Iraq
Posted: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:
Security
The Washington Post: “Senate Democratic leaders are planning a rare all-night session tonight, employing theatrics and scheduling votes that they hope will chip away at Republican resolve to back President Bush's Iraq war strategy. Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) had hoped to convince Republicans to allow a simple-majority vote on a Democratic proposal to withdraw most U.S. troops from Iraq by next spring. But GOP leaders held firm to a 60-vote threshold for passage -- a routine maneuver in today's closely divided Senate but a number Democrats have been unable to meet all year. And Republicans decried Reid's decision for a marathon session as a stunt.”
Anti-war MoveOn members will hold more than 100 "counter-filibusters" tonight in cities and districts across the country -- including on Capitol Hill, in Minnesota (outside of Sen. Norm Coleman’s office), and in Maine (outside of Sen. Susan Collins’ office) -- as GOP senators join a filibuster to block a vote on ending the Iraq war.
NBC’s Ken Strickland says that Democratic and Republican critics of the war hope to get votes on their various measures this week seeking to change course in Iraq. While the amendments vary greatly in how much they force the president's hand, they all embrace one common denominator: changing the mission from combat to counterterrorism, protection of personnel, and training of Iraqis.
With about a half dozen amendments offered, it's unclear if any of them can muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. This uncertainty about something passing would seem to contradict the new surge of GOP opposition to the war, but within that group there is no consensus. A handful support timelines for troop withdrawal (Levin-Reed). Others may prefer only an immediate "transition of mission" (Nelson-Collins). Still others say the president should enact the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group (Salazar-Alexander). And the latest proposal in the mix (Warner-Lugar) requires new war plans to be drawn up in October and "recommends" they're carried out before the end of the year. Warner-Lugar also "expects" the president to submit a revised war authorization.
But the first obstacle for anything to pass will be a group of Republicans honoring the president's request to vote against anything, and instead delay any action until after General Petreaus' September report. Also, Democratic leaders are likely to oppose some of the measures, arguing that they don't go far enough to push the president and/or put too much faith in him to act voluntarily. Voting should start Wednesday with the Levin-Reed amendment.