ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Bill lets loose in interview

Posted: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:30 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Abby Livingston

“Probably, just to get a political story and get a fight going, somebody will watch this interview and parse everything I said,” said the 42nd president Friday night on Charlie Rose. What? Never!
 
In the hour-long interview, Bill Clinton downplayed Hillary’s chances in Iowa, citing her competitors’ strengths in the state. He noted Edwards’ history in Iowa. He also commented on Obama’s home state of Illinios’ proximity to Iowa, neglecting to mention that his wife was raised in suburban Chicago. “So my view of this is that I never thought she had a big lead in Iowa and never thought she could have one.”
 
Bill Clinton was on the prowl last night, and he was after Obama and the press.  He made a litany of criticisms toward Obama, but diverging from Clinton campaign strategist Mark Penn, Clinton made no mention of cocaine. He did, however, bring up Kinder-gate with no prompting from Rose. Clinton claimed that the controversy began because Obama was quoted making a “fairly derisive and obvious comment about Hillary saying, you know, she had some decades-old plan to be president, repeating this total canard.” 
 
“He kept repeating this totally fabricated account from this anti-Hillary book that she had this decades-long plan to be president,” Clinton continued. “As if it were something bad…And so on her website, they put up reports from people who worked for Senator Obama that he was planning to run for president when he first got to the Senate, then he was planning it in the state Senate, and then they put the kindergarten letter in. They thought it was funny.”
 
Clinton felt that the press played into the Obama side of the story, saying, “He just got a few stenographers to write stories about the- as if this kindergarten letter was serious.”
 
It is clear that the months of Obama’s veiled criticisms of the Clinton administration are getting under Bill Clinton’s skin. “If you listen to the people who are most strongly for him,” Clinton said, “they say basically we have to throw away all these experienced people because they have been through the wars of the '90s.”

Later, he followed up with, “That’s sort of a superficial, you know, bigotry. That’s like saying ageism or something. It’s like you fought and did good things, we got to give you a gold watch and tell you goodbye.”
 
Clinton also sees little similarity between his own changing of the generational guard campaign of 1992 and that of Obama’s current campaign. Clinton perceives stark differences in both the candidates and the times. “Unlike 1992 when I ran,” he said, “I don’t think security can ever get completely into the background.” 
 
And in Bill Clinton’s worldview, Obama is just not experienced with security. He elaborated on the age similarities during their runs for the White House. “But remember, in 1992,” he said, “when I was just 46-years-old, I was also the senior governor in America…I had been doing it for a very long time. And I had also extensive international economic experience because of my economic development efforts.” 
 
Although Clinton “gets tickled” watching Obama, he feels it is simply not Obama’s turn, stating that Obama is “somebody who started running for president a year after he became a senator because he's fresh, he's new, he's never made a mistake, and he has massive political skills.”

Clinton also referenced his own early career in the 1988 campaign. “And I, even when I was a governor and young and thought I was the best politician in the Democratic Party,” he said, “I didn't run the first time. I could have….I had lots of Democratic governors encouraging me to. I knew in my bones I shouldn't run, that I was a good enough politician to win, but I didn't think I was ready to be president.”
 
He even went so far as to say a vote for Obama is “rolling the dice.” “In theory, we could find someone who is a gifted television commentator…and let them run,” Clinton said. “They’d only have one year less experience in national politics…I don’t want to be flippant here. There are a lot of people who honestly believe what you have done for other people in your public life…is completely irrelevant, but what matters is what you symbolize.”
 
Wearing his strategist hat, Clinton said he believes Hillary’s embattled history is a strength in the general. He said that the Republican trend of attacking his wife is attributable to the fact that “they think she would be the hardest to beat because she has been vetted and because she consistently does better with the Republicans as they get to know her.”

Clinton countered Obama's argument that experience got the nation into the war in Iraq. "I remember the first time Senator Obama said that, said, you know, 'Cheney and Rumsfeld had a lot of experience,’” Clinton said. “And that has great superficial appeal. But let me make the argument in another context. That's like saying that because 100 percent of the malpractices case, medical malpractice, are committed by doctors, the next time I need surgery, I'll get a chef or a plumber to do it. I mean, the logical extension of that is inherently absurd."

Earlier in the fall, Hillary Clinton made use of the Harry Truman quote, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.” And she even unveiled the slogan “Turn up the heat” at the Iowa J-J Dinner. This time around, however, it was her husband turning up the heat.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"what goodwill are you talking about him letting the terrosists run all over us, and left Bush in a recession. "


Poor GWB - who could have guessed he couldn't handle it and would make a big pooch of the wonderful economy he was handed? Too stupid to take the warning on terrorism, all prezidunt stoopid monkee could say was "You've covered your ass. Now get out of here."

Is Texas the stupidest state in the Union? Are you all really such ignorant hillbillies?

Conservatives hate Bill Clinton because he makes it sort of obvious just how dense and slow conservatives are. That's why they like Bush - he doesn't make anyone feel stupid.
The Clinton's are scum.


Obama '08
Cocaine, Kindergarten, Muslim-ties name calling...

No Thanks Hillary !  No Thanks.

Barack Obama for a better America.

It's time to Rise and Shine again.
I long for the days when Bill was our president.  The current idiot in chief is a total embarrassment.  We need Hillary back in the white house! Now!

Socks the Cat

--------------

This is an impostor. Hillary had Socks euthanized in 1999.
Judging from the title, I thought that Bill was back to sodomizing interns again.
Obama is not ready and no matter how Oprah packages him (with questionable motives I might add), he is a gamble for the democratic party.  I'd be happy to see a woman or just about any minority win the presidency of this country in 2008, however, Obama simply is not ready.  Bill is right and despite some of your negative comments, he is one of the most prominent figures in the democratic world.
Obama missed the Iran vote, because he was told it would absolutely not take place that day and then they pushed it through.  This was trickery by Hillary's establishment pals.  

As for the Des Moines register endorsement.  It seem I read an article a few days before that Hillary was having a private dinner with the head writer.  That doesn't seem appropriate to me.  But this is typical Clinton, I wonder if there was intimidation involved?

I also read an article today about Clinton amassing super delegates.  I didn't know that governors, former presidents, congressmen got delegates.  I am very concerned that the majority of Democrats are going to vote for Obama, and then the establishment of the party is going to overide the people's vote.

Our election process needs to be overhauled.  The electoral college, as well as these super delegates that apparently make up nearly 1/4 of the primary decision.
The gospel of change according to St Clinton

1988 - BUSH
1992- CLINTON
1996 - CLINTON
2000- BUSH
2000 - BUSH
2008 - CLINTON
20012 - CLINTON

AMERICA ... GOT CHANGE?
Boy oh boy, did you see Hillary dance around the questions that NBC's David Gregory ask her on the Today show. She is just like Bill. If she is elected maybe she'll have Bill for VP and Chelsie can be Secretary of State. And then any one with a grain of salt for a brain can move to Mexico or China where all the American jobs are.
Let's be real folks: anyone who believes that Shaheen's hack job last week (the drug comment) or the attempted slam on Obama's longstanding ambition (since kindergarten) was not orchestrated by the very top levels of the Clinton campaign and endorsed by Hillary herself is either:

(1) in denial or (2) being paid by the Clinton campaign
Its HILLARY folks.  NOT bill.  She is the only candidate that can bring our country back.  YOU all must open your .......... eyes.  What is wrong with you people.
[P]lease Monroe…, "Why" you would bring this garbage back up? At the same time I would ask if you honestly feel these seedy attacks really represent relevant political discourse, given the gravity of this next election? My Christian upbringing fails to inform me on exactly how "idle gossip" genuinely fits in with the public persona of the "morality based” wing of The GOP. This national plague of so-called "values-voters", who number only about 30-40% of the Rep. Party, seem to account for a much more sizable chunk of this out of control airplane than just merely a "wing"…..it always seems like they make up the whole damn fuselage"! The vv talking heads, (Tony Perkins and that crowd), who absolutely covet every second of TV time they can get like some sacred cow, are the main spigot for a vast majority of this divisive social and political rhetoric we hear all the time. If values-voters had their way, Americans would always stay divided. No doubt their private persona originates much more from their “hatred for this, or objection to that, but mostly from their fear of someone who is different” than any Biblical conviction about what is just as right for all. One thing is for sure, they don’t mind if spreading gossip helps “anointed” Republicans get elected to higher office. Maybe values-voting is just a carefully disguised cover for what seems more like "mean-spirited, bitterly self-interested voting"? In any case, this kind of acrimony played out in the media only makes The Democrats want to continually rehash the 20+ different, "known", "potentially impeachable" criminal offenses and back room scandals that have caused America’s fall from grace on the International stage since George Bush was handed the White House in 2000. The current Dick Cheney Administration has perpetrated more half-truths and out-right lies on the American people and have systematically bled our treasury of more money than practically all the other previous Administrations combined. Well, at least all those since Grant!

So Yes....”trot Monica back out”, reference the cigar thing in desk chair too…that is "sooooooo" much more important and relevant than these peripheral, minor topics like The Never-ending Republican Sponsored War in Iraq, the desperate need for Universal HealthCare by the least fortunate of our tax-paying citizens, and improving our troubled economy so we can once again compete in the World! Forget all that silly nonsense! Let’s talk about Monica! :(
Two serious questions for William in Tennesse (and all others who believe in the "Obama's not ready" line):

How is Obama now different from Bill in 1992 in terms of their so-called experience?

Does 4 more years in the Senate make Hillary that much more experienced than Obama?
Bill Clinton is spot on here.  He speaks the truth.

Obama has been running for President since he got to Harvard.  Yet he attacks Hillary Clinton for having ambitions of her own.  How dare she, right?

Obama is a puppy.  He is wet behind the ears.  He just isn't ready to be President.  
As much as this guy is wreaking havoc for the campaign - he is so on the money. He is so right on the kindergarten thing (Obama was slamming her with a 20 year story - which was ridiculuous). Also, to say that she can only account for 7 years in the Senate - as experience is really weak. She without question was fully engaged with both is governor administrations and presidential. She is going to make us one great president!!
I am a lifelong liberal and very progressive Dem...I worked for two great U.S. senators and am rather seasoned in the world of politics.  I also have enormous respect for President Clinton. However, I believe that this nation is ready and in need of a new direction and that does not include Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office.  Barring a third party candidate, if the choice in November is between Hillary Clinton and a reasonable Republican (Romney or McCain) I will vote Republican for the first time in my life -- and I know many Democrats who will follow suit.  This nation is in need of genuine leadership and inspiration.  A second Clinton presidency will only ensure a continuation of division and argument at the federal level.
This is an impostor. Hillary had Socks euthanized in 1999.
Buddy the Dog (Sent Monday, December 17, 2007 12:16 PM)

--------------
This is an imposter because Buddy the dog was ran over by a neighbor's car.

The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated
The more I see Bill Clinton on the stump for Hillary the more he gets me sick and I absolutely never thought I'd say that about Bill Clinton who I voted for both times.  But the media keeps sticking Bill out there as if he is the one running for president and it isn't him, it is Hillary. Gee, he's fighting all her battles.  She won't be the president, he will be if she wins.  YUK.  Enoughs enough.  How in the world is he able to get away with this stuff he says.  The more he speaks the more lies come out of his mouth.  I wish he just would've retired and wrote his memoirs because I think he is losing the 'it' factor he once had with each passing moment he fights for Hillary.
Bill Clinton has always been more the buddy-buddy guy. Now though, it appears he has become the hatchet-guy. Bill was never good at doing the dirty work of the campaign. When things got rough during his presidency, Bill would send Carville or Begala out to do the smear while he stood in the background going "aw-shucks". No more. Now Bill is now the red-faced finger-wagging hatchet guy of his wife's campaign, and it is not pretty to watch. Deep down, we all know that Bill had a mean streak, but he always let his political-hacks show that side of him. Now Bill is out there front and center, and it's embarrassing to watch.
William, Oprah's motives are not questionable.  She and Obama are friends and go to the same church.  It is not racially motivated.  But while we are on motives.  Bill Clinton's motive is crystal clear, and as always he can't be trusted.  His prominence should not be encouraged.  Yes, his years as president weren't an international disaster but they were an embarrassment.  America has a new prominent leader in Obama, and once he becomes president, the Clinton/Bush legacy will be forgotten.

Obama is as ready as any other candidate to be president.  Don't be fooled by the Clinton rhetoric.
He has more years of public service than Hillary does.  Better yet he is the one with a history of making good decisions.  Look over Hillary's (and for that matter, Bill's) history and count up the numerous bad choices they have made.  We can't afford to sacrfice any of these crucial years, to grant them a do-over.
I believe Bill is double talking on Hillary for two reasons:

1) He doesn't want to have his presidency compared with his wife's.  She has the potential to relive his presidency and learn from his mistakes and defeats.  If she would be successful as president, she would be regarded higher than him and steal his thunder for being the first woman president.

2) I don't believe Bill has ruled out a possible cabinet position should Obama win.  He gives the guy great compliments all the time but will cut on him when he compares Obama to Hillary.
Here goes MSNBC - Can we just stick to reporting on candidates and not their partners - unless of course you are going to come out with stories today about Michele and Elizabeth? But something tells me you wont -
Michael, Los Angeles CA (Sent Monday, December 17, 2007 10:45 AM)


There has been a lot of coverage of both Elizabeth and Michelle.  I guess you missed it, huh?
It's so funny how Republicans blame the state of our country and our economy on HILLARY CLINTON!!  LOL!!!  Check your facts: last I checked, when Clinton handed over the keys to the Whitehouse, we had a 3-Trillion dollar SURPLUS and we got bombed on Bush's watch.  We started a useless war also on Bush's watch.  We're trillion's of dollars in a deficit also on Bush's watch.  We almost sold control of our major ports to Dubai on Bush's watch.  Not quite sure why HILLARY is to blame for all this.  
Hillary is no Bill Clinton!  She had the lack of a
"likeability" factor.  She is not a good public speaker. Just because Hillary's husband was president does not mean that she's experienced while using her husband's laurals. NOT!

Also, I'm a mature married female.  I will not vote for anyone (male or female); who allow their spouse to cheat over, and over again, while the public watch.  Hillary "allowed" this man to disrespect her more that just a couple times. Do you remember Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica?

How can anyone respect Hillary to be president !
Bill, Hillary is your trick, you keep her.
She can not run her own house, how can she run the White House.      
I like Obama - but he isn't ready.
I am a lifelong liberal and very progressive Dem...I worked for two great U.S. senators and am rather seasoned in the world of politics.  I also have enormous respect for President Clinton. However, I believe that this nation is ready and in need of a new direction and that does not include Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office.  Barring a third party candidate, if the choice in November is between Hillary Clinton and a reasonable Republican (Romney or McCain) I will vote Republican for the first time in my life -- and I know many Democrats who will follow suit.  This nation is in need of genuine leadership and inspiration.  A second Clinton presidency will only ensure a continuation of division and argument at the federal level.
Celticfire

--------------------------------------------------

Thank you for making the argument, I hope the blind followers are listening.
I'm surprised that Bill Clinton is stumping for Hillary.   He has a credibility problem.  Sure I voted for Bill (twice).  I thought he was the right guy at that time.  And he served America well during good times.

But let's face it.  Bill also brought disrespect for the office.  He was the butt of many, many jokes (infidelity, dishonesty, cigars, etc.).  The Clintons fueled the rise of the Republicans to power in opposition to "Slick Willie's antics".  Bill's administration instilled partisan politics at its worst.

And although I defended Bill in the 1990's.  I cannot any longer.  We need a fresh approach to our problems in Washington.  This is not the right time for another Clinton in office.  

San Francisco Liberal "the Clinton's are scum"

That's mature.
Bill Is really embarassing himself out there

Go Obama
"Judging from the title, I thought that Bill was back to sodomizing interns again. "

I'll bet you were in church yesterday, showing God what a good Christian you are, weren't you?

GWB sodomized the whole country and you enjoyed that.
I am an old woman and have heard and seen things I wish I hadn't, but citing a paper written in K-garten is not a dirty trick, nor is it really low-down, especially if it is true.  R/T Bill's indiscretions, old news.  Or, do you have something new?  I would rather focus on what the dim-wit in the office now has done to us!  Except for the fact that there are still young people fighting and dying in Iraq,  it is also old news that someone else is going to have to figure out!  And--(I am not a Hillary  supporter) what does the tone of her voice have to do with anything???? Those of you who rail about it, need to take a deep breath!  Those of you  who continually point out personal( in your eyes) flaws as opposed to policy issues, need to retink the kind of politics you want to engage in.  The talking heads are not going to caucus with us, nor are they going into the voting booths with us, nor are they going to pay my bills!  They are comfortably employed and have no idea what they are talking about.  Now, back to Bill.  He has a right to an opinion the same as I do.  And I have always maintained that sex does not equal the death on one you soldier!
I used to be quite proud of the picture of me and Bill shaking hands, that sits on my piano.  Now, when I chance to glance at it, I just shake my head with a smirk on my face.  The sad thing for me is, the more I see of Bill's disingenuous campaigning for his wife, the more I become aware that her whole run for office is a thinly disguised skirting of the 22nd amendment.  I know that we are better than a 'tin horn' dictatorship that offers the pretense of a democracy.

Also, as one who voted for Bill Clinton twice (and in fact have voted Republican only one time in thirty-five years), the HRC campaign has forced me to re-examine Bill's presidency.  It seems to me that he presided during a relatively non-challenging time in American history.  The success of the times were little influenced by his stewardship (a stewardship which was often times counter-productive).  In fact, the only challenges he faced were brought on by his own misadventures.  The behavior demonstrated by Bill and Hill during this campaign, has made me appreciate why they were so polarizing during the nineties.  Their intransigence and duplicity spawned a national reaction that led to the election of a simpleton like GWB.  Man, would I like to go back to a day when Republicans and Democrats could agree to disagree and forge a government that could once again function.

Which brings me to Paul Krugman's, now routine, anti-Obama vitriol, written in the NYT today.  After reading his commentary on 'the correct approach' to a comprehensive overhaul of healthcare in this nation, I can only say that it seems quite foolish to start in the trenches when dealing with the pharmaceutical and insurance companies.  As with international enemies, it is best to start with diplomacy.  Not only is there a chance at rapproachment, but through dialogue, you learn much more about their intents and technique.  Certainly, it may come down to trench warfare, but how, 'let me say', naive, how unsophisticated, to go right to the battle stations, as John Edwards and Paul Krugman suggest.  Interestingly, Obama offers the most well thought out and uncompromised plan in dealing with these special interests.  He may actually be able to get something done without being either at war or in the pockets of these special interests.
Obama '08
That bit that some earlier poster included about a "call girl" reference was part of a satirical piece that is on the Huffington Post. It is not true. Bill Clinton did not say that.
And don't let it detract from some of the other, truly non-savvy and weak attacks that he really did make, which others have made note of.
Also, everyone should check out the Today Show's footage of the interview that Gregory conducted with Sen. Clinton this morning. He references Bill Clinton's interview and Sen. Clinton is ridiculously evasive. She looks like she's back to old tactics.
Bottom line - Hillary is NOT Bill Clinton. He was a very good president for this country - but Hillary will NOT be. You don't get to be president bec your husband was president (Hillary) or your father was president (Bush Jr), etc. I think Bill is tarnishing his own image by his role in the Hillary campaign.  I think it will be better for Bill if Obama wins. Obama rules!!
I have been following all the nasty comments, that White American has said about Obama, short of calling him the N-word which I am sure they do at home in the thier living rooms, which will soon spill out.
First he is a Drug addict(But, Bill Clinton ya know the I smoked but did not inhale)
and now he is a Muslim. Give me a break. As far as the Iowa Register endorsing Hillary, did you read what it said about Obama, it was almost an apology for not endorsing him. Don't tell me there was some arm twisting by the Clinton's going on. They old you own me a favor.
LTD

an
Bill Clinton brought shame to the presidency with his Monica Lewinski affair. After watching the Charlie Rose show, our ex-president shows us again what he thinks of his former position as leader of our country. He said that "being president is a lot like being a thousand-dollar-a-night call girl, where experience matters." Shame on you Bill, and shame on the media that allows Mr. Clinton to spew his profane analogy with impunity. I guess that the Clintons can say anything without being 'called out' for it. So, these are the people you want to put back in the White House?.
Bill and Hillary were idealistic, bright-eyed, and bushy-tailed when they started politics,.....just like Obama is now!  However, their EXPERIENCE has made them more pragmatic and given them the wisdom needed to run a very LARGE business....the USA.  When Obama speaks, I'm impressed....however, I'm old enough to know it's going to take more than eloquence to get our country on the correct path again.  We need "seasoned" (experienced) PROFESSIONALS now, more than ever!  I pray that Obama does not become
another "spoiler" like Ralph Nader was....letting his desires get in the way of the Democrats winning the presidency. P.S....."I miss Bill" !
Somebody should CAP HIS MOUTH.DNC should introduce 'bill  protocol'.
What was so wonderful about Bill Clinton?  As president he broke the law, not because of Lewinski, because he lied under oath. Then add on top of that the numerous scandals that surrounded them.  Then add on top of that the selling of the White House bedrooms for money.  Then add on top of that their selling pardons.  Then add on top of that the stuff they stole from the White House when they were leaving.  Then add on to that the fact that Hillary is taking credit for Bill's presidency as her experience.  

Are the people in this country NUTS?  You vote for a leader to lead this country because they are charismatic?  These people are so corrupt that the only thing they are going to give us is grief and shame.  Why would any country want a "couple" to occupy and run this country when the only thing they are truly interested in is control, use and breaking the law and getting away with it!
HILLARY DOES WORSE IN POLLS AGAINST REPUBLICANS THAN ANY OTHER DEMOCRAT!!!


WHEN IS THE MEDIA GOING TO REPORT THE FALLACY OF THE CLINTON'S "ELECTABILITY" CLAIM???
Please, everyone.....bash the Clinton's as much as you wan to.  They are the celebrity canonized couple that, like Tony and Carmella Soprano, can continue to stampede decency and ethical maturity, but we will still worship them and await their next episode.  I just hope that next episode doesn't cost the United States it's existence.
I think it is incredible that so many people are affended that President Clinton is out making comments in support of his wife's candidacy and trying to set the record straight.  In my opinion, President Clinton is correct in his assessment of the current situation with Senator Obama, and I agree that Obama hasn't had enough experience to handle what the next president is going to face on January 20, 2009.  I am also tired of Obama's elegant but empty rhetoric and all the 30 second sound-bite solutions.  The problems facing this country are going to need someone who will look at how they all impact one another and consider solutions from a systems perspective where they will all be worked on at one time.  Anything else will only make matters worse and from what I have seen and heard from all the candidates, I am convinced that Hillary is the only candidate who will take that approach to problem solving.
Bill Clinton did well during his presidency--we were all doing well economically, culturally and internationally.

This gives Bill a lot of legitimacy in my eyes, and in the eyes of a lot of practical people.

To demean him for his personal affairs shows a great and pathetically attemptedly guiled hate.

Anyhow, as long as Clinton or Obama win this--America is going through some deep ish, and we can't afford to have another anything-close-to-Bush candidate.
President Clinton hits it right on the head.
Obama is WAY too green to be president.  This is no time for on the job training in the White House.
I do not support either Clinton or Obama, but if I had to choose, Clinton.
OMG someone said Clinton left Bush a recession to handle...

I can't believe how monsterously stupid people can be.
MM,Ma, first, Bill can have sex with anyone he wants, but when he stares into a camera on national TV and states under OATH that he never had sex.  Well, what do you say about a man in the highest office of the land who les to the entire American public under oath.  It should tell anyone a lot bout his character.  Hillary is no different, given the opportunity she would sell her mother down the river.  They keep saying she has experience, from where, Dick Morris said it right to Colmes, of Hannity and Colmes.I was there, she has no experience.  She does it with smoke and mirrors. People need to make their decision on WHO would you trust the most to run this country.  It cetainly wouldn't be Hillary.
WHAT WE NEED IS MRS.CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET BACK ON THE RIGHT SET OF TRACKS. REMEMBER IT WON'T BE NICE TO FOOL MOTHER HILLARY!
Bill Clinton was the greatest President in the history of America and I can't wait until Hillary has her party's official nod so I can vote Bill back in by voting in Hillary!!!
“If you listen to the people who are most strongly for him,” Clinton said, “they say basically we have to throw away all these experienced people because they have been through the wars of the '90s.”


That is what Bill Clinton has to add to the criticism on Hillary: but Bill, it is SOOO TRUE...this is what America wants. We are fed up with waging trillion dollar wars for Israel and all politicians who have lied to us, only to get these wars waged, all those zionists, who are neglecting our own interests only to protect moribund Israel, they have all got to go. We need a major cleanup here in Washington. And since Hillary joined Liebermann in trying to get us into a new war with Iran (which will cost us even more than the one with Iraq) at the request of Israel, Bill can be damn sure that we are fed up with a liar like Clinton.
"What was so wonderful about Bill Clinton?"

The comparison with the corporate tool and wanna-be fascist that followed him. Next question?

"Are the people in this country NUTS?"

Half of it, yes. Witness, if you will, the excuse in the WH now. Witness, if you will, the parade of snake oil salesmen and travelling revival preachers running on the right. Thank you, conscienctious voter.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=520661

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google