ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Oh-eight (R): Stand by your man

Posted: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:15 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

So whom is the Bush family supporting in the GOP race? The Washington Post does a comprehensive look and finds Bush clan fairly split. Literally, Jeb Bush's kids are split between Thompson and Giuliani (while Jeb himself seems the most complimentary to Romney). And that's the Bushes in a nutshell: They’re basically as undecided as the GOP itself.

GIULIANI: Rudy appears to have made the decision that he's going to stand by Bernie Kerik in some form no matter what happens, defending his friend's stint as a crime fighter. "Giuliani said yesterday that the crime-fighting successes of the disgraced former police commissioner, Bernard B. Kerik, outweighed his legal problems, and added that ‘if I have the same degree of success and failure as president of the United States, this country will be in great shape.’”

In the interview with AP, Giuliani said that he had erred in not thoroughly vetting Mr. Kerik, who is now under a federal investigation for accepting free renovations while he was working for Mr. Giuliani from a construction firm suspected of having links to organized crime. But Mr. Giuliani said that Mr. Kerik’s wrongdoing did not diminish what he had accomplished for the city. ‘There were mistakes made with Bernie Kerik,’ Mr. Giuliani said in the interview. ‘But what’s the ultimate result for the people of New York City? The ultimate result for the people of New York City was a 74 percent reduction in shootings, a 60 percent reduction in crime, a correction program that went from being one of the worst in the country to one that was on “60 Minutes” as one of the best in the country, 90 percent reduction of violence in the jails.”

Besides Kerik, Giuliani addressed his business dealings in the AP interview. “Giuliani laughed when asked if he would ever release a list of clients involved with his consulting firm, Giuliani Partners. ‘Everything I did with Giuliani Partners has been totally legal, totally ethical. They are a very ethical and law-abiding business… There's nothing for me to explain about it. We've acted honorably, decently."

HUCKABEE: The candidate was raising money in Fred Thompson's backyard at Franklin's Williamson Christian College.

MCCAIN: In corn country, McCain told Iowans “he opposes government subsidies on ethanol the same way he opposes subsidies on other products, including oil.”

The last thing the McCain campaign needs is liberal columnists asking the "can he come back" question. When more conservative columnists do it, then the campaign will know he's getting somewhere. Still, this E.J. Dionne piece does have some good quotes to use in fundraising emails.

PAUL: The AP writes, “Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, aided by an extraordinary outpouring of Internet support Monday, hauled in more than $4.2 million in nearly 24 hours… Paul's total deposed Mitt Romney as the single-day fundraising record holder in the Republican presidential field. When it comes to sums amassed in one day, Paul now ranks only behind Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton, who raised nearly $6.2 million on June 30, and Barack Obama.”

The idea for yesterday's record-setting fundraising push for Ron Paul was hatched about a month ago among supporters not affiliated with the campaign, Paul spokesman Jesse Benton tells First Read. The supporters wanted to raise money online and make a statement. So they put together a Web site, with the hook of November 5. The date’s significance was two fold -- 364 days before the 2008 presidential election and the British Fawkes Day, named after Guy Fawkes, who attempted to blow up the British Parliament in the 17th Century and is referenced in the movie “V for Vendetta,” which Benton called, “Kind of a cool flick.”
 
On the haul, Benton said they “expected it to be a good day,” but he was admittedly surprised by just how much the total wound up being. How has Paul done it? He represents three disparate groups -- “old Republicans,” as Benton called them, of the “Taft/Goldwater vein,” who believe in “not policing the world;” marginalized libertarians; and disaffected liberals and moderate Democrats frustrated by a continued war in Iraq. “It’s a mixture of the three,” Benton said. “Democrats were elected in '06 to end this thing [the war in Iraq] and haven’t been able to.” But that is not your typical Republican primary voter, and Benton acknowledged that. “Obviously that is a concern,” Benton said.
 
Paul has said -- and Benton affirmed -- that the candidate will not, and cannot support, a candidate in favor of continuing the war in Iraq and certainly would not back a Democrat. But Paul has also said, and Benton insists, he will not seek a third-party run; he will not be this cycle’s Ross Perot. “Ron’s run third party before, and ballot access makes it almost impossible,” a pragmatic-sounding Benton said of Paul, who ran as the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate in 1988. But what happens to that fervent, activist base if Paul doesn’t win his party’s nomination? Will they just sit idly -- with all their millions already poured in -- as Paul stands on the sidelines? What happens when they start passing those petitions to draft Paul to run? They’ll make a compelling case. Guy Fawkes certainly wouldn’t sit it out.

ROMNEY: Paul Weyrich endorsing Romney is getting some attention. The Boston Globe notes: "Weyrich's support could help Romney make further inroads with evangelical Christian leaders who consider his Mormon faith heretical, and could also aid Romney in blunting the surging candidacy of Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and Baptist preacher who is an ally of the causes that are dear to Weyrich." More: “‘This is a significant boon for the Romney campaign,’ said Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform, who has not endorsed a candidate yet. ‘Weyrich's endorsement will speak loudly to conservatives in general - guys who care about guns and taxes and everything else, but especially religious conservatives.’”

Romney's latest direct mail piece to land in Iowa mailboxes subtlely targets Giuliani. "Mitt Romney is drawing contrasts with rival Rudy Giuliani on the issue of immigration in a new mailing being sent to Iowa Republican activists. In the mailing, Romney touts his plan to slash funding for cities that declare themselves immigration sanctuaries.”

NBC/NJ's Erin McPike was with Romney in Florida yesterday. Both in his stump speech and in his answers later to reporters, Romney suggested that marriage is a status that doesn’t change in separate regions and therefore ought to be legislated on a national level. And asked to evaluate Republican rival Fred Thompson’s Meet the Press appearance, Romney critiqued his stance on same-sex marriage. “A person who moves around the country carries that status with them. And embracing the idea of same-sex marriage in one state without recognizing its impact on the entire nation I think is wrong. It’s one of the places we disagree, and so far as I can tell, among the four front-runners in the national standings at least, I’m the only one that says we have to have a national standard for marriage,” he said.

Salon's Scherer finds a Florida evangelical minister in Florida, Bill Keller, who doesn't have many nice things to say about Mormons. "Though Keller's rhetoric is extreme and his predictions are controversial, his biblical reasoning is mainstream for many of the nation's Christian evangelicals, who make up about 40 percent of the Republican Party. Large denominations like the Southern Baptist Convention have long considered Mormonism to be a cult, not a true path to salvation."

THOMPSON: In New Hampshire yesterday, Thompson got to show off his gun stance. “Seeking to point out his differences with his fellow Republican presidential candidates, the former Tennessee senator and actor toured the Thompson Center Arms factory and spoke to more than 100 workers, some with tattoos on their necks.”

The campaign is still doing some cleanup from Sunday's Meet appearance, especially on the issue of abortion. If Thompson's the nominee, he will not try and remove the human life amendment from the GOP platform, so reports CBN's David Brody.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments


Go Ron Paul!! =)
After Ron Paul's massive $4 million fundraising yesterday, you have to wonder whether Ron Paul will  actually be a factor in the GOP primaries? Remember, a very recent New Hampshire poll had Paul running at 7.5%, AHEAD of Fred Thompson: http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/10/morning-polls-everything-as-usual-in.html
Hopefully, Ron Paul won't have to rely on running as a third party candidate. Yesterday proved that the only candidate that will protect the constitution has the support of the people and the message is contagious. If only the MSM would allow equal access to air time, there would be no doubt who our president would be in 2008.
In other words, the Jeb Bush family are all on crack, starting with Noelle.
I wonder how Republicans interpret the movie "V for Vendetta". I know liberals come out of it thinking that people need to stand up to over-reaching government. Republicans must come out of it thinking that more rights should be denied to the public to avoid getting overthrown.
finally fair coverage on Ron Paul...good job.
Ah, Julie, standing by a crooked cop.  Need anyone say more?  The culture of Republican corruption will be restored under Rudy G.
Go Romney! With significant leads in both IA and NH he is sure to win SC and go on to beat Hilary. It is time to admit that he is the only one with the resume and the intelligence to lead out country.
It will be between Guiliani and Edwards, just watch.
Thank you for the great consolidated column about the several campaigns. As a Ron Paul supporter, I was naturally drawn to the analysis of his big day yesterday. I appreciate how you put together the report, citing the AP story and expanding on it by getting insight about it from Paul spokesperson Jesse Benton.
Rudy's stand on Kerik is exactly what one would expect from his obvious right-wing authoritarian personality.  Once you're a member of the "in" group any and all wrongs are excused as long as you remain loyal to the group.  That's why Scooter Libby's lawbreaking is excusable.  It's why wingnuts were furious that Tom Delay and Duke Cunningham were caught and willing to excuse their wrongdoing.  As well as why Ollie North, Eliot Abrams, and Adm. Poindexter remain conservative cult figures in spite of being admitted lawbreakers.  And why John Dean received death threats for doing his civic duty during Watergate.  These people are dangerous to our nation and the political process will remain sick until it is cleansed of these people.
Who the BushCo principals vote for is of no interest to me unless Jeb has something to do with the vote count, again.

But that wasn't news in 2,000, was it?
Asad "I wonder how Republicans interpret the movie "V for Vendetta".

Well my first thought was it should be remade with an Iranian historical spin, and have the DVDs and costumes smuggled into Iran. Of course that would mean Hollywood actually doing something to help America, and that doesn't sell overseas.

My next thought was this is what will happen to America if democrats ever gain total control. Just look at the fear mongering they've done over GoreBull Warming.
Other than that I thought it was a great flick.
"that's the Bushes in a nutshell"

--- was that an intentional pun?
It often intrigues me that evangelicals would support pro-life positions, families, etc, yet still support illegal wars that kill or maim our brave soldiers who signed up to defend us and our Constitution. Is it they actually believe Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? It didn't for those of you keeping score. Is it that they all really don't care about finding Osama bin Laden and bringing him to justice? There is a candidate who is pro-life, a family man, and supports the end to the war in Iraq yet is committed to hunting down bin Laden. His name is Ron Paul.

He also happens to be the only Republican who can beat the Democratic nominee no matter who that is, and that is because he has been against the Iraq War from Day One.
“Giuliani laughed when asked if he would ever release a list of clients involved with his consulting firm, Giuliani Partners. ‘Everything I did with Giuliani Partners has been totally legal, totally ethical. They are a very ethical and law-abiding business… There's nothing for me to explain about it. We've acted honorably, decently."

Is that a yes or a no?  I mean, if it was Hillary who had laughed in response to such a question, people would jump all over her for it.  
Rudy is going to do more good than bad for our country.
Just look at Bernie and see that his good will shines through during his trial.
Evaluating how you will do while using a man who got caught taking perks as an example does not give me good feelings about Rudeboy. What an odd way of saying something and nothing at the same time.
Grover says Weyrich endorsment of Mitt will appeal to guys who care about guns and taxes. No gun issue to think of Grover and I too like my guns so what do you really want to say. Taxes, we all think about that, I think Grover sees his own down fall in the party and is stumping for Weyrich more than Mitt.
Mitt will slash federal money from cities called sanctuaries, first, he has to have a congress to go along unless he takes the imperial road and signs executive orders, two, what money would he slash, all of it, health and police, good plan to start a riot or medical emergency. Mitt may look good but as soon as everyone hears his ideas he will tank in the general election. Blaming cities for a federal problem ignored for many years sounds like killing the baby because it crys.
FRED FRED FRED, guns are cool look at me, I like guns, when is he going hunting?
Buck season starts here soon, maybe I'll see Fred in one of those high priced SUVs traveling around on the road, looking for game and throwing their beercans out for me to pick up.
Fred is truly the most idiotic of them, go Huckabee kick his ole butt back to the porch, his hunting dog is hunting for him.
It would be pretty cool to see an Obama-Paul general election, with a choice between the two candidates who are most pro-Constitution, anti-neoconservative, and who get the most contributions from our troops in the field.  Plus, zero negative personal attacks; I can't see it from either guy.  Come to think of it, that race would be healthy for the country in so many ways, restoring American political dialogue to what it was for over two centuries before the neocons stormed in: an ongoing debate between individual freedom and social well-being where neither side ever truly vanquishes the other permanently.
Didn't Romney raise 6.5 million in a day?  4.2 is definitely amazing though.  Maybe they can use some of that for the anger management classes.  All the Paul supporters I've met (Iowa in particular) were very angry.  Hopefully the 4.2 will help Paul smile more too, instead of that pursed mouth scowl.
Record setting fundraiser by Ron Paul?

No, actually THE record setting fundraiser was done in January in Boston by Team Romney hauling in 6.5 million in one National call day.

Romney is by far the best candidate for President (as is his wife & family) and poised to win this.

The anointing of Rudy Guiliani by the national media will only take him so far. Thankfully, the national polls do not control the early primaries.

Here's what Kathleen Parker had to say today on National Review 2008 predictions:


Kathleen Parker:


"I hate guessing for all the usual reasons, including the fact that 4,000 things can happen to change things. But here’s my go-for-broke best guess: Clinton vs. Romney.

Clinton will beat the boys for the nomination because she’s tougher, has the machinery, the money and The Bill. Romney will prevail as Bobby Jindal did in Louisiana because this is the season of the brainiac. IQ matters.

Mitt will take Iowa and New Hampshire and begin to get the attention of the many who still don’t know who he is. His Mormonism eventually will become less important as his campaign focuses attention on values. His mind-changing on issues such as abortion will become less important because in the brain game, people who never change their minds are idiots. Not insignificantly, Mitt can keep writing himself checks and he’s got a winning track record with the Olympics and as MA governor.

And if he tags Mike Huckabee, beloved by evangelicals, for VP, he’s even smarter than I thought.

Will he beat Hillary? Well, that’s another crystal ball altogether. She’s never run anything; Mitt has run a state, a wildly successful business, and bailed out the Olympics when it was going under. When it comes to executive experience, there’s no comparison. None. When it comes to first families, Hillary still has The Bill, and Mitt has a lovely wife who will never embarrass anyone. These folks are so squeaky clean, they’ll have to resurrect Norman Rockwell to paint the White House portrait."

Exactly!

With the sub-title of you article, "Stand by your man", it (appropriately) reminded me of the new Rascal Flatts song...STAND



"Cause when push comes to shove you taste what you're made of,

You might bend til you break cause it's all you can take

On your knees you look UP

Decide you've had enough... and you STAND!"

Out with Republican mediocrity in with Storge!! I love the comparison to gov. elect Bobby Jindal, the new face of the Republican party.

Bring it on home Gov. Romney!



Yes, Dave. The words "total control" are key. Our government works because of checks and balances. And we should always strive for these checks and balances. When any party gains total control, they put in systems that cater to their own special interests. It may be fear mongering to benefit the planet (a liberal's special interest), or fear mongering to benefit corporations (a conservative's special interest).
If Rudy is nominated, he won't even carry his home state.  Ask Al Gore how that worked for him in 2000.
Hey Mitt, way to disregard Mike Huckabee.  Watch out, because he is nipping at your heels nationally.  And, while your campaign is lagging in the polls, Gov. Huckabee is picking up steam.  

Of course, I understand why you want to minimize him.  All the social conservative stances that you decided upon when you entered the race he has had for his entire life.  That's an argument you just can't win.
I can only see a female as our next president. Hillary will be the next president of the United States. This vision is very strong.
When 70% of Americans want to end the war, only an anti-war Republican can beat any Democrat. The public still thinks the Democrats are against the war, but clearly Hillary is fine with it lasting until the end of her first term. Obama or Edwards might pragmatically withdraw the troops but won't do what is necessary to end the occupation permanently as well as redeploy our foreign-based troops to our own country where we are expected to be defended.
Gators - You are correct about Romney.  Perhaps it is the record for online fundraising?  It's hard to tell, as I have read differing accounts of who has raised the most money in a day.  
I can see a female in the White House. Hillary Clinton will be our next president. I can see it clearly.
Romney is a dog abuser and worse than that..a stinken Mormon!
To try and give some perspective lets look at recent history and contrast the ‘Best’ versus the ‘Worst’.  What we see is that the consistency and thereby the meaning isn’t found in the issues or in their political identity but rather in their personal quality or lack thereof.  So maybe all of our concern and back and forth bantering about the issues simply isn’t where we should be focused or where we should base our decision.

My chosen examples (replace with your own):
Best:                 Worst:

Truman                GWBush (absolute worst)
Reagan        Nixon
Kennedy        Johnson
 (*excluding his womanizing which shouldn’t be excused)
                  +/- Qualities
        +                           -
honesty dishonesty
compassion arrogance
respectful belligerent
conscientious self-indulgence
some humility insatiable ego
sincerity deception
           (expand as you see fit)

If we want whoever to make the right decisions about Iraq, Iran, foreign policy, domestic issues, consistency with Christian values or whatever, it may be best to just check our own biases and strongly weigh their integrity and character before we make our choice.  This includes the need to make our own decisions and to not be led by others who have their biases/motives.  We have vividly seen what we end up with when we allow ourselves to be manipulated and I don’t think we want ‘more of the same’.
Please let's realize how great Fred Thompson would be! Unfortunately, I think he may have come in too little too late, and some think he is too old. But he is the best candidate out there on the Republican side!
Basically, you're an America-hater if you don't love Ron Paul. Remember what you learned in civics class about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? And remember pledging allegiance to the flag?

Well, that's what Ron Paul represents. He's what America is all about. That's what I grew up with. That's why I'm voting for Ron Paul and that's why everyone in my family is voting for Ron Paul too.
Ron Paul is the last hope for America. I fear that, if he doesn't win, America will be lost- I am sure that any other candidate (whether Democrat or Republican) will end up giving us nationalized health care, never ending war, more church-state relations, more government regulated commerce (while still calling it "free trade") more robbing of the people by the unconstitutional federal reserve and IRS, never ending illegal immigration (after all, they all support the North American Union idea), they will take away our guns,  and control more of the  individual through more patriot act policies. The idea of "America" with its experiment of freedom is holding on by a thread- what will we do?
Stand up for the constitution! Vote Ron Paul- the hope for America.
Rudy - Arm a little straighter, palm a little higher, other arm.
Does this mean we'd be trading No-Bid Contractors for No-Bid Sopranos?
Ron Paul is not extremist, outlandish, a moonbat or anything else but a highly intelligent man who is the only one who believes in the rule of law in the this pack. This government is extremist. How can you even justify a government that starts wars and interventions perpetually, builds Iraq while New Orleans is in shambles and burns coal for power and keeps increasing foreign oil dependence. This government has failed, and this is a time to vote for Ron Paul to flush this terrorist government down the toilet. The only extremists here is the maniacs that cling to the government of the military industrial complex.  

RON PAUL, 2008, FREEEEEDOM! THIS IS AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
The very idea of "electability" is an interesting one, in that, WE THE PEOPLE determine someone's "electability."

It’s not the polls, or MSM or…whatever.  It’s US!

The object of an election is to put into practice, at the governmental level, the ideals, that are consistent with the U.S. Constitution, I as a voter/taxpayer/American citizen deem beneficial to me personally and me corporately (being a legal citizen who cares deeply about my country).

It’s really quite simple: if enough of US decide that we want our government operating under such-and-such ideals, and we vote based on that desire (not the “lesser of two evils”), it can and does happen.

History, recent and not-so-recent, is replete with examples of “underdogs” triumphing: “Navy Beats Notre Dame, Ending 44-Year Losing Streak” (Nov. 3, 2007); “Appalachian State 34, No. 5 Michigan 32” in “one of the greatest upsets in college football history….” (Sept. 1, 2007);  in early-2003, Joe Lieberman was leading the field for the Democratic Presidential nomination yet failed to win any primary; in early-1991 Bill Clinton was at 2% and went on to win the Presidency; in early-1975 Jimmy Carter was polling at 1% and went on to win the Presidency.

Would to God that we as citizens would approach the election process with the fervor, intensity and no-holds-barred approach that we can see in life’s other activities.  I can assure you that, although some members of the Navy and Appalachian State teams had their doubts, they were encouraged to believe in themselves and to make the best possible effort they could, being unwilling to settle for anything less than that best effort.

No, no, NO, folks!  Our job as U.S. citizens and patriots is not to "pick a winner," which seems to me to be a view which trivializes our opportunity and responsibility as citizens.  We’re to carefully consider all our options and then vote based on what is best for our COUNTRY!

One by one, as each of us decides that our vote IS important and that we are modern stewards of this great country, for which so many have given so much, THEN we begin to realize what we must do.

For me, that means expending whatever resources I can to make right what so many have worked so hard to destroy: my country...the United States of America.  This great land deserves nothing less than the best I have to give.  Can I truly call myself a "patriot" having done less than I could for this great country?  What kind of American am I to see an opportunity to install into the White House a man with demonstrable and impeccable credentials and then do little to nothing to forward that effort?

No!  I will have no part whatsoever in sitting idly by as others who, in the name of God or Money or “Compassionate Conservatism” or “Honor” or whatever do their utmost to denigrate and dissolve this great country…MY country!  RON PAUL for President!  Viva la Revolución!

P.S. If someone doesn’t like the way the U.S. was designed to operate and opposes a return to that way of thinking and governance, I politely suggest they find another country that DOES provide all the services and care they desire from their government. (“Paging a Mr. Robert Altman and Mr. Alec Baldwin…Final boarding call for any and all flights departing America….”)  But that is NOT the way the U.S. was designed and I, and millions of others, intend on returning the U.S. to it’s roots…it’s Constitutional roots.  


Carrie:

  Presidential candidate Mitt Romney did raise the most $$$ in one day irrespective of how it was achieved. The bottom line is how many dollars for a candidate in one day.

   They both had either option aviable to them. Mitt Romney chose friends, family, campaign staffers and they used phones for 6.5 million. Romney knew it would work and he was right. This is why we need Romney's leadership in D.C.

And that's the un-MITT-i-gated Truth!

Justin read your remark about Gov. Huckabee. He is good but... Go read on line Southern Political report today. Here's the caption:

Another Failed Governor of a Small State?

By John A. Tures
Associate Professor of Political Science
LaGrange College


Go Iron-Willard... Unapolgetic pro-lifer and intelligent fiscal brainiac!

Go the Distance Team Romney, this is marathon not a sprint.


"Guy Fawkes certainly wouldn’t sit it out."

Ron Paul won't need to sit it out either; unless the Republicans have a death wish (and well they might), Paul will be nominated.

None of the Republican shills stands a chance against Hillary.
Romney's 6.5 million included 3.4 million in PLEDGES

like an iou - you know, what we give to China so they can finance the war in Iraq.

Romney's actual number of donation on Jan 8th was 3.1 million per the FEC
In corn country, McCain told Iowans “he opposes government subsidies on ethanol the same way he opposes subsidies on other products, including oil.”

--- that took some balls. Is McCain going to re-invent himself again?
There aint no way we are gonna have a crossdressing, fake macho man with a lisp, for president of this great country!
All democrats!!Just vote democratic on election day.
I think Ron Paul is an impressive man, but I am not YET convinced that he has the executive abilities to be president.  This latest haul of cash is amazing, but it wasn't really the product of the organization that HE built. It was supporters from outside his official organization that pulled off this feat. I'm not minimizing their efforts, only saying that it hasn't shown me Paul's abilities to build an effective organization -- though he has undoubtedly impressived the website builders sufficiently to do this for him.

I think he's a great guy and all, honest, principled, etc.  But for CEO ability, so far Romney comes out on top.

They'd make an impressive team.

If you want a thick wallet or a fat purse you want to get rid of the IRS and the banking cartels and all taxes not ratified through our Constitution! My god people do you love being slaves?! Free your mind and support the only candidate who supports your interests and america's interests! Ron Paul!
Details - good comment on Ghouliani's pic, too funny!
Romney being CEO of an investment company doesn't equate to the leadership abilities of a medical doctor responsible for bringing life into this world.
The qualities of a Doctor in my mind outweigh the qualities of a CEO when it comes to leading the free world.
How many employees did Romney manage - or did he just manage money?
Well, my own husband is a military physician who also saves lives, so I am not deprecating Paul's medical credentials.  In military medicine one has many opportunities to exercise many different leadership roles, but Paul wasn't in the service all that long.

I think Ron Paul is a great guy.  I just presently think he would be a better vice-president -- someone who could advise someone who excels in executive skills -- and help keep the president true to his principles.

I think there is the potential for some impressive synergy there.  Paul true to self and country. Romney and incredible do-er and achiever, who knows how to get the job done. I think they could both use the strengths of the other.

ROMNEY will be the next president, and rightfully so.  He is the only leader with any experience, is by far the most inteligent, educated, prepared leader running.  Folks, get ready for Romney vs Hil-Billy 2007.  Any no matter who Hillary runs agains, she is totally un-electable.  She is far too polarizing. The fact that she is prety much a lock makes the race totally a republican win.  

ROMNEY ROMNEY ROMNEY!!!!!!
What is so contagious about Ron Paul? The man has not even topped 5% in popularity in the United States. I cannot comprehend why anyone would vote for Ron Paul. The media hates him. He would be the least effective president of all time because he does not practice diplomacy. While he maybe straight forward about the constitution, he needs to win with the support of the media. Otherwise, he has no chance of winning this political contest. The media would "eat him alive" should he become president each and every time he did something that changes the status quo. Then, before you know it, the people would all be praying for an impeachment like many are doing for Bush.

It is my opinion that the only way the Constitution will be saved is by more blood on our own soil. A single president cannot do it by themselves. It would require a president, a significant majority of the Senate and the House, and some Supreme Court justices who are able to see the constitution from the position our founding fathers saw it. Anything else, simply will not work. There are far to many people who are self-absorbed in their political views rather than thinking about how decisions will impact the nation as a whole. The constitution was only meant for those who lead a life of service to others. If we as Americans cannot or will not serve others, than the constitution will lose value in the lives of those who do not serve.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=450592

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google