ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



RNC strips 5 states of half their delegates

Posted: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:27 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
The Republican National Committee has voted to strip New Hampshire, Florida, South Carolina, Michigan and Wyoming of half their delegates for violating party rules and shifting their nominating contests earlier than was originally agreed upon.

Iowa and Nevada, which also moved their contest dates, are not being punished because they have non-binding contests.

Here's a link to the AP story.

*** UPDATE *** “Our rules lay out a clear process for delegate selection,” RNC Chairman Mike Duncan said on a conference call with reporters. Duncan added, “We spent most of this past year educating them on what the rules are. This should come as no surprise to them.”

In fact, the RNC approved its rules at the 2004 Republican convention -- “unanimously,” Duncan points out.

The states have not been officially notified yet. Those letters are being sent out today.

South Carolina, for one, has already threatened legal action. “We’re going to check the legality of it,” Katon Dawson, South Carolina’s Republican Party chairman, told the AP. Dawson pledged to “put up a fight.”

Florida’s Republican Party Chairman Jim Greer said in a statement: “While we disagree with the Republican National Committee’s recommendation to sanction the State of Florida, at the end of the day this is a disagreement among friends and we recognize that we are all working towards a common goal -- re-electing a Republican President in 2008. With that in mind, we are confident that Florida will retain our full delegation to the Convention and all 114 delegates will be seated.”

New Hampshire potentially could lose 90% of its delegates if it does not select a date before the Republicans’ final call to convention, which has to happen by the end of the year. Duncan stressed that the scenario, posed by a reporter on the call, is a “hypothetical” and didn’t want to comment. Though he called it “interesting.”

Democratic candidates have pledged not to campaign in rule-breaking states during the primary process. Duncan said he’d make no such requests and took a shot at Democrats in the process.

“The Democrats have such flexibility with their rules, I don’t know where to begin,” Duncan said, citing waivers and exemptions. “We aren’t saying don’t campaign in Florida. Our rules stick for a four-year period; their rules can be amended in between.”

Also unlike the DNC, the RNC does not have rules as to when non-compliant states would have to submit new plans.

“We always believe in redemption,” Duncan said. “So if they wanted to make a change we’d certainly be open to that.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This is why RNC and the Rebuplicans are seen as more effective leaders. Instead of pandering with the violators, punish them once and for all. DNC will feel the pulse of the consequences before taking a stand......Hillary Clinton model of leadership....I was going to vote NO before voting YES
Ooops jerry, the RNC is pulling a Howard Dean on your party. Does this mean Howard wasn't wrong to try to enforce party rules and discipline?  Or does this mean the GOP has turned its back on the voters of those states?
HAW HAW!!
Opps.  This makes Guliani's comments (about not disenfranchising Florida voters) at the last debate seem a little bit against what the RNC thinks.
Those delegates will also have all of their records searched by warrantless eavesdropping.
We counted the votes right before we didn't count them...werent the rightwingnuts just rattling on about disenfranchisement as it pertained to the dems? Oh that's right, it is different when the chickenhawk party does things...like start wars they cant finish and talk tough but don't serve
the republicans in Michigan have been drooling because of the punishment from the DNC-----guess they will have to pull their bibs off now----they are in the same boat----just too funny----what will mittens do----he has all the money and votes pretty well locked up.The republicans should not worry Bush did not win in MI either time,nor daddy bush
It seems to me the RNC went beyond by punishing New Hampshire and South Carolina--how will that affect Colbert???  That's like smacking the South, something the dems could not get away with.

On a related note, I think we've had enough Southern Presidents recently.
Bobo - FL was stripped of ALL of its delegates by the DNC shortly after it announced it was moving its primary.  Much, much sooner than the RNC has punished these states.
hmmmm, what happened to all the go-pee-ers who complained when the dnc did this?

LMAO

punishing New Hampshire?

who is ahead there? that's who the RNC doesn't want to win the nomination!
Nuanced:

I'm beginning to wonder about both the RNC and the DNC.  This does have all the markings of the screwiest election in history.  By the time this is all done, I wonder if anybody will have any delegates to send to the conventions and the conventions should be ended as of today!  
Just proves that Republicans are only half as stupid as Democrats.
jerry, I agree we should end it as of today. Forget the campaigns, debates, primaries and elected delegates. Just go to convention now with the pre-selected super delegates of party bigshots and let them pick the nominee. It would save a lot of money.
Jerry...I don't usually agree with you but this time you are right on the money. It has gotten so confusing and I think it is going to get worse before it gets better. Maybe they should stop conventions. This is what I can't stand... The conventions that this electon will not be true conventions because delegates have been cut and states jockeying to see who holds primarys first. It has become a big mess if you ask me.
I thought the great, wise, and benevolent voters in New Hampshire deserved to decide the outcome of the primaries because they were fifty times smarter than the rest of us.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=424088

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google