ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Immigration

Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:13 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

A Washington Post news analysis observes that Bush admitted defeat after the immigration bill he supported died in the Senate yesterday. “It was, in the end, simply a statement of reality after the Senate buried his proposal to overhaul immigration laws. But for a president who makes a point of never giving in, even when he loses, it was a striking moment, underscoring the depth of his political travails. It took almost two years before Bush acknowledged, just months ago, that his effort to reshape Social Security had failed. Now he has surrendered in what was probably his last chance of securing a legacy-making second-term domestic victory.”

The Los Angeles Times sums up Bush's terrible week: "Bush began the week struggling to salvage his most important foreign and domestic initiatives: the war in Iraq and an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws. He ends it closer to losing both than at any time in his presidency. And in a remarkable reversal for a president who once commanded nearly unflagging loyalty from lawmakers in his party, those most responsible for his setbacks are Republicans."

The New York Times has this nugget: “Mr. Bush placed telephone calls to lawmakers throughout the morning. But members of his party abandoned him in droves, with just 12 of the 49 Senate Republicans sticking by him on the important procedural vote that determined the fate of the bill… The outcome was a bitter disappointment for Mr. Bush and other supporters of a comprehensive approach… The vote reflected the degree to which Congress and the nation are polarized over immigration. The emotional end to what had been an emotional debate was evident, with a few senior staff members who had invested months in writing the bill near tears.”

As mentioned yesterday, all the presidential candidates currently serving in the Senate (Democrat and Republican) voted for cloture to end debate on immigration bill -- all except Brownback, who voted for it and then voted against it. His Senate office and presidential campaign then released twin statements about his opposition to the bill, despite his earlier support. Giuliani and Romney also issued statements in opposition to the legislation.

McCain, who supported the legislation, said in his statement: “I am disappointed that the Senate was unable to conclude its debate on comprehensive immigration reform. However, the American people will not settle for the status quo – de facto amnesty and broken borders. I am hopeful that we will have another chance to address this critical national security issue that affects people throughout our country.”

Soon-to-be candidate Fred Thompson said on FOX yesterday, “Sometimes not making the wrong move is better than nothing at all. And I think that they had an immigration bill that didn't secure the border. I think that shows a disconnect with the American people that they thought that they could convince them.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Buzz - the Democrats DO want the Hispanic votes. So do the Republicans. They are one and the same.  When it comes down to facts neither side gives a damn about our nation and our future.  They want to cater to whatever group from whom they can draw votes and whose lobbyists (Chamber of Commerce, etc). come up with the most money. They are walking a thin line now with Americans on MANY issues - illegal immigration and border security perhaps the most heated right now. BOTH parties STILL claim it was a failure.  Neither side is giving us what they are PAID to do which is border security - whether we have 2 illegals in this nation or 20 million - the JOB of our federal gov. IS border security.  WHEN did border security depend on FINES collected from ILLEGALS?  How stupid do they think we are?  We are supposed to believe that if we had NO illegals to fine, there would be no border security?  Maybe that $4000 tax raise they gave themselves could build a few miles of fence or hire and train some more border patrol agents.  It is so disgusting - but they will continue the same until WE demand better. WE have to forget party lines and try to find people who just might attempt to what they are paid to do.  Worth a try anyway for we are getting nowhere fast with the bunch we have now and the bunch we have had for decades.
Barbara, TN
"RoBoTech, Arab, AL ~ we did NOT elect Bush."
That's not what I said.
I said why would we elect a President that was out of touch with the American People, like Bush is now.
Why would we replace one Elitist with another?
So, President Bush has given Libby a "Pathway to Freedom". You know, continue to follow our laws (2 years probation), pay a Stiff fine ($250,000, which will probably be paid for him) and he will be free.
Does this rhetoric sound familiar? Sounds like "Shamnesty" to me.
Now there are several Democrat Senators that are protesting, saying that it undermines the "Rule of Law" and "Equal Justice".
Aren't these the same Democrats that tried to shove the Immigration Reform down our throats while the American People were saying that it undermines the "Rule of Law"?
Is that group of Democrat Senators being hypocritical, or am I missing something?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=249237

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google