ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Clinton at the Armstrong forum

Posted: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:47 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
Clinton was the first presidential candidate to speak at the LIVESTRONG presidential cancer forum, moderated by Lance Armstrong and MSNBC's Chris Matthews. Clinton, Edwards, Richardson, and Kucinich were the only Democrats who attended the forum today -- and Brownback and Huckabee are the only two to attend the Republican forum tomorrow. As he did on Meet the Press yesterday, Armstrong expressed his disappointment that other candidates chose not to attend. "It is my belief, like a lot of other Americans, that the next occupant of the Oval Office must discuss this critical issue with voters," Armstrong said at the beginning of the forum.

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton tells the Livestrong forum the Bush administration has waged a war against science and research.

Matthews asked Clinton about this during her first question -- bringing up Giuliani, McCain, and Obama, all who have a close connection to cancer but didn't attend. Clinton did not attack either Obama or any of her potential GOP opponents, but instead promised to renew Nixon's "war on cancer," making it one of her "big goals." She  brought up her universal health-care plan (which she will reportedly unveil next month) several times, tying it in to her war on cancer answer. "The big goal of the war against cancer has to be fit into the absolute essential goal of quality affordable health care, universal health care for every single American," Clinton said. "You cannot do one without the other, and we need to do both, and I intend to."
 
Clinton earned her largest applause for calling an end to President Bush's "war against science." "The president of the United States has been leading an assault on science and research," she said. "The two priorities of this president have been the war in Iraq and tax cuts for the wealthy -- neither of which he's paid for, while he has cut the budget for the National Institute of Health and the National Cancer Institute. At the same time, he has prevented a very strong majority in the Congress and the country from proceeding in an ethical way with stem cell research, which I think holds out promise for certain forms of cancer, and has muzzled government scientists, closed down government websites, refused to allow this country to continue in our governmental capacity -- this inquiry, this freedom of thought, that has made this a great country for so many years."
 
When asked if she agrees with a national ban on smoking, Clinton said yes, but she did not call for federal regulation. Rather, she said localities, counties, and states should ban smoking in public places. Yet she did say that the Food and Drug Administration should regulate tobacco, calling it an "addictive deadly substance."
 
Of note, Clinton referred several times to her nine-point plan to win the war against cancer, but she never articulated the nine steps.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Joyce is really a repub, or its Jerry again.
Joyce - No offense, but obviously you have not been reading First Read very long or very carefully.  Hillary supporters are reguarly insulted and for some reason seem to owe everyone an explanation why they choose to support Hillary.  Bullying?  You are looking at the wrong side of the fence.  

It's ridiculous that people feel the need to belittle others because they support different candidates.  Each of the candidates, Democrat and Republican, have strengths and weaknesses.  Some have more strengths, obviously, and some have more weaknesses.  But not a single one of them is all good or all bad.  People place different priorities on different attributes.  Just because you think what Obama (or whoever "your" candidate is) embodies the best thing doesn't mean that everyone else does...and it certainly doesn't mean that those who are not for your candidate have not given the matter careful thought.  
HMT-MI - My family will vote for any Democrat that wins the primary or caucus----We will not vote for the republican party where it seems everyday another sexual predator,molestor,crooks and liars,NO family values,and corrupt creatures fall off the religous right wagon.


No sterotypes there.  Apparently Billy C. has skipped out of your memory cells?
You know, MK, you are the only one obsessed with Hillary's gender.  Why is that?  I don't see very many other people focused on the fact that she is a female.  You are the one making an issue out of it, all because you don't think there is any other reason to support her.  Well, with all due respect, your opinions and your preferences are not shared by the rest of the world.  So don't be so quick to judge.  
It doesn't matter how you democrats spin Hillary's candidacy. The bottomline, she can't wwin in the general election. Democrats wake up! No candidate can win without independent.

If you refuse the voice of wisdom now, then, you are doom to make the same mistake you made in 2000.
Dawn: why is fighting cancer a federal government responsibility? And yes, my family has been touched, probably more that most, by cancer.
It's, "DOOMED", and Al Gore WON the election in 2000.
Except for that, you're batting 1.000.

So much for, "the voice of wisdom"


Van
vanruter says: "and Al Gore WON the election in 2000."

Of course he did.

Now its time for your bottle, and then your afternoon nap.  And when you get up, we'll let you watch President Gore on the televison.



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=334550

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google