ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Oprah-palooza

Posted: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:20 AM by Mark Murray

“OMentum” is the New York Post headline on the Oprah-Obama events this weekend in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. “In her first foray into politics, Oprah drew nearly 70,000 people in appearances with Obama over the weekend at two events in Iowa, one in South Carolina and one last night in New Hampshire, where about 8,500 supporters showed up. As people streamed into the Williams-Brice Stadium in Columbia, SC, they were each handed a slip of paper. On the front was a list of four South Carolina voters to call using their cellphones, and on the back was a script touting Obama.”

The Los Angeles Times notes how Oprah and Obama tailored the message for the South Carolina audience yesterday. "Winfrey and Obama appealed directly to that demographic, peppering their speeches with ‘y'all’ and ‘you folks.’ They made several references to church attendance, beauty parlors and God, and quoted the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr."

The Washington Post's Balz notes, “Winfrey drew responses of ‘no’ and ‘nonsense’ when she said there are those who say the youthful Obama, who is in his third year in the Senate, should wait for his turn before seeking the presidency. The cries turned to cheers and applause as she continued: ‘Think about where you'd be in your life if you waited when the people told you to. I wouldn't be where I am if I waited on the people who told me it couldn't be.’”

NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli was in Manchester for the last stop of Oprah-palooza. Obama’s speech was largely the same, Memoli reported, except for one acknowledgement early in the speech. Obama welcomed members of the AFL-CIO, who he said were his special guests. “They’re here at my request, as my special guest because the Verizon Wireless Arena does not hire stagehands who are union workers,” Obama told the crowd. “This is a great facility, and we should have union workers in here to make sure that the stagehands are getting a fair shake.”

The Los Angeles Times on Oprah-Obama in Iowa on Saturday: "The 50-minute rally in Des Moines was a potent hybrid of pop and politics; of hope and self-help admonition (‘I am not here to tell you what to think,’ she said. ‘I am here to ask you to think’) peppered with subtle digs at Obama's main opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York. ‘Experience in the hallways of government isn't as important to me as experience on the pathway of life,’ she said.”

The Columbia State: “Winfrey wows crowd.”
 
The Boston Globe called it a “watershed moment.”

Newsweek's Fineman believes Oprah outshone Obama.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The New York Post is a conservative rag that WANTS Obama to be the nominee.
Be smart people!
Candidates who will throw the election to The Republicans for sure, on the next Oprah.


As someone that attended the NH rally, I must say Howard Fineman doesn't know what he is talking about. Obama brought the house down last night. He made a compelling argument and every body stood up towards the last 2 minute of the speech. He was in a different realm and was passionate about the future of America.

Every one in attendance including the Gov of NH were all clapping and were all in awe. Here is how one of the reporters from Boston put it “ I have been to some of his rally where he looks more like a professor  but tonight …Obama was more like a Baptist Preacher and he brought the whole house down"


Let's see How many people Hillary can put in Shea Stadium for a rally.....

Maybe if she reunited the Beatles, maybe....

Considering she had some people at a rally in Iowa and more were there to see her husband then her, makes you wonder who the real star of the democratic party is.
WHY doesn't first read tell us how Obama and Oprah crossed picket lines in NH ?

YOu know, Obama isn't for the working class, he's much more of an Oprah weath type
Get ready, J. Merle, it's gonna be a looooooooooooonnnng week for you hillary supporter's.

" DELUSIONAL THINKING BY COMMON SENSE AMERICAN'S IS OVER "
haha NY Post conservative rag?  Looks like the Clintonites are already pumping negative propaganda to hide Clinton's demise.

Fineman is widely recognized to be in the pockets of Hill-Billy.  Considering his story is out-numbered 10 to 1 with people who think Obama hit the nail on the head, along with Oprah at his side, speaking honesting, and calling on women not to vote based on some past idea of sexual oppression, but instead, to rise up and recognize that they now have their OWN right to THINK FOR THEMSELVES, make their own choices!

It was a fantastic event from all fronts.  
Obama and Oprah rocks and there is nothing you can do about it!!!
Bee...thanks, as some one who watched a live stream of all four rally's that was my feel also.  But, Howard fineman's analysis doesn't surprise me in the least.

They continue to undersestimate Barack and the American people.  A month ago they had crowned Hillary and they are relunctant to take that crown off and admit that they don't know everything...so they will continue to try and clamp down his gains and him until they can no longer.

BTW...Howard's opinion is just that one man's.  thousands if not millions saw it for themselves.
Bee, Fineman is a HRC supporter.  many in the media are.
I watched the rally in SC on the Obama site and He was on fire.  anyone who can say that Obama was overshadowed just are not paying attention or have their column written beforehand.
and Oprah succeeded in what she was suppose to do.  Bring out the women to see Obama.
And Obama delivered.
So Obama had a moment .... say all you want.... Hillary still maintains a very hefty lead in every poll across the nation (against all Dems and especially against the GOP). It's going to take more than just Oprah to help out Sen. Obama gain some lead.
to chuck, actually obama's campaign made an agreement with the union out of respect to the union. the union agreed to go along with the fact that no other facility of the size that was needed was readily available goegraphically on sudden notice. the events original designation could not hold the number of people that suprisingly responded to the invitation.

you shouldn't misrepresent the truth. it does harm to the process, sir. if you would go online and read the n.h. papers you will find this to be true. it wasn't in just one or two biased papers. it was in every paper in n.h.

also, obama dedicated a part of his speech to advocacy of stagehands being able to unionize at that location. if you were really interested in the truth you would find that most of obama's career has been dedicated to the less fortunate(women, men and children). another false statement on your part, sir.

i think at this stage in the campaign that everyone be truly in search of facts and the truth, not talk points, slander or character asassination. lies don't help the process in anyway.

hillary, obama, edwards, richardson, biden, paul, mccain and huckabee all have good qualities. all the candidates have shortcomings. if we debate upon the facts and issues without twisting the truth we will hopefully make a proper and informed vote. thank you.
I went to the rally to observe what was happening on the ground and I left fired up and convinced about my pick. Like Oprah said "Obama is the one we've been waiting for" It is high time we changed the way we think in this country. Elect someone that has great vision for our country. We need a visionary like Abe Lincoln, period.
I'm confused about why the issue of "too young" continues to brought up in reference to Senator Obama. He will be 47 years old when the next President is inaugorated.

There have been 8 previous presidents in their 40's when they took office, and 4 of them were younger than Senator Obama will be.

Ulysses Grant - 46
Franklin Pierce - 47
James Polk - 46
James Garfield - 49
Grover Cleveland - 47
Theodore Roosevelt - 42
John F. Kennedy - 43
William Jefferson Clinton - 46
The Oprah - Obama rallies were lots of fun and very inspirational. It is exciting to see that many people coming together to do nothing more than celebrate the possibility of change. A new day is dawning . . .
A MUST READ FOR ANY OPRAHBAMA groupie
http://www.obamatruth.org/

LOOKS LIKE OPRAH AND OBAMA SWITCHED PLACES, OPRAHS NOW RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? AND OBAMA IS HER CAMPAIGNE FLUNKIE?
Go Oprah! We ALL know if anyone can’t take the attention off of obama’s no experience lack of leadership, refusing to show up and vote in the senate on Iran, Abortion measures etc... Seeking a trillion-dollar tax hike and raising the retirement age for Social Security!!!! Is not in favor of a health care plan to cover all children rich or poor and that he cannot make a decision on his own. You can….YOU have disgraced American woman, now as a last ditch effort you throw Dr Kings name at the black voters, now American knows where you stand on race…  

SHAMEFUL ACT...I SUGGEST WE ALL TUNE OUT BOTH!!!

WAKE UP AMERICA! Its time we stop playing with Oprah and elect a QUALIFIED PRESIDENT!!! not just a man because he’s black and oprah says so, she may know soap and books, but why in he world would anyone jeopardize your future because a TV talk show host said so?... This weekends Oprah circus, will not help obama, its make us all realize Oprahs running the show not obama...Our great country needs a qualified leader, maybe if oprah was legally running, but obama is…. Glad the dog and pony show is over

Oprah is a shame to her gender, yes the same gender that made her who she is today and she turns her back on them in a second when race is involved...

I think its time WE ALL tune out the oprahbama show, and let’s elect a REAL Presidential candidate like CLINTON!
Seems like even the Govenor of NH wanted a little of the "O" dust on him....couldn't let the moment slide to be in the same company.

BTW his wife (Hillary supporter) couldn't take a pass either to be there or to stand by his side as he praised Obama( did not endorse)....sure the Hillary campaign is loving that.
SickofOprahObama,

get over it.....
wow. it is amazing how some are reading all the wrong reasons into oprah supporting obama. i don't hear all this ugliness about any other celebs supporting other candidates. i don't hear streisand is doing it because hillary is white or a woman. i don't hear norris is doing it because huckabee is white.

why does it have to be because he is black. hello for some of you who didn't know this or are unwilling to recognize a known fact. obama's mother was caucasion and he has stated he has no shame of his mixed heritage. what is wrong with you people.

why can't it be she believes in him? instead of all beating down oprah, please tell me since you are so focused on the issue; why are the other celebs supporting their candidate. please do that for me then i may take your hate mongering seriously.
ace p, washington, d.c.--I am loving your posts!! Please make sure you keep it up!!!
I attended the Columbia, SC event. I was convinced that the majority of people would be there to see Oprah, and was concerned that she would "outshine" (as some would say) Obama. Neither proved true. If you look at footage of the event, it is clear that most people are there for Obama. And it is clear that he was the focus of the night.
It awesome to read about the possibility of having a first black president. It's is something,but I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT WHERE WE ARE GOING AS A COUNTRY,than I am about making a first BLACK PRESIDENT in history. Our country is in serious need of an individual that has the courage to do "WHAT IS RIGHT,DESPITE THE POLLS OR WHETHER IT WILL BE APPROVED BY REPLUBICANS OR DEMOCRATS". We need a REAL LEADER,SOMEONE WHO WILL SPEAK TO THE HEART OF WHAT IS NEEDED AND WILL ACT ON IT BUT WILL BE WILLING TO TALK "PEACE" TO OUR ENEMIES NOT WAR, WAR, WAR. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMEONE WHO REALIZES THAT THIS IS NOT A TIME FOR CRITICIZING YOUR OPPONENT BUT A TIME TO LOOK FOR REAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE MESS WE ARE IN. OUR TROOPS MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO SAY WHAT THEY ARE FEELING IN THEIR HEARTS, BUT THEY NEED SOMEONE THAT WILL TELL THEM WHAT THEY ARE FIGHTING FOR: "IS IT FOR FREEDOM OF DEMOCRACY,OIL,WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OR TERRORISM, WHAT IS IT THEY ARE FIGHTING FOR,is it worth the price of lives lost so far? WHEN THIS IS TRULY ESTABLISHED,THEN,WE CAN LOOK FOR REAL SOLUTIONS AND BRING "THESE CHILDREN" HOME! SOMEONE, PLEASE STAND UP AND TELL THE "TRUTH!!! Obama,Hilary,or Huckabee, maybe one of them is THAT PERSON,I am not sure,yet. I am not naive that I can'T ignore our history. NO, THIS COUNTRY HAS NOT ALWAY ACCEPTED MY PEOPLE OR ME, BUT I STILL BELIEVE IN THE PRINCIPLES AND THE FAITH THAT GOES WITH IT. It confusing for me to hear, we are fighting in Iraq to have a democracy, and at the same time our democracy is being tampered with and destroyed, what is really going on? Will the real leader who has Courage and Faith, not that "bushwhacked faith",please STAND UP,then,I will know my vote will not be in vain.
He spoke out against the Patriot Act then voted in favor of reauthorizing it, he cannot commit to withdrawing the troops out of Iraq by 2013, possibly later.. He hasn't ruled out using strikes against Iran, not to mention the same vote he criticizes Hillary for, he missed himself and sponsored the exact same legislation designating the IRG a terrorist organization in back in April.. He implied that he would invade Pakistan, without the consent of their government.. He made votes making it more difficult for average citizens to sue big corporations.. He has no consistency on the issues of social security and taxes, in the very beginning he was for raising the cap, then having all options on the table, then appointing a bipartisan commission, now he's back to raising the cap.. He receives contributions from lobbyists, corporations and interest groups

WHY WOULD ANYONE VOTE FOR HIM
hey, sick of oprahabama -

the website you listed, obamatruth.org, was created by a guy named Joe Novak - aka, "Low Blow Joe". here's an excerpt from this link:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20060809/ai_n16660014

"Joe Novak is to campaign dirty tricks what Donald Segretti was to the Watergate, what Stradivarius was to the violin, what Al Capone was to the mob. He once told the Sun-Times' Scott Fornek, "What some people consider a dirty trick, I would argue is many times the legitimate dispersal of information." If dirty tricks were an art form, Fornek observed in 2002, Novak would be Renoir."

i'm fired up and ready to go!
Vote for change, vote Ron Paul!
-he voted against the Iraq war
-he has never voted to raise taxes
-he voted against the Patriot Act
-he opposes amnesty for illegals
-he opposes entering war with Iran
-he voted against Bush's amendment banning gay marriages
-he is for reducing the national debt by cutting government spending instead of placing the burden on taxpayers
-he is for free trade
-he is for limited government
-he is for handling global situations with diplomacy
-his voting record is consistent
-he isn't backed by corporations, lobbyists and special interest groups

www.ronpaul2008.com
Oprah says read a book Oprah says open a school Oprah says vote for Obama,Why Oprah,should anyone listen to her.
J. Merle - it seems that the rest of the voting public may not share your (and Senator Clinton's) partisan "us vs. them" mentality.  You know who else shares that mentality?  The extreme right wing.  And you better believe they are licking their jowels at the prospect of running against Hillaryland to run the same pathetic circus all over again.  Perhaps we can tie off some space for you all to duke it out so the rest of us can move on?  Just a thought.    
Oprah....Umma....Oprah....Umma....Oprah....Umma...
The endorsement of a celeberty like Oprah does not make me change my mind, per se, but hearing her speech gave me a moment to re-think my support for Hillary.
I'm sick of Oprah-ma too.
I don't think reality-soap-daytime-talk-show hosts need to be picking our Presidents for us, do you?
Can you imagine what our electoral process would turn into, if a nomination or even an election hinged upon support from the likes of Maury Povich, Montel, or Jerry Springer?
"What will Vanna wear tonight? Vote for Obama and find out!"
There should be more dignity to The White House than that. Elections are not "reality shows," and The Presidency shouldn't be a prize on "The Price is Right."
I'm sorry, but Oprah's invlovement with Obama's campaign really turns me off.
I appreciate your post today Pat,

"The endorsement of a celeberty like Oprah does not make me change my mind, per se, but hearing her speech gave me a moment to re-think my support for Hillary."
pat huntington ny (Sent Monday, December 10, 2007 11:26 AM)


I know you are a very strong supporter of Clinton and for her speech to even give you a moment to think about Obama is great and shows that he truly can be and will be the next President of the US.
There are only two ways to lead, by inspiration and by example, and they are not mutually exclusive. Obama as potus would provide some credibility in both areas, from a global as well as U.S. perspective.

Consider a continuum with do-as-I-say-do-not-what-I-do at one end and lead at the other end. What we have here is a seminal moment where America's claim of global democratic leadership (as opposed to imperial posturing -- as man has done since the inception of the species Homo sapiens here on earth) can be pushed toward the lead end of the continuum.  Why do we need these visions so bold that they run the real risk of ridicule as idealistic naiveté? For this reason: Precisely because we are all such imperfect beings, we must strive for perfection (at least in the standards we promulgate as visions).  The point is, if we were perfect, then, by definition, whatever action we took would be the right thing to do. So the anchor of a bold vision is a good thing to precede action. Notwithstanding that from the perspective of humanity that it is sad that it's so, given the world extant,   in the circumstance of campaign '08 in the U.S., the onus is largely on the dominant group to move beyond what is, and even what can be, and envision what ought to be and THEN grasp this seminal moment that has arisen here.  Why? Purely and simply numbers and the one-person-one-vote principle, even if it works to perfection. Consider the circumstances of the South Carolina Democratic primary. Why that one? Because it is said that in that particular primary, blacks comprise circa 50% of the vote. Current estimates say that the black vote is evenly split between Clinton and Obama and that Clinton enjoys a significant lead over Obama for the white vote.  Now, how many places exist where such is the significance of the black vote?  In 2004 Sharpton received, it is said, 10% of the black vote. (Oh, by the way, this isn't the first time Oprah would have had an opportunity to so publicly support a candidate of African descent}. Notwithstanding all else, 1+1 = 2. It's purely and simply the numbers.

So, as delineated above, the onus is largely on the dominant group. After all, blacks are circa 12% of the population.  Nevertheless some of the convoluted arguments being proffered by many blacks, particularly among the “prominent” class, as to why they will/should/ought NOT vote for Obama suggest that a larger vision is required from them if they, also, are to “see” this seminal moment.


I am a lifelong Republican (however, I never voted for a Bush) and I have never seen a more perfect person for president as Obama.  

On the night of his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention, I commented to my wife, "he could be the first black president", and here he is.

I for one will do whatever I can to put him in the White House.  

If it doesnt happen, I will shift my full support to Hillary, because the Republican party has become the party of radicals, not conservatives.

He spoke out against the Patriot Act then voted in favor of reauthorizing it, he cannot commit to withdrawing the troops out of Iraq by 2013, possibly later.. He hasn't ruled out using strikes against Iran, not to mention the same vote he criticizes Hillary for, he missed himself and sponsored the exact same legislation designating the IRG a terrorist organization in back in April.. He implied that he would invade Pakistan, without the consent of their government.. He made votes making it more difficult for average citizens to sue big corporations.. He has no consistency on the issues of social security and taxes, in the very beginning he was for raising the cap, then having all options on the table, then appointing a bipartisan commission, now he's back to raising the cap..

j (Sent Monday, December 10, 2007 11:19 AM)

1) Parts of the Patriot Act (while still not my favorite legislation) have been revised since the initial passage.

2) It takes time to safely remove 150,000 troops and equipment. You can't just put them all on a boat and send them home all at once.

3) You can't take the option of military strikes off the table. And he never said he would attack any country. He said he would go after al-Qaeda on the Pakistan border if they don't do it. And aren't they the guys we're after in the first place?

4) The legislation he sponsored isn't exactly the same as the resolution recently passed. The issue isn't whether or not we should declare them a terrorist organization as much as it is tying our presence in Iraq to Iran's military being a "terrorist organization". His legislation didn't do that; the most recent resolution did.

5) Being for the Social Security cap, then leaving it on the table, then being for the cap again? While I think you kind of have that wrong, it still seems pretty consistent to me.
I seem to recall that Oprah is also the reason that millions of Americans bought and read, "A Million Tiny Pieces" (I forget the exact title).  But it was after the fact that Oprah finally did her research and concluded that the non-fiction book she had heralded turned out to be pure fiction.  She was duped and she passed it on to her loyal cattle...I mean followers.  Does she have any recommendations for a plastic surgeon in Los Angeles that she wants us all to know about?
Just because she has a talk show, does not mean that she is speaking the gospel truth.  The fact that only 2% of the country even watches her show is proof that she will have little effect on Obama's political future.  Hillary will prove this in about a year.
".....Get ready, J. Merle, it's gonna be a looooooooooooonnnng week for you hillary supporter's.
" DELUSIONAL THINKING BY COMMON SENSE AMERICAN'S IS OVER "....."
Rick,ky (Sent Monday, December 10, 2007 9:44 AM)

Ha Ha, oh really Rick?
Why, what's Oprah-ma doing now.....offering the Vice Presidency as a bonus prize on "Hollywood Squares"?

Let me get this straight. Obama and Oprah play the race card and yet the media says nothing. It is clear that Oprah largely backs Barack Hussein Obama because he is black. Listen to the content and style of their speech in SC and it couldn't be clearer that the race card is being dealt. Meanwhile Clinton speaks at an all girls school and gets accused of playing the gender card? Wake up people.  Both the conservative and liberal media wants Obama as the nomination although for different reasons.Either way the public is being manipulated.
If i were Hillary Clinton supporters, i will be more worry about this article.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=anRcoLyfN0VM
"...3) You can't take the option of military strikes off the table. And he never said he would attack any country. He said he would go after al-Qaeda on the Pakistan border if they don't do it. And aren't they the guys we're after in the first place?..." CitizenJ

CitizenJ.....WRONG! He did indeed say he would 'nuke' China.
Furthermore, He didn't say that he would amass troops on the Pakistan border, he said he would invade Pakistan!
Your spin and LIES will not change the truth about the things Obama said.
Frankly, I don't understand how Obama's supporters expect us to take him seriously, when they constantly try to change the content and what he has said over the course of the last 6-12 months.
It's as if they don't think we've been paying attention to the debates, or to the rhetoric that's been coming from his campaign.

CitizenJ.....WRONG! He did indeed say he would 'nuke' China.
Furthermore, He didn't say that he would amass troops on the Pakistan border, he said he would invade Pakistan!
Your spin and LIES will not change the truth about the things Obama said.
Frankly, I don't understand how Obama's supporters expect us to take him seriously, when they constantly try to change the content and what he has said over the course of the last 6-12 months.
It's as if they don't think we've been paying attention to the debates, or to the rhetoric that's been coming from his campaign.

Sick of CitizenJ's LIES, and Sick of The Oprahma Hype (Sent Monday, December 10, 2007 11:59 AM)

Hmm...I wonder who this could be.

J. Merle, if you are sick of my "lies", then just scroll past my posts. And I don't know why you didn't seem to have any problems with any of the other endorsements of this campaign season, or why you think Oprah's reasons for supporting Obama are any different from those of Clinton's supporters, but you being "sick" of the "hype" is not my or anyone else's problem. Start an "I hate Oprahma" diary.
Obama is the anti-christ
Ok, What's wrong with everyone in this country. Just because "The Loney Wife Club" can stay at home and run out to buy everything Oprah suggest doen't mean she can pull the winning votes for Obama. Lets be real this is a serious matter, a little more than picking the book of the month.
Oprah always puts her "black on" when she is around other african americans.
May God protect us from ourselves.  I am for free speech but I am also for everyone using their own God given abitlities to reason.  Hitler was very charismatic, very well liked and made quite a hit at all rallys and speeches.  Have the supporters of Barack Hussein Obama looked at his heritage and his background?  Should we not be a little cautious?

One person asked why we are making this about race.  Why is Obama?  Why is he running as a black instead of taking on his mother's race?  Why is Oprah so adament to use "y'all" in her speech when you never hear her use such language on her television show unless she is trying to remind people of her "background."

It is time we all look at this logically and intelligently.  We shouldn't vote for a black so we can go around saying, "America has its first black president."  We shouldn't vote for a woman so we can go around saying, "America has its first woman president."  We should put into office the best qualified and the most trustworthy American that we can so that we can go around saying, "America has a forthright, patriotic American as president who will protect the rights of all citizens without playing favorites to blacks, women, non-Christians, Christians, Muslims, etc.

May God Bless this country and have mercy.
Am I the only person out here who finds Oprah extremely racist?
Would she even pay attention to a white candidate that was an upstanding person?
I'm sick of her racial bias.

M.
The American People need Obama for change. we the people need change and the only man that can do that for our country is Obama,Obama for change.
It is quite obvious that Obama is using Oprah’s popularity just to get votes , nothing more. An honest question to Obama would be if he truly cares what kind of audience Oprah has and if they would be soley voting for him not for his stand on issues but only because that they are Oprah addicts ? If he doesn’t care then it would point to the fact that he wants to get votes “anyway possible” including using big name showboats. Where will it end, who else will join the dog and pony show ?  Wake up America, these types of politicians will do anything and say anything to get a vote, any vote and as many as possible. Try thinking for yourselfs and see that there are choices , not the ones pushed down your throat by big media productions and grandstanding techniques. How about Oprah goes back to day time TV where she belongs and Obama try and sells himself to America ?
It is quite obvious that Obama is using Oprah’s popularity just to get votes , nothing more. An honest question to Obama would be if he truly cares what kind of audience Oprah has and if they would be soley voting for him not for his stand on issues but only because that they are Oprah addicts ? If he doesn’t care then it would point to the fact that he wants to get votes “anyway possible” including using big name showboats. Where will it end, who else will join the dog and pony show ?  Wake up America, these types of politicians will do anything and say anything to get a vote, any vote and as many as possible. Try thinking for yourselfs and see that there are choices , not the ones pushed down your throat by big media productions and grandstanding techniques. How about Oprah goes back to day time TV where she belongs and Obama try and sells himself to America ?
I don't think any of the critiques of the "O&O evening helps me any. I am very turned off by Ms. Oprah illuding to the MLK speech." The dream she has leaves out the white vote, and there are many, and there were many at the "Oprah shows." I think this is the hardest decision I have ever made. I don't care who supports who, however, Oprah was the brightest star.
Media is biased, agree, in not commenting on the fact that Obama and Oprah are playing the "race card".  May be the next game is Obama appointing Oprah as the VP running mate, or later as heading a special cabinet post for worldwide communications...down right danagerous
Sounds like a lot more than the Clinton Machine are threatened by the "young" senator with no experience...He exudes intelligence, civility, integrity, hope, optimism, and inclusion. Gee, why would that appeal to so many?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=507726

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google