ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Is Gore thinking about 2008?

Posted: Friday, October 12, 2007 9:18 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

It doesn’t seem like it. Reuters writes that “advisers say he is showing no signs of interest in the 2008 race… Long-time adviser Carter Eskew said he talks to Gore about once a week. ‘I don't think he's going to run,’ said Eskew. ‘He has said technically he hasn't ruled it out. But I can tell you he's making no moves and no sounds to indicate to me that he's going to run.’”

MSNBC.com’s Tom Curry adds that “the record of the American politicians who have won the Peace Prize since it was first handed out in 1901 shows that if you win, it’s an indication that your peak has passed. Theodore Roosevelt, the one American Peace Prize winner who tried to stage a political comeback, failed.”

More: “The list of previous American winners is dominated by politicians and statesmen whose careers in public office had ended or were soon to end: Jimmy Carter in 2002, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1973, former Secretary of State George Marshall in 1953, and Vice President Charles G. Dawes in 1925.”

As for the Gore endorsement primary, score a minor victory to Edwards, who was the first campaign -- at 5:17 am ET! -- out with a statement of congratulations. “Congratulations to Al Gore,” Edwards said in it. “The Nobel Peace Prize rewards three decades of Vice President Gore’s prescient and compelling – and often lonely – advocacy for the future of the Earth.  His leadership stands in stunning contrast to the failure of the current administration to pursue policies that would reduce the harm of global warming.”

And Clinton now offers congratulations on her campaign Web site.

Obama was the last of the Dem front-runners to put out a statement: "By having the courage to challenge the skeptics in Washington and lead on the climate crisis facing our planet, Al Gore has advanced the cause of peace and richly deserves this reward,” he said. “His voice and his vision have awakened the conscience of America to the urgency of this threat, and now we must take bold action so that our children inherit a planet that is cleaner, safer, and more peaceful for generations to come.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

NO! The Media thinks he is thinking of 2008. The Media is thinking he is thinking what they are thinking! Do not over think it Media!
This can't happen.  All the hot air produced by Hillary and Al's blabbering would warm the planet.
He could not win the democratic primaries, his best bet is to keep harping on global warming!
I hope so.
Why would be bother to subject himself again to the combination marathon/meat grinder that is a presidential campaign?  Why would he subject himself to having pundits recycle the same old lies that, "Al Gore claims to have invented the internet!"  He never made that claim, but that never stopped the noise machine from spewing it over and over again like some ill individual contending with a prolonged bout of projectile vomiting.  If he decides to run again, THAT might well make me question his judgment.
WOW 11 stories about Gore on your political page.  I wonder were Republicans get the idea that the media is biased. Please I really don't want to watch C-Span to get my political news, but you may be forcing my hand.
Al Gore did invent the internet, and the voices in his head tell him he can save the world from his Tennessee mansion as long as he continues to wrap his head with aluminum foil before he goes to bed at night.
Is it really a surprise that the response that took the longest was the only one that you can actually tell was written by the candidate?
i would like to see Al run, after all this is sport and i think Al would win by a land slide. there are a lot of backward idiots from fox here posting so i think i will go to fox and post a while. Rick
A Gore campaign would certainly be interesting.  It would almost surely turn into a debate on the accuracy of his claims for global warming. (Other recent news: a judge in England ruled that a number of the claims in Gore's movie are factually insupportable) A Gore candidacy would place all of his claims on the line -- win, lose or draw.  Mr. Gore must decide whether he will put his cause into play in a forum which has demonstrated in the past a marked inability to separate fact from hyperbole.
Sorry for all of you Gore lovers out there, but will NOT run for Pres, and here's why:

He's making more money than God right now and will continue to do so for some time.

He has much more freedom right now than any president or candidate to say and to do what wants and what he belives is the right thing.  

Belive it or not, but he just may have almost as much influence as a President, at least in those limited areas in which he truly cares about, such as the environment.

He will not give all of this up for the pleasure of cleaning up after George Bush in Iraq.  I'm not saying he couldn't win or wouldn't be a good presdient if he did, but what exactly is in it for him???  

Think about it.  
Whether or not Gore runs for president, and I think he probably shouldn’t, his winning the Nobel Peace Prize with the IPCC is a very good thing and I’m delighted. Anything to get more people thinking about, and then doing something about, global warming is critical for survival.

I encourage people to read:

The Warming Globe and Us
It’s More Than CO2

by Dan Brook and Richard H. Schwartz
Dissident Voice / May 1st, 2007

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/05/the-warming-globe-and-us
Of course he won't run.  And, he shouldn't.  Mike RC  said it best when he stated, "Why would be bother to subject himself again to the combination marathon/meat grinder that is a presidential campaign?  Why would he subject himself to having pundits recycle the same old lies....."
If Al Gore ran, it would quickly become obvious that he was not competitive.  Even with the same starting line, he would not match up.  Certainly he would not starting far behind.  He is much better off basking in the glow of his Nobel prize without too many questions about the accuracy of some of his statements or the resources that he consumes with his personal life style.
Another communist....
As far as Im concerned the communist Democrat party shoulkd be banned, its candidates arrested
Once you lose like he did why run again??  If you lose again you lose whatever clout you have left.....I think that if the Republicans want to really put a stranglehold on things after they win the election....appoint him to the cabinet and watch the left go nuts
What a bunch of haters!

How miserable you must be to still stand by a bumbling tool at best, a fascist tool at worst, and hate on a guy that just won the Nobel prize.

Isn't it about time for one of you to call the democrats the "party of hate"?
Zak - Zieg Heil.
In my opion he won the last election but the power of the Bush's stole it
In regard to Zak Marsoli, do you really advocate arresting candidates?  That is what totalitarian regimes like the communists (whom you apparently, to employ understatement, do not like) used to do and is totally against what the United States of America stands for.  Do you even realize that you are taking the position of the type of enemies our great country has normally opposed and fought?  Do you even care? If your line of thinking (assuming it represents your true beliefs)ever becomes the majority, then the greatness of this country will have actually been destroyed.  
Ah, I see the extreme right has tired of abusing children and wounded vets and is happy to find a favorite old target back in the spotlight.
As usual the best of them twist facts or take them out of context, such as Don H's comment about the accuracy of An Inconvenient Truth.
Though an English judge stated some claims were unproven he also said the film "is substantially founded upon scientific research and fact" and ruled the points raised  about the causes and likely effects of climate change were broadly accurate.
The worst of them are epitomized by someone like Zak Marsoli, who without a trace of irony suggests "the communist Democrat party shoulkd (sic) be banned, its candidates arrested" without considering that those are the very tactics used by the Stalinists and Nazis.
Nice to see how little respect you have for freedom and how quickly you'd give it up Zak.
Though it's pretty clear President Gore isn't running in 2008 he would do a fine job in the Oval Office, certainly better than the boob a Supreme Coup D'etat put there in his place.
The best man for the job in 2008 was the best man for the job in 2000 as well.
This is the Nobel Peace Prize we are talking about here!!  Congratulations to Mr. Gore, no one deserves it more!!!  AL Gore has more integrity, wisdom, respect and intelligence than the current administration (all combined) and anyone running for office at this time.  Anyone who denies the fact that global warming is a very real and serious threat obviously lives in a state of denial - They probably voted for the current administration and also more than likely listen to Faus Noise.  Of course, they probably all average IQ's of about 65, which explains a lot!!  
The absolute funniest thing is that he wins this award the day after a court in Britain found that his "documentary" was slanted and not based on fact!

Oh, Big Al, Gore didn't run in the last election. Check your facts, sweety.
AL GORE SHOULD RUN.THE COUNTRY NEEDS SOMEBODY LIKE HIM TO CLEAN HOUSE AND MAKE THIS COUNRTY GREAT AGAIN.
If Mr. Gore were to run and win the nomination, I would be grateful to vote for him. If Clinton wins the nomination, I am staying home on election day. We Democrats need to look beyond star-power, celebrity, all that first-woman-in-the-White House crap, and elect, for the first time in many years, a deserving, intelligent, and rational president who can pull this country out of the muck, before it is too late to ssave this once-great nation of ours. But, unfortunately, no one with these credentials has yet announced.
Is it just me or doesn't it look convinient that msnbc put the congratulatory statements made by the Barack Obama and John Edwards in the article but put a link to Hillary Clinton's campaign website in order to view her comments on Al Gore's Nobel Prize...
Have you ever heard of the fued between the Hatfield's and Mc Coy's? Well that's what would happen if Gore ran against Hillary. The Gore's and Clinton's fued would be a disaster for the Democrats. I do really think Al want's to run for President, but Bill say's no. Loyalty matters I guess for some people.      
I soundly second the comments from David Lawrence of Pittsburgh.

I doubt very much that Mr. Gore would subject himself to the rigor and attacks that a run for the presidency would produce.  In my opinion that is our loss!  We are sorely in need of some intelligence in Washington!

I congratulate Mr. Gore on the award of the Nobel prize and hope that he will continue his efforts in respect to the problems of the environment.
Hey Zak-

I spent 6 years on active duty to protect your right to be that f-ing stupid.

Thanks - time well spent.
Congratulations on the Peace Prize, Mr. Gore.  I wonder why the only Republican to win was Theodore Roosevelt who was an anti-corporate Republican.  Maybe it is because they have a vision what is best for all human beings except for those in our little corner of the world who allow themselves to believe problems can be solved by one-line political campaign slogans and a God who, if he exists, doesn't seem to be listening.  Oh, Dawes was a Republican too; however, he was intelligent and a sometime song writer so he was never the actual presidential candidate.
I've seen no one whos running officially whos worth voting for, Hillary has no chance whats so ever. Gore would win hands down this next election and I'm a republican and would vote for him. People in New Hampshire cannot Stand Hillary on the whole and we always vote the winner in.
Im an Ohio Republican and I wish Gore would run not only would I vote for him I think he would easily win.The republicans dont have anyboby worth voting for. And for the love of god please please no Hilary Clinton. Although a Gore/ Clinton ticket would be an easy win. I would rather a Gore / Edwards ticket
run al run!
Remember when reading these comments that we have an educational system that considers awards for cheerleading to be more important than an awards for Science projects.
It at least helps me from screaming at the CRT.
The 2008 nominating process is becoming so front loaded as state after state seeks to maximize expose and tourist revenue, the period of time in which the nominating process is essentially over before the political convention creates a new dynamic and a potential problem.

For the purpose of discussion, lets say Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination by early February, five or six months before the Democratic convention.  If anything were to happen to Ms. Clinton (or whoever is the prospective nominee) before the convention, the Party would likely turn to a statesman like Al Gore as it's standard bearer.

In all likelyhood, that is the only scenario in which Gore is like to run for President in 2008. As much as many of us would like to see Al become President (in part to get over remaining bitterness about 2000), he seems comfortable in his new roles and can accomplish much with being a Nobel Peace Prize winner and global warming activist.

Congratulations Al! Well done!  
"The republicans dont have anyboby worth voting for."  

Rick: Ron Paul. I could live with him.

The rest of that pack of rats - P.U.! Fascists, zealots, more never-served-and-neither-are-my-kids, but-YOUR'S-are cowards, all yelling for a head-long rush into an even bigger mistake of a war - a disgrace.
I will say that as a Republican voter, I am deeply distressed in my choice of candidates this year. I'm actually starting to eye the Democratic party with enthusiasm. If Gore entered the race, that would certainly seal my support. He should have won 8 years ago, and I believe he could win now. Who would challenge him, Hillary? She can't even figure out how to beat her own demons.
<deep sigh> Al never said he invented the internet.  He said he helped in the creation of the internet.  During his time in the Senate, he helped promote, pass, and fund a measure that was responsible for the creation of the internet.  The original text of his statements--before Repugnican revision--can be found on the (drum roll, please) internet!  Go look it up--I'm not going to do the work for you.

Second, Al has a master's degree in environmental science.  I think I would believe him, who feels responsible towards the planet on which he lives, than a Ph.D., who feels responsible only towards those who fund his research--such as Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil.
{ I wonder why the only Republican to win was Theodore Roosevelt who was an anti-corporate Republican. }


Whats amazing is that Reagan never won it.  'Tear down this wall' and all.  The Nobel now seems to more symbolic then of any substance, and because of that, a Republican has no chance of ever winning it.
To all of you androgynous liberals who still think the Supreme Court gave the 2000 election to President Bush, there were actually two recounts after the election and Bush won both of them.  He won.  Get over it.  Oh, and he won in 2004 against that fake war hero too.  Get over that too.  You vertebrate-challenged transgendered bitches need to realize that the American people don't like losing.  We are staying in Iraq for the long term whether you like it or not.  Even Hillary has said we'll be there until at least 2013.  So it's time to man up and stop talking this defeat bullshit.  Defeat is not an option! And stop saying you support the troops but not the war.  You can't support the troops and hope that they lose!
There is really nothing we need to do about global warming anyway as long as we each maintain a carbon footprint the same as or smaller than Al Gore's.  This shouldn't be too hard since at one of his three houses he uses 20 times the energy of the average American. Obviously most Americans don't use that much energy so it should be easy. Unless, this is a "do as I say, not as I do situation."  But that would mean Al Gore is a hypocrite and I'm sure they wouldn't award a Nobel to such a person.  Am I right?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=408417

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google