ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



First thoughts

Posted: Monday, August 27, 2007 9:15 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Mark Murray and Domenico Montanaro
*** Gonzo Gone: Breaking news from the New York Times: “Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred by controversy and accusations of perjury before Congress, has resigned.” Per NBC’s Pete Williams, Gonzales will appear before cameras at 10:30 am ET to announce the news. Williams says the word of his resignation has caught the Justice Department entirely off guard. As for the rumor that Michael Chertoff would replace him, a senior Homeland official tells Williams that Chertoff has many things he'd like to accomplish at Homeland. The official knows of no plans for Chertoff -- who is in town today -- to make any change. Edwards was the first presidential candidate out of the gate with a statement, and it was only this: “Better late than never.”

Video: NBC's John Yang reports on the Gonzales resignation.

*** Another Anti-War Badge For Hillary: On Thursday, the highly disciplined Clinton made what seemed to be a pretty big faux pas: She suggested that Republicans would benefit if there’s a terrorist attack between now and November 2008, and that she would be the best Democratic candidate to deal with that GOP advantage. That remark -- which was picked up by the national press on Friday, but then virtually disappeared from the papers over the weekend -- was roundly criticized by rivals Dodd, Edwards, and Richardson. Yet the comment will most certainly be eclipsed not only by the Gonzo news, but also by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s sharp criticism of the New York senator for complaining about his leadership. Is there a better way to bolster one’s national security and anti-war credentials than by coming under attack from someone who seems to be even more unpopular than President Bush?

*** Experience Doesn’t Matter? Speaking of foreign affairs, the New York Times’ Helene Cooper made this interesting point over the weekend: that previous foreign-policy experience isn’t a prerequisite for an aspiring commander-in-chief. In fact, some with the most experience had mixed foreign-policy records as president. “‘I think experience is a terribly overrated idea when it comes to thinking about who should become president,’ said [historian] Robert Dallek… ‘Experience helped Richard Nixon, but it didn’t save him, and it certainly wasn’t a blanket endorsement. He blundered terribly in dealing with Vietnam.” With this -- and also with Carter national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski essentially endorsing Obama over Clinton -- are we beginning to see a shift in the CW on Obama and the issue of national security?

*** The DNC-Florida Dem Showdown: On Saturday, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee voted to strip the Florida Democratic Party of all of its delegates for the state moving up its primary to January 29 -- if the party doesn’t come up with some sort of compromise within 30 days. Per a DNC official, the delegate reductions would be effective without further action from the full DNC or its executive committee. Yet this could all amount to nothing, even if the DNC acts. If we get a Democratic nominee by early February, as many expect, that person would effectively control the convention and would seat the Florida delegates. But what happens if -- and it’s a big if -- there’s a brokered convention (i.e., the nomination is still up for grabs)? Could Florida’s 200-some delegates be the difference between someone winning and losing? 

*** The Tour de Iowa: In Cedar Rapids, IA beginning at 11:00 am ET, four Democratic presidential candidates -- Clinton, Edwards, Richardson, and Kucinich (in that order) -- participate today in the LIVESTRONG presidential cancer forum, moderated by MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and Lance Armstrong. Each candidate will have two minutes for an opening statement, and then will engage the moderators for 13 minutes in Q&A. Tomorrow, the Republican candidates -- just Brownback and Huckabee -- will have their turn speaking to Matthews and Armstrong. Brownback is a cancer survivor, while Edwards’ and Huckabee’s wives have battled with cancer. Yet there are some cancer survivors who will be no-shows at the forum, including Giuliani, McCain, and Fred Thompson. Armstrong told Tim Russert on Meet the Press yesterday that he was disappointed with the no-shows: "I think the future commander-in-chief needs to show up and talk about what kills 600,000 Americans a year." Also, this will be the first forum/debate that Obama, whose mother died of ovarian cancer, has skipped since his campaign declared that it would begin limiting the senator’s appearances at debates and forums.

*** Katrina Politics: The other big event today is Katrina Recovery Summit in New Orleans, which Clinton, Edwards, Huckabee, and Hunter will address. Besides Iraq and the numerous GOP corruption scandals, no other event/situation hurt the Bush White House and the Republican brand more than Hurricane Katrina -- whose two-year anniversary comes on Wednesday. It also has raised a new threshold question for the presidential candidates: Can your administration effectively respond to a natural disaster and its aftermath? On Sunday, in fact, Obama unveiled a plan to speed up New Orleans’ recovery.

*** On The Trail: Sandwiched between her appearances at the LIVESTRONG forum and the Katrina summit, Clinton participates in a conversation with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers in Florida; Huckabee also meets with the union in Florida; and Fred Thompson visits the Minnesota State Fair. 

Countdown to MA-05 Special Election: 7 days
Countdown to LA GOV election: 54 days
Countdown to Election Day 2007: 71 days
Countdown to LA GOV run-off (if necessary): 82 days
Countdown to Iowa: 139 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 161 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 435 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 512 days

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"The remark -- which was picked up by the national press on Friday, but then virtually disappeared from the papers over the weekend --"  I wonder why?  Could it be the press is too fixated on making an issue out of Michelle Obama's benign remark about taking care of her house rather than reporting Clinton's outrageous remarks?  
Good riddance Gonzo!!!Just figure every person that Bush is going to appoint or have close to him will eventually become completely destroyed. I think Laura Bush should run like hell away from this guy! He's downright dangerous to all of us too.
Alberto Gonzales can't remember important people, places or things.  How did he get that job with a problem like that?
All this talk about Katrina recovery doesn't mean a hill of beans if the government doesn't get it's act together and fix the walls.  All I have seen so far is money for navigation and the river, nothing for the protection of new orleans.  With the city also sinking, it is kind of hard to understand why you would want to put money in a sinking hole, but that is liberals for you.  those 200 delegates really did in 2000 for the democratic party, this must be Howard dean's punishment for Florida for screwing up the elections.  
Gonsouless is still souless but at least GOZO!
I'm no expert, but I'm not so sure Hillary Clinton's comment is simply going to go by the wayside.  That comment will come up in a future debate and will haunt her.
Na Na Na Na

Na Na Na Na

Gonzales

Good Bye

Come on everyone sing it with me !
Fine that Gonzo is leaving, but must not be the end of it.  All the things that were previously done wrong are still wrong and all the other participants in his bad decisions and deceptions are still in place.  Also don't think the Administration won't try to put in place someone even worse.  That's what they did when Ashcroft left.
Asta la vista Gonzo and no to the failure of Katrina, Chertoff
It was YOU, "'Fredo", it was you all along. Good riddance to another Bush henchman. Rove, 'Fredo, Bartlett, et al, are all jumping off that sinking ship, though 'Fredo was pushed, but the only way we'll see Cheney go out is, "feet first". It's a great day for democracy and the rule of law.

Van
Looking for a democrat to replace Gonzo? How about Jamie Gorelick. Then we can have a nice little show trial huh  I mean hearing on the gorelick wall.
To, the, "Polls don't matter because everyone I talk to agrees with me...", crowd here.


Op-ed: Clarence Page on 'birds of a . . .feather'

BY CLARENCE PAGE | Clarence Page is a syndicated Chicago Tribune columnist based in Washington. James K

There they go again. I'm listening to a political call-in program on the radio, and a caller says he doesn't believe the major opinion polls. "And everyone I've talked to feels like I do."

Wow. Somebody break the news to Gallup, Harris, Roper, Zogby and all those other pollsters. They're all washed up. Politicians and major corporations don't need to keep spending gazillions of dollars on polls and focus groups. All they have to do is talk to this guy's pals.

One of my pet peeves is when people don't stop to realize the whole world might not be thinking about or experiencing things the same way they and their friends do. In politics, economics and other current affairs, people often are influenced less by facts than by their friends. Increasingly, sociologists are finding that, whether we intend to or not, birds of a political feather flock together.

Almost 20 years ago, sociologist David Knoke at the University of Minnesota found that you can predict someone's politics with great certainty if his or her closest two or three friends all leaned in one political direction. As another presidential election heats up, it's wise to understand the subtle but important role that the attraction of like-minded individuals plays in our political attitudes.

To political strategists, we're not really "red state" or "blue state" America, according to Douglas B. Sosknik, Matthew J. Dowd and Ron Fournier, the bipartisan authors of "Applebee's America: How Successful Political, Business and Religious Leaders Connect With the New American Community."

Instead, they argue, we're a bunch of "red tribes, blue tribes and tipping tribes," shaped by our lifestyle choices and persuadable by anyone who makes a "gut values connection" with us.

But do our views shape our friendships, or do our friends shape our views? "It's not an either /or question," Duke University sociologist Lynn Smith-Lovin said in a telephone interview. "Most of what we learn is shaped by our associations, and ... our associations are shaped more by the structures in which we live - our neighborhoods, workplaces, churches, the clubs we join and so forth."

Normally, she said, "You don't set out saying you are going to hang out with these people because they are all supporters of one candidate or another. You go because a certain place is full of people who are like you in a lot of other ways. Political beliefs become just another part of the soup of information that you share with one another."

Critical ingredients in that soup, says sociologist Mario Luis Small of the University of Chicago, are our demographics and shared experiences. People with similar incomes, backgrounds, work categories and family situations gravitate to the same places, activities and, ultimately, friendships.

"The implication for our political attitudes," Small said, "is that these activities end up reinforcing the attitudes I already have."

These days, Smith-Lovin noted, we are more likely than ever to have our group-shared partisanship hardened by a growing array of Internet sites and other media dedicated to very specific tastes and viewpoints.

Increasingly, if you so desire, you and your friends can cruise through an entire day of media reports without ever sharing the viewpoints or experiences of someone unlike yourselves.

Many people find that narrow sampling of the world to be comforting, no doubt. Complexity makes some people nervous.

But the world is complex, and sometimes discomfort is good. We learn things not only by reinforcing our cherished beliefs but also by seeing how well those beliefs stand up next to somebody else's views.

In other words, it's not easy for birds of a feather to leave their flock, but sometimes it's worth the flight.

More articles

Copyright © 2007, Newsday Inc.

Van
A new addition today;

http://www.pollster.com/

I provide you, the voter/reader, with the tools to enable you to have fun exposing them yourselves.

Whenever they post their, "opinions", ask, "Where did you get that information? could you please post the link?" Then you can go to the actual sources of their information. Almost all of the most current factual information on the candidates, the polls and the candidates' finances and contributors can be found below. I will be posting this list EVERY morning and updating the sources as they become available. The best way to combat lies is with TRUTH. Here is your ammo pack!

http://www.fec.gov/index.shtml The Federal Elections Commission is where the candidates file the financial information for their campaigns.

http://www.opensecrets.org/  Opensecrets.org is "Your guide to money in U.S elections."


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/  Is THE source for political junkies, with links to every major political site on the right, left and center.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/ is the one of the most accurate polling companies in the business, with daily tracking polls.


http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib.htm?o1=lib_composite&o2=asc#vr Has the voting records for all members of congress, and their Liberal/Conservative ratings.


http://votesmart.org/index.htm Here's what they say at the site;
Thousands of candidates and elected officials. Who works for you? Who is seeking your vote? Project Vote Smart, a citizen's organization, has developed a Voter's Self-Defense System to provide you with the necessary tools to self-govern effectively: abundant, accurate, unbiased and relevant information. As a national library of factual information, Project Vote Smart covers your candidates and elected officials in five basic categories: biographical information, issue positions, voting records, campaign finances and interest group ratings. What would you like to know?


Van


HRC's use of terrorism as a political tool may have not made the front pages but I do not think it has gone away.  She is creating quite a list of revelations that put together are going to come back again and again.  They include...

We are safer since 9/11.
Lobbyists represent real Americans.
HRC did not read the NIE before voting for authorization.
HRC does not believe in talking to hostile leaders without preconditions.

As the Bush Administration has demonstrated, regardless of how tight and secretive your machine may be... the truth will get out.  
New Orleans = Atlantis

Make it into a dive site.
Dee Anna Roberts , Green Bay Wisconsin (Sent Monday, August 27, 2007 9:48 AM)

Perfect! I knew the tune immediately. Good goin'! (both you and G!)
HRC with another fear tactics. Finally, the MSM are now making sense of Obama's judgement on foreign policies.

The more people get to know the candidates' policies the more they will realize that HRC is a gun powder that is waiting to explode. She is more of the same, calculating and cold hearted.

As for me and my house, we're voting for something different come January 2008. No more establishment.
We're getting a big smoke and mirrors routine from the Republicans and the corporations that own them. They're going to "allow" Hillary to win the election. That way the people get a Republican in Democrat's clothing. And everybody's happy. We think we have a Democrat, they know they have a Republican.
Another traitor bites the dust, good riddance benedict gonzo arnold.
Correction Hillary didn't just criticize him, she said he should resign or be replaced.

Ok, not only are we doing "What IFs", she is now trying to tell a sovoureign government what they should do.  The US telling another government (Muslim)how they should run their country/who can lead it, would go over very well in that part of the world. Is she suggesting the the US pick their leaders?

What happen to candidates running for President being careful about what they say because of the impact it would have around the world?

I am not convinced this is a PLUS as you say ,all it does is show once again "the Two Faces of Hillary"

I agree this will come up in debates.  Along with her other "Face Changes".
OH Dee and Lewis we are so afraid..so full of fear if only the  shrub will save us from bin laden!!!!
I think all should ask why the idiot and the military might of the strongest most powerful nation in the WORLD, is making us afraid of ONE MAN with no ARMY.
I predict at least five terror "alerts" (high but as usual false) 2 "reports" of active cells( in the rose garden) before the election.
The JOKER IN CHIEF is playing the he he he game on the "huddled masses." He is snikering at the gullible fools.
It seems like as all of these repubs resign there is an order to it. The more stupid they are, the longer they hang on before resigning. Gonzo finally got it. This leaves the two most stupid ones. Bush and Cheney.
The only chance the repubs have next year is to scare enouph dems into not voting for Hillary. They know she is the one that will beat them.
Jerry, for once I agree with you.  There's no point in rebuilding the levees for less than a Cat 5 hurricane.  That would be far cheaper than rebuilding the city after it gets destroyed.  So why does the Bush Administration insist we can't afford to do better than rebuild to the existing Cat 3 level?  And why did Republican Mississippi get far more money for rebuilding on far more lenient terms than Democratic Louisiana, which suffered more damage?
I'm sorry but I'd rather have Obama, Edwards run than HRC. She's basically saying anything now, and this latest comment is basically saying nominate me b/c I'm a good political fighter. It's no different than what the GOP said. I don't care about national polls, I hope the grass roots campaign on the Dem side will elect someone else.
With the news of Alberto Gonzales' resignation as AG, it appears as if another of the walls of the Bush Castle has come down. The inner sanctum is slowly being eroded away. It seems that whenever Bush gives someone the "great job, Brownie" accolade, they are then doomed to ignominy. I wonder who will be next?

Who's next??? Cheney?
Independent, Texas

I'm celebrating this morning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RqMQFQ028M
Great picture of THE GRUESOME TWOSOME!
They are BOTH looking over their shoulders.
CD, you said:  "The US telling another government (Muslim)how they should run their country/who can lead it, would go over very well in that part of the world."

I hate to break it to you, but the U.S. routinely tells other countries how they should run things.  We are downright bossy with the rest of the world.  But aside from that, you are basing your criticism on a false premise.  Iraq is not a sovereign nation right now.  It's an OCCUPIED nation - occupied by us and the "coalition of the willing."  Granted, we have occupied it to "help" them, but we are still responsible for...hm, pretty much everything, it seems.  We have pumped billions of dollars into Iraq to give them democracy.  If we want to criticize the way that democracy is being handled, then by all means...get to it.  
Jerry, for once I agree with you.  There's no point in rebuilding the levees for less than a Cat 5 hurricane.  That would be far cheaper than rebuilding the city after it gets destroyed.  So why does the Bush Administration insist we can't afford to do better than rebuild to the existing Cat 3 level?  And why did Republican Mississippi get far more money for rebuilding on far more lenient terms than Democratic Louisiana, which suffered more damage?
Well well well... another coward makes his exit. Good f'in riddance.
Welcome back Van...missed you on Friday.  Then again Hillary was having a "REALLY BAD DAY" wasn't she.  Not even you could defend her actions/words.  I was so looking for your comment/justifications for:

"What If" a terriost attack, Is that playing the fear card?

"Surge (tatics)is working in some places" in front of VFW, then later surge isn't working

Well welcome back, hope that y
Courtesy of CD, NC (last week):
'Brzezinski Embraces Obama Over Clinton for President

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the most influential foreign-policy experts in the
Democratic Party, threw his support behind Barack
Obama's presidential candidacy, saying the Illinois
senator has a better global grasp than his chief
rival, Hillary Clinton.

Obama ``recognizes that the challenge is a new face, a new sense of direction, a new definition of America's role in the world,'' Brzezinski said in an interview on Bloomberg Television's ``Political Capital with Al Hunt.''
``Obama is clearly more effective and has the upper
hand,'' Brzezinski, who was President Jimmy Carter's
national security adviser, said. ``He has a sense of
what is historically relevant, and what is needed from the United States in relationship to the world.''  Brzezinski, 79, dismissed the notion that Clinton, 59, a New York senator and the wife of former President Bill Clinton, is more seasoned than Obama, 46. ``Being a former first lady doesn't prepare you to be president,'' Brzezinski said.
Clinton's foreign-policy approach is ``very
conventional,'' Brzezinski said. ``I don't think the
country needs to go back to what we had eight years
ago.''

Hillary as first lady was nothing more than a 'glorified housewife' !!!
She was more akin to Edith Bunker than some foreign policy wizard.
Edith Bunker with a philandering Archie ;-)
What foreign policy 'experience' did she gain as 'first lady' ?
That's why nobody asks Barbara Bush or Rosalind Carter to sit on Foreign Policy advisory panels.

`Being a former first lady doesn't prepare you to be president'

Any more than being a cheerleader prepares you to be a quarterback !!

When will the info-tainment industry discover this truth ?
CJ / don't worry hillary won't get the nomination, despite the constant blathering by a few on this blog that only want clinton nominated because of her gender, when objective people look at clinton they see her for what she is, a corporate owned deceptive republican clone, the radical sexist bigot's are few and that's the only dems backing clinton, people are tired of business as usual
Hillary is right again.

She is the best candidate to keep us safe and to defend against the republican attack machine in case of terrorist attack (God forbid). I am sure that statement will help her with the American people, those in the media who hate Hillary and keep looking and hoping for something and anything to bring her down will fail again.

This attempt to make a mountain out of a mole hill will backfire as usual. The mainstream media ignore this attempt by Hillary haters to score a cheap point, they know that there is no story here. Thank you.
Gonzo's resignation is irrelevent. He was just the puppet and there is no reason to believe the policies will change. He needs to be prosecuted and put in jail because that is the only thing that will give the next Attorney General pause before trashing our laws.  At least the Republicans are always telling us that harsh jail sentences are the only way to combat crime.
Since Gonzo has so much trouble remembering, would
he benefit from stem cells?
Z -- what say you?
I'm not saying that it isn't,"Politics as usual", to contradict your rhetoric with your actions...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/26/AR2007082601446.html?hpid=topnews

An, "Old Guy", with a lot of, "Washington Experience", who's, "...been around long enough that he can recognize problems and pitfalls..."

"Pete's very good at looking around the corners of decisions and playing out the implications of them," Obama said an interview when asked about that discussion. "He's been around long enough that he can recognize problems and pitfalls a lot quicker than others can."

Pete Rouse is the Outsider's Insider, a fixer steeped in the ways of a Washington that Obama has been both eager to learn and quick to publicly condemn. The meticulous workaholic rose through three decades of unglamorous legislating to become arguably the most influential Democratic aide in the Senate when he worked for then-Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.).

"His familiarity with Washington makes him somebody whose judgment I trust," Obama said. And yet this is the Washington of "cheap political points" and "petty" partisanship that figures prominently in Obama's public speeches these days. "I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington," Obama tells his audiences. "But I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change."

How many know who is on the Obama campaign staff, and how they compare to the, "insiders", on other candidate's teams?  For all the ,"Kum Bah Yah", talk of new directions and bringing people together, the campaign staffs of all the major candidates are drawn from the same pool of political pros who've been doing this for the past 20 years or more.  Whoever the, "Face", is, the same puppeteers are behind the curtains.

Van
I've said it before, and I guess I'll have to say it again: Why is it a Federal responsibility to rebuild New Orleans?  Did the Federal Government put the city in a swamp that's below sea level to begin with?

A lot of Federal money (I don't know how much, but I know it was a lot [no, not as much as was spent in Iraq, but that's not relevant to anything])has already been spent rebuilding the Gulf Coast after the hurricanes hit.  A lot of what was spent went into rebuilding the levees and dredging the river (two argualbe Federal responsibilities), but an awful lot more was just "lost."  

I don't feel that the Federal Government has any further responsibility to New orleans or to the rest of the Gulf as a result of 2005's storm damage.  It isn't a Federal responsibility to rebuild cities, towns, houses, etc.--that duty belongs to the States and their political subdivisions and to the people themselves.  And under no circumstances does it make sense to put Federal dollars into rebuilding a city that is below sea level in a swamp.  Doing so only invites further disasters.

And, yes, I'd take the same position if my home area was hit with a similar disaster.  The Constitution doesn't apportion responsibility based on where something happens.
Keep it going Van, you are right on everything. Love your posts. Hillary will win and turn this country around for the best.
"...when objective people look at clinton they see her for what she is, a corporate owned deceptive republican clone, the radical sexist bigot's are few and that's the only dems backing clinton..."

Objectivity...some people should look up words before they make themselves look silly...


Van
Hillary's comment about an attack was right on. She's a pragmatist and people should get used to it.

The best thing in the world that could happen to the "fear-mongering" right wing would be an attack. They'd immediately spin it as a sign that terrorists aren't afraid of Democrats.

Hide and watch.
vanreuter, NY NY / I agree hillary and obama are both to entrenched in all that smells in washington, and both are corporate owned entities with no need for the average american citizen, that’s why I will be voting for edwards, the only candidate that has plans that will help all americans not just the wealthy elite, but van it's pretty lame when you have to start stating that other candidates are equally as bad as hillary, but I guess when that’s all you've got that’s all you've got
I hate to break it to you, but the U.S. routinely tells other countries how they should run things.  We are downright bossy with the rest of the world.  But aside from that, you are basing your criticism on a false premise.  Iraq is not a sovereign nation right now.  It's an OCCUPIED nation - occupied by us and the "coalition of the willing."  Granted, we have occupied it to "help" them, but we are still responsible for...hm, pretty much everything, it seems.  We have pumped billions of dollars into Iraq to give them democracy.  If we want to criticize the way that democracy is being handled, then by all means...get to it.  

Well Carrie...you need to tell all of the other Politicians and the world, who have been saying since Iraq's elections (so call) that they are a sovereign country. So are you saying they are the 51st state or are they like Puerto Rico?  Or is this just another attempt to spin an Hillary gaffe?
VAn...you forget the obivious..but as a Clinton supporter that is understandable.  The candidate or the President sets the tone.  You can chose capable people but you tell them how to act  not the other way around and you make sure that they do just that.  Are you referring to Mark Penn ( works for Hillary) who works for Lobby Busters but HRC touts her union support?

So I don't believe Senator Obama is managed by puppeteers behind the scene.  HRC, may be, but again it is politics as usual with her campaign.  She has shown she will say whatever is necesssary depending on who she is in front of (ie VFW).
MK - Who is it that only want Hillary nominated for her gender?  Will you at last answer me?  I think not, because it seems to me that it is you who is obsessed with her gender, not anyone else.  Yes, there are people who think it would be great to have a woman elected president.  I know I do.  That doesn't mean that any of those people think that someone should be president solely because of gender.  

Just out of curiosity, do you say those who support Obama do so only because they want a black man to be president?  I don't think I have seen you say that.  
nuanced ***** The champage is flowing over here,we been parting for hours! Come on over and join in the fun.We got a pin up of Alberto, who is Gonzo on the wall.And we have been re-playing the vidio on Georgie and Gonzo, isn't it a hoot. Yes, I'll take another glass of Don Perion. Gonzo-Gate is not going to go away, we will be talking about this "many" years from now, because prosecutions will take time. There is still is much, much more to follow. I got all the time in the world,cause it isn't going to fade away.
LOOK WHAT THE "REPUBLICANS" ARE DOING IN FLORIDA, MOVING "UP" THE PRIMARY DATE. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MAY THROW OUT ALL DELAGATES, SINCE THIS DATE WAS CHANGED. AND LOOK IN CALIFORNIA, TRYING TO CHANGE THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAME. WAKE UP AMERICA, IT'S A FULL ATTACK ON THE ELECTION SYSTEM AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
So Van what your saying is Senator Obama has Hired Washington INSIDERS, the Same old dirty tricks kinda politicos, the who's who in what to do?
My my I am so dsappointed, I had hoped he was for change and a new direction.  I guess he is just trying his best to be president and will do what ever to get there, then he will change it, right?
I do so want to trust him.
Na Na Na Na

Na Na Na Na

Gonzales

Good Bye

Z -- thanks for the Champagne, I'm ready for a refill. Great party!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=333807

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google