ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Progress vs. protection

Posted: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:14 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Progress vs. protection: One of the most striking findings in the latest NBC/WSJ poll is just how angry Americans -- Democrats, Republicans, and independents -- are, and how much they want change. Just 21% believe the country is on the right track, only 31% approve of Bush’s job, and a whopping 74% say they want the next president to take a different approach than Bush. All this sounds like the 2008 election is shaping up as a slam-dunk for the Democrats, right? Not so fast. While Americans want change, they appear to have differing opinions of what that means. In the poll, 51% said they want the next president to focus on progress and help move the country forward, compared with 44% who said they want a president to focus on protecting what has made America great. Interestingly, says NBC/WSJ pollster Peter Hart (D), the split here falls under normal partisan lines: The “progress” folks tend to be Democratic-leaning subgroups (African Americans, liberals, people under 35, independents), while the “protection” people tend to lean Republican (conservatives, evangelicals, people over 65). The result here is still an advantage for the Dems, but not as big as their lead in the generic presidential ballot suggests (50%-35%). It's a good preview of just how each party's nominee may attempt to run, and it may explain -- at least on the GOP side -- why a guy like Giuliani (i.e., Mr. Protector) is doing so well.

*** Hillary, Rudy maintain leads; Fred drops: Looking at the Democratic presidential field, Hart and NBC/WSJ co-pollster Bill McInturff (R) say that it would be incorrect to note from this survey that Clinton is in trouble after her recent debate performance. But it would be equally wrong, they add, to suggest she’s headed to a coronation. Clinton leads Obama, 47%-25%, which is virtually unchanged from September. Edwards comes in third at 11%, which is a five-point drop for him and his lowest number all year. All three Democrats lead Giuliani in a hypothetical general election match-up, but it’s within the poll’s margin of error (46%-45% for Clinton; 44%-42% for Obama; and 45%-44% for Edwards). Meanwhile, Giuliani leads the GOP field with 33% --
followed by McCain at 16%, Thompson at 15%, and Romney at 11%. Thompson, in fact, dropped eight points since September, while Huckabee gained four points (from 4% in September to 8% now).

*** Circa 1968? Looking more closely at Clinton’s numbers in the new NBC/WSJ, Hart says: “Hillary Clinton is really Richard Nixon, circa 1968” -- which is something we’ve also alluded to in the past. Of course, this ISN'T saying that her Administration will orchestrate the break-in of a popular building. Rather, it’s saying that she’s respected for her knowledge and experience (76% of Democrats and 51% of all adults give her high marks on this attribute), while also viewed as a polarizing figure due to her past (only 49% of Democrats and 34% of all adults see her as likeable). Moreover, she has a net-negative on the feeling thermometer (43% fav/44% unfav) versus Obama’s (43%-24%) and Edwards’ (37%-31%) net-positives. “At this stage, she has a magnificent tailwind” given the Democrats’ structural advantages, Hart adds. “But against that, she has an exceptionally polarizing image.” However, do remember that Richard Nixon won two terms…

*** Do Republicans really want a three-way race? Hillary also seems to benefit if there’s a third-party candidacy. A three-way Clinton-Giuliani-Pat Buchanan contest is 44%-35%-12%. What that tells McInturff is that an anti-abortion third-party candidate has the capacity to shift a large portion of voters away from the GOP. (Note: Pat's not running; he just had the best known profile of someone running to Rudy's right, so we tested him.) Meanwhile, a Clinton-Giuliani-Bloomberg match-up breaks 42%-39%-10%, which is closer for the GOP but still not as close as a Rudy-Hillary head-to-head. As Hart puts it, Clinton benefits if there’s a third-party candidate, because that person splits the anti-Hillary vote.

*** When voters attack: Congress’ approval rating is at 19%, and that’s largely fueled by independents’ increasing disapproval. Per Hart, “This says to Democratic leaders, ‘You are not communicating. And you are not communicating with independents.’” That said, Democrats still enjoy a nine-point advantage on the generic congressional ballot (46%-37%). But just 39% of respondents believe their OWN member of Congress deserves re-election; 51% say it’s time to give someone new a chance. That's a staggering number, folks. “I believe that we are facing as angry and unstable an electorate as I’ve seen in my career, McInturff says. And when that happens: “A lot of straight-line projections we thought will happen will not happen.”

*** The Bernie Kerik hurdle: So far, Giuliani has cleared some important hurdles -- speaking to the NRA, addressing the Values Voter Summit -- that analysts thought he’d trip over, although he cleared them largely by just showing up. Now comes Bernie Kerik’s upcoming indictment, which could be announced on Friday. If Rudy emerges unscathed from this, what else is there to stop him on his way to the GOP nomination? One person who wants to stand in his way is Romney, whose poll numbers are on the way up in South Carolina (something that's largely been under the radar lately). Is a situation emerging where Giuliani is getting stronger and stronger nationally, while Romney is making a move in the one early nominating contest that has been his weakest state?

*** On the trail: Biden, in New Hampshire, delivers a major policy address on Pakistan; Clinton is also in New Hampshire, where she attends an energy and environment roundtable; Giuliani campaigns in Iowa and then head to Las Vegas; Huckabee is in Iowa and Michigan; McCain stumps in McCain and then raises money in Chicago; Obama campaigns in Iowa; Richardson is in New Hampshire; Romney fundraises in New Canaan, CT; and Thompson hits a fundraiser and concert with country music star John Rich of Big and Rich.

Countdown to Iowa: 56 days
Countdown to New Hampshire: 61 days
Countdown to Michigan: 68 days
Countdown to Nevada and SC GOP primary: 72 days
Countdown to SC Dem primary: 79 days
Countdown to Florida: 82 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 89 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 362 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 439 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I have a question for First Read:  Why is the press so obsessed with this Rudy vs Hillary blood match?
if it was another time, when things are at peace and things are well, it would be funny but, we are in deep trouble as a country and both candidates are simply the worst of each side.
rudy is a lunatic and Hillary is Nixion in more than just your beloved polls.
the press knows they influence voters greatly and the storyline all year has been designed to drive Rudy and Hillary to the nomination knowing they would both make terrible presidents for this time in history.
So, why is the press still so insistent on driving it and obsesses over this fantasy?
Kucinich Tops Liberal Activists' Poll
Nathan Burchfiel
Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) - Liberal activists across the country voted Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) as their favorite candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination in a poll released Tuesday by Democracy for America (DFA). Yet other national polls - not exclusively of liberal activists - show Kucinich trailing frontrunners such as Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D- Ill.).

Nationally, Kucinich received almost 32 percent of the 150,000 votes cast in the Internet poll. Clinton, the frontrunner in primary polls, received only 4.2 percent of the votes. Her closest rival, Obama (D-Ill.), received 13.9 percent.

In second place behind Kucinich was former Vice President Al Gore, who is not officially running for the nomination. Gore earned 24.8 percent of the votes. Former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) received 15.6 percent of the votes.
All the major candidates except Clinton and Sen. Joe Biden (D-Conn.) campaigned for votes in the poll. Gore supporters who have been encouraging him to run for the nomination organized a write-in campaign, propelling him into second place nationwide, according to poll organizers."

You can bet you won't see a headline here about Dennis that isn't about his hot spouse or UFO's...


Van


I'm surprized to see the edwards drop given his great performance in the last debate.

Hillary holding steady? Barakites must be going nuts
Rudy is good at protecting...himself. Ask his ex's. Fred has made his points...now when is that TV show of his own going to show up? I doubt if there is a Three-Way-Split, unless the Independent Candidate is also a Woman. Hillary gets 95 per cent of the Woman Vote. Mitt's handlers told him to kiss Everybody in SOuth Carolina. Even Hillary, if he runs into her. Rudy is busy kissing Preachers.  And the Countdown? Dubya's gonna hafta scramble if he wants to suspend the 22nd Amendment. (Lookout Iran!)
Its being reported that Hillary Clnton is backing out of a sit down interview on the Today program. Tim Russert exposed her during the last debate, so she will not let herself be open to hard questions anymore. She will stick to scripted monolog, and planted questions from milk toast reporters. If defeated in Iowa, she will fade from view with thbis type of non approchable, non answered, canditate in hideing campaign. So Chuck you better crank up the spin machine
Despite Dems having control of Congress, the desire for chamge hurst Republicans the most. Everyone agrees that Bush is a disaster, and change needs to start at the top. One year of Dem Congressional control is not enough to pass judgement.

http://www.political-buzz.com/
you forgot that ron paul is going to win the repub nomination, re-do all your calculations taking that into account and your precious poll numbers take on a very different complexion
I don't see anything here that's a huge surprise.  If someone expects the eventual Democratic candidate to win with 70% of the vote just because 70% of Americans have figured out that GWB is a pathetic loser they're being overly simplistic.  It doesn't change the fact that the Republicans have done a lot to marginalize themselves over the last few years and seem determined to continue doing exactly that.  The Democrats still have more than ample opportunity to give this election away in the end and have a history of doing so.  Dems just have to make the obvious case that they are the better party.  A landslide victory is well within reach but far from a given.
hillary has a net-negative on the feeling thermometer (43% fav/44% unfav) that ain't going to change for the better people, get over hillary's novelty status and pick a candidate that can win the general election.
Rudys on wife number 3
police chief corrupt as can be
a little inspection
reveals on reflection
the apple's not bad, it's the tree
'...Hillary Clinton is really Richard Nixon, circa 1968”...'

I KNEW IT !!
I KNEW IT !!
...and Richardson is Spiro Agnew, right ?

If you liked Nixon....
You'll LOVE Hillary

'...-- which is something we’ve also alluded to in the past. Of course, this ISN'T saying that her Administration will orchestrate the break-in of a popular building...'

Weren't some Obama campaign offices broken into ?
What was taken ?

... Clinton/Agnew '08
Business as usual !!
',,, Congress’ approval rating is at 19%, and that’s largely fueled by independents’ increasing disapprova...'

Stop givng in to Bush !!
Stop rolling over for Bush !!
NO IMMUNITY for Telephone companies !
Filibuster the Mukasey nomination !!

Wake up, Congress !!
This just shows how much fear resonates within the repub party, it also may show how their candidates may work the fear factor up.
Too bad they don't also have a forward looking attitude. Optimism (Mitt) and fear (Rudy) are emotional manipulation with out a guiding principle for change. Gerogia and Pakistan, two 'ALLIES' have shut down any kind of opposition to democracy and George sits on the sidelines, and the candidates for his party mouth the same garbage, We will protect you from terrorists but not from corporate malfeasence, or faulty products or crime in the streets or falling wages or failing health or your own government.
Republicans should be angry that they are being manipulated into voting for these guys, don't they have any new ideas?
Funny thing is that third parties and their candidates were mentioned, but not listed with their candidates anywhere I could find.  At least not comprehensively.

Is the Media once more doing a blackout job on third parties, and keeping the general public in the dark?  Some of them have very good ideas, and experienced men at the helm, do they not?

When you list the whole string of DemoPublicans, no matter how unlikely, and leave out the minority party candidates emtirely, you do a grave dis-service to the Public.

Let us see the whole picture, please.
When voters hear the Democrats silently took money out of a bill that had passed with overwhelming support dealing with border control and security it furthers the disgust voters have with Congress and if Dems continue doing such usual things they wont have any reason to be voted for either. The continued support by Dems for illegal aliens is going to hurt them if they dont get it soon. The Dem leadership is woefully inept and lacks backbone. Impeachment is supported by an overwhelming number of Americans yet they try to stop and thwart it , to thier peril.
Excellent analysis Mr. Todd, I agreed with the points you make in your article "When Electorates Attack."

I like it when Edwards talks about our corrupt system, because it IS corrupt. I want to see major changes in Washington regarding earmarks. Obama had a great list of nine, I think, proposals to make government more transparent. I like it when Hillary attacks Bush because I hate him too! Giulani is an appealing person because he has a kinetic energy. I think the only Democrat who can beat him is the trial lawyer, John Edwards, because he will find Giuliani's weaknesses and hammer him there. Otherwise, I am afraid, the American people will once again vote for their fantasy of what a President is supposed to act like.
Love the pic of Rudy and Bernie. Rudy never leaves his friends behind.
What I find hard to comprehend is how 74% say the country is moving in the wrong direction and want change, yet 45% support Republican candidates pledged to continue Bush's course. If you assume all of the 26% who are OK with our course are Republican candidate supporters, that leaves 19% who say we are moving in the wrong direction yet support candidates who will continue the direction. What is with their thinking? My fear is that they think we haven't ventured far enough into the dreaded fire swamp.
Amy - I also think Edward's trial experience aids him in the campaign, and not just with Rudy.  However, let's not forget that Rudy is also a trial lawyer (criminal, not civil) so he can probably hold his own as well as find Edwards's weaknesses.

The results of this new NBC/WSJ poll put to rest two myths that have been perpetuated by bloggers on this site:

1 – Hillary’s debate performance in Philadelphia: As you can see there is no fall out – her lead over Obama remains HUGE and has increased slightly since the last NBC/WSJ poll in September

2 – The elect ability argument – She defeats Giuliani.  While the margin is close, she also beats him in the recent CNN and Marist polls by larger (up to 7%) margins.

Sorry Sierra, Hillary is still wiping the floor with Obama and Edwards!
Hey Diane -- I think the extra attention to Rudy vs. Hillary is due to their respective leads in the national polls. But, as you can see above, we tested Rudy against all of the top-three Dems. It's a good way to see how much of a toss-up the general election might be. Thanks for the question, and thanks for reading us.
Liberal activists across the country voted Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) as their favorite candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination in a poll released Tuesday by Democracy for America......

Probably one of these DailyKOS/Moveon.org/Air America style acid taking groups.....

Amy in Portland says...


I think the only Democrat who can beat him is the trial lawyer, John Edwards, because he will find Giuliani's weaknesses and hammer him there.

I doubt that very seriously.....
Tax and Spend John might be a nice fellow and has better hair then Rudy, but there is no way Edwards could beat Rudy one on one.  Nice thinking.

Ever since Hillary got caught at the last debate and Bill Clinton lying through his teeth trying to back up his wife, more and more questions are being written up for the next democratic debate.  If she had any brains (doubtful, but if she did) she would just sit and let the firestorm pass over her and keep her husband in his cage.




The poll also tell us one thing, the democratic party is in trouble if Hillary is their nominee.

The wall street journal has an interesting article on this. I can sense another de javu again. I hope the real democrats listen
I was told that Senator Obama did not place his hand over his heart durring the pledge of allegence at the last debate as all the other canidates did. I'm curious to know if this is true and if so why he didn't? I surely would not vote for someone who does not honor our flag and country. Can anyone verify this.The source for this info came from watching the last debates on television.This could be a rumor to sway votes from his campaign so I'd like to find out if it's true before making any decisions about the man.
Do you really think Hillary can lose a likeability contest to a guy who's on his third wife and who's kids won't talk to him?

What is this with "likeability" anyway?  If we continue to vote like this is a junior high election, we'll continue to get dopes.  Voting for likeable incompetents ain't gettin' it done, people!
Democrats.  Full of hate.  
Linda Landzettel, great question. But this is just a rumor to sway votes, Obama did in fact have his hand over his heart during the entirety of the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. First read actually had a post about this on yesterday!!
Hillary "Nixon" Clinton vs Rudy "I'm on my 3rd wife" Giuliani

Just the choice every American wants to make!!!

Do I choose death by hanging or death by firing squad?

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!   Give us the change we need and deserve!!!!
csh, IL :'...Sorry Sierra, Hillary is still wiping the floor with Obama and Edwards!...'

csh, Let's see what happens in the next debate !
The blood is STILL in the water....
If Edwards and Obama keep after Hillary on truthfulness and integrity.... Hillary is toast !

Look carefully, csh...
the Clinton DeathStar is starting to wobble and Darth Vader is still talking about 'Swiftboating'.......
(in space, no one can hear you scream)

How much do you want it, John Edwards ?
Hillary has a big problem among the independent and the democrats like me who don't trust her. She is going to cost the democrats another election if she remain on the ballot.

I hope this guy learn their lesson before it is too late
It's human nature, I suppose, for some segment of the population to be scared and trembling, and its in the nature of politics that some group increases their fears and offers them protection.  It's just a shame that so many Americans are trembling in their boots, scared of their own shadows and duct-taping their windows.  There will always be a party to manipulate this basic cowardice in some group, and the Republicans are it.
John B. in des Moines is right---the Dems have a chance to win a landslide against Rudy and the Repubs, but they will probably squander it, as they are too often wont to do.John from PA is right, that the GOP is manipulating the fearful, not mentioning that the gov't as it is now, may well be the one to fear most.And Bee is right that Hil just isn't likeable enough, and the Dems shouldn't nominate her if they truly wnat the White House.
Fear (the "protection" group) and loathing (the hate-Hillaries) in America.
was told that Senator Obama did not place his hand over his heart durring the pledge of allegence at the last debate as all the other canidates did. I'm curious to know if this is true and if so why he didn't? I surely would not vote for someone who does not honor our flag and country. Can anyone verify this.The source for this info came from watching the last debates on television.This could be a rumor to sway votes from his campaign so I'd like to find out if it's true before making any decisions about the man.
-----------------------------------------------------

This is false and not true. Here is an interesting article on it.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2007/11/obama_nabbed_by_the_patriotic.html

It is good to always fact check this kind of story that originate from fox news
Ms. Linda Landzettel from St. Louis , Mo.

Regarding your question.

"Senator Obama’s personal history represents the best of the American Dream. His grandfather fought in Patton’s army and went to school on the GI Bill. His grandmother worked on a bomber assembly line during World War II. His father crossed an ocean in search of the promise of America. And his mother taught him that America has a place for everyone’s dreams."

"To all those trying desperately to discredit Senator Obama’s patriotism, take it from us: we have served this nation for decades, and we know a true patriot when we see one. Barack Obama is a patriot. America needs him now."

Signed:
- Gen. Merrill “Tony” McPeak, USAF (Ret)
- Richard Danzig, Secretary of the Navy (1998-2001)
- Maj. Gen. J. Scott Gration, USAF (Ret)


http://obama.3cdn.net/bd741716c892f7b788_eum6iycah.PDF


I hope this helps you make up your mind.  Politics as usual, when you can't find anything make something up.
The media continues to ignore the only candidate that can change the "business as usual" trend in Politics, Ron Paul! In spite of the neglect of the media he is continuing to move up in approval of the voters and if he is not included on the ballot, I will write in his name!
John Alexander: Your take is based upon the same partisanship evidenced by Oregons Democrat David Wu in House testimony yesterday by State Dept.officials including John Negroponte,who frankly used Wu for a mop and glided him across the floor of the chambers.''We have been quite clear in stating our intentions to the Musharref government'',giving Wu an exasperated look for relying more on what the agitprop rag New York Times was saying about the crisis[Wu quoting from this rag],than in what Bush was in truth advocating per his phone call with the Pak leader on Tuesday. Musharref was ''to quit the Army,and immediately hold free elections''.[remarks:President Bush,Nov.6].
               So what in blazes is the problem here? Could a Biden or a Hillary or an Obama[who originally wished to invade Pakistan],have done any better? I firmly doubt it. As it is,todays AP observes a feeler coming out of Karachi whereby free elections will be held in February,while the State Dept. works on getting protesters released.
            [we will point out here that Burma,[so-called ''Myamnnar'']under US pressure as well as that of the UN,has agreed to allow dissidents to meet with the government and is releasing from jail several top anti-government leaders. We will also point out that pro-democracy protesters in Caracas,Venezuela,under a regime championed by American liberals and the leftwing,who were also teargassed and beaten by Army soldiers,are STILL in jail,with no comments from the peanut gallery demanding their release]. While Bush can be faulted in several areas,his dealings with the Turks,Paks, Iraqis,[where violence continues to drop],and Iranians [Day 425 since we were supposed to be ''at war''with Iran according to Sy Hersh],are not among these. Even Bush can see the benefit of a fusion-Bhutto government in Pakistan,getting the Turks to back off on an invasion of Kurdistan,[which for the moment,they are,under intense US diplomacy,which was nearly wrecked by the House Democrats],and continuing reconciliation in Iraq [highlighted by the Iraqis reopening of a Christian church this week and the release of 500 Sunni prisoners not deemed to be a terrorist threat].
Great. The posters have generally fallen into critiques of the horse-race aspect of the candidacies. Instead, why not analyze these candidates' actions in office and try to discover what these people will do once they are in power to ensure good governance occurs during the next administration. Despite huge numbers of candidates, our choices are severely limited by the fact that most of the current candidates have been in positions of power during one of the most corrupt and destructive administrations in the history of our nation, and rather than stand up against corruption, tyranny, and belligerence, most of the candidates encouraged and supported it through their votes in Congress or their (mis)management of the agencies they headed. We're all Nero fiddling away while Rome burns.


Being inspirational and an exciting choice for president
Democratic primary voters
November 2007 *

Clinton-37
Obama-32

November 2006 (same question)

Clinton-25
Obama-38

Is Obama getting less exciting? Better known? How do voters see him;

Being knowledgeable and experienced enough to handle the presidency all-11  dems-15
Clinton.       all-31, dems-51
More than THREE TIMES as many respondents, whether dem or not view Clinton as being more capable.

Having the strong leadership qualities needed to be president Obama, 15-all, 23-dems

Clinton          26-all, 45-dems

More than TWICE as many.

Here's the real kicker;

Bringing real change to the direction of the country;

Obama,   18-all 28-dems 29(June, 2006)

Clinton, 22-all 34-dems 32(June, 2006)

MORE view her as the change candidate...

He is more likable though... Obama-26 Clinton-18

What can Obama do to to bolster voter confidence in the competence and capability categories?

Van
From the Huffington Post:

'...Play of the Day: Vote for 'Uncle Mitt'?
         
November 7, 2007 06:24 PM EST |  

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Maybe Mitt Romney should study his family tree.

Surprised to see a distant relative in the front row at a campaign stop Wednesday, the Republican presidential hopeful interrupted his education speech at a children's museum to introduce her.

"In the front row over here is my niece, Heather Glenn," Romney said. "That's probably not your last name anymore, Heather. But Heather is a school teacher. Are you a school teacher?"

"No. I'm a pediatrician," she responded.

"She's a pediatrician," Romney said, to laughter. "Deals with kids. I haven't seen Heather in, um, 20 years. Good to see you, Heather."...'

See how quikc he learns ?
Go, Willard 'Mitt' Romney !!

'...Romney resumed his speech about teacher pay, and they hugged when he was finished.

Heather Krueger, whose last name changed when she married, said she last saw "Uncle Mitt" at a family funeral a decade ago. While she called him an uncle, she said they were actually second cousins.

Though Krueger was "getting more and more excited" about Romney's candidacy, she hasn't yet decided whom she will vote for in the January primary.

"I'm staying open," she said...'

Gee, I wonder why ?
Where did 'Uncle Mitt' touch you ?

NO ! NO ! NO !
It's not MORMON, It's MORON !!
Republicans.  Full of sh_t!!!!!!!
VOTE FOR HILLARY AND VOTE OFTEN. hillaryclinton.com
Linda, This is another distorted lie. They were not pledging allegiance to the flag.  They were singing the Star Spangle Banner.  Tucker or one of the MSNBC talk show host set the record straight.
Havn't we had enough of Clinton/Bush???!!!  People were stupid enough to vote for Bush in 2004.  Are we going to continue the polarized politics by voting for Hillary??!!  Don't get me wrong, I liked the Clinton-era and I think Hillary is a great leader, but America badly NEEDs change after 8 years of disasterous Bush-recklessness.  So if you care for our once-great country you vote one of these: Richardson/Edwards/Romney. Richardson will repair US's poor image abroad, Edwards will make average folks like you and me feel better and proud again, and Romney will do good to the economy/budget.  So you do the pick. Of course, you probably won't regret it if you vote for Obama or Giuliani, although obama is a little naive and Giuliani could be a Godfather type of leader.  I used to like McCain, but I can't stand him rooting for the C-grade president the way he did.
To Linda Landzettel St. Louis, Mo. 11/8/07 10:24 am
If you go to the website-- http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact checker(Michael Dobb article titled 'Obama Nabbed by the Patriot Police")----there is an article with pictures that should put this salute flap nonsense to rest.
B Obama was taught by his maternal grandfather--a WWII veteran--,since he was a little boy, that you only place hand on heart during the 'Pledge of Allegience' ; and you stand at attention or sing during the 'Nat'l Anthem'(which is what was being sung by a lady at the Harkin Steak Fry picture). Notice another inconsistency in that picture (HRC & BR have hand over heart, which should be for the 'Pledge' , but yet their back is towards the flag. IMO.. I, as do many other voters, knew since grade school to face the flag and put hand over heart during the Pledge of Allegiance(as you see B Obama doing in various other photos in the article. This ridiculous smear email will backfire on whoever started it(because many other photos of B Obama doing the proper thing is out there too). Peace
ABOUT FIRST READ
First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.


Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director


Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director


Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher


  First thoughts: Progress vs. protection Posted: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:14 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: First Thoughts
From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Progress vs. protection: One of the most striking findings in the latest NBC/WSJ poll is just how angry Americans -- Democrats, Republicans, and independents -- are, and how much they want change. Just 21% believe the country is on the right track, only 31% approve of Bush’s job, and a whopping 74% say they want the next president to take a different approach than Bush. All this sounds like the 2008 election is shaping up as a slam-dunk for the Democrats, right? Not so fast. While Americans want change, they appear to have differing opinions of what that means. In the poll, 51% said they want the next president to focus on progress and help move the country forward, compared with 44% who said they want a president to focus on protecting what has made America great. Interestingly, says NBC/WSJ pollster Peter Hart (D), the split here falls under normal partisan lines: The “progress” folks tend to be Democratic-leaning subgroups (African Americans, liberals, people under 35, independents), while the “protection” people tend to lean Republican (conservatives, evangelicals, people over 65). The result here is still an advantage for the Dems, but not as big as their lead in the generic presidential ballot suggests (50%-35%). It's a good preview of just how each party's nominee may attempt to run, and it may explain -- at least on the GOP side -- why a guy like Giuliani (i.e., Mr. Protector) is doing so well.



*** Hillary, Rudy maintain leads; Fred drops: Looking at the Democratic presidential field, Hart and NBC/WSJ co-pollster Bill McInturff (R) say that it would be incorrect to note from this survey that Clinton is in trouble after her recent debate performance. But it would be equally wrong, they add, to suggest she’s headed to a coronation. Clinton leads Obama, 47%-25%, which is virtually unchanged from September. Edwards comes in third at 11%, which is a five-point drop for him and his lowest number all year. All three Democrats lead Giuliani in a hypothetical general election match-up, but it’s within the poll’s margin of error (46%-45% for Clinton; 44%-42% for Obama; and 45%-44% for Edwards). Meanwhile, Giuliani leads the GOP field with 33% --  

followed by McCain at 16%, Thompson at 15%, and Romney at 11%. Thompson, in fact, dropped eight points since September, while Huckabee gained four points (from 4% in September to 8% now).





*** Circa 1968? Looking more closely at Clinton’s numbers in the new NBC/WSJ, Hart says: “Hillary Clinton is really Richard Nixon, circa 1968” -- which is something we’ve also alluded to in the past. Of course, this ISN'T saying that her Administration will orchestrate the break-in of a popular building. Rather, it’s saying that she’s respected for her knowledge and experience (76% of Democrats and 51% of all adults give her high marks on this attribute), while also viewed as a polarizing figure due to her past (only 49% of Democrats and 34% of all adults see her as likeable). Moreover, she has a net-negative on the feeling thermometer (43% fav/44% unfav) versus Obama’s (43%-24%) and Edwards’ (37%-31%) net-positives. “At this stage, she has a magnificent tailwind” given the Democrats’ structural advantages, Hart adds. “But against that, she has an exceptionally polarizing image.” However, do remember that Richard Nixon won two terms…

*** Do Republicans really want a three-way race? Hillary also seems to benefit if there’s a third-party candidacy. A three-way Clinton-Giuliani-Pat Buchanan contest is 44%-35%-12%. What that tells McInturff is that an anti-abortion third-party candidate has the capacity to shift a large portion of voters away from the GOP. (Note: Pat's not running; he just had the best known profile of someone running to Rudy's right, so we tested him.) Meanwhile, a Clinton-Giuliani-Bloomberg match-up breaks 42%-39%-10%, which is closer for the GOP but still not as close as a Rudy-Hillary head-to-head. As Hart puts it, Clinton benefits if there’s a third-party candidate, because that person splits the anti-Hillary vote.

*** When voters attack: Congress’ approval rating is at 19%, and that’s largely fueled by independents’ increasing disapproval. Per Hart, “This says to Democratic leaders, ‘You are not communicating. And you are not communicating with independents.’” That said, Democrats still enjoy a nine-point advantage on the generic congressional ballot (46%-37%). But just 39% of respondents believe their OWN member of Congress deserves re-election; 51% say it’s time to give someone new a chance. That's a staggering number, folks. “I believe that we are facing as angry and unstable an electorate as I’ve seen in my career, McInturff says. And when that happens: “A lot of straight-line projections we thought will happen will not happen.”



*** The Bernie Kerik hurdle: So far, Giuliani has cleared some important hurdles -- speaking to the NRA, addressing the Values Voter Summit -- that analysts thought he’d trip over, although he cleared them largely by just showing up. Now comes Bernie Kerik’s upcoming indictment, which could be announced on Friday. If Rudy emerges unscathed from this, what else is there to stop him on his way to the GOP nomination? One person who wants to stand in his way is Romney, whose poll numbers are on the way up in South Carolina (something that's largely been under the radar lately). Is a situation emerging where Giuliani is getting stronger and stronger nationally, while Romney is making a move in the one early nominating contest that has been his weakest state?

*** On the trail: Biden, in New Hampshire, delivers a major policy address on Pakistan; Clinton is also in New Hampshire, where she attends an energy and environment roundtable; Giuliani campaigns in Iowa and then head to Las Vegas; Huckabee is in Iowa and Michigan; McCain stumps in McCain and then raises money in Chicago; Obama campaigns in Iowa; Richardson is in New Hampshire; Romney fundraises in New Canaan, CT; and Thompson hits a fundraiser and concert with country music star John Rich of Big and Rich.

Countdown to Iowa: 56 days
Countdown to New Hampshire: 61 days
Countdown to Michigan: 68 days
Countdown to Nevada and SC GOP primary: 72 days
Countdown to SC Dem primary: 79 days
Countdown to Florida: 82 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 89 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 362 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 439 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.




EMAIL THIS

Comments
I have a question for First Read:  Why is the press so obsessed with this Rudy vs Hillary blood match?
if it was another time, when things are at peace and things are well, it would be funny but, we are in deep trouble as a country and both candidates are simply the worst of each side.
rudy is a lunatic and Hillary is Nixion in more than just your beloved polls.
the press knows they influence voters greatly and the storyline all year has been designed to drive Rudy and Hillary to the nomination knowing they would both make terrible presidents for this time in history.
So, why is the press still so insistent on driving it and obsesses over this fantasy?

diane (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:24 AM)

Kucinich Tops Liberal Activists' Poll
Nathan Burchfiel
Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) - Liberal activists across the country voted Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) as their favorite candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination in a poll released Tuesday by Democracy for America (DFA). Yet other national polls - not exclusively of liberal activists - show Kucinich trailing frontrunners such as Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D- Ill.).

Nationally, Kucinich received almost 32 percent of the 150,000 votes cast in the Internet poll. Clinton, the frontrunner in primary polls, received only 4.2 percent of the votes. Her closest rival, Obama (D-Ill.), received 13.9 percent.

In second place behind Kucinich was former Vice President Al Gore, who is not officially running for the nomination. Gore earned 24.8 percent of the votes. Former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) received 15.6 percent of the votes.
All the major candidates except Clinton and Sen. Joe Biden (D-Conn.) campaigned for votes in the poll. Gore supporters who have been encouraging him to run for the nomination organized a write-in campaign, propelling him into second place nationwide, according to poll organizers."

You can bet you won't see a headline here about Dennis that isn't about his hot spouse or UFO's...


Van



vanreuter, NY NY (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:28 AM)

I'm surprized to see the edwards drop given his great performance in the last debate.

Hillary holding steady? Barakites must be going nuts
Chuck,San Diego (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:28 AM)

Rudy is good at protecting...himself. Ask his ex's. Fred has made his points...now when is that TV show of his own going to show up? I doubt if there is a Three-Way-Split, unless the Independent Candidate is also a Woman. Hillary gets 95 per cent of the Woman Vote. Mitt's handlers told him to kiss Everybody in SOuth Carolina. Even Hillary, if he runs into her. Rudy is busy kissing Preachers.  And the Countdown? Dubya's gonna hafta scramble if he wants to suspend the 22nd Amendment. (Lookout Iran!)
Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:28 AM)

Its being reported that Hillary Clnton is backing out of a sit down interview on the Today program. Tim Russert exposed her during the last debate, so she will not let herself be open to hard questions anymore. She will stick to scripted monolog, and planted questions from milk toast reporters. If defeated in Iowa, she will fade from view with thbis type of non approchable, non answered, canditate in hideing campaign. So Chuck you better crank up the spin machine
TruthnMedia for America (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:33 AM)

Despite Dems having control of Congress, the desire for chamge hurst Republicans the most. Everyone agrees that Bush is a disaster, and change needs to start at the top. One year of Dem Congressional control is not enough to pass judgement.

http://www.political-buzz.com/
mpp (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:36 AM)

you forgot that ron paul is going to win the repub nomination, re-do all your calculations taking that into account and your precious poll numbers take on a very different complexion
MK,MO (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:39 AM)

I don't see anything here that's a huge surprise.  If someone expects the eventual Democratic candidate to win with 70% of the vote just because 70% of Americans have figured out that GWB is a pathetic loser they're being overly simplistic.  It doesn't change the fact that the Republicans have done a lot to marginalize themselves over the last few years and seem determined to continue doing exactly that.  The Democrats still have more than ample opportunity to give this election away in the end and have a history of doing so.  Dems just have to make the obvious case that they are the better party.  A landslide victory is well within reach but far from a given.
John B, Des Moines, IA (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:41 AM)

hillary has a net-negative on the feeling thermometer (43% fav/44% unfav) that ain't going to change for the better people, get over hillary's novelty status and pick a candidate that can win the general election.
MK,MO (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:42 AM)

Rudys on wife number 3
police chief corrupt as can be
a little inspection
reveals on reflection
the apple's not bad, it's the tree
Eric, Seattle Wash (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:45 AM)

'...Hillary Clinton is really Richard Nixon, circa 1968”...'

I KNEW IT !!
I KNEW IT !!
...and Richardson is Spiro Agnew, right ?

If you liked Nixon....
You'll LOVE Hillary

'...-- which is something we’ve also alluded to in the past. Of course, this ISN'T saying that her Administration will orchestrate the break-in of a popular building...'

Weren't some Obama campaign offices broken into ?
What was taken ?

... Clinton/Agnew '08
Business as usual !!
Sierra, SF (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:46 AM)

',,, Congress’ approval rating is at 19%, and that’s largely fueled by independents’ increasing disapprova...'

Stop givng in to Bush !!
Stop rolling over for Bush !!
NO IMMUNITY for Telephone companies !
Filibuster the Mukasey nomination !!

Wake up, Congress !!
Sierra, SF (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:49 AM)

This just shows how much fear resonates within the repub party, it also may show how their candidates may work the fear factor up.
Too bad they don't also have a forward looking attitude. Optimism (Mitt) and fear (Rudy) are emotional manipulation with out a guiding principle for change. Gerogia and Pakistan, two 'ALLIES' have shut down any kind of opposition to democracy and George sits on the sidelines, and the candidates for his party mouth the same garbage, We will protect you from terrorists but not from corporate malfeasence, or faulty products or crime in the streets or falling wages or failing health or your own government.
Republicans should be angry that they are being manipulated into voting for these guys, don't they have any new ideas?
John S. Alexander, Edinboro, PA (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:53 AM)

Funny thing is that third parties and their candidates were mentioned, but not listed with their candidates anywhere I could find.  At least not comprehensively.

Is the Media once more doing a blackout job on third parties, and keeping the general public in the dark?  Some of them have very good ideas, and experienced men at the helm, do they not?

When you list the whole string of DemoPublicans, no matter how unlikely, and leave out the minority party candidates emtirely, you do a grave dis-service to the Public.

Let us see the whole picture, please.
Lewis Munn Roundup, MT (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:57 AM)

When voters hear the Democrats silently took money out of a bill that had passed with overwhelming support dealing with border control and security it furthers the disgust voters have with Congress and if Dems continue doing such usual things they wont have any reason to be voted for either. The continued support by Dems for illegal aliens is going to hurt them if they dont get it soon. The Dem leadership is woefully inept and lacks backbone. Impeachment is supported by an overwhelming number of Americans yet they try to stop and thwart it , to thier peril.
Donald Shelton (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:58 AM)

Excellent analysis Mr. Todd, I agreed with the points you make in your article "When Electorates Attack."

I like it when Edwards talks about our corrupt system, because it IS corrupt. I want to see major changes in Washington regarding earmarks. Obama had a great list of nine, I think, proposals to make government more transparent. I like it when Hillary attacks Bush because I hate him too! Giulani is an appealing person because he has a kinetic energy. I think the only Democrat who can beat him is the trial lawyer, John Edwards, because he will find Giuliani's weaknesses and hammer him there. Otherwise, I am afraid, the American people will once again vote for their fantasy of what a President is supposed to act like.

Amy B Portland, ME (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:03 AM)

Love the pic of Rudy and Bernie. Rudy never leaves his friends behind.
Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:10 AM)

What I find hard to comprehend is how 74% say the country is moving in the wrong direction and want change, yet 45% support Republican candidates pledged to continue Bush's course. If you assume all of the 26% who are OK with our course are Republican candidate supporters, that leaves 19% who say we are moving in the wrong direction yet support candidates who will continue the direction. What is with their thinking? My fear is that they think we haven't ventured far enough into the dreaded fire swamp.
nuanced (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:11 AM)

Amy - I also think Edward's trial experience aids him in the campaign, and not just with Rudy.  However, let's not forget that Rudy is also a trial lawyer (criminal, not civil) so he can probably hold his own as well as find Edwards's weaknesses.
Carrie, Eastern Iowa (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:14 AM)


The results of this new NBC/WSJ poll put to rest two myths that have been perpetuated by bloggers on this site:

1 – Hillary’s debate performance in Philadelphia: As you can see there is no fall out – her lead over Obama remains HUGE and has increased slightly since the last NBC/WSJ poll in September

2 – The elect ability argument – She defeats Giuliani.  While the margin is close, she also beats him in the recent CNN and Marist polls by larger (up to 7%) margins.

Sorry Sierra, Hillary is still wiping the floor with Obama and Edwards!

csh, IL (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:16 AM)

Hey Diane -- I think the extra attention to Rudy vs. Hillary is due to their respective leads in the national polls. But, as you can see above, we tested Rudy against all of the top-three Dems. It's a good way to see how much of a toss-up the general election might be. Thanks for the question, and thanks for reading us.
Mark Murray (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:16 AM)

Liberal activists across the country voted Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) as their favorite candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination in a poll released Tuesday by Democracy for America......

Probably one of these DailyKOS/Moveon.org/Air America style acid taking groups.....

Amy in Portland says...


I think the only Democrat who can beat him is the trial lawyer, John Edwards, because he will find Giuliani's weaknesses and hammer him there.

I doubt that very seriously.....
Tax and Spend John might be a nice fellow and has better hair then Rudy, but there is no way Edwards could beat Rudy one on one.  Nice thinking.

Ever since Hillary got caught at the last debate and Bill Clinton lying through his teeth trying to back up his wife, more and more questions are being written up for the next democratic debate.  If she had any brains (doubtful, but if she did) she would just sit and let the firestorm pass over her and keep her husband in his cage.





jerry/corpus christi texas (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:17 AM)

The poll also tell us one thing, the democratic party is in trouble if Hillary is their nominee.

The wall street journal has an interesting article on this. I can sense another de javu again. I hope the real democrats listen
Bee (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:23 AM)

I was told that Senator Obama did not place his hand over his heart durring the pledge of allegence at the last debate as all the other canidates did. I'm curious to know if this is true and if so why he didn't? I surely would not vote for someone who does not honor our flag and country. Can anyone verify this.The source for this info came from watching the last debates on television.This could be a rumor to sway votes from his campaign so I'd like to find out if it's true before making any decisions about the man.
Linda Landzettel St. Louis , Mo. (Sent Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:24 AM)


There are all sorts of rumors about this.  The first one I saw was about Harkin's Steak Fry back in September, which displayed a picture of the other candidates with their hands over their hearts and Obama with his hands clasped waist-level.  However, this was not during the Pledge of Allegiance, but during the playing of the national anthem.  Obama's campaign later said that sometimes he puts his hand over his heart for the national anthem and sometimes he doesn't.  

Either way, I don't think it's a big deal personally.
Mark Murray

Thanks for including the Biden info in "On the Trail."
America has not seen the can of whup-azz Senator Clinton is going to put on the Republican nominee.  She is allowing Edwards and Obama to whup up on her right now for the sake of the party.  Don't think for one minute the gloves won't come off when the time is right.  I have every confidence in the lioness ability to take on any of these boyzs.  If any of these boyz think their wife/wives have ever opened up a can of whup-azz on them just wait until they come face to face with Senator Clinton.  Former President clinton could warn them but he won't.
Do you like conspiracy theories?  For fun try this one.  The rich and powerful few, who the Bush administration has consistently catered to and who simply control so much, including having influence over the media (as is literally demonstrated), really don’t worry about whether it is Giuliani or Clinton as they have actually bought into both (likely Thompson and maybe others too).  And the theory continues that right now they are simply trying to convince the voters that Giuliani and Clinton are the only real choices, while knowing that either is okay for them.  Then the question is, ‘can they pull it off again or not?’
It may not be easy to buy into that thinking but just for fun play with it.  Do a ‘what if’?  Does it answer any questions?  Is it feasible?  Are there connections that substantiate it?  Could they accomplish that?  Does it really look like that is what is happening?  Whatever, but isn’t what is really important simply that the voters actually have the control and the options?  Do you think they actually do?  Or… are they being manipulated and used again?
Maybe we don’t like thinking like that and don’t want to give in to that logic, to admit that Special Interests and a select few could have that much control, possibly then we should just ask four questions:
1. Why else has the Bush administration consistently done everything to benefit those Special Interests and a select few, arrogantly offering subterfuge and deception to cover, at significant cost to America and the average American?
2. How else has all of that transpired with minimal criticism and no real effort to hold anyone accountable?
3. What else explains all that has transpired, what is transpiring and the direction everything is taking?
4. Whose country is it; who really has control?
Dot -- of course. If we have a schedule for the candidate that day, we include it. I believe Biden was in DC the last couple of days with his Senate duties.
Oh, forgot, Ron Paul's views are refreshing, though a little extreme.  he won't be elected, but go for him if you really want changes in America.  So my revised choice:
Richardson/Edwards/Romney/Paul/Obama/Giuliani
It is in the vision and in the stars. We will have a female president of the United States. This will happen. It will come to pass.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=454997

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google