ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Janet Huckabee speaks out

Posted: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:11 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
Janet Huckabee, wife of presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, stumped for her husband in South Carolina yesterday. She described to a group of supporters how she plays a support role for her husband and said policy questions were "off-limits."
 
"If it's a policy question or something you want to know that Mike stands on, you're probably going to have to ask him," she said at a First Ladies Tea in the South Carolina Governors' Mansion. "Because that's just not where I am. That's not what I'm doing. I'm asking to be your First Lady of the country."
 
In an interview after the event, Huckabee further explained her position on being First Lady. "I leave the policy up to my husband,” she said. “Not that I'm afraid of it, but I wasn't elected to do that. I think he is very capable of leading this country and I think he would be the one that would be the policy maker in our family."
 
Running for President is a family affair for the Huckabees. Janet Huckabee has taken a leave of absence from her job and her four children (including an in-law) are all working on the campaign. Their eldest son spearheads the blogging for the campaign while their middle child runs the TeamHuckabee Web site. Their daughter-in-law, who is a lawyer, is on the legal team while their daughter is living in Iowa through the caucus.
 
"I cannot imagine taking something this huge and a task this large without your family's support," she said, possibly offering a dig toward Giuliani. "I just can't imagine coming home to non-supportive family members."
 
When Janet Huckabee opened the floor for questions, the first questioner asked about new polling that shows Huckabee narrowly trailing Romney in Iowa for second place.
 
"In Iowa?!?" Huckabee said to laughter. "Thank you for asking. They're going to think that question was planted. We don't do any planted questions."
 
She offered more during the interview, telling the reporter her husband doesn't have to win the state. "Just placing in at least one of the top three positions is very good," she said. "My gut feeling is we're going to do better than that. And I would not be surprised at all if we won Iowa. The people there are committed; they'll walk through snow to vote. That's the ones you want, not the ones that are fair-weather friends but the ones who are truly, truly committed to do whatever it takes to get people to the polls to vote."
 
Janet Huckabee also admitted she is "very disappointed" in the National Right to Life's decision to endorse Thompson over her husband. "Mike has been a true Right to Life person,” she said. “He's marched in the Right to Life parades for 13 years. He's just been a big supporter pro-life legislation, and it was disappointing to him."
 
"God's a big God," Huckabee continued. "If he wants us to continue to go and to fight the giants, we'll do that. You remember Jesus feeding the 5,000 with two fishes and five loaves. So, we're multiplying our money. Every dollar spends like a thousand and every prayer we get is like a million bucks."
 
She said she would devote part of her time as First Lady to working on better personal preparedness for natural emergencies and for more affordable housing. She let her supporters know a little more about her -- letting them know about her interest in the military. As First Lady of Arkansas, she fired a grenade launcher (hitting the target two out of three times) and jumped out of an airplane.

"It helps to understand a little bit about what they do if I can experience that," she said. "And I appreciate it far more."
 
Mike Huckabee is often asked if he would accept the job of vice president, and his wife faced the same question. "We're not looking there," she said. "That's a long way down the road. ... I like to think we have a stealth operation. We're out there. We're underground. We're grassroots and the people are coming out and supporting our message.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How charming, she can fire a grenade launcher and adroitly evoke Jesus's name to further her husband's career. What part of Christ as the "Prince of Peace" do these phony Christians not get?
Janet's Huckabee's statement is obviously a dig at Hillary because First Lady's role is soley to escort the President around the globe, decorate the White House, arrange for state visits, smile for the camera;however; god forbid if they have an independant thought, ideas and disagree with the husband/president. The so-called christian right want their women to be seen and not heard, raise the younguns, pretend to care for charitable causes and all the while wearing thousand dollars dresses/jewels donated, attend church weekly, and label any women who is not as your typical Feminists. Once woman attain the status as men they become the B word as Hillary has now become.
What a refreshing difference than the other candidates wives/husband! I'm tired of these wives talking about policy like they're being elected president. The job of the first wife/husband is to support their spouse, and spearhead humanitarian efforts within our country and beyond. It seems liek Janet Huckabee is already doing that in her regular job and she will be a nice fit for first lady.

Visit http://www.hucksarmy.com
Amy:

I'm not sure why the Huckabees would be considered "phony" Christians.  He is, after all, a minister, and by all accounts their faith is incredibily important.  

Is the insinuation that because Huckabee supports the war in Iraq that he can't be a real Christian?  I guess I don't understand how being a Christian and being in favor of the war in Iraq are mutually exclusive.  Are you saying that all Christians should be pacifists and never support military action?  If so, there are probably billions of Christians around the world that are "phony" by those standards.
Do I sense anger in the first 2 comments?  I thought those on the left wanted tolerance for others.  I am always amazed at how critical the people who preach tolerance are.  Can anyone value something different than you?

Darryl
I didn't realize there was an official job description for the first lady.  I will agree that traditionally the First Lady has been more of a ceremonial position.  However, traditionally women did not work.  Women were not involved in politics.  That has changed, and that change is being reflected in the involvement of the spouses of the presidential candidates.  I see nothing wrong with that at all.  
juan,ft lauderdale, fl-
Your response is a typical bigoted comment that Christians get because you know some really bad people who claim to be christian.

Don't stereotype us.
Huckabee is dangerous and not the kind of person we want running this country.  He denies evolution, and still thinks the world and the universe is only about 6000 years old.  That's not the kind of person I want running my country.  If elected, he'll dumb down schools by taking out real proven science and replacing it with hocus pocus superstitious religous nonsense. And he'll rename this country Jesus Land.
Now there is the nice subserviant women that help their men in the GOP.  I am glad she is only running to be cute.....because in looking at the last elections, "Cute and Quiet" still wins in this country every time.  Did I forget tax cuts?
Janet Huckabee is an asset to her husband's campaign for the Presidency.  She should be applauded for her family first orientation.
I would have loved to be at that tea. Janet Huckabee is a breath of fresh air.  
how quaint that firstread is skipping that obama says he has no papers from more than 8 years as an illini congressman.

Carrie,

I realize my calling Huckabee and wife phony Christians is a harsh statement, however, I am very angry at the way politicians are evoking the name of Jesus. I am a Christian and I don't appreciate seeing my religion evoked by any politician. I thought Tim Russert's question in the last debate, where he asked candidates which bible verse was their favorite was deeply offensive. The bible is a holy text to me and should not be used as a kind of political litmus test. These are my religious beliefs, and I realize people from other denominations might not agree, but I strongly object to politicizing Christianity. I believe one will know a Christian by their behavior, not by their vocal assertions. And, no, I do not believe it is in the spirit of Christianity to play with rocket launchers. PS I am a Congregationalist of Puritan stock, and Baptist pastors don't have any special authority over me!
What about McCain's wife?  Is that b!tch out stumping for him this week?
Christians already have one pacifist among them. Jesus. And to some of them, one is enough.
Women were created to be man's helper...not his opposing running mate.  I think Janet's approach to complimenting and supporting her husband is exactly what the First Lady should do.  She should help him be successful by serving him and helping to meet his needs.  Don't think I am on a one way street though.  Likewise, the President is to serve and meet the needs of his wife...along with his fellow American citizens.  Gone are the times when you can have a fractured family and a successful career.  Now those AREN'T mutually exclusive!  

Character, competence and service are all attributes of the Huckabee Team.  Go Huckabee!!!
Amy from Portland,

Jesus was not a pacifistic as many people would like to think. Jesus even instructed his followers to buy a sword.
"He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."  Luke 22:36

Jesus was not stupid, he knew having a sword was not for the disciples to butter their toast.
Poor Juan where would he be without his 1960's stereotypes.
Darryl- Since when do the religious right practice tolerance when it comes to a women right to choose to control her own reproductive organs, accept lying war mongers, condemn gay marriages etc;however; when you look closely and read the bible it contains  tidbits like Solomon had 100 wives, Abraham was married to his hlf-sister and Mary was 12 or 13 when she married Joseph. So yeah Darryl I am alittle pissed off at the so called holier than thou who claim they're rightous when in fact they are hypocrites. Karl Marx once stated that religion is the opium of the masses. We the people better wake up not allow our country become a theocracy.    
I believe her position is correct. She will not create policy and is not in an elected position. Why would she discuss policy?
I agree Janet Huckabee's refusal to talk about policy is a good thing, we are electing her husband for President not her. I like Janet Huckabee, she is different, like a breath of fresh air and I think she will be a PERFECT first lady...Go Huckabee!!
The new Iowa poll out this morning has some stunning results, as it shows Huckabee having TIED ROMNEY in the caucuses for the first time!! Link: http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/11/morning-polls-iowa-iowa-iowa.html
Daniel, my interpretation of Luke 22:36 is that Jesus was preparing to give up his life and possessing swords (only TWO, "that is sufficient"), was just the excuse the authorities needed to take him in custody. When Peter drew his sword to protect Jesus, Jesus admonished him and healed the man Peter wounded. This is my understanding, you have yours. I do respect other people's religious beliefs, I just don't like politicians usurping my religion for their own purposes.
a good repub wife she knows to shut up and serve her man.
Admiring our military is not contradicting her faith. It takes a lot of courage to defend this country and the lives of other. It makes my heart hurt to see a war happen; but, what if I was an Iraqi woman who was being raped and tortured by Saddam's regime, and there was no one stepping in to my rescue. This was happening to a lot of women, and men were being brutually murdered too. Along with the defiance of Saddam to comply with the UN. I don't think turning a blind eye was the answer either. It says love thy neighbor, that has no boundaries. If someone was going to murder your family or friend would it be right to stand by and watch?
A lady after my own heart. She's what we need in a first lady. She's tough and gentle at the same time. It's wonderful that Mike's family supports him. I like Mike.
Hey, Jenny in Indiana -- do you think that Huckabee granting clemency to a rapist who went on to rape and murder two other women, solely because some people on the right decided he was framed since the victim was a distant cousin of Bill Clinton's demonstrates "character"?
Bush has made religion sleazy.Course his loyal followers enabled this false christianity.I do not want a minister,preacher or mormon for president,thank you.Go to work in a taxpayer funded church.The president should have an open mind for all its citizens.I am tired of having a president that has ignored 50% of the country and insulting my politics and religion.
Barbara C., Pompano Beach, FL--Who are you to say whether Janet's choice of her role in her husband's campaign is right or wrong?  Would you frown on a man being 'subservant' to his wife's campaign, I wouldn't.  I would certainly think highly about a person who opted to be a stay-at-home parent just as I would if that person worked hard.  I think she sounds like a nice lady with a grenade launcher.

I like both types of First Spouse.  Is what disappointed me more about Hillary isn't that she was involved in the goings-on at the White House, but that she backed off and played a more subdued role after Clinton's staff asked her to for Bill's appearance.  And now she's running on that experience, which she has previously backed off from.

Dickie Flatts, Charlotte, NC--That's just uncalled for.  Why would you even make a statement like that?  Is his wife really that malicious of a woman?
Janet is right, we elect the president to be the policy maker. We don't elect the first lady. That's what Hillary just didn't get, until she was finally shut up & sent overseas. We don't vote a couple as the potus. We elected Bill, not her. She needs to support her husband's office & quit trying to sit at the desk in the Oval Office
Dave-Spare me your condesending attitude. It is obviously too much for your brain to understand that we are a secular nation and have a constitution that has a separation of church and state. Unfortunately, you and the other 30% enablers, have no problems being dictated  by hate mongers....You know the ones in the 60's that used scriptures to say that rascism, separate but equal and that interracial marriage was condemned by the bible.
From what I have read about her, Janet Huckabee seems to be a good person.  So does her husband.  I don't have an issue with their religion, as long as if he were elected president he was tolerant of all religions and all political parties, not just his.  That's the problem I have with Bush.  He is the president of the United States (all of the US), not just of the Republicans or the Neocons.  I find him intolerant and petulant all the while he is claiming to be a good christian.  I don't have a problem with whatever religion the President has, as long as he doesn't impose that religion on anyone else.  I am a Christian, but if I were president, I wouldn't base any political decisions on christianity because it is not the religion of everyone in the US.  The thing that bothers me about Huckabee (and for that matter all Republicans) is their blind support of the president (even the unchristian things) and yes, the war in Iraq is very unChristian.  Nowhere in the bible does it say that we should start an unprovoked war, lie to the citizens of the US about it, and kill innocent military people and civilians.  That is not Christian and supporting this war and the liar who started it and perpetuates it is not Christian.  I see Neocons blindly following anyone just because they are republican- I have an issue with that.  
Jethrine Huckabee and her brood of tubs o' fun boys have mean streaks a mile wide. Don't fall for this tripe. Ask her about her son torturing and killing a dog in front of a bunch of boy scouts. She and Huck didn't bat an eye except to protect their progeny from arrest. Are those the kind of folks you want running the country? Michael Vick for President then.
I think Janet Huckabee seems like a very classy lady who is supportive of her husband, but also realizes that she wouldn't be making policy, the President makes the policy.  I think she's refreshing.
While First Lady is not an elected position, it is in the best interests of our country that everyone (yes, even the "lady of the house") would be educated on the issues and be able to articulate their positions and their reasons for their positions.  It's fine for a person to defer to their mate in personal and family matters, but in matters of national interest, each of us citizens get our own vote.  When we give up our individual voice, or vote, to another person, or defer to a group, we give up our freedom.  When Laura Bush admits that personally she supports womens' reproductive rights, yet doesn't stand up to the GOP's position on the issue, she gives up some of her personal freedom.  While Dick Cheney and his wife support their daughter's sexual orientation, they don't stand up to the GOP's position on the issue, and they give up some of their personal freedom.  While there are some (a few) issues I agree with Huckabee on, I don't find his wife's position on stating her positions to be in his favor.  
The idea that Jesus Christ was a total pacifist and wanted his followers to also be the same is a mistaken idea.

In ancient times since armed robbery was common (remember Christ's story of the "good Samaritan" who helped a man who was beaten and robbed) it was common for people to carry swords to use in self defense. Did Jesus forbid his followers from doing so? No. Quite the contrary. Consider the words of Luke 22:36-38. "Jesus said to them, "... if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. ...  38 The disciples said, "See, Lord, here are two swords." Christ replied "That is enough."

Jesus also told his followers to, "Love your neighbor as yourself." And he rhetorically asked, "Who is your neighbor?" He clearly indicated that loving our "neighbor" means caring for the needs of more people than just the few who live next door to you. So, for someone to say that it is OK for Christians to defend ourselves but not our neighbors makes no sense.

With these things in mind, as a Christian, I see nothing wrong with Mrs. Huckabee learning to defend her country against possible attacks which may come from those who wish to do her and her neighbors harm.
Pat Huntington NY,
The definition of science is it must be repeatable. We can't repeat the beginning of the world. It's *all* faith, at some point. Never has anyone found an organism that is partially morphing into another. For pete's sake, when ever has order come out of chaos, without the input of an intelligent mind to guide the process? I really just want to know. A heap of screws and bolts don't magically create a 747.
"Science" is simply man's theories based on man's observation. We have never observed something coming from nothing. We have never observed a nothing creating a tangible (creature) that innately posses an intangible (feelings, conscience). We never observed evolution in action, or even abiogenisis (spontaneous life from nothing).
Evolution is as much a theory, a religion and a faith as creationism and intelligent design. What proves that life can come out of nothing? What proves that the earth is billions of years old? Radioisotope dating does. Did you know how radioisotope dating works? It measures the amount and rate at which the hydrogen molecules escape the object (particularly rocks/fossils), and then ASSUME a beginning amount of  hydrogen in the object and ASSUME that the hydrogen has been escaping at the SAME RATE since it began (can't say "was created", I suppose). This supposedly gives them an estimate of how old the object (rock) is. A fact based on assumptions.
When Mount St. Helen erupted, scientists performed the same R.I.D test on the rocks newly formed from the molten lava. It showed them to be million of years old. See, how could they know how much hydrogen was in the rock to begin with? And we know that it's possible for environmental circumstances to change and affect the rate at which the hydrogen escapes. So how can we safely assume that it escapes at the same rate over the years without ever varying?
Even more profound: why do many intelligent scientists cling to this obviously flawed theory of basic abiogenisis? (life from nothing).
Because, as Mike Huckabee said, if we admit that there might be a creator, then we *might* have someone to answer to at our life's end. Scary and uncomfortable, right? Evolution scares me more. To believe evolution I have to throw my brain and conscience away. I have no reason to live. I have no hope after death. everything is just a never ending process of survival of the fittest, and worst of all, humanity's future is in the human's hands. That's down-right frightening.

Like Mike? Sign the Huckabee Petition.
http://www.iwouldvoteforhuckabee.com
Laura Bush may personally support women's reproductive rights, but she is a Stepford Neocon wife who follows loyally at the heels of her inept husband and criticizes anyone who doesn't agree with him.  I lost all respect for her and now do not like her at all.  She goes along and is complicit in her husband's lies and discourages any logical dissent.  Lynn Cheney is evil.  Nothing more to say.  I didn't have a problem with Hillary as first lady- at least she didn't loyally follow an idiot and criticize those who dissented.
*correction. Radioisotope dating measures the leakage of Carbon-14, not Hydrogen.
My apologies.
Michael,

Is that how you see the war in Iraq as defending our country against possible attacks?  If so, then why aren't we also doing the same with Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, etc?  All those countries can possibly attack us, but we haven't started a war with them yet.  Any country can attack us.  As far as helping our neighbors, are we helping Israel are we helping Cyrpus, are we helping Sudan?  Why is Iraq only worthy of our help?  Bush lied to us and got us into a war of HIS chosing.  I don't see anywhere in the bible where it states that we should start wars under false pretenses and because the president choses a war with a certain country that is no more dangerous than the next.  Are you aware that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and there were no WMDs in Iraq and the Bush knew this?  I don't think Christians should advocate pacifism, but they most definetly shouldn't advocate lying, killing innocent people and imposing the president's beliefs on everyone.
I feel sorry for the people behind theses remarks against Christians. One thing that I have always noticed that distinguishes the believers from the "Chritphobics", are the "Chritphobics" are always dripping with anger and hostility in their words and actions.  Mostly because they are not "getting their way" but deeper then that, they hate themselves.

Jesus can certainly set them free little do they know he is right in front of them asking.
All I can say Juan is I never have and never will belong to a group or organization that is race exclusive. I also won't have a guilt trip laid on me by people who do.
Michael Satterlee, I don't agree with your intrepretation of Christ's message or your reading of the bible. The Old Testament said it was OK to take an eye for an eye but Christ said if you are attacked, turn the other cheek. Christ's message was something radical, something difficult and unnatural, in a way. It is very difficult to live up to Christ's example, but I don't think we should just give up and claim Jesus approves of war.

More specifically,  I don't agree with invoking Christianity to win votes. Invoking the miracle of Christ multiplying fishes and loaves to describe raising money in a political campaign is offensive to me. I would be equally offended if a Democrat claimed God was pulling for them. That is my religious belief. I realize other denominations don't have that point of view, but I just have to put it out there. I am just a person who disagrees with politicians using Christianity in their campaign. That's me.
Hey Pat, G.T. has a great answer for ya, I would love to see you show some of that so-called "scientific evidence" that you proudly rant and rave about. I'll wait I got a little while. Janet Huckabee would make a wonderful "First Lady."
Hey MSNBC, What about the comments that are attacking Christianity and our President, VP and their wives. Those are OK? You make no sense to me, that why I can't stand watching you.
God is not a pacifist.  He lead David in battle and many others.  He did not turn his head or back.
"*correction. Radioisotope dating measures the leakage of Carbon-14, not Hydrogen.
My apologies. "

Decay to C-12 - not "leakage," but it's not real anyway. Ask Michelle and Josh - the Bible is the only science book we need. Military tactics, too. I don't know why we have any other books.

(Who could attack our war criminal VP or prez? Unbelievable! I remember an America where everyone did as they were told, didn't criticize elected officials, kept their heads low and butts high! Wait - that was Nazi Germany.)
Attacking militarily for no reason is ok, but expressing an opinion on our president, our VP and their wives is not OK?  Huh, you're the one that makes no sense. We live in a free country and we don't have to agree with a man who is a liar and an idiot just because he has the title of president.  And we don't have to like his wife if she criticizes us for not agreeing with her husband.  And I don't think anyone has a problem with Christianity, it's those that are hypocritical (i.e. I'm a Christian therefore, I don't support abortion, but I support the war even though it's causing needless death because it was started by a republican president).  Hypocrisy at its best.
I'm taking a stand and donating $100 to Mike Huckabee on November 20th.  Together we can make a big difference.

http://Nov20ForTheChildren.com
Can't believe that someone wouldn't even put their name on their post. I love science and the Bible, they prove that God does exist. You just have to look real close in both of 'em. The Bible talks about science, Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 1:25 & 27 "For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, ... but God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise." And remember "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline." Proverbs 1:7


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=467972

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google