ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



John Edwards: Coulter's 'crazy'

Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:32 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
A day after his wife Elizabeth called in to MSNBC’s “Hardball” to confront conservative commentator Ann Coulter, Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards made his own appearance on the show.

He dismissed Coulter, calling her “mean-spirited,” having no shame and being “crazy.” He defended his wife’s efforts to ask Coulter to drop her personal attacks, saying, “You have to stand up to them.”

“I don’t think [Coulter] has any shame; there’s no doubt about that,” Edwards said. “I think that's just the way she behaves. That's who she is. And I think that's a lot of what we see from these people who are just -- that are crazy.”

Below is the transcript from today’s Hardball. Click here for video.:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Last night, Ann Coulter responded to Elizabeth Edwards with a question.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
 
ELIZABETH EDWARDS, WIFE OF FORMER SEN. EDWARDS: It debases political dialogue. It drives people away from the process. We can't have a debate about issues if you're using this kind of language.

(AUDIENCE MEMBER SHOUTING)

ANN COULTER: Yes, why isn't John Edwards making this call?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, I guess the question last night was why didn't you make the call, rather than Elizabeth, to Ann Coulter on the "Hardball" set?

J. EDWARDS: Well, the simple answer to that is Elizabeth, I guess, heard her and knew she was on, and called in. So I thought it was appropriate that I come on today.

MATTHEWS: OK. Did you talk with your wife, Elizabeth, beforehand about this, her decision to call in to the program?

J. EDWARDS: Elizabeth made this decision on her own to call in, I guess based on what she was hearing from Ann Coulter and I think something Ann Coulter had said a couple of days before.

MATTHEWS: Right. Well, what is your reaction to what you heard last night and heard today about what happened last night?

J. EDWARDS: I applaud Elizabeth. I think that when people like Ann Coulter -- and it's not just her, unfortunately, it's her and people just like her, Karl Rove and all those people. I mean, when they engage us in this kind of hatemongering, you have to stand up to them. You have to stand up to them. They start this fight, but we have to be willing to be strong and to fight back. Because if we don't, Chris, what happens is all the important things: men and women dying in Iraq, those who don't have health insurance, et cetera, their issues don't get heard. Instead, it's this -- it's this low-level dialogue with this name-calling, which is what we see.
 
MATTHEWS: Well, what do you make of the role of trash talk in politics generally, this willingness on the part of partisans to enrage the other side by going over the top? I mean is that a smart tactic? Does it work? Does it debase the politics?

J. EDWARDS: Oh, it clearly debases the politics. There's no doubt about that. It makes it very difficult to talk about issues that affect people's day-to-day lives. And it's why when this kind of hatemongering and this hate language is used -- and I just, I feel the need to point out, this woman didn't just use it against me. I mean, the things she said about Senator Obama; the things she said about Senator Clinton -- they all fall in the same category. And they're calculated to create an emotional response. They're calculated to make people hate. And if you don't speak out against it, then that means you're tolerating this kind of language, and it means you think it's OK. It's not OK.

MATTHEWS: What do you make of someone who's a person who writes a column, went to Michigan Law School, has a fine education, apparently, from what I can tell, who is quite a writer, a good writer, uses comments like, "I hope that the terrorists kill this guy," things like that.
What do you make of that stuff? Where does it come from?
 
J. EDWARDS: Well, it means a couple things. Number one, she's smart enough to know better. She knows exactly what she's doing. She's not alone. I mean, if you look at what she's doing and you look at what's happened in the past; for example, the Swift Boating of Senator Kerry, I mean, I think a lot of this is very coordinated, very calculated. They intend to create a result. And what they hope is that we won't say anything; we'll just let them continue this hateful dialogue, and we'll try and hope that the country will hear us talk about important things, issues that affect the lives of Americans every single day. But we have to fight back, Chris. We have to be strong. We have to speak up. That's what Elizabeth did yesterday. And I'm proud of her for it.
 
MATTHEWS: Elizabeth had one -- I think Elizabeth may have made one strategic error last night. That's assuming that she could get Ann Coulter to express shame.

J. EDWARDS: I don't think she has any shame. There's no doubt about that. And her response to any effort to raise the dialogue, to talk about things that people care about, is to attack in a mean, hateful, mean-spirited way. I think that's just the way she behaves. That's who she is. And I think that's a lot of what we see from these people who are just -- that are crazy. I mean...

MATTHEWS: Yes.

J. EDWARDS: I mean, there's nothing remotely mainstream about them. And normal people are repelled by them.

MATTHEWS: Well, how do you explain that you see people with good educations walking around the streets of New York and Wall Street, people with big business jobs in equity firms -- hedge fund people -- all buying books by Ann Coulter? How do you explain the fact that even last night's fight involving your wife Elizabeth and Ann Coulter probably helped her sell some more books to these kind of guys?

J. EDWARDS: Because I think there is a segment of the population that responds to this sort of hateful craziness. It's always been true, Chris. It's been true my whole lifetime. When I was young, growing up in the South, people were very responsive to name-calling of African-Americans, prejudice and discrimination against African-Americans. And people would say the most outrageous, demeaning things about good human beings. And there would be a response.

And so there's always been hateful language, hate-mongering in this country. It's been true for as long as I've been alive and it's still true today. But that doesn't mean we have to tolerate it. We have to speak out about it. We have to stand up.

MATTHEWS: Can you dismiss this as hate speech and negativity and debasing of the political process and at the same time have your campaign use the comments made by Ann Coulter to raise money? It's clearly part of your Web site e-mail campaign solicitation effort now. Two e-mails have gone out now to raise money off of Ann Coulter's attacks on you and your family. Do you think you can do both, attack her and exploit her?

J. EDWARDS: Here's what I think. I think that we can say to America that we're not going to tolerate this kind of behavior, we're not going to tolerate this kind of hate language and we're going to stand up and we're going to fight. And if we ask Americans, other good Americans to join us in standing up and being strong, there's nothing wrong with that. And that's exactly what we're asking them to do. And I hope there'll be lots of people who will join us in standing up and doing the right thing.

MATTHEWS: Have you raised a great deal of money? There was a report today that you've had your best, most successful e-mail hitting back at Ann Coulter that you've (inaudible) so far?

J. EDWARDS: We are raising money. I don't know the numbers. I hope they go up. I hope we get more and more people who join us in this cause, because this is important.

MATTHEWS: Do you think people should buy Ann Coulter's books?

J. EDWARDS: No.

MATTHEWS: OK. We'll be right back. That's a good answer. John Edwards. We'll be right back with John Edwards, who's coming on tonight to follow up on that incident here last night involving Ann Coulter and her very strong words, many people believe over the line, against the Edwards family. We'll be right back with John Edwards.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MATTHEWS: We're back with Senator John Edwards talking about what happened last night involving Elizabeth Edwards and Ann Coulter. How's Elizabeth doing?
 
J. EDWARDS: She's actually doing real well, Chris, but thanks -- first of all, thank you for asking. She's...

MATTHEWS: Well, you know we love her, or I love her personally, because she's the greatest person in the world and she battles with you as to who's the best of the two of you. She is a piece of greatness, I think. But that's my opinion.

J. EDWARDS: Well, I'm a little biased. I share your view. But she's doing real well. She's on her treatment. It seems to be going well. We're staying on top of it and monitoring her. She's out on the campaign trail, working hard.

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about how you explain this kind of -- it wouldn't be a tit for a tat -- this nastiness the other night, to your older daughter, your college-age or actually law school-age daughter, Kate. How do you explain these kinds of things that happen in politics?

J. EDWARDS: You know, I think the truth is, Chris, I don't need to explain it to Kate. I mean, because I think she's extraordinarily mature for her age. She understands that these sort of things go on in politics, that you have to -- if you care about what we're doing -- as to what we've always -- Elizabeth and I have always taught our children: If you care about what you're doing, if you want to make the lives of other people better, sometimes, if you're going to do it politically, which is what we've chosen to do...

MATTHEWS: Yes.

J. EDWARDS: ... you're going to have to endure some attacks and be willing to stand up and fight back.

MATTHEWS: Yes. Have you heard from any of your colleagues? I mean, they're your colleagues, but they're also your rivals for the nomination. Has anybody stood up and said to you, "Don't let her get away with that," meaning Ann Coulter?

J. EDWARDS: No, but in fairness to them, I've been almost -- traveling almost nonstop since this happened yesterday. So I'm confident they will. I mean, as I said earlier in our discussion, the things that this woman has said about some of the others for the nomination are outrageous and have to be rejected.

MATTHEWS: Yes, what did you make of her attack on Hillary? She made fun of her build, her weight. She made fun of a couple of things. She made fun of Osama -- Osama, I'm sorry -- of Barack Obama's middle name, Hussein. What do you make of that, that sort of general invective you get from her now?
 
J. EDWARDS: Well, I think, first, as to Senator Clinton, this is demeaning and offensive to women at large. It's offensive to Senator Clinton, who's a terrific senator and a great leader in this country and a great role model for a lot of women. And for her to demean her that way is completely unacceptable. And Senator Obama -- I mean, here's an African-American man who's running for president of the United States who is in many ways a role model for a lot of young African-Americans in this country. And for her to make fun of -- first of all, it's something he has no control over, his name...

MATTHEWS: Right.

J. EDWARDS: And to make fun of and demean him in that way is just -- it's completely consistent with what we see from these crazies. And somebody has to speak out about it and stop it.

MATTHEWS: Yes. If we want everybody in the world whose name's Hussein to be our enemy, we are really stupid. Because there's millions of people with that name. Anyway, thank you. By the way, what's the reaction out on the road now? You've been campaigning, as you said. Are people rooting for you in this regard, are they mentioning it or what?

J. EDWARDS: Oh, yes. Yes. I've heard it a lot just since yesterday. People are very excited about the fact that we're standing up and speaking out about this hate-mongering. They want to see strength. They want to see us standing up and fighting back.
 
MATTHEWS: OK. Thank you very much. Senator John Edwards. Please come back. You're always welcome on "Hardball," as is the lovely Elizabeth. Thank you for joining us tonight.

J. EDWARDS: Thanks, Chris.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Ann, You are really full of it. Not one commment you have made in your life as a journalist or otherwise has not been "not hateful". Sorry babe, I hope you live happily ever after in HELL
Regardless of which side of the aisle you reside (I am a registered Independent), you have to admire the courage of Elizabeth Edwards to stand up to hatemongering and obscuring the issues with personal attacks. Idealogues who pander to the lowest emotional denominator are a dangerous lot. I want to know why radio personalities like Imus can be thrown off the air while Ann Coulter can do far worse and wrap herself in the flag. She will always find an audience of the disenfranchised right, but one can only hope someone with her intelligence cries herself to sleep at the "empire" she has "built" by tearing down those who do not share her hateful ideology
Follow the money trail idiots. Both sides, including MSNBC. Ratings. You coulnd't buy this kind of publicity. Everyone is laughing all the way to the bank. America is getting taken to the cleaners. Wake up. This is not life, this is theatre. Who gives a rip what Coulter has to say, or Edwards either for that matter. Most Americans will go to sleep tonight worried about how they are going to make it to the end of the month. Coulter, Matthews or Edwards don't share their anxiety. All of them are pissing on our backs and telling us its raining. Sad part is, we believe it.
It isn't about taking heat from political issues - Ann Coulter has attacked the Edwards' personally from the loss of their son, the legitimacy of the marriage/John's sexuality (she can say it was a schoolyard taunt all she wants - that's not what it means anymore), and suggesting a terrorist attack on a US political figure. When are you people going to come up with something that is actually worth talking about? We get it.... he has expensive haircuts.... I guess he is the only Presidential candidate to do that.... (highly unlikely as Clinton needs a whole team but we don't hear about her stylists she has other issues of her own) and he was an ambulance chaser. Let's hear something different if you want to engage in legitimate political dialog.
Ann Coulter knows exactly what she's doing.  She peddles hate and non sequiters to right wing bigots who enjoy hearing her bilge.  In doing so, she makes a tidy living without having to work very hard...the American dream.  You may rest assured she will sleep well tonight wrapped up in a blanket woven of good old fashioned conservative bigotry and liberal disdain.  The howling about her only feeds her warped ego.
And as an aside...how is it that this paragon of Aryan family values seems to have neither husband nor child....hmmmmm....
Standimg up to Ann Coulter is not enough. The good Americans expect hardhitting reactions. Of course, not at her level or those like her. How many of the conservative Christians batting for the Republican party are cheering her on in privacy? If they are out castigating her, telling her to get behind them rather than they get behind her, that would be very good news to hear. Sadly, I'm not holding my breath.
It was most unpleasant to see Ms. Coulter in her repugnant, delusional arrogance on your network.  I immediately changed channels.
Coulter behaves like coke addicts I have seen.  Can we stage an intervention?

Her thoughts seemed muddled, her glasses dark and her hands were jittery.  

As an aside, we've given more money to the Edwards campaign.  Thank you Elizabeth!
Ann Coulter's hate speech is lapped up by people who like to hate.

Bad people. People who are borderline evil.

People who support unnecessary wars, torture, suspension of habeas corpus, spying on Americans, etc.

Bad people.
As a crazy person, I am offended that Edwards called Coulter crazy. There have been a lot of good crazy people in this world like Einstein, Newton and Churchill. We all know that Coulter is human garbage, so why does anyone care what she says?
I totally agree with Sen. and Mrs. Edwards; I only wish they'd both been more forceful in their denouncement.  Political speech has been debased in this country.  And when the Supreme Court equates campaign donations with "political speech" while the requirement for fairness evaporates from the airwaves, I can only surmise things will get worse before they get better. Unless people in this country speak with their votes and their wallets - meaning campaign contributions, book purchases, whatever - against hatemongers and the Corporate Bank of Free Speech, the democratic system in this country is headed for a real down-and-dirty brawl of trash talk and character assassination.  And once the seeds of hatespeak are sown, it's only a matter of time before character assassination leads to real assassination.  We don't need to revisit those bad days, and we need to start holding politicians and their satellites responsible for veracity and mendacity.
To all "news" magazine shows:  Please, please, please stop booking guests like Ann Coulter who use rhetoric and inflammatory language for the purpose of stating their point of view when what it really is is entertainment.  People such as this are using the news magazine shows to promote themselves, to gain fame and money.  But, it's not NEWS.
CHUCK TODD and ANN COULTER should get married! I believe both are stupid enough to have a happy married life together.
  Good job of speaking up for the silent majority Mr.& Mrs. Edwards.  You said exactly what a lot of sane people were thinking.  Thank you!  
  Now, can we all start ignoring this loud mouthed broad and her male, drug abusing, radio show hosting counterpart.  I'd rather be thinking...for myself.
How could anyone that believes in GOD as I here all Republicans do support her? Does she even go to church? Do any of you that support her go to church? When was being mean and hateful put in the bible, for I have yet to see it.  She preaches hate, she is rude, and I really do not care what she, he, it is. When you come out with the most hateful things, as Ann does how can anyone who believes listen to her. I could understand listening to her if not for the hate and down right mean things she says, for we all have freedom of speech. But it sounds like she is out for blood, why is Ann so mad? Why does she hate so much? I gave up listening to shows that have her on, for I do not want my children to learn hate and disrespect from her. You can disagree with out personal and screaming attacks on people. Wow way back when, in our parent’s days this would not be acceptable behavior. She hope people are killed, die and hurt, would you let your kids talk like that?  God help us all, if Ann is the Voice of the Republican Party.
What is scary about Coulter and those like her from any party or not, is that they model hateful behavior, and then to make matters worse, todays' media glorifies and magnifies it. And we wonder why our society has become so crude and violent? MSNBC and Matthews also hold responsiblity for contributing to this sorry cultural level of our country. Shame on all of you!

Sue Williams Anchorage, AK
Chris Matthews, with this interview, has past the point of no return. He is an agent of the democratic party. He was when he worked for Speaker Tip. He is today. Her words are not hateful. They have a meaning.

Her point is that everyone in this country has the freedom of speech... unless you're a republican. or conservative. or someone who is happy to be a part of the white protestant majority.

You can say the most hateful things about bush. about christians. about the right and get away with it.

Her statement about wishing for Edwards to die in a terrorist attack was meant to solicit a two minute hate. Why didn't Maher get the same treatment when he said the exact same thing about Cheney. THAT IS HER POINT. Matthews is a smart guy. He omitted her broader argument and purposefully misled his audience for the purpose of raising the pitch of the liberal two minute hate.

I fear for this country. Not all men named Hussein want to kill us. But more men named Hussein want our destruction than those named Larry. All democrats( except Lieberman) are facilitating our destruction. How sweetly ironic it is that the main democrat running for president is called Osama more than Obama.  Chris had it right the first time. Obama is not evil, Hillary is not evil. They are either just dangerously naive or stalinists in sheep's clothing. Both animals comprise the democcratic party. The vicious and the stupid.
"Many mean things have been made about Bush and the Republicans. ..."
Ruth, since when do two wrongs make a right?

Mean spirited?!?  Wasn't it John Edwards who outed Dick Cheney's daughter on national television during the debates of 2004?"
Sorry Janet.  He didn't out her.  Her sexuality was reported in the media well before the 2000 election.
For every Ann Coulter there are 50 on the liberal side who say similar if not worse things about conservatives every day. As usuall people on the left are all for freedom of speech as long as what is said is something they agree with.
It is amazing that a 40 something , bolemic woman trying to look like an 18 year old, who has no sense of grace, composure, or real conversational talent is an MSNBC amusement spot and posing as someone who has something of value to offer the viewing audience.  It is an insult to the American public that MSNBC, and other networks, rarely show real news.  All we see are celebrities giving us their biased opinions.  Who are these people?  How did they get their jobs? What qualifications do they have to even speculate on world issues? When will we ever get real news instead of celebrity opinion?
I'm with Edwards here. If the only political arguments you can make are personal attacks, you're just wasting your time. We had a guy like that in last year's NC 13th district race, Vernon Robinson, who specialized in implying his opponent is gay.
Ann Coulter may be educated. A law degree does not weed out bad attorneys. In any field of profession a person can be smart with their education. It is then assumed that they are open-minded with positive morals and caring of all others. Not true with Ms. Coulter and other educated or uneducated individuals alike. She is ignorant, immature and irresponsible to be making these statements. She is using her educational background as a means to show all other ignorant people that these attacks are appropriate. It just shows that she could never be a leader because her focus is not relevant to the issues of our country. Her dialogue equals mean junior high school verbal attacks not a positive adult looking for solutions.
They can put on a supposed comedian like Bill Maher who spews hate ... but that is ok because he is liberal.  You put on Coulter and Matthews is all aghast at the state of politics.  Once again, Chris Matthews shows that he is a liberal democrat.
People with overblown ego's...half of America doesn't have cable.  Half of 100 people shown Chris Matthews or Ann Coulter's picture wouldn't recognize them.

Are they the "uneducated" sect, no, probably frugal not paying for cable costs rising faster than inflation and uninterested in political bickering.  Cranks use Ann Coulter in their favor.  

Who buys her books, people wasting money. She has inroads to truths?  She makes assumptions, attacks and blasts others with made up names. A comedian doing standup, sit down, wherever she is.  She's not funny.

This shows how biased you are Chris, why wasn't there a conservative invited to participate in your conversation with Edwards???
Let me tell you why, Edwards wouldn't come on if your show was fair and balanced!
Edwards is a trial lawyer. He deserves no respect, just as those on the left who are attacking Ann, and our First Amendment right, deserve no respect.
Thanks, Ann, for standing up to the lying, hateful, and evil Matthews, the silky pony, and his wife who reminds me of Cindy Sheehan.
What's with the black tank tops, anyway???!! Trailer trash is what Coulter is, that's all, pure white trash and it's a shame we're all talking about this stupid subject. But I say GO ELIZABETH! You are great! Everyone should have such class and brains.
>>Mean spirited?!?  Wasn't it John Edwards who outed Dick Cheney's daughter on national television during the debates of 2004? <<

Cheney's daughter was already very much out of the closet at that point. All Edwards did was point out that the Vice President supported legislation that would take legal rights away from his own daughter, which I believe was a valid point. I'm not that big a fan of John Edwards, but let's at least get the facts straight about this. And MSNBC should be ashamed to be giving air time to a vile hatemonger like Ann Coulter -- can't they present an intelligent and articulate conservative like William F. Buckley or George Will? I don't agree with their views, but at least they can discuss issues without resorting to childish and cowardly personal attacks.
Chris,

Ann Coulter is the affluent poster child for everything that is wrong with American political discourse.

She is a disgrace, every time she opens her mouth she sells another thousand books and the conservative movement loses another thousand votes.

Do the political process and your viewers a favor and do not give her any future forum on your other distinguished program; otherwise you will lose my viewership.
Chris, for crying out loud!!!   Why do you give this blonde scum the time of day??  And you ask John Edwards if he's "using" her to raise money -- what are you doing but "using" her to stir up ratings and controversy for your show?!

It is really disappointing to see somebody like you give her a platform.  Ann Coulter contributes nothing of substance or benefit to the political discourse, and she doesn't deserve this attention.  And I disagree TOTALLY that it was a fundraising move on the part of the Edwards campaign to call in -- I think Eliz. Edwards was honestly and rightly disgusted with the attacks on her husband and was right to try and stand up to the vicious b**ch.  The fact that Coulter attacked her just makes it abundantly clear who's the trash here.
I am very proud of Elizabeth Edwards.  She was standing up for her family and her husband.  Anybody who is married and has children knows that familial protection goes a long way.  Elizabeth Edwards is a wonderful, loving mother who thinks of others before herself.  Ann Coulter will never know what this is like.  The only person she cares about is herself.  How pathetic!!
Maybe people should watch the clip...this is exactly what happens in these instances..everyone zeroes in on a sentence without knowing the background and that makes Ann the "bad girl"..WATCH THE CLIP.
I got an e mail today asking for money for John Edwards campaign because Ann had hurt their feelings....Boy ! did THEY jump on that fast as a way to gather some "pity money"...get over it John and Liz...how can you stand up to the criticism the white house will bring you, if you can't handle Ann for 5 minutes? I'm doubtful you can. She accomplished what she wanted to..and John pocketed some money from some bleeding hearts. whats the problem????
Ann Coulter makes conservatives look like complete idiots which can only help the Democrats. She has her core audience but I think Edwards had it dead on when he said most normal people find her repulsive.
Ann Coulter - Americans love the way you take the Left's demagogery and beat them over the head with it.
Increasingly I get concerned over the need of Chris Matthews and MSNBC to expose their audience to the likes of Ann C...she's clearly mean spirited and emasculating in her perception of weaker men and intolerate of women who are self sufficient and confident about their identity...Chris also needs to explore the basis of his negative feelings about Hillary as well...Ann is so transparent it may be easier for him to deal with her...it's a shame the media can so distort a meaningful dialogue Hugo
Boycot MSNBC, except for Obermann. Now that's an idea whose time has come!  Chris, I used to like your style of not letting guests rant on w/o adding substance to the dialogue.  But now I see that you are just an instigator, the ultimate amoral flip flopper, who blows smoke up skirts on both sides of an arguement.
Question?  Why is it hollywood liberals can get away with this type of speech and it is just a blip on the screen?

Ann is a true conservative and she was making fun of the Bill Mahr's of the liberal elite.  Funny how many of the posters on this site can not figure this out.

I myself agree with 90% of what Ann Coulter's views are and unfortunately for the majority of you probably 50% of the American people are with me.

Sorry,  But Ann sell's alot of books.
Dis anyone notice that the ENTIRE interview with Edwards boiled down to the statement "we've got to stand up and speak out about this hate-mongering."? Edwards said absolutely NOTHING of any substance whatsoever. How MSNBC can claim this is a "hardball" interview I don't know. To me it was an empty, hollow, unremarkable commentary on Edwards's lack of credentials or acumen.
Thank you Ann, you helped the Edwards campaign a lot.  Makes people send more money to Edwards.  I hope Edwards doesn't acknowledge anything she says.  That is what she lives on someone fighting with her.  She can't even talk about the real issues.  Maybe she is not knowledgeable enough.
Ann Coulter attacked a woman who is fighting for her life, and brought up a DEAD child. DO you people have no sense of decency or shame. NO TELEVISION SHOW in the country should allow this woman a forum for her malice. It is beyond indecency. This woman needs treatment. Badly.  And it is absolutely revolting that anyone support what she has said.
Isn't the John Edwards campaign the one that had those two vile bloggers?  Didn't Johnny defend them even as they were spewing Anti-Catholic invective?  

I guess evil is in the eye of the beholder.

And John Edwards ain't never gonna be President ya'll.
I could say "I hope the terrorist rapes ann and her whole family" but that would be sinking to her level and I refuse to do that. It's obvious ann is not a Christian woman or she would not have said what she did.
I am disgusted with Chris Matthews for allowing that hateful BITCH Ann Coulter to appear on his program.   It's journalism of the lowest level.   You owe your viewers an apology, Chris!!!!!
Ann C. is a disgrace to all women. She obviously is trying to present a 'sexy' persona with the long blonde hair, low cut black dress and sun glasses. Gag me!
Chris Matthews is her p... The more I watch Chris, the less I like him. He butts in on all of his guests, showing that he obviously just wants to hear himself talk. It was nauseating to watch him and Ann C. together. Who won for talking the most?
Keep Ann Coulter on Fox and off MSNBC.  I have boycotted Fox for several years now because of their over the top, biased, mean spirited, and in Coulter's case, racial slurs and remarks. Those who like that kind of stuff can watch her and buy her farcical books - that's their right - but for those of us who choose not to listen to her, keep her off the mainstream stations.  Chris Matthews gave her a forum - shame on him and shame on MSNBC!
Ann Couter isn't crazy, she is hateful.  She is a bully in a skirt.  I'd like to see jello filled kiddy tub cat fight with her and Rose o'Donald.  Now that I would like to see.

Chris Matthews I'm done! You talked months ago about Coulter having gone too far, then months later you need some rating and here she is.  Remember, the early thirties in Germany, this is how people in the Nationalist Social Party talked about people they didn't agree with. Hate is hate, even if you agree with the her Republican views, the methods of Coulter can not be condoned!

Chris Mattews you have no shame!

So I'll simply go to my cable box and edit out MSNBC, your loss not mine!  
People who argue that Edwards can't take the heat act as if Coulter jousted with the candidate on the issues and won. Calling him a faggot and wishing terrorists would kill him is how she copes with not being able to debate Edwards on the issues. She's rude, base, immoral, and should be banned to the sewer, where her words, like the turds they are, belong.
Would Ann Coulter be where she is today if she were ugly and had chubby legs. Nope. Nada. No way. I noticed that she continually flipped her hair and crossed and uncrossed her long skinny legs while speaking to Elizabeth Edwards. She has come onto the Americal political scene simply because of her looks. She could have the same education and experience, but if she looked like a gremlin, she would be writing briefs in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Ann Coulter got to where she is because of her looks. How sad for her and us! She is a vindictive, hateful human being who spews venom. I choose to ignore her and her version of politics. Candace Webster


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=245585

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google