ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



More on yesterday's debate

Posted: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:25 AM by Mark Murray

The big change between this GOP debate and the previous ones: the intensity of the spin between the top three campaigns. By our count:
-- Romney’s camp sent 17 debate related emails with all of their attack emails aimed at Giuliani.
-- Giuliani’s sent 14 debate related emails, half of them either attacking Romney or Thompson.
-- Thompson’s sent 15 emails, half of them either attacking Romney or Rudy.

“On a day when stock indexes hit record highs, Republican presidential candidates gathered here Tuesday for a group defense of low taxes and free markets and warned that Democrats, particularly Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, pose the greatest danger to the nation's future prosperity,” the Washington Post says.

The New York Times notes that Giuliani and Romney “tangled over taxes and government spending yesterday as the Republican presidential candidates debated in Michigan, highlighting the way in which their increasingly fierce confrontation is starting to dominate the race for their party’s nomination… Mr. Thompson often found himself a bystander as Mr. Giuliani and Mr. Romney attacked each another — or, just as frequently, went after Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, reflecting Republicans’ expectation of a general election contest against Mrs. Clinton, who is leading in polls of the Democratic candidates.”

The Wall Street Journal: “Of all the forums to date, this one featured the most direct confrontation yet between Messrs. Giuliani and Romney -- over their respective fiscal records, and over who best could take on Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton.”

USA Today adds: “Taxes and spending were at the heart of the Romney-Giuliani argument over who is a true fiscal conservative. The two threw conflicting statistics at each other then faced off over the line-item veto, which lets governors cut specific items from a budget.”

CBN's Brody: "Fred Thompson may have been the buzz candidate coming in and he held up well but Mitt Romney was as sharp as he’s ever been tonight. It was Mitt Romney's night… Thompson’s performance was measured and pretty strong. He spoke faster which helped him appear more in control and presidential. He didn’t offer up a whole lot of specifics but he did answer questions directly and forcefully… Mitt Romney is truly a human power point presentation …and I say that in a very positive way."

AmSpec's Jennifer Rubin: "Romney's ‘ask the lawyers’ will perpetuate the sense he is not tough enough, confident enough in a post 9-11 world. And someone will have to explain why he thought the line item veto was a winner…  McCain was sober and steady but didn't shine... Huckabee suffered from the extra body on stage… Rudy is a prepared and confident debater. He won the dust up with Romney and his HillaryCare jibe reminded us (as if he would let a day go by without a reminder) there is no one better at Hillary bashing."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

to: Mike Neely, Rochester, Pennsylvani

Bravo to you for your wonderful post.  I wish I had written those words.  Ron Paul for America, Ron Paul for President!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks again Mike Neely you made my day.
Lets call this a test. I have just viewed the results of the MSNBC Republican Presidential Debate opinion polls and only one canidate has overwhelmingly been selected as the people's choice.  He is congressman Ron Paul. Will MSNBC refer to these results when further reporting on the debate or will they ignore their very own website polls? Why is it that the online community's collective opinion of a presidential canidate is scoffed at by mainstream media and disregarded as irrelevant, yet these same media corporations invest many millions of dollars to know our opinions when it comes to what we think of their products? Why such a difference of treatment of opinion? The reason is due to how we as a collective are valued by corporate interests,mostly as potential consumers of a product and not so much as contributing voices in a free republic.    
Ron Paul supporters are not plants, or planted.  But because he provides light like no-one has for many years, they are passionate.  And as they don't have the mountains of wasted corrupt money behind them, are probably just much harder working - recognizing the difference Ron Paul could make.  Truth and light presented with sincerity in the face of much opposition is very inspiring & motivating.    He may not even need to get elected - the main thing is to get the people informed.  There are major problems brewing everywhere.  The ecomony is teetering on a foundation of bamboo.  He probably is not really wanting to be President, but just following the light within him.  
Its all about Fred! NOT!!! Nobody cares about the media's sponsered puppets. Why isn't the attention focused on real candidates like Ron Paul? Did he not pay them off or something?
Can a moderator respond to me as to why my comment given Wed. night has not been posted?  I adhered to all constraints, used appropriate language and was not attacking any comments of others.
Hi Debbie, friendly give and take here, thanks. You are right, these are just opinions and we are entitled to them.
I lived in NYC half my life and was working in the city while he was the mayor. My concerns lie with his unwillingness or inability to corrall an out-of-control NYPD that resulted in unnecessary deaths and immeasurable human rights violations. I don't understand why he is given such great credit for helping the city and country get back on its feet after 9/11. While I gotta hand it to him for delivering some powerful speeches in the aftermath of the attack, especially when compared to those of the president or the nitwit governor, that's all they were - speeches. It seemed that his biggest concern was jump starting the NYC tourism industry again. How does this make him the GOP's leading expert on homeland security? His taking such great credit for the reduction in crime in the city is also dishonest, given that similar reductions were occurring throughout the entire country. His suggestion that own his term be extended was also a red flag. When you strip away his 9/11 "credentials", what's left? A liberal who turned conservative once he was out of office in a liberal city. And I would suggest he is the leading candidate because the rest of the republican field is not so great, and because he is beginning to run an effective campaign against Clinton.
Hmm. The ''real candidate'' Ron Paul is now being supported by the American Nazi Party. Strange company you Paulians are keeping.

www.stormfront.org- The National White Socialists.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=404984

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google