ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Viva Las Vegas

Posted: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:37 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro


LAS VEGAS -- If last month’s debate in Philly was the moment when Democrats and reporters realized that the Clinton coronation -- with a crown of diamonds and pearls? -- was postponed, last night’s will be remembered for Clinton effectively fighting back, Obama sticking to his guns, and the gap between those two and everyone else widening. The Clinton vs. Obama spat exposed the true fissure in the Democratic Party: generational and ideological. Edwards found himself on the outside of this fight; he was hurt especially by the fact that Clinton and Obama were standing next to each other, while the former North Carolina senator was off to the side. 

*** Dr. No: Clinton ducked the drivers’ license controversy that has dogged her since Philly, because all she had to utter was one simple word: "no" (that she didn’t support giving illegal immigrant drivers’ licenses). Indeed, she didn't have to answer why she waited more than two weeks to give a definitive answer or why her “no” seemed inconsistent with her past statements. Meanwhile, the theatrics between the moderator and Obama over whether he was answering "yes or no" on the issue gave Clinton the moment on immigration her campaign was looking for. Will this be the Clinton YouTube moment they push around? We'll see. On the flip side, Clinton’s about-face on NAFTA from what she said about the trade deal just one year ago was striking (and perhaps something reporters look into). Nobody on stage jumped on it -- but it's perhaps a bigger flip she'll have to answer for than the war.

*** A swing and a miss: As for Obama, he did fine. But early on, he missed a major opportunity, which displayed his inexperience at debating. When Clinton hit him early on health care, Obama simply defended himself from the attack, rather than deflect the attack and counterpunch with the 1993 health-care reform failure. It was an easy hit for him, and he missed. Clinton is winning on "experience," not because of the practical experience she has as a former chief executive (she's never been one), but the experience she has as a politician, as a debater. Clinton would not have missed a similar opening. But Obama got his YouTube moment when he got to challenge the moderator on the issue of being a pessimist. Look for THAT in an email box near you VERY soon.

*** Those boo-birds: A final Clinton vs. Obama point… Hillary really benefited from the audience responses. An organizer for the debate told First Read that each campaign received 22 tickets, while the state party and UNLV invited the rest. But just how many of the rest were Clinton supporters? Because their booing when Edwards or Obama confronted Clinton was distracting to the candidates and threw them off. The audience was supposed to play a role via the questions they asked; instead, they played a MAJOR role in helping Clinton have home-field advantage.

*** First impressions count: As for Edwards, he just wasn't at his best tonight. His attempts at hitting Clinton early on fell flat. That little "planted question" line was out of place.

What's interesting is that Edwards seemed to get it, and went back to his comfort zone and ended the debate a lot stronger than he started. Of course, first impressions are everything and Edwards didn't make a strong first impression at this debate. David Yepsen's declaration this morning is not helpful to Edwards, but he also warns Clinton to not bury Edwards too quickly or else face the possibility of a stronger Obama who unites the anti-Clinton vote.

*** The rest: As for the rest of the field, Biden -- again -- had a good night. He keeps doing well at these debates; we'll see if he can use this to propel himself in Iowa. Richardson, by the way, had one of his better performances, possibly his best. But his response that he has always Yucca Mountain will likely give him headaches from Nevada reporters. Dodd didn't get a lot of time, but when he did speak, he seemed to be on message.

*** Enter Lou Dobbs? There is some speculation today that Lou Dobbs might run for president. Seriously. Writes the Wall Street Journal’s John Fund: "After months of telling reporters that he ‘absolutely’ would not consider leaving his highly-rated CNN show in which he crusades against free trade and illegal immigration, Mr. Dobbs posted a commentary on his Web site last week predicting a surprise new presidential candidate in 2008. The mystery candidate is an ‘independent populist . . . who understands the genius of this country lies in the hearts and minds of its people and not in the prerogatives and power of its elites. Friends of Mr. Dobbs say he is seriously contemplating a race for the first time, although it's still unlikely. They spin a scenario under which the acerbic commentator would parachute into the race if Michael Bloomberg, the New York billionaire and favorite of East Coast elites, enters the field as an independent."

*** On the trail: A day after last night’s debate, Nevada continues to be the center of attention: Clinton hosts a discussion on renewable energy before holding a campaign rally in Reno; Edwards tours a Henderson, NV hospital with SEIU nurses and then holds a press avail with them; Romney is also in the state, where he attends a Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce roundtable; and Hunter stumps in the Silver State. Elsewhere, Biden campaigns in Iowa; Edwards heads to California to picket with striking Writers Guild members; Giuliani addresses the Federalist Society in DC; McCain campaigns in New Hampshire; Romney later hits a fundraiser in Provo, UT; Tancredo is in New Hampshire and Vermont; and Thompson stumps in Florida. Also, Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in New Hampshire before addressing the Young Democrats of America National Fall Conference in the Granite State.

Countdown to Iowa: 48 days
Countdown to New Hampshire: 53 days
Countdown to Michigan: 60 days
Countdown to Nevada and SC GOP primary: 64 days
Countdown to SC Dem primary: 71 days
Countdown to Florida: 74 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 81 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 354 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 431 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

<<Obama sticking to his guns?   You folks in the media are trying ever so hard to make this a race.  Obama was a disaster last night.  He had more waffles than a diner at breakfast.   >>

You were watching CNN, right? In the couple instances he was given more than 2.7 seconds to speak, Obama never once wavered from anything he's said previously either at a debate, a town hall, or other speech he's made since his campaign began.

Clinton hasn't given a single response that she hasn't changed within 48 hours since the campaign began. Talk about waffling. She must be a stock holder in a company that makes flip flops.
Hillary did great, she answered the questions, and she put on a strong game. Those who say otherwise, did not see the debate, or are just exposing their intellectual dishonesty and utter prejudices.
MSNBC does a better job of these debates. Wolf Blitzer drone voice would put most people asleep. As for the debates Hiliary is not Bill in any way shape or form and Barack represents another generation of voters all together; Hiliary is of the past and Barack's for the future and since Bill has been in the world has changed dramatically so the New Democratic Party of the future is represented by Barack so if you want to move your country forward people vote for to Barack to lead....and yes he does have a "different style" of leadership and he knows the constitution (constitutional law professor); a much more different leadership style and a hell of alot more knowledgable than GW.
I feel like I'm screaming in the dark, here.  PEOPLE HATE HILLARY.  Nominate Hillary, and you elect the Republican (or at least set up another squeaker they can steal, particularly now that the Supreme Court has been polluted with Roberts and Scalito).  She's the ONLY thing that could get the dispirited right wing fired up again.  Want President Giuliani?  President Romney?  All you have to do is make Hillary the nominee.

(Not that she wouldn't make a good President; she's just never going to get the chance.)  ANYONE BUT HILLARY!!!
Wolfe Bliter was terrible and I am usually ok with him. This was pure pandering to an audience and competeing with NBC.
Wolfe Bliter was terrible and I am usually ok with him. This was pure pandering to an audience and competeing with NBC.
Structure for today's comments, and a list of those who will be posting them:

"Hillary showed those boys! They are so scared of her being president. They should just get over it and stop hating women. I have a vision of a woman in the White House!"

Posted by:
BionicWoman
bb
Psychic Mary
Students from UNF
Tuck, Realityville, KS

"I didn't watch the debate, or read anything about it, but Hillary clearly won. She was strong, resilient, and the other candidates sucked."

Posted by:
bb
Tuck, Realityville, KS
J. Merle Stanley

"Hillary is a flip-flopper! She won't answer questions! Barack killed her on Social Security."

Posted by:
Sierra, SF
Hillaryhater
Sierra, SF

"Hillary sucks."

Posted by jerry

"Biden performed well again, and still won't gain traction."

Posted by:
Carrie, Eastern Iowa (Thank God for Carrie)
Mark Thieme

"Let's wait for the Hillary-haters [Obama-haters] to post their excuses"

Posted by:
Van
Mike K, Denver

"Lets be rational here - nothing has really changed with this debate. Each of the front-runners took some criticism, and deflected some. And what do you know, they are in exactly the same place on issues as they were before the debate. The only difference is who the media says "won" or "lost", and who had the best sound-bytes. Now we have something different to talk about until Iowa."

Posted by:



As an Edwards supporter, I have to admit I was dissapointed last night. I posted on an earlier thread that he need to get back to basics, what he's about and how he plans to fix the country and stop attacking Hillary. He didn't and he got knocked down a few pegs. I agree with Carrie, the boos we probably for the general negativity and not for Edwards him self. He can recover but he needs to keep his trap shut about Hillary and focus on what he can do for this country and beat that message home. Everyone is applauding Hillary's performance because she fought back. She still didn't give straight answers as to the driver license issue or why she voted for the resolution on Iran, but the medai has let her slide on that once again. Obama look puzzled, lost and frustrated. I still like him and think he'll make a great VP to whoever wins the nomination, I just hope it's not Hillary. We don't need a democratic-republican for the next four years, we need a true democrat.
mike K.. obama was given the most time to speak of any of the canidates... you're just confused cause he never says anything during that time

<<"Clinton ducked the drivers' license controversy" by answering no.  Total BS.  She was asked--as was Obama and everyone else--to answer yes or no.  She and Biden both accurately understood the value of a succinct answer on this one.  Too bad for Obama if he didn't.  Just because neither Blitzer nor any of the other candidates followed up doesn't mean she ducked it.  Get real.  I know you guys want a race, but if last night's performance was any indication, Obama is way overrated and I wouldn't hold your breath.  You want a race:  go cover the Republicans. >>

But this leads to the bigger issue of illegal immigration which does NOT have a one-word solution. It was not the time for Wolf to play "beat the clock" with the candidates and see how fast he could get through the question just so he could pitch another softball to Clinton. Obama understands that it is one piece to a complex puzzle and not a one-word bullet pointed answer.
Actually, I thought the whole thing was high comedy and I can't wait for the Saturday Night Live version of last night's debate.  Sad to say, but Edwards just faded out last night.  He kept trying to elbow his way back in, but just couldn't stay in.  A lot of his stuff was good, and he did deflect some of Hillary's rejoinders, but in all, he just didn't make an impression on last night.  Obama got slapped bigtime last night, and was left wandering around like a duck wacked on the head.  Hillary was ready for it.  She handled the questions well, and whether you like her or not, she was ready for a fight and dished it out.  Joe Biden was excellent.  I was the most impressed with him, and sadly enough he just doesn't have the money or the means to take a lead in the polls.  Hopefully that might change come Iowa, but I'm not holding my breath.  Dennis Kucinich was almost reduced to comedy relief last nigh. Even though I respect the man and his beliefs I just don't see much more for him.  Richardson and Dodd were just taking up space.  So, to me the winners last night were Hillary and Biden, with Biden being the most impressive, and then Obama and Edwards, with Edwards behind because he was shunted off to the side away from Hillary.
Kudos to CNN for sparing us the swimsuit competition portion of this pageant.

soccersecuritymom

It got really ugly when Richardson missed the memo from CNN that they had dropped the swimsuit portion of the competition, and he showed up on stage in a Speedo. Haven't heard that much gagging since Clinton was in one of the back rooms of the Oval Office.
It escapes me how anyone can watch one of these Democratic presidential debates and not come away with one very clear candidate that can immediately begin restoring our country to it's rightful place of respect and dignity.  With the little time that he is given, Joe Biden is hands down the most qualified and capable candidate to hit the ground running and make a positive difference.  Joe Biden can immediately work across party lines and international borders to begin forming alliances that will restore our ability to be the diplomatic leader in the world. It's no coincidence that when a question is first asked of Joe Biden, after his answer and in follow up with other candidates they almost always start with "Joe is right"  That's because he IS right and he has the knowledge no one else on the stage does. Give EM Hell Joe!!!
Carrie

I didn't get to watch the debate so I was glad to read your blog.  As I have read through those posted on the topic, so many of them say, in some for or other (Biden seemed the best--Biden seemed qualified, etc) I am wondering if this is resonating with the caucus goers of Iowa? Since you live there, do you get a sense that the whole story is about Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or do they other candidates still have a chance?
NBC just LOVES Obama!! I didn't think he did very well last night. He can't even get a sentence out without stuttering through it! I thought Hillary had a pretty good night, but I think Biden is CLEARLY the most straight-forward and the most knowledgeable. If you've watched all the debates, you might have noticed how many times the other candidates say that they agree with Biden when they answer a question. It's happened quite a lot. Pay attention to that guy!!
Dr. No:  It's nice that H.R. Clinton could finally form an opinion on something now that the controversy is over.  Anyway, Obama.  He said that he supports driver's licenses for illegals (I love that term, it seems so not P.C., but it is, I think).  Anyway, he supports licenses for the short term for the reasons of national security, preventing traffic accidents and uninsured situations, since the Federal government is not doing it's job on the issue.  His IMMIGRATION POLICY is to secure the borders and come down tougher on those hiring illegals.  The problem with the simple Yes or No question on this issue is that if you say you support it, then people will think that you immigration policy is to give driver's licenses to people which leads to people believe that you support the Kucinich plan of complete amnesty.  That is not the case with Obama.

It did bother me how Obama always said undocumented workers.  I'd be like, did he just say that, and when the closed captioning came up, it kept saying immigrants, and I'd be like ooookay ... to which the who cycle would repeat itself.


A swing and a miss:  I don't know about you, but I'd rather have a leader, somebody who can articulate his positions like Obama.  So maybe he doesn't take every advantage to attack his opponents, why do you always head for experience?  Maybe he's just a nice guy, wow, wouldn't hat be nice.  Nice guys finish last you say, well not on Jan. 3rd!  Where in the job description of President is, "The ability to give a 30 second sound bite?"


Those boo-birds: I found the jeering and cheering irritating even when they did it to Clinton.  It was a CNN debate, not a boxing match, right?
Hillary Planted Questions for her audience at events in IOWA. How do we know her staff didn't plant those BOO-ERS to scare off the other candidates? Why are the other Dems so intimidated by her?

I thought she did terrible again last night but the other candidates DID WORSE by not attacking her or by calling her out.

SHE COMPLETELY DODGED THE 1ST QUESTION! I was screaming, "She's doing it again and the others aren't calling her on it"

I'm sick of Edwards and any other Candidate saying, "They're happy to be here in Nevada" there are only 2 reasons anyone should be happy to be in Neveada. Gambling and a visit to the Moonlight Bunny Ranch.
Hillary did great, she answered the questions, and she put on a strong game.

Pat, her game was about as strong as the Miami Dolphins.
A "swing and miss" ??????? Maybe a swing and dance ...  When obama ask about Clinton about playing with the numbers ie.. only 6% of american are in the group that make over 97000.00 why did she dance around with issue,it seem clinton next stop should be on dancing with the stars.
Let's Cut to the chase! This is not about Clinton and Obama, this is about the next leader/President of the United States and I am tired of these debates being Clinton & Obama when neither one shows any kind of leadership, when they don't have a plan they attack Pres. Bush and they both side step every question in order to never be pin downed. How about we have a debate regarding the issues and not about gender, ex-presidents husbands past accomplishments and he said she said.( I could watch Jerry Springer for that crap)! Senator Biden and Governor Richardson far more represent the kind of President I seek. One who is deliberate, answers the questions with their proposed solution, and shuts up, like it not they have a plan and thats a start, and they don't mind sharing it. If you wish to have a President that will change their mind always, to blame others and to answer questions in generic terms then vote for the past, but if you wish for our country to move forward, be a leader and stand up to China, terriorist, border issues and Health Care then Biden or Richardson should both be President & Vice President.
No More Debates about the 3 losers ( Edwards, Obama & Clinton) lets grow up, answer the questions as a leader, not  what I want to hear and take responsiblity! As for the media, you guys need to realize this is not a soap opera about the Southern, the Old and the Minority, it's about the right person for the job, no one is a front runner but Biden & Richardson, talk about them, do your job and report not create stories.
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester,NY: '...I can't wait to see sierra's, and jerry's comments on Hillary's performance last night...'


Merle:

She did about as well as the New York Giants did against the Cowboys in the second half last Sunday.
The following is one reaction to the 11/15 Democratic debate and indicates what was perceived.

Clinton: Calculated and Cunning; didn’t win but maintained status quo; seems so hard to trust whatever she says, as if it is always just said for calculated affect.

Obama: Tentative and Unsure; may have lost some ground; usually seems more presidential but not this time.

Edwards: Aggressive and Measured; probably gained some; impresses with his ability to present his position and be direct to the point.

Bidden: Confident but Flippant; likely gained some; impressive positions but really needs to be more diplomatic.

Dodd: Assured and Strong; probably did the best job; but simply doesn’t impress as a real contender.

Richardson: Self Focused and Argumentative; had to lose ground; he is hard to seriously consider.

Kucinich: Disagreeable and Impertinent; the real looser; definitely not presidential.

‘Last Night’s Winner’:  Bidden / Edwards.

I felt the debate format and the moderator were ‘clumsy’ and inhibited a better performance by the candidates.  For the first several minutes everything seemed focused on Clinton and that also was an unnecessary distraction.  

Just one person’s opinion.


By the way, is it just me or did Kucinich seem really pissed the whole night? I kept thinking he was going to jump over his podium and attack Wolf Blitzer.
During this entire primary process I have been dissatified by the choices. I wouldn't buy a used car from Hillary. Obama never seems to overcome doubts about his inexperience. Edwards, the first populist/ millionaire/lawyer president? I don't think so. Richardson can't speak in complete sentences.

What's surprising to me is Joe Biden. He continues to show himself the class of the field. I no longer consider him to be a wasted vote. He's won my support.
I have always been an Obama supporter...I changed my mind!

Clinton, who I never was a fan of knocked him out last night. Edwards was a pathetic, whiney, angery pompus jerk as usual and the rest..well were the rest.

Clinton took a hit last debate...She hit back last night!

The game is on, Hillary is turning up the hit and ready to fry these boys right off the stage.

You've got my vote now Hillary!

Am I the only one that despises how CNN setup this debate? A week of advertising that "this time, the gloves come off" with a boxing match metaphor, and then opening the debate with questions specifically designed to start the candidates off with commentary on each other?

This was then presented in post-debate analysis as the candidates going after each other... CNN created the situation. Once Wolf started asking questions about actual issues, the debate become productive. The first thirty minutes was completely wasted on questions designed to fulfull CNNs boxing metaphor. Disgraceful.

Also - in a yes-or-no question, 'No' will almost always be the short answer. Expecting someone to comment on a complex issue without providing context is simply ridiculous. I wasn't impressed with this debate format. The previous debate was much more useful.

That said, Biden is now on my radar following last night.
After reading the wonderful comments on Mr biden, why is anyone even talking about those other yahoos!!
I have voted for the "person" in all past campaigns so I have been all over the board....My husband as well, we both watched the debate and was so impressed with Jo biden, statesman and so much more knowledgeable than the top 3 put together. Why aren't you people behind the obvious "best leader" of the bunch...This just may be the year for us to get back on the democrat ticket...
As I read about the diamonds or pearls quesiton, I couldn't help remembering a similar incident during President Clinton's campaign when he was asked the quesiton "Boxers or briefs?" I guess the question to Senator Clinton could have been about briefs or bikinis??? So Silly. Rather odd that both husband should be asked such inane questions at their public appearances.  
I agree with one of the writers. Joe Biden is the only adult on the stage. We have already made plans that if Hilary Clinton is nominated we are moving to a third world country. Can you imagine, what might take place behind her desk in the oval office???? And she wants to be our President.... Anybody know of any land for sale???
Joe Biden is the Alan Keyes of the Democratic Party. He stands out in every debate as the seasoned and practical person who addresses the issues head on without trying to be politically correct. He clearly wins every debate.
Clinton is the most evasive politician I've seen in a long time that is using the media's backing of her "experience" to the max. Where is her experience? She has only held office about the same amount of time as Obama. If you count Obama's Illinois service, he is more expereinced.
Obama does come across as the least experienced in terms of debate experience. This hurts him, even though he doesn't pander as much as Clinton does.
Edwards has lost his stride and is being pushed to the point of irrelevance by the media.
The rest of the field is just striving against the wind.
If it were left up to the media, especially CNN, there would only be a debate between Obama and Clinton. Wolf Blitzer and Campbell Brown were pitiful in their attempts to twist the questions of the audience so blatantly to make Clinton's opponents look bad. And, the opening questions by Wolf Blitzer were as sorry an excuse of "professional" journalism as I've ever seen.
So, with CNN's and MSNBC's full support and use of every opportunity to try to make Clinton look the hero, she should have no problem winning the Democractic nomination. Too bad that their actions will result in defeat in the general election because the American public will not accept Hillary as a viable option.
 
<<Obama sticking to his guns?   You folks in the media are trying ever so hard to make this a race.  Obama was a disaster last night.  He had more waffles than a diner at breakfast.   >>

You were watching CNN, right? In the couple instances he was given more than 2.7 seconds to speak, Obama never once wavered from anything he's said previously either at a debate, a town hall, or other speech he's made since his campaign began.

Clinton hasn't given a single response that she hasn't changed within 48 hours since the campaign began. Talk about waffling. She must be a stock holder in a company that makes flip flops.
Mike K, Denver (Sent Friday, November 16, 2007 11:34 AM)

Mike are a blind puppet? Obama changed his positions 3 times this year on Social Security. If you are a Obama supporter who can read, you should go see the Obama campaign release on Oct 27th when he said no cap increase.

Also Obama was totally evasive on drivers license. Talk about lies.

Edwards is the best. Iowa will vote for him.
What's the difference between a planted question and one from Campbell Brown?
I will be waiting for Chris Matthew's and Keith Olberman's enlightening analysis of last night's debate.  They can always add a touch of humor which makes this whole political process more palatable!  
I have to start out by saying that Wolf Blitzer is a hack.  Absolutely the worst moderator for a debate I have ever seen.  And the questions, oh man, the questions!  The best of the best questions came from the audience (except for the Hillary diamonds or pearls plant!).  I think an audience of undecided voters asking questions is definitely the way to go in ALL of the debates- and how about giving the candidates an equal and reasonable amount of time to answer?  We are asking these people for soundbites, not solutions!  This is the presidency of the United States we are dealing with here, not student council president!  

OBAMA '08!
Sara, Cedar Rapids, Iowa,

Your analysis was right on the money. CNN should be ban from organizing debate and wolf should be thrown out of Democratic debate. He is the most useless moderator i have ever seen.


The audience was rude and they don't seem to understand what is at stake in this election. Audience should allow candidates to differ on substance but not personal attack.

I suspect the folks that boo were all Hillary’s supporter. I sincerely believe they are all Clinton's plant.

CNN - Clinton News Network.

The worst debate ever. I prefer fox news to this stupid CNN.
I guess the next time I know someone who needs an abortion, I'll know to send them to CNN ... what a horror show ... the first 15 minutes was totally wasted lining up the candidates like Cheshire cats with their backs up for a photo shoot ... then Wolfie announced the clock rules had been canned, thereby forfeiting any element of control over the candidates' collective mouths ... the next 20 minutes was  a scab fest free for all between Hillary, Borack, and Johnnie Boy, with nary a word from anyone else ... the next 40 minutes was soliloquizing in extraneous, wandering length by virtually everyone on stage, totally ignoring the need for concise and clear yes or no answers despite Wolfie's pleas ... interestingly, the very same Hillary who wandered all over the map a few weeks ago in the last debate was about the only one who tried to give succinct declarative answers in this debate, although Joe Biden did pretty well and has always impressed me as the real presidential timber in the group ... and the last 1/2 of the debate, which didn't start until 9:20 eastern time, only left 40 minutes for 1/2 the 2 hour total debate time and consisted of mostly inarticulate local citizens with no public speaking experience, some of whom could barely read, asking inane questions about such things as whether Hillary liked diamonds or pearls better ... give me a major break ... why the achingly lovely Campbell Brown left her upcoming anchor job at NBC to be a part of such a total meltdown and insult to viewers is beyond me, but she made her own bed ... unfortunately, the rest of us had to lie in it for 2 hours and it stunk to high heaven ... put Wolfie back in the Situation Room, lock the dang door, and get MSNBC and Chris Matthews and Tim Russert back on stage.
REG... "impressive positions but really needs to be more diplomatic."
--------------------------------------------------
Are you speaking in terms of being more diplomatic at the debate or more diplomatic in general?  This man heads the Foreign Relations Committee in Congress, has had personal consultations with President Musharraf of Pakistan,etc  so I think his diplomatic skills in the area of relations with other countries are quite good.

if you meant he should have been more diplomatic at the debate, from what I read it was well into the debate before either he or Dodd, Richardson, or Kucinich were given the chance to speak, well that might make one a bit testy and less than diplomatic.  
I want to encourage everyone who has any doubts to get behind Jo Biden for the next President.  In just a few minutes he stated more, knew more, was more Presidential than any of the others...It doesn't make sense to let the best canidate slip by when we so desperately need the BEST NOW because you dpn't think he can win....The best can win if we all put him on the front line where he should have been all along....why settle for thirds when we can have the best...He is so impressive and knowledgable..Just what is needed for foriegn policy.
Dr. No??  Shouldn't that article be about Ron Paul?  Hillary isn't a doctor and she has rarely said 'no' to the Bush White House.  What a stupid subject for a paragraph, Go Ron Paul 2008

Was was my first blog.....
I'm so tired of these debates.  You hear the same questions/answers.  I watched about 15 mins and watched football and basketball games.  CNN is definitely for Hillary and he is not good as a moderator.  The best debate moderator thus far, Tim Russert.  I can't believe that stupid hardball question from Campbell Brown to Hill about the gender card.  Why didn't she ask Barack was it is like to not use the race card because it should be irrelevant as should the gender card.  No more CNN debates.  Get some good moderators.
LOOKIE HERE EVERYPNE. hillaryclinton.com
Joe Biden would be OK except his record of plagarism and foot in the mouth disease is not good, especially if you are a person of color.  Joe Biden seems to have some old views when it comes to black people.  He just can't always control himself.
"I have always been an Obama supporter...I changed my mind!

Clinton, who I never was a fan of knocked him out last night. Edwards was a pathetic, whiney, angery pompus jerk as usual and the rest..well were the rest.

Clinton took a hit last debate...She hit back last night!

The game is on, Hillary is turning up the hit and ready to fry these boys right off the stage.

You've got my vote now Hillary!


James Beuford, Iowa"

That's a 10 on the BS meter.
I would love to see Lou Dobbs run for president.  He speaks for the people not special interests.  
"Perhaps the audience was booing the in-fighting that has begun to characterize these debates."

If that's the case, God help us all. Disagreements on policy and the questioning of one's commitment should take place at debates - if not there, where? It's sort of like saying boxers shouldn't hit each other during a boxing match ...

Besides, I'd rather candidates take on each other face to face instead of leaking "info" to Drudge, which has become Hillary's calling card of late ...  
As a Democrat, I'm real concerned with the negative tone of these debate. At the end of this process we're all together, but our party for the first time is looking more fractured than the Republicans. I'm real frustrated, sadly, with Barack for the first time, has he finally figured out this is his last chance at national exposure before 2016? Key to our party's success next fall is presenting a united front to the GOP, something that they will not be able to do this time around. Unfortunately, the negative tone of recent debates could destroy that.

The counterpoint to the above argument is that we're an open society which fosters debate, this no one could disagree with. However, the tone of our debating process makes our party recently appear weak and negative, and we need be mindful of that.
Well, well, well, turns out CNN forced the last question on the "diamonds or pearls" for Sen. Clinton (see thinkprogress.org), the student wanted to ask a more substantive questions.  
I want to encourage everyone who has any doubts to get behind Jo Biden for the next President.  In just a few minutes he stated more, knew more, was more Presidential than any of the others...It doesn't make sense to let the best canidate slip by when we so desperately need the BEST NOW because you dpn't think he can win....The best can win if we all put him on the front line where he should have been all along....why settle for thirds when we can have the best...He is so impressive and knowledgable..Just what is needed for foriegn policy.
What's the difference between a planted question and one from Campbell Brown?
Richard, Washington State (Sent Friday, November 16, 2007 12:20 PM)

Campbell is hotter:-)


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=470168

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google