ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



So how fair was it?

Posted: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:39 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
At the beginning of the debate, Gravel called it the fairest one so far. Unlike previous debates where the front-runners received more questions than the rest of the candidates, in this debate each candidate got to answer every question. But the format may not have allowed for the most amount of total candidate on air time. There were a total of only eight questions.
 
We kept track of how much time each candidate held the stage, and neither Clinton, Obama, nor Edwards spoke the most amount of time -- that honor went to Richardson, who was the only candidate to speak for more than eight minutes. Obama was next, with Dodd and Clinton following. At the beginning of the debate, Dodd looked like he would receive the crown for longest speaker, but after Smiley chastised him, Dodd kept his answers to the time limit.
 
The rest of the candidates spoke for less than seven minutes. Although the format should have allowed for each candidate to speak for a similar amount of time, Gravel spoke the least, barely over six minutes, and Kucinich spoke for less than 6 1/2 minutes.

Here's our rough count of the time for each candidate:
Richardson 8:15
Obama 7:42
Dodd 7:25
Clinton 7:20
Biden 6:58
Edwards 6:36
Kucinich 6:29
Gravel 6:08

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Well can anyone be surprised if Senator Dodd tried to get as much time as he could to address the electorate?  The preceding debates on MSNBC and CNNN were a joke for fairness.  Thank you PBS for letting everyone speak!
HILLARY CLINTON ROCKS ! ROCK ON!
Oh yeah I think Dodd's website had the "talkclock" or something like that.  You guys might want to mention that...
I prefer this format.  Like hearing each one answer the same question.  Would have liked a question on Iran.
There was enough time to build and inform, wasn't just one liners and gotcha questions like previous "debates".  2 hrs would have been better.  Although the best format would be a 'conversation', ask the question and let them discuss the topic.  
Most of the candidates did great.  However your coverage here on these pages. . .that's a very different story.
It was a big improvement in fairness.
It was as good as could be expected. It could have been longer, and each candidate could have been given an extra fifteen seconds. Richardson had a bit of trouble putting on the brakes, which makes up for last time. Overall, a fairly good format.
I fully agree that the format allowed the audience to hear what each candidate had to say about the same topic. That's a fantastic format. I wish it had been a longer alloted time so that more questions were asked.  
I thought it was fair and wonderful. I really got to see how each candidate feels about issues that really are a big concern to me as a black woman and I hope to the rest of the nation.  I really enjoyed this debut.
It seemed as if Richardson floundered on EVERY question. Not that his answers were wrong, just seemed very uncomfortable trying to give them.
 My vote goes to Mike Gravel.  He told it like it is.   No beating around the bush for this guy.
 Hillary to Obama told it like the audience wanted to hear it. Snake oil doctors.
 I am in awe that people would consider Hillary as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces if elected!
The middle East has nothing but scorn for females and that is where are biggest problems lie.
Re Jack: the middle east has scorn for females so don't elect them? By that logic we should not elect christian or jewish candidates. Lets run the list of Republican and Democratic candidates past Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait and Jordon to get a ranking.
It was a big improvement in mediocrity,little more.In such a format all have shown themselves ,using William Lloyd Garrisons take,to be ''first rate,second rate''candidates.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=248702

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google