ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’

Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:19 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/National Journal’s Tricia Miller
Edwards introduced his policy on corporate responsibility in a speech called “Renewing the Social Contract” in Des Moines this morning.

“Over the course of our history, every generation of Americans has helped to expand the reach of that compact, moving us ever closer to the America of our ideals, where opportunity is truly shared by all,” he said in prepared remarks. “But now, instead of expanding further, our social compact is falling apart.”

Edwards called for a “new universal retirement account requiring every business to automatically enroll its workers in at least one plan: a traditional pension, a 401(k), or an IRA.” He also reiterated his support for universal health care, blaming lobbyists and insurance companies for blocking it thus far, and called again for the strengthening of organized labor. He said his administration would enact laws encouraging transparency in corporate reporting and more rights for shareholders, including “a say on executive pay.”

Edwards used the speech to continue his theme of rooting out corruption in Washington, as well as in corporate boardrooms. He brought the speech to a close with a quote from John F. Kennedy: "John F. Kennedy once said, 'The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated.'"

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

So Edwards thinks that the government telling us what to do gets us closer to our "ideals"?  It's no wonder Edwards's has become so irrelevent.

He goes on to say:

"his administration would enact laws encouraging transparency in corporate reporting and more rights for shareholders, including “a say on executive pay.”"

Would that include caps on what sue lawyers can make?
it is clear that John Edwards is driving the democratic argument for the future.  Health care, retirement planning, help for the poor, a strong and smart policy on Iraq.  No matter what, if John Edwards isn't the democratic nominee, then none of us should complain in a year when either we get stuck with Mitt Romney or we spend the next four years triangulating ourselves with republican policies.
Social contract?  Dont make me sick.
he forgot the "ist"
edwards is the only dem that can win the general election, and also the only one that cares about the american citizen, clinton and obama are corporate entities
John Edwards....A man with a vision for all Americans.

EDWARDS 08
Yes a social contract. There are many domestic issues that our current administation have allowed to go to hell because their heads are stuck up Iran and Iraq's a--holes. Edwards would return our #1 priority to our own backyards, where it should be.
Social contract is a pretty good description.  As Americans we tend to believe that capitalism and democracy are almost synonomous but that isn't necessarily the case.  The nature of capitalism is to sell everything for the highest possible rate, concentrate wealth in the hands of those who control the means of production, and pay workers the least amount that results in a warm body.  Obviously the masses would not vote for that result.  For many decades we've mediated that conflict by allowing business owners, especially large business owners, to do pretty much as they please as long as they share enough with the middle class to keep them secure.  Now that social contract is unraveling and the foul mood of the electorate is partly a reflection of that.  If middle class security isn't restored democracy will force changes that probably will be an overreaction to the situation and hurt the country as a result.  
John Edwards new campaign slogan
"Yea Socialism"

all these socialist democrats are trying to get more control over peoples lives.  Soon the democrats will have what they want, we will live in a socialist country, and all the money and power will belong to the politicians.  
John Edwards is a Truth-teller - and the corporate media and TV talking heads retaliate by dissing and dismissing him.
The corporate media cares about corporate interests - not middle class interests - and promotes the Corporate Democrats who offer "hope" and "nostalgia."

We need John Edwards in the White House!
When I see Edwards standing up to big corporate interests NOW, I know that he would stand up to them after he is elected. He is standing up for regular people at a time when most candidates are trying to please special interests to keep fundraising dollars rolling in. I hope a lot of middle class Americans will hear about this, and stand with Edwards. Big corporations will certainly hear about this quickly, and double their efforts to help Edward's opposition win the election and maintain the status quo.

Thanks for reporting on this, Ms. Miller and First Read! This is a big story that will likely get very little coverage.
When reading this or other blogs, it's important to know that Mark Penn, Clinton's campaign manager is the invertor 'astro-turf'.

'astro-turf' is fake grass roots.
It's a strategy to make it appear that real people are in favor of his clients, when he's really manufacturing phoney public opinion.

This makes it appear that there's a groundswell of public opinion in favor of his clients (here, Hillary Clinton).

Are all these pro  Clinton bloggers real ?
Are they paid Clinton staffers ?
You be the judge.
It's nice to hear that John is still in the race. He is a good man with many good ideas. There isn't any question that he would be a better President than any of the republicans running.


Van
Senator Edwards is correct in his premise that we definitely need to work on the social issues here at home, and his plan sounds good, but as long as the war in Iraq continues to drain our nation's resources, and the national debt keeps rising, I don't think his plans will be easy to put into action.  All of his proposals are commendable, but will require major outlays of funds to implement.  Botom line, I guess, how do we pay for everything?
Edwards couldn't be elected dog catcher in a national election! He has literally lived in Iowa the past four years and all he has to show for it is a three way statistical tie for first. His national campaign strategy is to win in Iowa- that is it! He has no staff at all in 21 states, he's taken others out of the Western strategy and flooded Iowa. He won't win his home state, nor will John Edwards be remembered after New Hampshire. Even is he wins a very close race in Iowa- he's finished after that. If he doesn't win Iowa- he's DOA on the spot.
Take it to the bank...anyone on here who decries social program are going to be BIG users of that social program...you know none of you ever turns down that SS check, medicare coverage, pensions, military and civil servant retiree benefits (talk about cradle to grave socialism), tax cuts or credits...you just bitch about the fact that someone else can take advantage of them but you never mention your social program loving selves...lmao
What a concept, government of the people, by the people and for the people. John will have his work cut out for him trying to wrest control from the plutocracy* running the country now.

*a plutocracy is any form of government in which the wealthy exercise the preponderance of political power, whether directly or indirectly.
I am starting to entertain the idea of supporting this guy.
This loser will obviously say anything to capture a vote.
Edward and Obama, are out of it, TOAST, even the NYT's and msnbc, nbc, cbs, and abc, is behind Hillary, she is the one that will unite us all. So pack your bags and get onboard to victory in 08
We do not need John Edwards in the white house unless the toilets need cleaning.  Considering his socialistic fervor, what is next, communism from the lefties?
George W. Bush was such a disappointment I changed from Republican to Democrat & voted for Edwards in the '04 primary.  I voted for him because he actually ADMITTED that politicians want to spend money, and that taxes would have to be raised to pay for programs.  That's political death talk.  He didn't win then, and I doubt he's got much of a chance now.  I don't even think it matters whether he's got good ideas or not, he won't get the nomination.  Probably Hillary will, and then you'll see another Republican in the White House.
What these republicans seem to forget, when they go on and on about how wrong Socialism is, and how THEY (the democrats) want to "Control" us...is they are either too rich or stupid to realize that CAPITALISM is now our MASTER and "CONTROLS" us. And it is NOT kind. Bye now.
To all of you neocon-lacky-republicans..

Since the majority of you have been bought and paid for by either the Republican party, or corporate America, you have no idea what is going on in the real world.
Corporate America is ruined this country. Since when should businesses be allowed to call the shots in government? The amount of lobbiest that interact with our government is absurd. When will you all realize that this is paralizing my country. From pharmacuticals, to big oil. They call the shots, from the people we elected, and we stand by and let it happen. Every one, who is a legal citizen, should get free health care, free education, and a better way of life. Not just the "elite" such as yourselfs.
Why in the year 2007 do we have people die, because they cant afford to go to the hostpital? How come the retired couple has to make a choice between staying warm, eating, or there medications?
They general sentiment in this country is "its not my problem", well it is!! If we conutinue to let this happen, what will haappen to your children, to your grandchildren??
It's time to fix "big" government, and time to do it now!! We elected these idiots, now we must hold them accountable. AMERICA-IT IS NOW TIME TO MAKE A STAND!!
FIGHT FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES FUTURE!!


This story is much too important to be relegated to a little column comment.  The AP has slightly better coverage.  Clearly, we are ready to debate this as a serious issue.  

I, frankly, cannot begin to understand what segment of society would oppose policies based on the social contract which was a part of the original Declaration of Independence and writings by Thomas Paine.

The vast selfishness, greed and domination which characterize the current diminishment of social contract is characteristic of a primitive psychology and sure to bring about an increasingly primitive and brutal social fabric.  That it has been brought to us by an administration which touts itself as champions of a "culture of life" is the big lie of all big lies.

The current administration has brought us 6 years of greed, cronyism and corruption.  I'm fed up.  My tax dollars, and I would be glad to pay a bit more, should be going to improve my community, help my fellow man.  Instead all our resources are lining the pockets of the gluttonous, self-righteous, and cruel.
Why does the idea, not anyone proposed implementation, but the mere IDEA of universal health care scare so many rabid republicans?  

certainly you all cannot be for the large insurance companies that are more interested in making profits by securing as much of our health care premiums as they can while paying out as little as possible for actual care...you're not FOR those companies are you?  Because that's what it sounds like when you all bash the UHC idea.  

I get you dont like democrats and anyone who thinks America should be for ALL Americans is obviously a socialist sack of sh!! but have you ever wondered why so many of you rail against those fighting the machine, all while the machine uses YOU and spits you out without caring???  

Anyways, Edwards doesn't have a chance because he's too radical for those who CONTROL the dem party...the only ILLUSION is the one called CHOICE...there are no real choices.  There haven't been for about 50 years.
Just Vote democratic in 08!
Well, would you rather have a government that tells you what to do while tapping your phone, eroding your civil rights, emptying the treasury and sending it to mercenaries and defense contractors like Halliburton who then take that money out of the country; or one that tells you what to do while making sure you have enough to live on when you get old? Frankly, I don't like anyone telling me what to do, but if we're picking the lesser of two evils, from what I've read and heard, John Edwards has his heart and head in (at least the vicinity of) the right place. I hope he's not just another politician spouting rhetoric.
When corporate profits have been exceeding records in recent years, yet the corporations are cutting benefits, freezing wages, etc., there's a huge problem. And then management deigns to "grant" 3% raises--telling us these are merit raises and not COL raises--which barely allow us to stay even, let alone reap any rewards for our hard work. That's good? That's fair? That's capitalism at its best? Bullsh*t!

It's not socialism to expect that workers who make the products and provide the services that make corporations profitable should be paid enough to live on, and then some, and to be rewarded for a job well done. The establishment hates John Edwards because he dares to tell the truth and because he cares about regular folks who don't have the money to funnel into the political coffers.

Edwards is the only hope for the everyday "Joe" in this country!
Anyone who believes that John Edwards is anything but truthful in what he espouses is, at best, deluding themselves.  This is a good, honest, caring individual who wants to see the US flourish.  You talk about Socialism and Communism and Lefties, but you don't talk about what he is saying.

Answer me a question, what is wrong with Nationalized Health Care?  What is wrong with paying fair taxes to use National resources?  What is wrong with wanting America to lead through peace and set an example of tolerance for the whole world?  What is wrong with expecting a company that lays off 2000 people not to pay its CEO $5 million in salary?

I can only assume that the people who are calling all these things "Socialist" are not in a position to avail themselves of these programs.  I mean we know that the top 1% of the earners in this country are being taken care of right now, and these sort of programs may affect them.  So we really want to base what 100% of the citizens have available to them on what 1% of the citizens will fight against tooth and nail?

No wonder other countries are starting to slowly but surely position themselves to lead in the world once the New Roman Empire crumbles under its own hubris.
If a national Health Care System, a fair wage for workers (that is, everybody who is not rich) and a level playing field between business and unions is "Socialism", then give me some "Socialism", please.  Additionally, there are also far too many people in jail for non-violent crimes, and far too much enthusiasm in some circles for wars.  I vote for sanity.
My god.  All this anti-Edwards and anti-Dem talk of communism and socialism and government taking over our lives sounds like utter lunacy to me.  Under Bush and his merry band of "conservative" wackos, the gov't has intruded into my family's life more than ever.  Populism is not socialism or communism or the desire for gov't control of our lives.  Who or whatever convinced you of that is smoking something pretty fantastic.
Nothing is free especially life under socialist rule. It's failed every where it's been tried, and you still end up with all the same social problems and more. Just look at the way France stacks up it's immigrants in slums.
MK,MO: '...edwards is the only dem that can win the general election,...'

Edwards is a good man.
But, Obama can win, too !!

'...and also the only one that cares about the american citizen, clinton and obama are corporate entities...'

Listen to Obama's answers, MK,it's not as black and white as you think.
Obama is a good and thoughtful man, too.
Obama or Edwards would be a good choice.
Certainly Edwards is pushing populist policies.
But, he and Obama both operated in the same DC culture.
It isn't like one is good and one is bad.
They're both reformers.
Let's not let perfection be the enemy of the good.
Thats right just keep adding more unnecessary cost to business's.  They are already heavily taxed whats one more expense.  No wonder more and more industries are leaving the USA.  It's getting too expensive to opperate within the country.  The only saving grace to businesses right now, and especially manufacturers is that the dollar is taking a dive, increasing our exports.  
Sierra - What relevance does your comment re: Hillary's grass roots have to do with a story about John Edwards?  Hillary wasn't even mentioned.  

Way to be obsessed.
die hard dem / 'Just Vote democratic in 08!'

  sorry chief if hillary gets the nomination me and a whole bunch of other people won't be able to, and hillary is the only dem candidate that commands that level of negativity
The idea of a social contract is nothing new.  It was popularized in the 17th and 18th centuries by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.  All a social contract theory refers to is some sort of agreement by which people form a nation and maintain a social order.  In such an agreement, the people give up some rights to the government in exchange for social order.  

But I like John Edwards.  He seems to come up with all sorts of hooks.  I'm not sure he will be able to win the nomination but he's not a bad guy at all.
Sierra, SF / 'Edwards is a good man.
But, Obama can win, too !!'

  get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash.  

Sierra, SF / 'Edwards is a good man.
But, Obama can win, too !!'

  get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash.  

If you folks think that Companies are shipping jobs overseas now, wait to you see what happens when Mr. Edwards' mandates take place. Required healthcare and retirement?

If companies are required to give certain benefits to workers in one place, butnot another, who do you think they'll hire?
MK,MO: '... get him nominated and I will vote for him, I still believe he is a little too cozy with big business as compared with edwards but I could vote for either, any dem but the criminal hillary, 'bush lite' is a spot on name for this elitist piece of trash...'

MK, we're in synch.
I think this country will really lose an opportunity
if we don't nominate an insurgent/reformer.

If Hillary wins, it'll be 4 long, corrupt years and then another Republican takeover.
And who knows for how long.

I'll buy my daughters airline tickets to Canada...
'Cause they're not gonna spill their blood for Iraqi or Iranian oil !!
Or for the American Empire ....
Edwards is the one pushing all the important issues. We need this guy. Not another reactionary panderer.
Those that would choose Hitlary over Edwards have very short memories. Have they forgotten travelgate,filegate, whitewater, rental of lincolns' bedroom and air force #1, the missing subpoenaed files Hitlary claimed were lost until just before the FBI were about to raid the whitehouse?                And where are the fiscal conservatives that have been in control of the Federal government the past six years? During their reign we have went from a balance budget to the largest national debt and trade deficit in the history of the world, American workers are working more and saving less that at anytime since the great depression, Americans have maxed out their credit, our economy is on the verge of freefall and most of the good paying manufacturing jobs have been shipped to near slave labor countries who have little respect for human rights or the environment. As a longtime supporter of conservative ideology I have had enough of the war mongering and isolation of wealth, it is high time for social reform and a resurection of the oppertunity for the American dream.And Edwards is the only candidate with the integrity and courage to take on "special interest" and corporate America
  IF YOU HAVE A GOVERNMENT OF ,BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE THE ONLY ONES THAT FEAR GOVERNMENT ARE NOT AMERICANS .
  AND IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THEIR PART IN THE SOCIAL ORDER ,THEN GET OUT .THEIR ARE PLENTY OF FASCIST REGIMES AROUND THE GLOBE THAT THEIR GREED WILL FIT INTO .THAT IS IF THAT GREED DOSENT POLUTE AND POISON ALL OF  MANKIND FIRST .
   THESE ANTI SURVIVALISTS THAT LOVE MONEY MORE THEN FRESH AIR AND A FUTURE, SHOULD BE IN STREIGHT JACKETS (DIAMOND STUDED OF COURSE).
The current administration has brought us 6 years of greed, cronyism and corruption.  
Lane , Ann Arbor (Sent Friday, October 26, 2007 1:32 PM)

--- Lane, your whole posting was nicely put.  But I would add the deaths the US and world has suffered because of this administration. Many, many deaths.
Sorry, Ellis, but "conservative" and "edwards" don't go together.
Edwards is the one for 08!  My gosh, do we really want 4 more years like we have had?? And why do we have to label everything like socialism, communism, etc.  Just listen to what Edwards is saying and he has not veered off message.

Edwards is the only one that is for ordinary citizens!  
Bruce you misinterpreted, my vision of conservatism and that of the present Administration are in conflict. I suppose I should have said "former conservative'
"Would that include caps on what sue lawyers can make?"
Ron Adams, Terre Haute Indiana

Mr. Adams,

Trial lawyers receive a portion of the amount awarded by the JURY or the amount the defendant AGREES to settle for, according to an agreement with the client.  The JURY decides how much a trial lawyer makes when it determines the value of damages caused to the plaintiff.  However, many of the cases are settled out of court, and why would a defendant settle for a large sum of money if they did nothing wrong?  

There are two other ways an attorney is paid.  Either according to an agreement between the attorney and their boss, or according to a contract with the client which lays out an hourly rate.

So how do you prefer to limit the amount of money a trial lawyer can make?  Should the jury be excluded from the process, should the defendant be forced to go to court and disallowed from settling out of court, should a client be prohibitted from voluntarily entering into a representation agreement with an attorney of their choice?

Now the frivilous lawsuits the rightwing loves to talk about.  The system has a rule designed to deal with lawsuits which can be characterized as frivilous.  Look up Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and (to the best of my knowledge) all states have enacted a similar provision.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=432588

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google