ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Last night's Univision debate

Posted: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:18 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Per NBC's Lauren Appelbaum, in the first presidential debate ever broadcast in Spanish, the issues were not solely focused on Hispanic areas -- as candidates also answered questions on troop withdrawal in Iraq, health care, and education, in addition to questions on immigration and relations with Latin America.
 

The debate was broadcast on Univision, the nation's largest Spanish-language network. Anchors Jorge Ramos and Maria Elena Salinas asked candidates questions in Spanish, which were then translated into English. Each candidate spoke in English -- regardless whether the presidential hopeful speaks Spanish, although Dodd and Richardson (both who are fluent in the language) got in a few lines in Spanish before the moderator reprimanded them. All of the answers were simultaneously translated into Spanish for the Univision audience. English closed captioning enabled English viewers to understand the debate.

Some of the reviews… The New York Times: “The three leading candidates, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois and former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, had especially sharp criticism for leaders of the Republican Party. They expressed concerns that Republicans were enabling anti-immigrant feelings and even racist attitudes, or at least not taking a tougher stand against them.”

The AP: “In the first presidential debate ever broadcast in Spanish, the protracted war in Iraq competed for attention with the swirling argument over immigration.”

The format itself didn't get great reviews. The Miami Herald: "No major gaffes occurred, but the on-air translation of the candidates' answers into Spanish was spotty at times. 'It detracted tremendously from the quality of the debate,' said Eduardo Gamarra, director of the Center for Latin American and Caribbean studies at Florida International University. Gamarra, who led a focus group of 19 young Hispanic Democrats who watched the debate, also criticized the candidates for giving vague responses.”

By the way, don't forget to check the ratings on this forum. Univision gets big numbers in certain markets (including Miami and L.A.). Don't be surprised if Univision nabs more viewers for this debate than some that have appeared on cable.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

KUCINICH is always a crowd favorite! :D
he killed this debate.
Jerry, is that what you call the language that you speak???? I thought it was a dialect called American Redneck.
--------------------------
After you have lived here a few years, you will discover it is simply one of the many dialects of the citizens of this country.  Then too.. you will discover there are many dialects of Spanish.

The role of Government in the United States is to find out what the people what, and get that job done.  The Democratic Presidential Canidates ignore that, and suggest the fact that the people of this country do NOT want to pay the enormous cost of keeping the illegal aliens is racist in nature.  That bodes very poorly for the future since racism *cannot* be a factor and the Democratic Presidential Canidates don't know that.

It doesn't matter though.  The people of this country want the incrediable expense of the illegal aliens removed from their taxes and local governments have gotten the message in capital letters.  Clearly, the National Democratic Party feels they are much better than the common people, and ignore that message.  The Republicans have not, and we see a very enlightened Republican Party moving to represent the people in this issue.. and many others.

By the way... who *is* running for the Democratic Party Presidential Nomination?
MSNBC has barred Mike Gravel from participating in the Oct.30 debate to be held in Phila. because he hasn't raised 1 million dollars.  I don't remember anything in our constitution saying a presidential contender had to raise a predetermined amount of money in order to run for the Presidency.  MSNBC certainly can't include every Tom, Dick and Jane who wants to participate but Senator Gravel has national credentials and has served our country well in the past.

Mike Gravel has earned the right to be included in this debate.  He spent 12 years in the Senate, is the person most responsible for pushing to end the draft, and entered the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional Record so they wouldn't be buried.  The man is a patriot -but MSNBC has barred him from being heard.  Furthermore, how can a serious candidate possibly raise money when he/she can't speak in a public forum.  Do you think this has anything to do with Gravel's dispute with GE, MSNBC's parent company?  SHAME ON YOU MSNBC!!  You're losing credibility.  Don't go the way of FOX!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=353237

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google