ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Oh-eight (D): The Hillary filibuster

Posted: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:07 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

CLINTON: The New York senator hit all the Sunday morning shows yesterday, including NBC’s Meet the Press. The Washington Post says that she “demonstrated a particularly senatorial skill: the art of the filibuster… Above all, though, in a morning of appearances that yielded virtually no news, Clinton illustrated her ability to talk. And talk. And talk.” 

The New York Daily News called it “TV’s Tour de Hillary.” On Meet the Press, Clinton touted her ability to withstand Republicans’ “withering attacks.” “I think I've proven that I not only can survive them but surpass them," she said. 
 

The Sunday New York Times had a CW-setting piece about Clinton's place in the campaign. "She has been challenged for fund-raising supremacy and news media attention by Senator Barack Obama of Illinois. Former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina beat her to the punch in introducing big policy proposals. But nothing that her main rivals have done has so far has derailed Mrs. Clinton, leading them to begin rolling out aggressive new strategies aimed primarily at her, including courting black voters in South Carolina and stepping up attacks."

In particular, here are two key quotes from Clinton foes… David Axelrod with Obama: “The question is ultimately, Is she credible -- whether people buy her as an agent of change in Washington. If they do, she’ll do well.” Joe Trippi with Edwards: “You used to be able to say the front-runners -- her and Obama -- but I don’t think that’s the case anymore. It’s pretty clear that she has sort of pulled away.”

Also: "The three leading contenders have also adopted decidedly different views of how the race will play out. Mrs. Clinton’s advisers argued that it would probably end on Feb. 5 when about 20 states vote. Though only 50 percent of the delegates will be selected by that day, the Clinton advisers suggested that one candidate would be so far ahead that there would be huge pressure on the other Democrats to rally around the leader.

Mr. Obama has begun preparing for a much more protracted campaign, arguing that it will be in effect a hunt for delegates that could last well into the spring. To that end, he is competing in some unlikely places — New York, for example, where he is holding a rally in Washington Square Park on Thursday — because under Democratic rules, delegates are allocated to candidates based on the percentage of votes they win."

How confident is Clinton? She's missing far fewer Senate votes than Obama.

Speaking of being the front-runner, Clinton can now dangle the VP slot as a way to win more endorsements. Add Evan Bayh -- who is endorsing Clinton today -- to the short list.

The Sunday Washington Post looked at the influence of Clinton's mother on the candidate. "14 years after Hillary Clinton entered the White House with her husband and became known worldwide, the woman she identified as her most enduring influence remains a mystery. Clinton, who famously kept her own daughter, Chelsea, out of the public eye, is even more protective of her mother. No interviews with her or photographs -- and no interviews with Clinton on the subject."

John Grisham headlined a fundraiser with Clinton in Charlottesville, VA on Sunday. The Charlottesville Daily Progress reports the event drew 1,000 people and raised $200,000.

DODD: The Connecticut senator gets the front-page treatment in the New York Times, which notes that his presidential bid is “is the most public chapter in his career-long quest for his father’s redemption.” Dodd’s father was censured by the Senate in 1967 for diverting campaign funds for his personal use.

EDWARDS: Today, at Kaiser Family Foundation's Health Care Forum, Edwards will unveil a new strategy to combat AIDS/HIV. As his campaign likes to point out, Edwards was the first presidential candidate to roll out a health-care plan. Today, his campaign notes, he builds on that plan with specific proposals to combat HIV/AIDS at home and around the world. "The loss from HIV/AIDS is almost beyond understanding,” Edwards is expected to say today. “This is a fight for people's lives. We have a moral imperative to do much more, and do it much better.”

OBAMA: The campaign holds a conference call with reporters at 10:00 am ET to make an Iowa-related announcement.

Doesn't Obama ask for coverage like this when he rails against Clinton's ties to lobbyists? The Boston Globe takes a look at Obama's ties to Illinois lobbyists.

The campaign plans to hold a major campaign event on Thursday in New York City, flexing its muscle a bit on Clinton’s turf. Also of note: There's a "Barack on Broadway" fundraiser set for tonight in New York.

The Columbia State’s Lee Bandy on Obama’s chances in South Carolina: “In South Carolina, Obama has put together a high-tech and grass-roots get-out-the-vote campaign unmatched by anything seen in the state before. Obama is organized in all 46 counties. Much goes on outside of the public eye or, as campaign organizers are fond of saying, below the radar.”

In addition, Sunday’s Columbia State says it “stands by its reporting as accurate” that Jesse Jackson said Obama was “acting like he’s white” because of a tepid response to the “Jena Six” case. The paper wraps what its coverage with what it calls “The Jesse Jackson fallout.”

Chicago Sun-Times' Sweet examines the most recent memo from manager David Plouffe, and notes how he attempts to raise the expectations bar in Iowa for Clinton. Also, don't miss Sweet's reporting on the SEIU endorsement. Apparently, Edwards won a plurality in the straw poll.

Meanwhile, NBC/National Journal’s Carrie Dann tells us to mark our calendars on Oct. 2 for Obama to commemorate his own five-year anniversary of his giving his first anti-Iraq war speech.

Dann also watches local Iowa TV so you don't have to. On Friday's edition of Iowa Press (Midwestern cousin of MTP -- a TV bible for newbie Iowa politicos and reporters), it was clear that the CW among the long-time gurus is that Hillary Clinton is in a solid place here in the state. The Register's Yepsen said that Edwards is "kind of flat," and we already know how he feels about Barack Obama from his "big loser" column last week. The AP's Mike Glover also made the somewhat brutal assessment that  "there is a tradition among Democrats that they shoot their wounded," meaning that Edwards might suffer from a damaged-goods syndrome left over from 2004. Yepsen sees a lean towards Clinton now, but he acknowledged on the show that it looks like the race "could break late."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary will be our next president-for 8 yrs. She will be even better than her husband. Go Hillary!
Do not overestimate Clinton.  You guys are so anxious for a Hillary coronation you are overplaying your hand. it is the middle of Sept.  You expect instant impact.  This is a marathon and no one is going to jump just because you guys are bored.
Do not underestimate Obama or Edwards.  there is plenty going on under the radar and nothing is going to happen right this instant.
If the 24 cycle demands so much, why doesn't the media do something like doing indepth looks at issues and the candidates instead of snap snap.
Dann also watches local Iowa TV so you don't have to. On Friday's edition of Iowa Press (Midwestern cousin of MTP -- a TV bible for newbie Iowa politicos and reporters), it was clear that the CW among the long-time gurus is that Hillary Clinton is in a solid place here in the state. The Register's Yepsen said that Edwards is "kind of flat," and we already know how he feels about Barack Obama from his "big loser" column last week. The AP's Mike Glover also made the somewhat

And I would trust YOUR analysis WHY......

How confident is Clinton? She's missing far fewer Senate votes than Obama.

Maybe its because she is OLD ( traveling gets to you after awhile)

How confident is Clinton? She's missing far fewer Senate votes than Obama.

Nothing new he stated it long ago.  he has always said "they had a seat at the table just not all the chairs"

In addition, Sunday’s Columbia State says it “stands by its reporting as accurate” that Jesse Jackson said Obama was “acting like he’s white” because of a tepid response to the “Jena Six” case. The paper wraps what its coverage with what it calls “The Jesse Jackson fallout.”

I've always been curious,  If Jackson said this why NO one else has come forward to say they heard it too!!!

I prefer to listen and read ( and corrected your slanted analysis) for myself.  Thank you very much.
By the time election day gets here,  the old hag will be a worn out Washington Paper Hanging hag. We are already sick Of her , wait till you start pukeing on your keep board!
Like the Tortoise and the Hare. Speed breeds blinded ambition. The slow and steady win the race. Never doubt the obvious. Clinton is a fad, and she will fade away eventually. Don't overestimate 'over confidence', it is sure sign of failure.
Seems to me Hillary is growing stronger as her attacks increase, just like her husband. She was quite impressive during her interviews and is intelligent and tough and sounds ready to run our country to me. Shes one of those folks that is powerful, yet openminded and doesn't take crap from anybody. Can't wait til election day.
You are doing a great injustice to count out Senator Obama. Obama is a very smart, charismatic individual who has been consistent in this race.I was a Clinton supporter but with her vote on that, on top of her mimicking the healthcare policy of Edwards and Obama, her continually changing her mind to fit her audience, it is really get ridiculous.
I don't really know what ideas she has b/c she just says what people want to hear!! And her branding her experience, if she is counting being first lady and being privy to her husbands ideas then heck, I guess we need to hold off and wait for Monica Lewinsky's entry to the race b/c looks to me like he shared more information with her than he did his wife.
The Clinton's were scum bags then & they're scum bags still.
Obama is a great person but is not ready to take on the viciousness of the republican smear machine. Sad, but true and that is our political situation now, thanks to the repubs. Vote democratic.
"I think I've proven that I not only can survive them but surpass them."

I thought the Republicans beat her in the 90s. Maybe she meant the fact that she got elected to the Senate in a blue state with the last name of Clinton. That really showed those nasty Republicans. Or maybe she meant all of the key legislation she has passed in the Senate.

Side note: I wonder how many people there are out there who aren't really paying attention and hear that Clinton is running and think that it is Bill who is running again. They have to be out there, I know it.
I think clinton will be better choice pluse she will have support from bill clinton not like BUSH and BUSH we had. Its hard to say he is real man with his giggle :P
Aslam
http://www.diabeticcorner.com
I second what Susan just said! (10:22)
Vote Democratic would be like going to a circus. The clowns with their red noses caused from getting too close to the real ass while kissing ass, white faces caused from being a professional liar, big shoes , a sign of empty ego, baggy clothes, used to hide their Washington Paper Hanging self serving agenda's.

Well , bring on the Elephants, there is the same shit again.

Is the a leader who wants the office of the President??? Step foward!!!!!!
AMC- ANYONE BUT CLINTON, but not obama
Obama is my choice!!  I am so sick of hearing about Hillary.  I think the press are over-estimating her popularity because they want to see a showdown between Hillary and the Republican candidate.  We need better press coverage with less spin from everyone.  Obama can bring this country together.  That is what we need.  No more polarizing figures who will divide and keep dividing this country. Go Obama.
I think its don't UNDERESTIMATE Clinton is what you wanted to say. The Clintons must never be underestimated. Thats what drives the repubs out of their skulls.
What has the Past taught us About the Clintons.

He was a small town hick, a perverted sick sexual addict, kissed who ever's ass which would move him up the chain, A trained liar ""good for his ego".

She was what? and today what? She does ride the coat tails of those who have alwways scorned what America is. She has so much Hidden agenda , no one knows what will come out of those baggy suits she wares, and it realy is meaningless to console your my over how stupid act to a fad. In today and gone tomorrow. Her candle burned out when she teamed with a dog and a liar..

But isn't that what Washington Paper Hangers have for a resume???
David Yepsen is held up by the national media as Iowa's all knowing political sage. Yepsen, is employed by the state's most respected and largest newspaper, but his political prognosticating record is nothing to brag about. In the early summer of 04 he wrote several columns that Iowa was safe for Kerry, that Bush shouldn't waste his time campaigning in the state because he had no chance etc. Guess what Bush won Iowa. Until very close to the 06 election he (and many others) thought Jim Nussle would be Iowa's next Governor. Nussle lost to Culver by over 100,000 votes.  In 04 he did not hedge his bets and say a Kerry upset was possible (not likely- he didn't predict it) until after the Register's poll released two days before the caucus. And after Kerry trounced  Dean and Gephardt, and Edwards finished a strong second, Yepsen was the first to claim that the reason Dean and Gephardt did poorly was because Iowans rejected their late negative campaign attacks. There was no basis for that opinion, it was his guess (and a poor one at that) and the national media hung on to it as gospel. It had no basis in fact. And it is now the "official reason" for the down fall of Dean and Gephardt in Iowa! In 04 (and again today)the media believed the Iowa polls, even though they should have known you can't predict caucus results based upon polling random registered Democrats, because of the inherent problems in obtaining a proper polling sample in  a caucus versus a primary or general election. Yepsen failed to notice prior to the caucus how few Gephardt supporters in 88 were supporting him in 04. That should have been a major warning that his support in Iowa was weak. It went unnoticed by the "God of Iowa politics". The real story behind Gephardt's  Iowa showing is in his failure to retain a large segment of his 88 supporters. (we aren't just talking about a few people, were talking about people with leadership positions in  his 88 campaign) Gephardt had little support among Iowa caucus goers, because he was the wars biggest cheerleader. That was his problem, and it existed through out the race, not something that was just discovered by us in December of 03. He polled well because of name recognition (which is what happens when your polling sample is of random registered Democrats which includes up to 80% non-caucus going democrats), and because he is well liked, but activist knew he helped draft, and push through the war resolution, he was seen as in bed with the WH. His pro- war ads hurt him more than any negative ad against him, or that he launched. Activists ( a large % of caucus goers) weren't supporting him at any time in the campaign.  Dean was never the front runner he was built up to be. He had the largest number of committed supporters until late December, when undecided caucus goers started to decide. But what Yepsen failed to understand (and the national media because they buy into Yepsen as the expert)is that Dean's support did not grow in any measurable amount from August on. Why when he was getting so much coverage (close to Clinton coverage today)did he not gain additional support. If you asked his volunteers from the fall of 03 you'd find out there was a large amount of(almost overwhelming)"anyone but Dean" sentiment among caucus goers. (similar to the ABC factor today "anyone but Clinton") They had rejected Dean (long before the negative ads), but hadn't decided  between the remaining candidates.

It is possible that Clinton could win Iowa, I wouldn't place any money on it. It is just as likely that she could do no better than Gephardt did in 04 (4th) but I wouldn't put money on that. I would be willing to bet a months wage that she finishes between those two places.
Oh, Crystal whoever you are, I'm not sure what's your breakfast but you must be one of those whose brain that was affected by o-zone layer. You're disgusted. If you would like to express comments and do it in a professional way. I bet you had more degrading experience.  
I saw Hillary Clinton interviewed by FOX's Chris Wallace on YouTube. She was incredibly persuasive in that interview, bright, strong, articulate, a real leader. I could see her as President. Funny how a hostile interviewer can bring out the best in a candidate. (Don't get mad. I can also see Obama, Edwards, Dodd, Biden and Richardson as President!)Go Dems!
Straightup so make up your mind already and get off the stinken fence. who is it you are leaning toward voting?quit crying and make up your mind.
I love you Mrs. Clinton!!!!
Diane – Do not overestimate Hillary?  The ground is littered with people who underestimated her – remember how we were told repeatedly that she could never be elected to a US senate seat from a state she never lived in?

My favorite post from the haters is the one identifying Hillary as a “fad”.  She’s been the most famous woman in the world for continuous 15 years – hardly a “fad” by any definition.

She will be the nominee and anyone who underestimates how strong and smart she will be as our candidate obviously knows little about her and her history.
I greatly respect Sen. Clinton, I am from Brooklyn and have watched her career from a far, I believe that for the times in which we live today we need a President that can build a new majority in the House as well as the Senate. The Clintons do a fabulous job of getting themselves elected, but have a proven track record of losing the congress. These next two election in 08 and in 2010 are two important to us to allow the Clintons to set us up for failure again. After all it was becuase of their mis-deeds that we lost the congress in 94, we cant let that happen again.
Amy - I saw Hillary Clinton interviewed by FOX's Chris Wallace on YouTube. She was incredibly persuasive in that interview, bright, strong, articulate, a real leader.

=====

Did Hillary keep shaking her head throughout the interview and cackle with laughter when asked about her vote to approve the war?
Crystal // I guess we need to hold off and wait for Monica Lewinsky's entry to the race b/c looks to me like he shared more information with her than he did his wife. //

Seems you are not aware that Bill Clinton is not running for President. It is Hillary.

Also, I believe the Republicans have the market cornered on sex. See former Rep.Mark Foley, former Rep. Kolbe, Sen. David Vitter, Sen. Larry Craig and of course Rev. Ted Haggard
They also have the market covered on sleaze. See Jack Abramoff, Randy “Duke” Cunningham and Sen. Ted Stevens.
Sometimes I wonder how some people on here would respond if, for 15+ years, nearly every single move they made and word they uttered was critiqued by the press, by the politicians and by the public.  How would you respond if your private marital troubles became fodder for the tabloids?  How would you respond if each and every one of your personal accomplishments were challenged, over and over?  How would you respond if your character was assassinated in print, day after day, month after month, year after year?  

I doubt many people would have responded with as much grace as Hillary has.  I don't know if she is the best candidate for president, but I know one thing for sure - Hillary is a fighter, and she is as tough as they come.  She's had to be.
Hillary is a winner and they(the republicans) cant stand it that the Democrats have a politician that can complete a whole sentence. Could you imagine another 4 years with W. Or any other out of touch ignorant Republican. Get it grip this time America vote for intelligence with intelligence.
Great post Crystal and crystal clear.
WOW Senator Clinton was awesome this weekend.
Even David Brooks the repuke reporter was impressed he said she was Presidential, he said it 5 times!!!!
Hillary is a winner and they(the republicans) cant stand it that the Democrats have a politician that can complete a whole sentence. Could you imagine another 4 years with W. Or any other out of touch ignorant Republican. Get it grip this time America vote for intelligence with intelligence.
I am dismayed that the serious reflections of Senator Clinto were reduced to the mindless mantra which have served to vilify her. I would have wished for a measured response to what she actually said and refutations based upon public documents from the Congress or a gaff which she might have made on the stump. Short of that,the litany of comments appearing in your article are simply unfortunate remarks wanting for substance.
csh, IL / you say clinton is 'strong and smart' but most people think she comes across as disingenuous and dishonest, I don't believe most people hate hillary they just see her for what she is and believe better choices are available
If Hillary can't keep her own man faithful and then lies for him when confronted over his sex escapades, why would anyone think she would be able to have loyalty from her staff, cabinet, or anyone else....and would she also lie to protect them????PLEASE.....learn how to keep your 'ol man's weapon where it should be before you think you can be in charge of our military!
If Hillary can't keep her own man faithful and then lies for him when confronted over his sex escapades, why would anyone think she would be able to have loyalty from her staff, cabinet, or anyone else....and would she also lie to protect them????PLEASE.....learn how to keep your 'ol man's weapon where it should be before you think you can be in charge of our military!
Those who say they want a "CLINTON" back in the White House are either naive, blind, or forgetful. Those who don't see that she has no business experiance, nothing more than a coat-tail to hang on to, and a self righteous indulgant dream of illusionary lies made from  huge errors in judgement better get their head on straight. You got time, just do it.
No, MK you are the one being dishonest. You hate her for being a strong female. Fess up. Disengenuous and dishonest? I think not.
So it sounds like the little woman Hillary is scaring the crapola out of the many insecure and "Im ascared of girls cuz I'll get cooties" crowd- dem and independent and repub males in the USA.
I wish folks would get off the "lobbiest money" train.  If more people would watch C-Span and not other so called news networks, they would see that there are hundreds of "lobbiest's" that work for issues that affect millions of Americans' like affordable healthcare, consumer protections from dangerous foods to lead based paints on kids toys.  All lobbiests are not fighting for the same things.  I agree that they all have too much access to Congress with ability for person to person meetings but I would wager that every American has benefited in the last 30 years from some lobbying group.  As for the sincerity of Ms. Clinton explaining her vote for the authorization to go to war.  Memories seem to be lacking here...does anyone beside me remember the talk of "mushroom clouds" by everyone including Ms. Rice, Mr. Cheney, Mr. Bush as often and publicly as was possible.  Those messges being delivered by the administration scared the bejesus out of me, having lived in Tampa (SAC Command) during the Cuban Missle Crisis.  We would have4 been a first strike city.  I would've voted the same way given the info
given to Congress.  
Until she says the magic words, "The vote to give the President the authority to attack Iraq was a mistake", she will not get my vote, my wife's vote, my three daughter's vote, my two son's vote (yes they are all over the age of 18), their spouse's votes, and anybody else that I can influence, family members, Booster Club where I serve as president, city-wide youth football league where I serve as VP, Sunday School Men's Class that I teach, etc. In the mean time it's Obama. And Edwards is my second choice. The reality is that while she leads in polls, the majority of her support is lukewarm. Which means when we get into the thick of things funny things can and will happen. If she is the nominee it is likely to hurt our chances to maintain/increase control of Congress. The Clintons are divisive and we will have to replay all the "Stuff" we went through in the nineties. Sorry, Ain't drinking the Kool-Aid yet.
MK - I disagree.  I think most people's image of Hillary is based on the consistent criticism she has received for the last 15 years.  I know many people who are quick to say Hillary is a bitch and Hillary is this or that, but when pressed to give specifics, they can't.  I'm not sure people put aside their preconceived notions of what Hillary is about and actually judge her on who she is now and what she offers now, rather than who she was when she first entered the White House.  
This Democrat will never under any circumstances vote for Hillary.  Who she is running against is irrelevant; with all due respect to Mr. Obama, Hillary is Bush III not Bush-lite.

The current popularity of Hillary among Democrats proves only one thing:  that Democrats continue to be addicted to losing.  Maybe nominating Edwards scares Democrats because watching the public overwhelmingly elect a Dem with HUGE coattails would force us to confront our own failed philosophy of a moronic American public.

Kendall: "Did Hillary keep shaking her head throughout the interview and cackle with laughter when asked about her vote to approve the war?"

No, but she did answer his questions about her vote in a manner I found acceptable. You want to hold Hillary Clinton, first term Democratic Senator and wife of Republican hated Bill accountable for not being able to stop George Bush and the accendant Republicans? I was at a pre-invasion protest rally and I was surrounded by young people and very old people in tie-dye and Birkenstocks, but no middle class guys in suits or ladies in heels. The American people need to own up to the authoritarian streak that caused them to support Bush. Hillary would have been committing political hari kari to vote against the war; remember Dean? And how's Kuscinach doing in the polls?
To all the knee-jerking Hillary-haters posting to this blogg, I have one thing to say: "There you go again!" -R. Reagan, pres. debates with J. Carter.
Democrats will be making the biggest mistake of their life if they nominate Clinton. It seems most HRC supporter are so infactuated with the name "Clinton". Can't you guys think for a moment by your self instead of listening to buch of pundicts.

This alone is a winning formula for the republican Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush- ????. If you democrats think this won't play out in the general election, think again.

If she win the nomination(which i doubt), the republican candidate will beat her 100%. This is no UK, Spain and France where monarchy rules. This is United State of America. I want to be free from Bush-Clinton Dynasty.
Dennis Chavez:  '..Could you imagine another 4 years with W. Or any other out of touch ignorant Republican......'

Dennis, that's what you'll get if you vote for Hillary !!  
Hillary and her husband are 'Republican lite'.
They support NAFTA, 'free trade' (sic), out sourcing, WTO and sending our jobs overseas.

We can do better, Dennis !!

Hillary is well programmed.
But, she's apparently afraid to take unfiltered questions in Iowa.
Why is that, Dennis ?
What is she afraid of ?
This sounds like a Bush/Rove technique, doesn't it, Dennis ?

Obama/Edwards '08
TURN THE PAGE
It is becoming increasingly clear that Hilary is the Democrat's only reasonable choice for the general election.  Obama's problem is lack of experience.  The reality of that problem has become apparent several times during the campaign.  As he has struggled to improve his position, Edwards has increasingly looked like a demagogue.  Hilary has needed to make some compromises with the left.  But increasingly she looks like someone who can lead the country.
MSNBC is a BIAS network.  They are a PRO-Hiliary network.  Just look how they report.  She was chewed up and exposed on the Meet The Press interview.  They brought things that no other Hiliary Pundent has.  They exposed her for not only being for the WAR but for voting against any legislation that would have prevented this in the beginning.  She also lied when she said she voted to CONDEMN Move-on.org.  She also invested in Contractors in Iraq and stoped once she decided to run for President to avoid a conflict in interest.  (This is the SAME WAR that she was against.) You have to do more research before you vote.  If you go by MSNBC or CNN, you will be sorry.  They are NO better than FOX.  In regard to the polls, they are false.  Most of these polls, both DEM and REP, do not include all the candidates.  When they call, they give you a limited selection.  This is why RON PAUL, Dennis K. and other barely register national yet win most the the debates and straw polls.  I will bring this up as a question on the YOU-TUBE debate, but it is a shame.  This is the type of Democracy that we are trying to imposed on other countries?  IT's time to WAKE UP.  
If it's true that the SEIU Dems gave the nod to Edwards in a straw poll following last weeks audition, then that is bad news for Hillary and Obama. The more you try to suppress, the more tenacious they become and harder to deny. Watch out folks. The Clintonistas pushed the panic button and hit all the talk shows because of the Hsu Scandal. Not even God can convince me to the contrary.
Extremely proud of Senator Clinton, and looking forward to calling her Madame President. She is a trailblazer for women everywhere. Her confidence visibly grows each day. How exciting to be living in these interesting times when I woman will finally be elected President. Also I will take no small amount of delight at watching RWW's heads explode when Bill moves back into the White House.
I am so "done" with both parties.  I don't want spin from either side.  I want evidence-based government with reasoned, unemotional, transparent decisionmaking.  Check out http://www.policyhub.gov.uk/downloads/JerryLeeLecture1202041.pdf.  It just might be possible!!!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=376385

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google