ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



A preview of Romney's speech on faith?

Posted: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:47 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Chuck Todd
So are you wondering what Romney will say this Thursday in his speech on his Mormon faith? The most extensive remarks he's made recently on the subject was during a Face the Nation interview in late October, when CBS' Bob Schieffer pressed Romney for a good 10 minutes on the topic.

Sources tell First Read to expect some of the language Romney used in this Q&A to show up in a speech -- a speech, by the way, which Romney is writing himself.

The exchange is below...

SCHIEFFER: Governor, thank you for joining us. You`ve come to Washington to try and win the votes of these conservative Christian evangelicals. In light of that, is it fair to ask you about your faith? I mean, I`m wondering, how much about his faith do you think a candidate is obligated to share with voters?

MITT ROMNEY, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: You can ask anything you`d like. I don`t feel bad at all about people asking me about my faith. I think it`s natural. Most people don`t know very much about it. And so, if they want to ask questions, I`m happy to respond.

If they have questions about the doctrine of my church, I typically direct them to the church, because they could probably do a better job explaining than I can. But in terms of my values, what I think about the future of the country, how my faith impacts my thoughts about important issues, then I`m of course open to all those topics.

SCHIEFFER: Well, let me just, for example, rightly or wrongly, a Newsweek poll says that 28 percent of the people they polled said they would not vote for a Mormon. I know your staff has said that`s irrelevant because they should be asked would they vote for you. But do you feel compelled to explain your religion or your relationship to it, or is that something that ought to be off bounds?

ROMNEY: No, no. I`m happy to have people ask questions. That doesn`t bother me. And I think the reason that some 28, 29 percent are not comfortable voting for a Mormon is they think they`re voting for Harry Reid. That`s not the case.

I think as people say, would you vote for Mitt Romney, and they get to know me and my wife and my family, they realize that our values are as American as any values you`ll find in the country, and they`re comfortable with us. Of course there will be some who don`t come on board.

But by and large, people will make their decision not based on where you go to church but instead based upon your values, your vision for the country and your ability to actually help the country at a time of great need.

SCHIEFFER: Well, will you ever make a speech like Jack Kennedy did back in 1960 when Catholicism was an issue for a lot of people? Would you ever make a speech outlining how you feel about your religion and the part it plays in your life?

ROMNEY: Well, I certainly get a chance almost every day to add one or two things to that speech. I probably could never do something that would compare to what John F. Kennedy did. His was a masterpiece in American political history.

But maybe there`s a time when I talk mostly about religion, although I don`t know. At this stage I`m getting good support across the country. People want to know a bit about my faith. They learned a bit about it.

And they say, OK, well, that`s fine. Now, what do you think about the jihad? What do you think about being competitive with China? How can you fix our schools? What are you going to do about health care? And those issues overtake any differences with regards to religion they might see.

But maybe down the road there will be a speech. Just haven`t made a final decision on that.

SCHIEFFER: Well, I would just think, for example, you know, there are many different people who call themselves Christians. I consider myself a Christian, but I don`t necessarily believe or take every line in the Bible literally. Other Christians do.

Do you take literally the teachings of your church?

ROMNEY: I do. I`m not going to try and distance myself in any way, shape or form from my faith. It was the faith of my fathers, of my sons, a long tradition in my family. I`m, as I say, true blue through and through. And so I accept the teachings of our church, and I do my best to live by those teachings.

It hasn`t made me perfect. I`m far from that. But I`m probably a better person than I would have been and my kids are better than they would have been without faith. And you know, I don`t try and be critical of other people`s faith. Actually, I`m of the view that religious individuals have an enormous advantage in stability in their life. And I respect the work that`s being done by ministers of all faith. I think it draws people closer to God and makes us better people.

SCHIEFFER: Well, I remember during one of the Republican debates people were asked -- various candidate, did they believe in evolution. And I believe you said that you did.

ROMNEY: Yes, I do. Yes, it`s very consistent with me to believe that there is a God and a creator, but that he might use the tools of science as we`re learning them to help create the human body.

Now, I don`t think he created the human spirit or soul that way, but I think that`s something that comes from God. But how he created our body is something which I think science will help to find.

And I don`t argue with science. I believe there`s no conflict between true religion and true science. And we have got a lot to learn. There`s so much we don`t know, probably both on the scientific front as well as on the front of theology.

SCHIEFFER: I`m told that the Mormons teach that the Garden of Eden was in Missouri. Is that correct?

ROMNEY: You know, there are probably the right folks to give you the answers to questions related to Mormon teachings. So I`ll probably let them respond to questions about specific doctrines. But what I can tell you is that the values of my faith are founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and the same kind of philosophy that`s associated with other Christian faiths and the Jewish faith and others is very much consistent with ours. The view that there is a God that created us, that all the children on Earth are of the same, if you will, divine origin, that the loss of one life anywhere is the loss of a fellow son or daughter of God, that liberty is a gift of God. These fundamental principles are the same faith to faith.

SCHIEFFER: Bob Jones, who heads Bob Jones University down in South Carolina recently endorsed you. And he said this week that he is completely opposed to the doctrines of Mormonism, but he said he preferred your erroneous faith to Hillary Rodham Clinton`s lack of religion.

ROMNEY: Isn`t that a great line?

SCHIEFFER: Can you accept that endorsement?

ROMNEY: Oh, I`m happy to receive endorsements from individuals. And of course, we have different faiths. I`m not expecting him to endorse my faith. I`m not asking anyone to do that. I`m asking him to look at me as an American and judge my values, learn about me and my family, my character, and decide whether I could help America at a critical time. And I`m pleased that you have an evangelical Christian leader who says, look, Mitt Romney is a guy who is a social conservative, an economic conservative, a foreign policy conservative. Those three branches, if you will, of conservatism have to be united if we`re going to win the White House.

And so, his endorsement is good news to me. But I don`t endorse -- or excuse me, I don`t expect him to endorse my religion.

SCHIEFFER: Why do you think that a lot of evangelical Christians do have a problem with you and with your religion?

ROMNEY: Well, religions are different. And in some respects, our faith has a different take on various religious issues, as do other faiths. And so in the competition, if you will, of religion and what`s a true doctrine and what`s not, there will be a lot of contrasts between the different faiths of the world.

But when it comes to the values of our faith -- I was with Jerry Falwell before he passed away, and he said, look, when we were fighting to stop gay marriage, he said, I got together with the Mormons in California and the leadership of your church, and we fought to try and stop gay marriage, because on a value basis, we come from the same place.

And I think that`s going to be true for people who take a good look at me. They`re not going to accept my religion necessarily, but they will certainly see me as someone who can be one of those who can carry the standard of conservatives for social, major social issues.

SCHIEFFER: Would you just -- I think back to the speech that Kennedy made. And people were worried about that somehow or another, he might take orders from the pope. How would you describe your relationship to the church and how you would see the responsibilities and duties of the president?

ROMNEY: Well, no president could possibly take orders or even input from a religious leader telling him what to do. I guess you could always listen to ideas, but you certainly wouldn`t be guided by someone outside the constitutional circle, if you will.

I subscribe to something Abraham Lincoln spoke about when he was a young man. He said you take the oath of office, and you subscribe to America`s political religion. That is you take the oath of office and the rule of law as your primary promise to God. And that`s the way I feel.

My church wouldn`t endeavor to tell me what to do on an issue, and I wouldn`t listen to them on an issue that related to our nation. If I`m president to the United States and put my hand on the Bible, I do what the Constitution tells me, what the rule of law tells me. I certainly don`t do what leader of my church or any other tells me to do.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

<b>2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll</b>

<a href="http://www.votenic.com">http://www.votenic.com</a>

The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.
I find it amazing that in our day and age such a speach should even be necessary. What a sad commentary on U.S. society. I don't care what faith any candidate is as long as that individual is honest and adheres to a strong, personal ethical code. Yes, bigotry is alive and well in our nation, especially against Muslims, Mormons, etc.
Two wives in every garage. What's next, a Scientologist for Secretary of Education?
Just read JFKs speech on faith and paraprase.A real original.Pretty boy floyd.
I don't know much about Mormon and i don't really care. The only thing I know about Mormon was the HBO show "Big Love"; perhaps, Romney speech will shed more light.
So, Clinton came out as an avowed atheist? News to me. As much as I'm not a Clinton supporter right now, these other guys are a bunch of hypocritical tools.

Romney, if you're such a proclaimed believer, you can answer simple questions.

or go to Hell
(which probably is Connecticut for you)
I think the comments that Mitt has made are clear , I dont understand what people are looking for, Mitt's belief in Jesus Christ is as Chirstian as can be.
Being honest with your fellow man is far more a quality in a president thant we could ever expect to get. This is what The LDS religion teaches.
Romney apparently learned to Mitt-flop from the Mormon Church which has now changed its Book of Mormon regarding the ancestary of American Indians.
Speeches like this, always end up sounding like, 'my faith or your faith are better than no faith", and then segue into ethics and leave faith behind. Attaching characteristics to themselves, and still hinting that an Athiest or someone who believes in something other that an Anthropomorphic Male God, is not only lesser, but cannot have an Ethics Code or Values surpassing their's, or have none at all. A sort of, "I'll Demonize if you will."speech to the unconverted. It's all about High Ground. They end up saying they'll pray for you. That's High Ground, too.
Bob- the mainstream LDS church has not changed the Book of Mormon or what it says regarding the ancestry of the the American Indians.  Nothing other than gramatical or punctuation errors have been changed since the first publication.  Where are you getting your erroneous information?

Randy- the mainstream LDS church has not allowed polygamy since the 19th century.  If you are Mormon and attempt to practice it, you will be excommunicated (kicked out) of the church. Only some of the break-off religions still practice it (like the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or FLDS).  You have probably heard of them because their leader, Warren Jeffs, was on America's Most Wanted list, was recently arrested, tried and sentenced to a minimum of 10 years in prison.

Bee- it is religions like the FLDS that Big Love is based on.  I hope Mitt's speech answers your questions about our faith, but if not, try mormon.org (designed for people not familiar with our faith), or lds.org (members mostly use this one, but its open to everyone).  Generally speaking, we believe in God, we believe that Christ is our Savior, we try to follow the golden rule and live the commandments as taught in the Bible.  We're far from perfect, but we believe in repentence and faith.  Hope that helps.
I don't understand this poll-I LIKE it a lot but it seems to go against what the news is reporting-that Obama is now leading Clinton. Can someone explain which poll is most likely correct?
Katforclinton08
PS- Steve, I don't like these kind of speeches either, but the people seem to be demanding it.  Leo, I agree with you: in a country where freedom of religion is supposed to be a guaranteed right, and where there is supposed to be a separation of church and state, a politician making a speech about his or her own religion should not be necessary.

Huckabee is just as religious as Romney, but I don't expect him to explain his faith to me.  I'm considering him (and Romney and 2-3 other candidates from both parties) based on their positions on the policies and issues I care most about.  I don't care what they believe as long as its in support of the freedoms our country promises.
Kat, which poll?

I haven't seen what you're talking about, since this page is about Romney, but on the news last night they were saying that Obama and Clinton were statistically tied in many places, particularly in some of the early caucuses...
I get so frustrated with people making Mitt's faith an issue. I dont hear people making Mike Huckabee's faith an issue or maybe the past morals (or lack of them)of Rudi Gulianni an issue in the campaign. The question should be will he do the job? Is he the man to lead this country out of the mess we are in right now?
Who cares what religion he is. He sounds like someone who would make good choices for the United States. From all of his answers it sounds obvious that he has his beliefs but he is able to keep his job as his job and his religion as his religion. He also has an obvious mind of his own which means that he won't be bossed around, rather, he'll do  what the American people want, not just what the Mormons want. People need to read the whole book, not just the cover.
i for one am sick and tired of the religion issue. i am a catholic, fascinated by the issues of every type relating to the presidency, and have been very impressed with mitt for several months, if not years. for the focus to keep coming back to his faith and to see such bigoted comments on blogs, etc, makes it extremely frustrating and makes me wonder if the intellect of this country is doomed.
Mitt Romney has all of the qualifications and experience required  to be a great president. Everything he's done has been a success. Also,he seems to have lived a faith-filled life, but his brand of religion is irrelevant.

http://conservativewordsmith.townhall.com/g/9d509f67-0007-45d1-9ff7-c025c422a526
Mitt Romney and Two Political Deists
Conservative Wordsmith Susan Baldwin writes: Mitt Romney, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson all have one thing in common: none of them were, or are, evangelical Christians. Mitt Romney is a Mormon; Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson were both Deists. I recently wrote a post called "Mitt Romney Qualifies With Article 6,"* which explains the fact that the Constitution of the United States prohibits religious belief as being a requirement for the holding of any public office.

According to Dr. Wayne Grudem, an evangelical research professor of Bible and theology at the Phoenix Seminary in Phoenix, Arizona; also a Townhall columnist: "'Here in the United States, God used not only Founding Fathers who were strong Christians, but also Deists such as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, to build the foundation of our nation. Jefferson even became our third President in 1801, a demonstration of the wisdom of Article 6 of the Constitution, which says, 'no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.'"

Mormons are in no way open/transparent on all of their doctrine. I would like to see Mr. Romney speak to a group of Christians and explain his churches temple practices on something like baptism. Baptizing dead church members by performing a ceremony on a living surrogate is in no way Biblical or Christian.
The day after the speech is December 7th for Mitt.  I fully expect this to be one of the best days of the campaign for Mitt.  Go to http://www.December7thforMitt.com for more details.
Kira,Utah...
Don't know much about you, However, you are an easy read and get to the point effortlessly. It is a joy to read your blogs; they are well thought out and not offensive. You certainly are a breath of fresh air. I look forward to your contributions here.
Michael, Read Corinthians. Paul says, ...if the dead riase not at all, why baptise we for the dead?"
King James Version
Let's cut through all the bull--lots of people think Mormonism is a cult. And people think that a cultist shouldn't be president.

One other point, when JFK gave his speech, 1/3 of the country was catholic. Less than 5% of the country is mormon.
Michael, Read Corinthians. Paul says, ...if the dead raise not at all, why baptize we for the dead?"
King James Version

Why do we tear down things we don't understand, rather than seek understanding? Fear I suspect.

Wisdom teaches us that Man can not comprehend all that God comprehends and therefore wise to not assume ourselves all knowing.
oh my god.  It just goes to prove the religous right is crazy. I don't care what religon you are.  What are you going to do for the country?  What are your past accomplishments.  Screw Religon,  iTs the root of all evil.  Watch out for the people crying religon they have the most to hide.  Religon should not be on or anyway near a presidential election.  Look at the university of Pedophilia (Catholic).  Priest are the devil in sheeps clothing.  God put us on this earth to see what we would do with our lives.  Not to blindly follow him.  He gave you a brain use it.  Who cares if roomney is a mormon.  I am more afraid of Huckabee because he was a Minister.  Seperate church and state or wind up like Iraq.
oh my god.  It just goes to prove the religous right is crazy. I don't care what religon you are.  What are you going to do for the country?  What are your past accomplishments.  Screw Religon,  iTs the root of all evil.  Watch out for the people crying religon they have the most to hide.  Religon should not be on or anyway near a presidential election.  Look at the university of Pedophilia (Catholic).  Priest are the devil in sheeps clothing.  God put us on this earth to see what we would do with our lives.  Not to blindly follow him.  He gave you a brain use it.  Who cares if roomney is a mormon.  I am more afraid of Huckabee because he was a Minister.  Seperate church and state or wind up like Iraq.
The reason Romney must give account, while Huckabee is not required to, is the crux of the whole matter. The LDS faith requires adherance to an authoritative organization, while protestantism is antithical to organized religion, by definition.

There is no Pontifical figure in protestantism who can speak authoritatively for the faithful.  For protestants, every man walks in his own way, and after the image of his own god, interpreting Christian doctrine from the Bible, as he/she sees fit (usually whatever way is most popular with his own flock.)

So, the question is, will Romney be any more likely to be influenced by the leadership of his church than was Kennedy? Kennedy's church had been ruthless in the past (see Fox's Book of Martyrs.) Romney's Church is so relatively new that no meaningful comparison can be made (though many try.)

However, Kennedy's appeal was as a Catholic, distancing himself from his church, while Romney's appeal is as a Mormon, affirming his faith, as the source of his all-Americanism.

What it boils down to is this: Will protestants brook someone that is "not one of their own," as a champion of their own conservative values? Is Huckabee a "Christian leader," while Romney is dissembling? Huckabee paints it that way:

"A person maybe runs for office, and he goes and presents himself to that Christian community for votes," he said. "But there's a difference if that person comes from that Christian community in really understanding it. It comes down to whether the language of the church is a second language for the candidate or if it's the native tongue."

This is an amazing admission. Kennedy said that he was not a Catholic candidate, but a Democratic Party candidate, who happended to be a Catholic, but Huckabee's position is that he is the Protestant candidate, who happens to be a Republican.

Can you imagine if Kennedy had appealed to the Catholic community this way?

Romney is not the Protestant candidate, and he shouldn't be. Neither should Huckabee. There is a Christian political agenda to be sure, but whether the Republican candidate happens to be a Catholic, a Protestant, or a Mormon, has no bearing on his ability and chances to win the Presidency in pursuit of that agenda.

What matters most is the agenda, and achieving it.
Michael, The point is that you don't have to agree with everything in Mitt's faith. I have never agreed completely (or even partially, at times) with the religious views of the presidential candidates in our country. That's what JFK's speech was all about- doesn't matter if 5% or 100% of Americans are Mormons. If you want to find accurate information about the LDS church, go to their website. If you want to have a strong, conservative, family-oriented person as president- then Romney is a clear choice.
Why don't we all just tell the truth. Huckabee will not win the nomination. Even if he does, he will never win the general election. In general, people are just as scared of a Baptist as of a Mormon. Huckabee's success does only one thing- it guarantee's the nomination for Guliani by weakening Romney. A vote for Huckabee is a vote for Guliani, plain and simple, which in the end is a vote for Clinton or Obama because, after all, Guliani and Clinton are on in the same.
as usual, mitt supporters miss the point. he has flip-flopped on some of the most personal and intimate issues an American can face. these are issues you do not just wake up one morning on the other side of.

as I watched a show on IFC about the 2004 election and how republicans lamblasted kerry on the flip- flop charges i couldn't help but think they have given the perfect playbook to run against romney.

once again by continuing to not take other views into account these supporters prove their own intolerance.to call kerry a flip-flop and then say romney is revelations just show blatant hypocrosy.

once again why do this on Pearl Harbor day??? if the media covers this angle you will crash and burn. but of course with such favorable coverage I doubt they will mention the fact.

republicans hate America and my middle class children.

flip-flop,flip-flop,flip-flop,flip-flop, get ready, it's coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
freedom of religion is only promised as no government interference which w. and republicans has trodden upon by the way. there are plenty of private businesses that hire only certain religions or church members.and also fire if philosophy is diagreed with. research before you make career choices you could regret without knowing the facts. i have lived these scenarios. blindly following the party line just leaves you blind. free advice take it or leave it.
I don't much care about his religion one way or another-but I sure don't want him as president. I'm sure he will somehow lay blame on the fact that many people won't vote for him because he is a mormon on Hillary.
Steve- your comment doesn't really make sense- why would he blame it on Hilary?  Has she made any derogatory comments about his religion?  Not that I've heard.  I guess that could only potentially be an issue if he is the republican nominee for the general election... in which case I think he'd have a great chance since so many people don't like Hillary.  However if the match up is Clinton-Romney, go ahead and vote for Hillary if you don't like Romney, it's a free country and that's how it works.  If that's the choice I'll be voting for Romney, so I guess our votes will cancel each other out.

A.Brocco- thank you, I'm flattered.

Michael Joseph- a few people have already said that the practice you mentioned is discussed in the Bible.  The LDS church doesn't have secrets so much as things that we hold sacred.  In the Old Testament, the practices in the inner most part of the tabernacle (temple) were only practiced by the Levites (the priesthood holders who God allowed to work in the temple).  Other faithful individuals could only do part of the tablernacle ceremonies.  Holding something sacred means to not discuss it with people who won't revere it as you do, it's a respect thing, not a cult thing, and it's been around since the beginning of mankind.

All the basic doctrines of the church (as well as some more advanced doctrines) are available in church sponsored publications or on the church websites which I mentioned before.

In regards to baptisms, we, like most Christian faiths believe that baptism is an important physical ceremony of accepting Christ into our lives (conversion, if you will).  We do not baptize dead people (eww). We do perform proxy baptisms in behalf of people who have died so that if they did not get baptized in this life, they may CHOOSE to accept or reject one performed for them in the next life (as spirits in heaven).  A baptism in behalf of the dead does not automatically make anyone Mormon or anything else.  Baptism is a physical act, so by providing proxy baptisms we are trying to give an option to those who have past from mortal existence.  There is nothing secret about that.  There is nothing forced.  If you came to my home and I offered you something to eat, you have the choice to accept or not, I would not force it down your throat... same idea.

I hope I have clarified that point for you.  Now, can we get back to politics and decide who would be most able to lead our country, versus who would make the best minister???

Thanks, sorry for the long entry!
twostepcub, kind of cynical aren't you?  If you're not a Clinton supporter and "these other guys" are all "hypocritical tools", who do you support? If you can't find a single person running who stands for at least some of what you believe, you may want to move to a country that does.  Otherwise, who will you vote for?  If you don't vote, you don't have a right to complain. :)

I lived in Connecticut for awhile. It's beautiful there (especially in the fall and spring).  If that's Hell, Heaven must unimaginably beautiful!
What I good time I had reading all this about Mitt and the issues of faith and politics in the US. I am LDS and would vote for Harry Reid, not for Mitt Romney.. for obvious reasons...
Maggie-
If it is obvious to you, I'd be worried.
My guess is that Maggie is a Democrat- since Harry Reid is and Mitt is not.  that would be the only "obvious" reason I can see :)
Do I think Romney MUST believe like Christians? NO... In the same God and Jesus Christ of Christians? NO. As an American Mitt Romney IS free to believe however, whoever, he chooses to believe.
 
AS A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, anyone subjects him/herself to the scrutiny ofvoters, the media and the world. That is just the way it is for anyone who attempts to occupy the highest office in the land.  

Romney brought his "faith" into his campaign from the beginning.He laid it out on the table. "I believe in God, Jesus Christ and the Bible." He could have said he believes in Beelzebub or witchcraft. He is free to believe as he chooses, he is free, whether or not to share his belief with voters.

What has become an issue with voters is the fact that Romney is NOT being forthright. Many Christians, Bible-believers AND LDS are becoming confused and irritated by Romney's 'statements of faith' as he tries to uphold LDS vows of secrecy AND attract Bible-believers and/or Christians. The LDS God/Jesus Christ, and belief in the Bible, is NOT the God, Jesus Christ of the Bible.

Voters expect candidates to be forthright, whatever they hold forth. And when we learn of incongruance--discrepancies, whatever the issue-- voters expect the candidate to be forthcoming to resolve any inconsistencies.


Even, AS HIGH PRIEST, SWORN ON HIS LIFE TO HOLD THE TEACHINGS OF LDS "SACRED/SECRET" Romney IS LIVING HIS RELIGION as HE REFERS US ON elswhere, to learn what he means when he says he "ACCEPT[S] THE TEACHINGS OF [HIS] CHURCH AND DO[ES] [HIS] BEST TO LIVE BY THEM." He upholds his OATH, SWORN ON HIS LIFE, to NEVER DISCLOSE the "THE DEEP DOCTRINE," as LDS call it--the inner teachings or temple rites of his church.

DOES ROMNEY HAVE A RIGHT TO DO SO? Yes. Of course. Is that THE BEST THING FOR OUR NATION?

THAT IS WHAT WE ASK OF ALL OUR CANDIDATES, as we set out to learn about them, what drives them--do they Really want to stand as the First Person in defense of our constitution, our GOD-given freedoms--do they have our best interest in mind, are they trustworthy, capable? Allbeit, these days, candidates play so many games with the voters and other candidates and the media, it is difficult, whatever we learn.

Above, Romney says HE DOES TAKE THE TEACHINGS OF HIS FAITH "LITERALLY". He says: "I'M NOT GOING TO TRY TO DISTANCE MYSELF IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM FROM MY FAITH.It is THE FAITH OF MY FATHERS, OF MY SONS, A LONG TRADITION IN MY FAMILY.I'm, as I say "TRUE BLUE THROUGH AND THROUGH.And so I ACCEPT THE TEACHINGS OF MY CHURCH, AND DO MY BEST TO LIVE BY THOSE TEACHINGS."
WoBoy!

Romney is, in essence, saying exactly what some of us have been trying to tell voters all along:

example:
The LAW of LDS God, regarding the "AFRICAN RACE" IS if any "WHITE MAN" "OF THE CHOSEN SEED" mixes blood with them, IT IS DEATH ON THE SPOT, THIS WILL ALWAYS BE SO. (eg Journal of Discourses,vol.10, p.110).

Romney's saying he will NOT distance himself from such as this, that he will do his best to live by this teaching (?)

He is saying he (is SO FAR OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY) that He DOES ACCEPT AS TRUTH that there was "STEEL" in the holy land 2400 years +- before it was created in the 1800's.(Book of Mormon, 1Nephi4:9)

Romney's saying he LITERALLY BELIEVES (?) EGYPTIAN EMBALMING INSTRUCTIONS, verified by Egyptologists to be Egyptian embalming instructions, are Really the LDS prophet's "true" interpretations of what LDS now call their Books of Moses and Abraham,
(mis)interpreted by their prophet's "gift of interpretation"(??)

Romney's saying he DOES (?) believe he must wear special undergarments 24/7 every day of his life to ward off attacks of the devil(?)

He DOES (?) believe LITERALLY the very LDS (still active, current)scripture (that LDS label those who obey it openly as "Fundamental LDS," )that LDS men MUST have PLURAL WIVES or lose chance at LDS celestial kingdom and glory, which is a fulness and continuation of their seeds forever, and also be damned and lose LDS godhood(eg LDS Doctrine and Covenants 132).(?)

Romney really believes LDS were justified in raising up their own armies against US citizens, more than once(?) (as verified by history, including LDS history).


Romney says, above, LDS is founded on Judeo-Christian principles?
The Bible, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, are MONOTHEISTIC, believing there is ONLY ONE GOD.
LDS-Mormonism is POLYTHEISTIC, believing there are many gods and that they, also, may become gods.

Judeo-Christian principles/ONE GOD (eg Isaiah 44-46), CHRIST is the Word of GOD made flesh(John 1), the fulness of the GODHEAD, bodily(Colossians). Thou shalt have no other gods--which are no gods; if any man or angel bring any other gospel, they are accursed(Galatians 1); Thou shalt not commit adultery; it is appointed unto man once to die, then the judgement; "Zion" is Jerusalem, NOT Independence, Missouri, USA.

Romney says he shares the same kind of philosophy as other Christian faiths and Jewish faith, that "A" God created us and we are all same "divine" origin? NO! That is NOT Judeo-Christian. Christians and Jews believe "THE ONLY GOD" Created us--do NOT believe we are of "divine" origin, but were born in sin, as the Bible teaches.

See Romney. Hear Romney speak. Watch Romney talk in cirles: Romney says: The values of his faith are founded on Judeo-Christian principles, the same philosophy associated with other Christian faiths, the Jewish faith/of course we have different faiths/our faith has a different take on various religious issues/so in the competition, if you will, of religion and what's a true doctrine and what's not/there will be a lot of contrasts between the different faiths of the world.  

WOW! That's just like reading LDS-Mormon scripture, (if you will). Not only does it dispute the Bible, it disputes itself. He's flip/flopping all over this, too.

some more:

no president could possibly take orders or even imput from a religious leader/I guess you could always listen to ideas/but you certainly wouldn't be guided by someone outside the constitutional circle, if you will/my church wouldn't endeavor to tell me what to do on an issue/and I wouldn't listen to them on an issue related to our nation

Voters better be finding out more.

LEO, Waco TX
"a strong personal ethic code"
Yea, Jim Jones and David Koresh had their "strong personal ethic code/s" too.

"compeititon for what's a true doctrine" (??)
LDS have ASSUMED many names/words/phrases from the Bible, Judaism, Christianity, which have very different meanings. Are they TRULY Jews? Christians? NO. THEY ARE NOT. BUT they ARE truly LDS. They are taught whatever their leaders hand down is the word of (LDS)God. Now they're told they're "Christians" since the name Jesus Christ is in name of their religion. As I and others have stated, that is like saying every Latino son named "Jesus" is the Christ-child, or, every male named "Christian" is Christian. But this is what they are told their God said and this is what they will claim unless/until told otherwise.

Of course, ANY "Christian" is not going to uphold and sustain scriptures that teach:
CHRISTIAN GOD IS LDS DEVIL
(eg Journal of Discourses,vol.5, p.331).

CHRISTIANITY WAS HATCHED IN HELL
(eg Journal of Discourses,vol.6. p.176).

LDSChrist is "SPIRIT-BROTHER OF LUCIFER"
(eg Moses 5:13, [LDS]Gospel Principles,revised 1979,ch3, and elsewhere throughout LDS scriptures and teachings).

His choice to speak about his 'faith' is up to him. It will be interesting, to say the least. Many of us are just waiting for him to be Forthright, believe what he may. There are many POLITICAL 'scriptures' in LDS dogma. As former president, Bill Clinton said recently, BEWARE THE DANGER OF ANY POLITICAL GROUP POSING AS RELIGION. I'm not saying all LDS are 'posing.' I AM saying there is A LOT of POLITICAL stuff. Romney himself says he won't distance himself in any way shape or form and will do his best to live by them. WHICH Romney do we believe?
Mick dude, please get some help... soon!  I can hear a gasket getting ready to blow.

Yo
mick, you are so far off base.  You really do need some help.  What exactly are you trying to accomplish by misquoting and twisting LDS beliefs?  You don't have to agree with it, like it, or accept it...so why don't you leave it alone? You really should find something good and productive to do with your life. This ain't it.
Get over it! So what if Kennedy had the nomination? Does that abdicate the "fear" that you all fear? He was Catholic...wanna talk monopoly on world religion, politics, world affairs, (yes all kinds), word-up and action/impact on all world political domination. Get it right...Mormon belief is that Jesus Christ is the Head of their church and follow His teachings from the Bible, hence The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints...albeit they use King James version of the Bible. They do not adhere to the practice of multiple wives, as has been misused by those against Romney's beliefs. For all those against Romney for religious reasons, then how do YOU reconcile YOUR need for domination based on YOUR beliefs? Same thing!
If Mohammad was a prophet and/or incarnation of Jesus Christ, and Buddha, etc., then why couldn't Joseph Smith be one too? Everyone who prays or talks to the Universe for spiritual enlightenment is capable of receiving revelation. Get over it. Look at the man's business record. None of the other candidates on either side of the aisle are squeaky clean, nor above board. Why hold a double standard? Makes you look the hypocrite that you proclaim Romney. By the way, I am voting for the best person for the job.



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=493849

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google