ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Not available until 2009?

Posted: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:35 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
A few days ago, Newsweek's Michael Isikoff reported on the lack of access to Hillary Clinton's papers at the Clinton Presidential Library, which he said runs counter to her complaints about the Bush Administration's secrecy and her vow to bring a "return to transparency" to government. That article followed an earlier Los Angeles Times article, which noted that nearly 2 million pages of her documents as First Lady were locked up in the library -- and wouldn't be released until after the presidential election.

So perhaps it wasn't surprising when a group opposed to Clinton's election handed First Read a copy of a letter it received from the University of Arkansas Libraries' Special Collections, which said that the group's request -- made back in May 2007 -- for access to the library's Diane Blair papers wouldn't be made unavailable until 2009. In other words, not until after the presidential election.

"The Diane Blair Papers (MC 1004) in Special Collections at the University of Arkansas Libraries, Fayetteville, will be available in 2009," the letter reads. "We are unable to photocopy pages for you from the Draft Finding Aid of this unprocessed collection."

Who is Diane Blair?

She was a friend to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, and her husband was the chief counsel at Tyson Foods, who had infamously helped Hillary earn nearly $100,000 in commodity futures. Blair was also a researcher on the '92 Clinton campaign, and according to Carl Bernstein's recent book on Clinton, Blair took on the project of writing a book on the '92 campaign -- but the book was never written. Yet Bernstein got his hands on her papers. In his book, he writes: "In the aggregate, the single-spaced contents of the binders, knee-high, provide a developing portrait of Hillary as she became the chief strategist and sounding board of her husband's presidential campaign, and contemplated the kind of first lady she intended to be. Her overreaching is recorded, on the one hand, and on the other hand, her incomparable ability to channel the best of Bill Clinton into action."

Reached for comment, Andrea Cantrell, the head of research services at the university library's Special Collections, told First Read that the Blair papers aren't yet processed, and that such a delay isn't that uncommon -- due chiefly to a lack of manpower. "It is not at all unusual."

For example, she said, the library received the papers of former Sen. Dale Bumpers (D) back in August 2000, and those papers still aren't processed. By comparison, the Blair papers were given to the library last year, and will be available in 2009 -- but not in time for those who want to look at them before the presidential election.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Even better.....

Someone finds something in those papers......

Might either be a one term Hillary or an impeachment.

The press must have that date circled on the calendar.

If she had any brains, she would release them now....

I wonder what she is hiding?
Someone should tell me why she is better than George Bush?
Another secret affair of Senator Clinton. Politican that are not ready to be open to American people cannot be trusted
and the corrupt clinton machine rumbles on, another indefensible act by the beloved hillary that will be ignored by her ditsy female drones and her republican backers, seems as though hillary’s transparent Washington is as opaque as the bush administration, now I have noticed that the hillary backers do not even bother trying to portray hillary as honest, now she has become no more dis-honest as so and so, whatever
'...Someone should tell me why she is better than George Bush?   Bee...'

Great point, Bee !!
What's the difference between Hillary's Iraq policy and Bush's Iraq policy ?

I think both clowns want to attack Iran.....
You peoplle are all absolutely ridiculous. Your brains are driven by hatred towards this woman instead of facts or even common sense. Get over yourselves. She will probably be our next president, so you might as well prepare yourselves for hating some more, hopefully for 8 LONG years.
Looks like Jerry has a following of sheep now.
When it comes to common sense.....
Hillary Clinton is an olive short of a martini....
Whoa!I guess all the Hillary haters have finally morphed together into one big unhappy,unhealthy family.Enjoy talking to yourselves.God bless.
And this surprises who? Same ol' same ol'.
Obama '08
So why can't we see those papers????
bb / who is really the unconcerned about facts 'sheep' here blindly following the crowd?

best clear any comments with van before you post your reply
Nick: You should never say anything else bad about Bush. No one likes for anyone to be in their biz. Frankly I think whats good for the goose is good for the gander. How convenient "It wont be available until 2009" Clinton is full of she-i-t.
Why do all of the Hillarophiles like to laud her inevitable election to the rest of us as if it were some sort of punishment?  Maybe because they know that it would be.  I just can't figure out what I did to deserve this.
Democrats need to ask themselves, what is she hiding and what scandals will break after she is sworn in.  While we don't agree with the media and the Republicans who will play this up if she is elected, it will distract from getting the things done that this country needs.  We should think twice about nominating someone who will just lead to more and more scandals in  Washington...20 years of Bushes and Clintons is enough!
I have yet to see anyone cite any law that says she has to divulge these papers at present.  The Presidential Records act sets deadlines of something like 20 years after a President leaves office that their papers must be made public.  So I would think that 2009 is pretty decent considering the normal timelines involved.  

But then again, I'm not desperately looking for a small ray of hope that the Democrats aren't going to stomp the heck out of the Republicans in the next election, like Jerry.  
Yup,folks, and she'll be our next president too, so tough she-i-t.
Thats calling the kettle black, Jerry.
Hillary would be impeached even before she was inaugurated.
Who cares?
A democratic president. Praise be to God!
John Doe: I'll remember you said this when your confederates begin to gripe over Bush not releasing his Cheney ''energy meetings'' documents,his private FISA-policy meeting-hours papers,or the Gonzales documents that the Democrats have been demanding.
The Bush papers form his term as Governor of Texas, are still not available. Some of us Texans wonder why. What secrets are locked away? We are still not able to see the papers surrounding John F Kennedy assassination. All of these secrets locked away just adds suspicion and fuels wild conspiracy theories. Even Mark Twain had some of his papers and writings locked away until after his death. If you go and read those writings today Twains reasons are obscure. Point is that personal reasons for secrets are only relative to the times.
".....Even better.....

Someone finds something in those papers......

Might either be a one term Hillary or an impeachment......"

*ahhh, conceding the election so soon, jerry?*

".....The press must have that date circled on the calendar.

If she had any brains, she would release them now....."

**Frankly jerry, I don't see how her personal papers are anymore or less relevant to this election than Gigolo Rudy G's love letters to any one of his ex wives.**

".....If she had any brains, she would release them now....

I wonder what she is hiding?....."

***Don't you mean to say...."oh please God let us hang SOMETHING on her! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let her be hiding something!!!!!"
You're pathetic, jerry.
Laughable, but nonetheless pathetic.***
since she is claiming her experience as first lady qualifies her as a canidate for president then her records should be open to the public for review.  all the other canidates records are open, why not hillary?  because she didn't do anything after her healthcare fiasco.  
Really, it's very simple she wants to control both the media and the electorate.  She doesn't want to answer any questions or allow any ammunition to those who would impede her from her goal or reveal all her shortcomings.  If she doesn't answer reporter’s questions (without complete control of the subject/location) she doesn't avail herself to criticism.  She will stick to her appearances on shows like Countdown (what a joke).  She wants everyone deft, dumb, and happy until the election is over.  She plans on controlling the media and the simple minded until it's too late.  She knows her base (easily influenced people) and is counting on their inability to think to get her through the campaign.  She is the stealth candidate.  Sadly the media doesn’t even have it’s radar on and they’re sucking up her fumes as she passes and can’t even see the story right in front of them.
The same people who are yelling and screaming in this blog about her releasing papers from DECADES ago are perfectly happy in their ignorance of all scandals BUSH.  Why is Hillary better than Bush?  Mmmmnnn!  She didn't lie to take us into a war.  She supports affordable healthcare for every American (appauling isn't it........idots!!!) She hasn't wire-tapped my phone without cause.  She didn't authorize torture and lie to us about it (why aren't you people screaming about the secret memos authorinzing torture which is relevant TODAY).  Under the Clinton's we actually had a surplus and a very strong US dollar.  Hillary isn't the one who allowed almost 20% of our country to be owned by foreign interests including communist China.  I'm exhausted!!! Why don't you tell me what Bush has done to make this a great country?  That would be easier.  NOTHING!!!
LOL  Merle says....


**Frankly jerry, I don't see how her personal papers are anymore or less relevant to this election than Gigolo Rudy G's love letters to any one of his ex wives.**

Then I guess she shouldn't have a problem with releasing them now should she?........

Wonder what she's hiding?......
Hillary is 100% UN-ELECTABLE.  I hope she wins the nomination.  
All the REPUGNICANS yelling still looking for White Water I guess. Do you people have any lives? What are you doing about your beloved jr that's still ruining this country?
"Wonder what she's hiding?"....

Wonder what you are hiding Jerry?  Maybe a brain!!!
Another bit of blood in the water for jerry and his tribe to pray over, keep focused on these non-issues and watch the world go by. No wonder your getting to sound like a broken record, that is how your party runs presidential races. John Doe is right. Perhaps you slept through issues in governemt class in high school, opps sorry maybe you didn't finish, my bad.
How about Bush wanting Jenna to keep his records closed, how about Dicks secret dealings with energy friends, executive orders that nobody outside the white house gets to see? There are still papers from the nazis and the japanese that are kept secret, what do you think is in them? There's a conspiracy you can sink your sharp little teeth into.
let's see, we still don't have access to Raygun's papers and those are what 25 years old.

but then obama , he has no papers....it's inexperience as somethiing new and fresh.
how bushian
Go Hillary!  Red State Democrats support you!  I think its funny how the republicans will create a controversy out of any little thing(ie papers not being release quick enough) but they want everyone to just ignore the page sexual abuse and the larry craig's in congress..... get a clue!! we all know your party of values is really just a sham!
There are somethings that are highly personal that could be seen as damning by the person but possibly not by many other people.  We humans are strange when it comes to what we find embarressing.  It could be that Hillary had an affair before Bill...  It could also be that there is a family relation mentioned in there that could be damning.  There is more than enough in the public domain that should help any voter make up his/her mind about voting for Hillary, Rudy, Barak, either Mike (Gravel or Huckabee) etc.  If you must dig so much farther, what else could you really want to know?  I know...  Could it be the first time she did @#%*!&...
Who cares ! I can't believe there are enough stupid people in this country ready to put this person in control of this great country .If there are GOD help us all .  
and does this jerry character from corpus have nothing better to do with his time then sit here and comment to everyones comments?  I swear everytime i read this column there is some ignorant comment from him... infact he reminds me of GWShrub.... same comment different words every time he opens his mouth(or clicks the keys)
so in a clinton presidentcy that was widely admired, what could the papers reveal about Hillary... that she was the power behind the throne?

It's much more interestig the GWBUSH didn't allow reagans papers to be released.
does it show the 10s of thousands he murdered in south america? the millions he gave to osama (not obama romney)? his drugs for arms deals?

it's a shame that supposed liberals are interested in HRC over the criminal admins. of reagan, bush and bush
Hey, maybe finally the cocaine dealings while Bill was governor will be used against her.  All that evidence, and the paid off media refused to turn it into a big story.  What I'd love to see is more on that 100 million a month that was cycled through their law firm, only to have a balance of zero shown at the end of the month before another 100 million appearing again the next month.  Or maybe the shoddy real estate scams, or, well, there's so many immoral and thieving acts she's committed that who knows how much she's hiding and how much is destroyed forever.  Accountability, the Clintons deserve to be in jail for all the crimes they've committed, and the murderers they pardones for political favors or profit need to be thrown back in a cell with them.
Hey Jerry, one of the first things George did was pull the Alzheimer Ronnie papers from the public under the overused national security argument. Did the same for Daddy's papers also. Wonder what those Iran-Contra papers had to say about treason?
Hey Z where are you?. Bush still SUCKS, right!
I will say it for you today ....

BUSH AND THE IRAQ WAR SUCK!!!
jerry from corpus christie texASS says;
"Then I guess she shouldn't have a problem with releasing them now should she?........

Wonder what she's hiding?...... "

Sure, just as soon as all Gigolo Rudy G's love letters to his ex-wives are released.....then, ya' can see Hillary's personal papers too
and like I said.....what you are really saying is...."OH PLEASE, OH PLEASE, OH PLEASE God.....PLEASE LET US HANG SOMETHING ON HER BEFORE THE ELECTION."
I can even see the little beads of sweat rolling down your forehead jerry, and the spittle froth ozzing from your mouth.
Can't wait to "hear" what you have to say AFTER the election jerry.
Ha Ha....if you think he's bad NOW, folks; just WAIT until after Hillary is President. He's gonna' go NUTS!
she obviously has quite a bit to hide. is this what we want in a president? i think not.
The truth is that democracy in such diversity cannot exist.  This is not meant to be racist so all you over-sensitive Al Sharpton types get a grip or go away.  What I am saying is that when you have SO many people from SO many cultures and SO many ideas, democracy cannot govern them in an effective way, and corrupt democracy is even worse.  Too many cooks in the kitchen trying to say how this country should be run.  How bout you shrink national government and let the states sort it out.  If Arkansas doesn't want to have a welfare program, or wants to regulate the drug industry, why shouldn't they be allowed to.  Then, if anyone doesn't like it, they can move to a state that gives them the variety of ideas that best suits there personality.

Give me any topic of debate and I will give you a random crowd of Americans, at least 30% for and 30% against.  How do you ever expect to accomplish anything.  Legislation?  HA!  All legislation now is a means to reverse legislation of the opposing party.  There is no middle ground.  You can't be half for abortion and half against.  You can't be half for gun control and half against.  And if you somehow can be, you certainly would be in the minority that doesn't have a loud enough voice to say anything.  I love my country but we are doomed because we are all free and because we are all stupid.  Sick isn't it?
...And wouldn't the Republican Smear Machine love to get hold of this stuff BEFORE the election, to use against Clinton!  As I keep saying, Hil's got major skeletons in her closet, and the Ministry of Republican Propoganda (Minitru in 1984's Newspeak) will kill her chances with as much of it as they can get their hands on.
Hilary will change AMERICA for the better!!!!!!!  Go Hilary and don't let all the negative comments on this page bother you.  The truth will prevail..

So many people love ya!
oh and amy, i don't want my tax money going to stupid people who don't wnat to do anything but sit around at home and get money for it. NO THANKS
The ONLY good thing about Hillary is her health care ideas, and they're just ideas no president can accoplish anything in 8 years besides declaring war, our "checks and balances" actually just cancel each other out if you haven't noticed. So reguardless if she gets in or not, don't expect a whole lot of change.
Hey Z where are you?. Bush still SUCKS, right!
I will say it for you today ....

BUSH AND THE IRAQ WAR SUCK!!!
IMPEACH (Sent Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:34 PM)



I’m sorry, but as I’ve said before the patients in the pysch ward are not allowed to use the computers on certain days of the week.  Z, provided he behaves and doesn’t have another bipolar episode, might be allowed to use one later in the week.
Attention BEE:  ANYONE, is better than George Bush !


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=428631

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google