ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



More on Fred's Natl Right to Life nod

Posted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:22 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum and Andy Merten
Several issues could have stood in the way of the National Right to Life Committee endorsement Thompson received today: his refusal to agree with the 2004 Republican Party platform on abortion, his opinion on the Terri Schiavo case, and his vote on the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. But Executive Director David O'Steen said today that those issues did not compare to his overall pro-life view.

On Meet the Press two Sundays ago, Thompson said he would not agree to the 2004 Republican Party Platform on abortion, which called for "a human life amendment to the Constitution ... to make it clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children." O'Steen said Thompson's answer was adequate: "The question he was asked -- if I remember correctly, within a word or two -- was, quote, 'Could you support that platform promising a human life amendment banning all abortions.' That's not what the platform says, and no one here can promise a human life amendment."

VIDEO: MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell talks with NBC's Adam Aigner about the National Right to Life Committee endorsing Fred Thompson for president.

"What he said was he was going to concentrate on what he could affect," O'Steen continued. "And that's what we want him to do. And what he can affect is to see that judges are appointed that will interpret the constitution according to its actual text."

Also on Meet the Press, Thompson said cases like the Terri Schiavo case should be a family matter and government should not be allowed to interfere. When asked about this, O'Steen said Thompson believes otherwise. "He believes that in cases where the patient wants treatment, the families want treatment, it should certainly be provided. He also believes -- and we have talked with him -- that in cases where the family is divided, he believes that the benefit of the doubt should be given to life." O'Steen later admitted these comments were made to his organization as points of clarification, and Thompson has yet to state these opinions publicly.

On McCain-Feingold, O'Steen said they disagreed with the bill because it put limitations on what they could do during political races. O'Steen made it clear Thompson's initial support of the bill was not a factor though, because "it simply cannot be compared to the life issue."

In the past week, two other pro-life endorsements were made -- Pat Robertson for Giuliani and Sam Brownback for McCain. O'Steen was asked about a splinter of the pro-life vote, to which he said this endorsement carries more weight because it is from a national organization and not an individual. "Well, I think it's time for the pro-life vote to begin uniting behind one pro-life candidate who can win this nomination, and that's Fred Thompson," he replied. "But with all due respect to these gentlemen, we certainly appreciate the pro-life record of Sen. Brownback, these are individual endorsements by individuals. And this isn't an endorsement by David O'Steen -- yes I support Fred Thompson -- but this is an endorsement by an organization representing groups throughout the country and three thousand chapters. And it just can't be compared to individual endorsements."

O'Steen also laid out why other pro-life Republicans did not get the endorsement. After examining the three factors of record, electability, and issue positions, O'Steen said Thompson came out on top. Regarding Huckabee, O'Steen said he has "a strong pro-life record" but electability stood in the way. O'Steen also contrasted McCain and Thompson.

"Sen. McCain is certainly a person whose votes on abortion we appreciate. There is a distinction between his position and Sen. Thompson's on the question of the kind of embryonic stem-cell research that requires the killing of human embryos. Sen. Thompson's got a strong position, and he in fact sent a message to our convention in June that he strongly opposed the kind of embryonic stem-cell research that requires killing human embryos. But he strongly supports the kind of stem-cell research that harms no one and is producing cures today. But everyone was considered. But when we looked at those three factors -- the whole record, the position on the life issues, and electability -- it wasn't close."

Romney's campaign issued a statement about the endorsement yesterday, saying the governor "has a great deal of respect for all of those who advocate tirelessly in the name of protecting and defending the sanctity of life." Today, O'Steen said one factor that Romney disqualified Romney is the lack of a consistent "pro-life record." He said Thompson is not "a person who's commitment and beliefs were in doubt."

O'Steen also called Giuliani a pro-abortion candidate, and said since Thompson runs second to him in most polls, the former Tennessee senator stands the best chance of beating him. "I think it's obvious, as a pro-abortion candidate, that he certainly couldn't stand up to Fred Thompson in our estimation."

While Thompson was not in attendance for the endorsement, he did email a statement. "I'm deeply appreciative for the past support by the National Right to Life Committee-PAC in my Senate campaigns, and today I am blessed and grateful to have received their endorsement for President of the United States," the statement reads. "In supporting me, those who have worked tirelessly to defend life are supporting a consistent conservative who has stood with them yesterday, who stands with them today, and will stand with them tomorrow."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I look at it as Rudy, Obama, and Clinton all look like they might do a good job. Clearly Rudy will be the rep. can., but have to wait and see who with be the dem. can.. I will wait till the dem's make their decition then do a little research on who's views I like better. It will be 4 years of cleaning up after Bush...and I see Bush as a dictator reather then a rep., so the so my vote could go either way. I just hope they don't start the mud slinging...it really turns me off as a voter... they are all out to make money and help out their friends...and really all 3 of them have pretty good records...yes you can find something bad...but that counts for every one in politics. No mater who wins this time I have to say I would be happy if any of the 3 of them win...but really would like to see a woman or a minority win just to level the playing field in future elections.
Don't worry every one, it will be all good in 08' LOL.
I like Fred Thompson for his consistency when so many others have blown in the wind on Abortion. I find it most interesting that anyone could consider Giuliani a pro-life candidate. His reinvention is almost as complete as Hillary's was.
It doesn't matter who the leaders endorse. It's obvious from all the buzz going on that the followers who are not power blinded but for principles are for Mike Huckabee.
It doesn't matter who the leaders endorse. The most important endorsement is from the followers who are not blinded by power but for principles. They are choosing Mike Huckabee by the thousands everyday.
Mr. O'Steen says that he wants judges who interpret the Constitution according 'to its actual text'. I don't recall reading anything in the Constitution regarding Social Security, Medicare, or the Air Force or Marines.  Does O'Steen believe that these and so many other Federal entities should be abolished?
The ONLY true "pro life" candidates are Ron Paul and Huckabee! The Thompson endorsement would have shocked me last week but the Pat Robertson support of Guliani has numbed me to most anything now.
We're in a LOT of trouble!
Joel-

"The Los Angeles Times reports that possible GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson once did lobbying work for the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association."

The only thing DeadFred is consistent about is licking the sewage off his money. (And looking like a basset hound.)
Bill Rochester NY - sorry, but if you thought Bush was a dictator, just wait for Emperor Rudy!
Fred lobbied for Planned Parenthood, opposes a federal ban on abortion...yet the NRLC endorses him?  This is laughable.  Their primary platform is to enact a federal ban on abortion.  Mike Huckabee firmly supports this, yet they've endorsed Thompson because they feel he has a "better chance of winning."  Or so I was told on the phone today by someone at their DC office.  I told them, "then you need to remove your support of a federal marriage ban from your website."  

Call them at: 202-626-8800 to voice your opinion.
GO FRED GO!!!
Lee,

Understood. I have seen Fred's response to that issue. He did work for a law firm that had that organization as a client. He has stated that he made a few phone calls and sat in on a couple of meetings. That hardly makes him a pro-abortion activist. I would be more likely to look at how he voted on measures intended to become policy for the US, instead.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=464879

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google