ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Clinton's energy, jobs policies

Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:40 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA -- Clinton laid out proposals today she said would promote clean energy and create at least five million "green-collar" jobs. The wide-ranging speech was the first of a series she will deliver on the topic this week. In it, she talked about the problems caused by climate change and pollution like rising sea levels, water shortages and health problems and compared dealing with these issues to the great challenges of the last century.

"For this generation of Americans, climate change is our space race,” Clinton told the audience at Clipper Turbine Works, Inc., a factory that makes the giant wind turbines seen churning all over the Iowa countryside. “It is our home-front mobilization during World War II and it is our response to the Great Depression."

Clinton added she would push for a new post-Kyoto treaty on global warming and establish a group of the world's major carbon-emitting nations to tackle energy and environment issues.

The perceived Democratic front-runner has been talking up parts of her energy policy for weeks, highlighting her plan for a $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund to invest in alternative energy. This is the first time she has laid out a detailed proposal. She said her policy would help combat global warming, reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, improve the country's national security and be a major engine for job growth.

"What does it mean to be a patriot in America in the 21st century? “End our dependence on foreign oil," the senator said under a green-and-yellow banner that read, "Powering America's Future: New energy, new jobs."    

The policy is centered on a cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions. Clinton claims it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050 from 1990 levels; cut oil imports by two-thirds from 2030-projected levels; and raise fuel efficiency standards to 55 miles per gallon by 2030.

The plan sets a goal of reducing electricity consumption 20 percent from projected levels by 2020 through strict appliance efficiency standards and incentives. It would phase out incandescent light bulbs and replace them with compact fluorescent ones -- a move Clinton said would save more than $10 billion over eight years.

Clinton would also speed the production of hybrid gas-electric vehicles, promote biofuels and public transportation and require all new government buildings to be carbon-neutral under her presidency, she said.

The Republican National Committee -- which now seems to be responding to every speech Clinton delivers -- issued this statement: “Hillary Clinton’s failed solution of throwing money at any problem and increasing government involvement in every facet of our lives will be rejected by the American people.  Senator Clinton has not earned the trust of voters on Social Security, openness and transparency, immigration or tax policy and there is no reason to believe the energy issue will be any different.”

*** UPDATE *** And the Obama camp, which usually doesn't respond, to individual Clinton speeches, issued this: “You can’t bring about change on our energy policy if you change your position to suit the politics of a presidential campaign,” Obama Iowa communications director Josh Earnest said. “When she had the chance to lead, Senator Clinton voted multiple times against legislation to increase production of renewable fuels and to increase fuel efficiency standards. To stand up for rural America and break America's dependence on foreign oil, we need a leader who won't just tell people on the campaign trail what they want to hear, but one who will tell the American people what they need to hear like Senator Obama did when he called for increased fuel efficiency standards during a speech in front of automakers in Detroit.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

If Obama and Edwards do not attack Hillary we will never get the truth from her she will keep on not answering the qnestions so bring it on
As the only regular poster here that is in the green energy business, Hillary is full of BS.

First, cap and trade is a ponzi scheme that is generally illegal in most instances, but fly a jet and plant a tree. It is crap.

Next the CFB instead of regular light bulbs are full of mercury and cost 10 times to produce and cost more to make then regular bulbs. You have to own one for 15 years for it to make a difference. Save money now buy a regular bulb.

The goal is to make more power than reduce power. It is electric power that made the US what it is and it is electric power that will take third world countries out of the dark ages. After Edison developed electric power the industrial revolution exploded, because motors could be made smaller and faster. The goal is to bring power to the people and yes renewables can help but they are not the only solution.

Oil is important to everything in our lives and if we could drill where we have oil and gas our dependance on foreign oil would be less, but the dem loving environs do not want us drilling anywhere near the American coast, but the Chinese can drill off Key West north of Cuba - thats stupid, but liberal.

Hillary has never been in the energy business and has no clue as to what it takes to find, develope and produce energy. She should apply for cap and trade for all the CO2 that she spews that means nothing.

She was in a windmill plant and neglected to talk about all the regulations that keep them from going in. Sen. Kennedy, her good friend, is against the cape wind project, can't have those outside my back porch on the cape! No one asked her about that. More and more regulations are being written to keep wind power from coming to certain areas. Just like drilling, the coasters want the power but not what makes it. Hypocrites.

She wants to TAKE from the oil companies and make a fund, that does not make the world better. It just punishes the oil companies for being in business. When can we punish the government for being in business.


You Obama and Edwards people need to let the two attackers know  that their HOPE is over.Go Hillary,you are the true WINNER and those two boys will have each other forever.Disgusting all the attacks on our future President Senator Clinton.All of you nasty bloggers should do something POSITIVE for your country  or help someone in need like in a 3rd world country!!!   writing these hate filled blogs against HRC  all day shows the miserable life you have. I'm sorry for each of you.  
This is embarrassing that any of you consider yourselves educated. Hillary Clinton has had her Energy Policy Specifics posted on her website for MONTHS. This is the press release. i'm not going to explain to you the details of her policy because apparently with your quaint vocabularies you can all read.

and I'm kinda sick of this archives thing. Really. She can't do a damn thing about it. Her and Bill have been the most persistent presidential couple to have their papers released except for their personal letters between themselves. which after the thousand page detailed discussion of his sex life, i can kinda understand why.

if you want to be pandered to and believe in HOPE whatever that means, then i guess you can go with the 2-year experienced senator whose record never has really been tested and ran away crying when he should've been voting on Iran.

that'll lead america out of the dark ages.
It's nice(sarcasm) that everyone wants to attack the auto industry as it crawls out of its grave.  Just quit hugging trees, drill in Alaska, sell the gas for 2.00 a gallon and put ALL of that money into researching alternative fuels.  Just don't attack the auto industry...let them heal their wounds first.
As posted by Van

'Much Ado About Nothing
A Commentary by Douglas Schoen
Monday, November 05, 2007


"With the publication of two polls this week showing no change in the Democratic nomination for President, it seems clear that Hillary Clinton's position is most likely more secure than many in the media and her opponents would like it to be." '

Big Surprise here:
Schoen was President Bill Clinton's research and strategic consultant during the 1996 reelection campaign
-and this was included at the end of the article- nice to leave this info out Van- seems you're picking up on that great SPIN idea- must be learning it from your issues dodging candidate
We need real Change. and if we are gonna change, lets go big or dont go.

OBAMA or EDWARDS 08


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=448498

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google