ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Edwards unveils ‘Social Contract’

Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:19 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/National Journal’s Tricia Miller
Edwards introduced his policy on corporate responsibility in a speech called “Renewing the Social Contract” in Des Moines this morning.

“Over the course of our history, every generation of Americans has helped to expand the reach of that compact, moving us ever closer to the America of our ideals, where opportunity is truly shared by all,” he said in prepared remarks. “But now, instead of expanding further, our social compact is falling apart.”

Edwards called for a “new universal retirement account requiring every business to automatically enroll its workers in at least one plan: a traditional pension, a 401(k), or an IRA.” He also reiterated his support for universal health care, blaming lobbyists and insurance companies for blocking it thus far, and called again for the strengthening of organized labor. He said his administration would enact laws encouraging transparency in corporate reporting and more rights for shareholders, including “a say on executive pay.”

Edwards used the speech to continue his theme of rooting out corruption in Washington, as well as in corporate boardrooms. He brought the speech to a close with a quote from John F. Kennedy: "John F. Kennedy once said, 'The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated.'"

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!!THE MOST ELECTABLE CANDIDATE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.WAKE UP DEMOCRATS!EITHER DRAFT GORE OR VOTE EDWARDS IF YOU WANT TO WIN.THAT IS THE TRUTH!
GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!!THE MOST ELECTABLE CANDIDATE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.WAKE UP DEMOCRATS!EITHER DRAFT GORE OR VOTE EDWARDS IF YOU WANT TO WIN.THAT IS THE TRUTH!
Any body but Hillary!!!
Judging by the amount of comments on this blog entry I'd say that Edwards should be getting much more coverage than he is getting. How about it Todd? When is Hardball going to do some honest to goodness coverage of Edwards? And I don't mean nasty haircut comments...Get Edwards on Harball and let's talk about his new proposals. I think your viewers would LOVE IT! We'd also love to see him on Olberman and Dan Abrams show.
So interesting how the right throws out "evil" words like "communism" and "socialism", and frets about how much money it would cost us to insure or educate our own citizens.  They haven't worried at all about "fascism", "corporatism", or how much money has been wasted on stupid wars, or just got lost(!)in Iraq.  Their priorities are whacked.
Carrie, Eastern Iowa (Sent Friday, October 26, 2007 2:30 PM)

--- thanks for the excellent thumbnail on the social contract.
I second Patty's motion.  More face time with Edwards even if it does cut into your political advertising revenue.
To those of you who revile the idea opf a social contract and call it socialism:
Who holds the power NOW? And how are they helping starving children right here in America? How are they helping the working poor who must go into debt to have their basic survival needs met?
Are you helping these people? Oh, I forgot. It's not YOUR problem.
Chuck Todd already let it slip that Edwards is detested among the DC elite. Why? because he is a threat to their business as usual corporate run policies. The press has nothing but negatives for him because thats what they are ordered to do. Edwards is the one for "the people" We should demand the powers that be give him the press coverage he deserves. As of now the press has been lousy and biased to the max, and  might add not in his favor.He has led on every issue this entire campaign, yet he has been marginalized, ridiculed, and up to now neutralized by a complicit media. 'We the people' should demand journalistic integrity! More Edwards coverage on hi many substantive policy proposals, no more tired RW memes...
John Edwards 2008 'The Peoples President' fighting to return the government back to the people.. Now we the people need to fight for HIM.....
John Edwards is a good man with good ideas, there fore he has no chance of being elected. What we will get is who ever the special interest choose to finance. It will be 4-8 more years of incompetence, mismanagement and favoritism. Oh yes, and more and expanding war.
Republicans go to bed at night praying that John Edwards is the Democratic nominee.  Ron Paul could even beat him.  
"This is a good, honest, caring individual who wants to see the US flourish. "

If that all it takes to be President of the United States I guess I am your man.  

John Edwards (and Hillary Clinton and Senator Obama  for that matter) have not accomplished one significant thing in their lives.  List ten, no make that five, of accomplishments he has had in the past 10 years that do not include fuzzy and worthless resume enhancing words like 'led', 'supported', 'voted for', and, my personal favorite, 'fought for'.  Bet you can't.  These people have no experience.  None.  Zip.  Nada.  Zilch.  Talking about doing something is in a difficult league than actually have done something. Anyone can talk about doing something.  
The end is near. More to come.  This is going to get nastier than a night in Michael Vick's backyard.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,305485,00.html
It takes courage to stand and say what needs to be said, as John Edwards does. It takes intelligence to formulate plans of real change for the good of all citizens of this country. It takes vision to lead on the issues as he has. It will take bold change to make the needed repairs to this nation after Bush, Clinton and Bush. The American people deserve better. Mr. Edwards has my vote.
You guys rock.  Keep up the good work.

How about Edwards and Ron Paul?
The national budget tells us what our values are.

A zero based overhaul of the national budget under an Edwards administration, based on this contract, would look much different.

Recognizing that national defense is the government's first priority, it is yet possible, I believe, to construct such a budget, keep it revenue neutral, and maintain a healthy business climate.
John Edwards must know he won't raise the big bucks that Clinton and Obama raise with positions like this.  There are not many business-types who see that the viability of their companies is tied to the viability of the U.S. - from the needy all the way to the mega-billionaires.

Obviously, John Edwards is less concerned about the number of dollars he raises than he is about being transparent of what his presidency will be about.  The further he goes along in the campaign and reveals himself, the more impressive he is!  This contract is one of the boldest and most forward-thinking expression of leadership ever heard from a U.S. presidential candidate.

 
According to an article in the Week in Review section of today's (Sunday, Oct 28) New York Times, Mr. Edwards, for instance, was known for choosing his cases with care. "'He was very selective,' said James P. Cooney III, who defended a dozen medical malpractice cases brought by Mr. Edwards. 'He only took the best cases, and by that I don’t mean the ones with the highest damages. I mean the ones where somebody had done something really bad.'"

Edwards works hard, does his research, plans with care, and that's why I support him for President.
So what did he say?
"where opportunity is truly shared by all"
Sounds good but I wonder, does all mean ALL?
"new universal retirement account requiring every business to automatically enroll its workers in at least one plan"
Again the all question comes to my mind, Does this include people have no legal right to work in this country, but do?
"universal health care"
Are we going to provide health care for every person found within the borders of the United States?
"the strengthening of organized labor"
Having been a member of O.L. for many years I can affirm that O.L. has a tradition of leaning pretty heavily on the socialist side of the wall.  
"a say on executive pay"
Does this include a say in the pay of U.S. Presidents, Senators, Representatives?? Probably not.
"John F. Kennedy once said, 'The heart of the question is whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether we are going to treat our fellow Americans as we want to be treated.'"
While not an ardent admirer of JFK, I think it is important that we not his use of the combined words 'all Americans' and 'our fellow Americans'. Can you find these word combinations in Mr, Edwards Speech?
Could the word Socialist be applied to Mr. Edwards speech?  Is there a difference between a socialist, a modern democrat, and an American Communist?  
Could you tell me what it is?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=432588

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google