann, are you a man? I've never seen an adam's apple like that on a female before- and the voice- it ain't exactly too feminine, ya know what I mean??? Maybe the Dems should hire a good private eye to dig up the truth about our lovely Lady Ann.
John Edwards is questioned about his use of the conversation of Ann Coulter and his wife to raise money, how about Ann Coulter's use of appearances and books to make a living?  The more attention the media gives Ann Coulter the more outrageous she becomes.  It is time to for the media and the public to turn their backs on her then lets see how she handles not getting the publicity she so loves.  She really reminds me of a modern Senator Joseph R. McCarthy and we all know what happened to him.  
Ann Coulter = KKK

God save America from the likes of people like that.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=245585

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google