ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama criticizes 527s

Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:39 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
Exeter, NH -- Obama singled out 527s for criticism at a roundtable for independent voters here Thursday afternoon. 

Pointing to a report from yesterday that showed that 527s would spend more than both political parties in this election, he said, "Right now in Iowa you have candidates who are having millions of dollars spent on their behalf uh by other groups."
 
"These folks don't have to disclose where they are getting money from. It's completely the Wild West, these 527s and so forth. And that's something that's going to have to be controlled," he added.

Obama himself is the target of such an independent expenditure -- with the Association of Federal State and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) criticizing his health-care plan in a direct mail piece in Iowa. But the group, which has endorsed Clinton, used a quote from Edwards criticizing Obama on his plan. 

The mailer has drawn fire from the Edwards campaign, which says it unfairly implies that the Edwards campaign is engaging in negative attacks and could bias Iowans, who have a distaste for attack politics, against their candidate.

Obama's comments came in response to a question on the need for term limits for senators to help prevent rampant corruption in Washington. He said that imposing term limits would be difficult, because it would require a constitutional amendment -- but it was more important to have competitive elections. He added that he was a huge supporter of public financing of campaigns, which could provide candidates free television advertising and make them less dependent on money from special interest groups.

In response to questions from the panelists at the table, Obama also said that if he could only pass one piece legislation during his years as president it would be comprehensive energy reform. "I would enact a bold energy policy, because I think that we could save so much money, engineer such a surplus in the economy, and solve climate change all at one time. And it would improve our national security posture. So you get three things. It helps our environment, our economy, and our national security."

He added that it would also free up resources to help pay for domestic programs like universal health care.

The roundtable focused on "Fairness in Government," but also served to give a voice to New Hampshire independents, who are a significant swing block in the first in the nation primary.

Trying to prove that he really did have an independent voice, Obama pointed to his stance on personal diplomacy, saying that he would meet personally with enemies. He said that Bush was not writing letters to Kim Jong Il, though before he was universally criticized for the statement. "I guess I was six to nine months ahead of the curve," he joked.

Obama was more engaged with the six voters at the table than he usually is at a roundtable, laughing at questions and adopting an aw-shucks attitude at the praise heaped on him by the independents at the table. Only two of the voters were undecided, and one man -- Peter Colby from Rye -- said if the election were held today he would vote for Obama.

One independent said that Obama really did personify the "audacity of hope." Another woman compared Obama's speech at the 2004 convention to the Gettysburg Address.

She told him, "I guess I've always believed a voice will come again that will help lead us back to the ideals of our founding fathers and of the ideas from the Gettysburg Address. I heard you at the convention in 2004 and I though, 'If this young man is for real…'"

"That's a lot of pressure," Obama joked, cutting her off

The tone of the roundtable could certainly help Obama, as he seeks to cull independents who can vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

No wonder the Illinois branch broke away from some of these unions to support Barack Obama.
Anyway, here is Mr McEntee of AFSCME back in April of 2007: http://www.afscme.org/legislation-politics/14062.cfm

Further info:
http://factcheck.barackobama.com/
Obama will be a great leader.  Lend your support people, if you want honest and hard working government. Obama 08!
Good. 527s are crap. I wish I could go back to the days when I didn't even know what they were and thought they were a type of jet
I was always taught..you can't judge a book by its cover.
Then I accepted my salvation and found out the Lord says that in His Word......
Don't look for a bunch of self serving politicians to ban 527's...nothing better than an "independent" group hammering your opponent
Two questions for the Senator:

HOW would he pass "comprehensive energy reform" that would solve all of these problems. Will it be akin to the "solution" of the CAFE hike, that will raise car prices 5-7000 dollars?

Secondly, would the Senator take away people's first amendment rights to comment on campaigns?
I got to say....
I really do like and believe in Barack Obama.
These attacks on Barack have really made me disgusted with the Clinonites.
These attacks affect me personaly, they hurt.
They hurt because they are lies, and insult my intelligence.
These attacks assume that I am an idiot. That says a lot about the sense of Royalty the Clintons have, and that they feel above all else that they DESERVE the presidency.
I used to be willing to vote for whoever won the Democratic Nomination, even if my first choice, bBarack Obama, didn't win the nomination.
Not anymore.
If Hillary wins, I'm not voting for her. The Democrats will deserve whatever they get if they choose her over either Barack or Edwards.
he is right. 527's need to be controlled. they need to be abolished. it would go along way towards stopping dirty politics.

Obama is right on the money again, the clintons think they own this government but we are here to take it back from them
I am 57 yrs old and my experience taught me that to know if a person is for real , you have to live with him for 24/7 , at least for one year. Without that luxury , it is better to look for experience . We (Americans) can not afford trial and error in any given election , you can ask your wit or your parents or just look in their eyes .  
ohhhhhhhhhh hmmmmmmmmmmm  ??????????????????????????????
Do you mean "how will we afford it all"?.....Well...you'll pay more taxes of course!I hope you like the bus.They'll even "pretty up" some bus stops for you while they ride in their limos:)))))))Now be happy little people!
This is yet another example of how Barack Obama is the ONLY candidate willing to bring about a change in politics. I know that he will be an outstanding leader for our country. Barack the Vote!!
Gag! Aswini, could you gush anymore over BO? Your copy sounds more like a high school girl reporting on her boyfriend who is runing for class president. Was there nothing that happened at that roundtable that deserves some scruitny? Aftr all, Mr. Obama is runing for president.
Unfettered, unfiltered, unregulated political speech?  Why, THAT'S AN OUTRAGE!
Obama is garbage he missed 70% of senate votes, voted in favor of reauthorizing the Patriot act, claims he's for diplmoacy when he supports bush's sanctions against Iran and implied he'd invade Pakistan.. he's a hypocrite for critizing Clinton on her Iran vote BECAUSE IN APRIL HE CO-SPONSORED THE SAME LEGISLATION LABELING THE IRANIAN NATIONAL GUARD A TERRORITS ORGANIZATION

HE ACCEPTS MONEY FROM LOBBYISTS WHILE DENYING IT AND HAD AN AFFAIR WITH A BLONDE WOMAN
It behoves me to think that so many think "America' is supposed to exist in the first place or that we can recapture the land and merely forget the constitution is a doubleminded document which protects criminals as well with the statute of limitations and that means LAWLESSNESS.
geez, barak, do you ever stop whinning.
you took money from pacs, from mobsters, from corporations, but you act like you're a virgin..
you are scummy and weak.
wait until the gop nails you for being effete
Please reflect on the following quotes:

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

— Abraham Lincoln

"The forbearing use of power does not only form a touchstone; but the manner in which an individual enjoys certain advantages over others is a test of a true gentleman. The power which the strong have over the weak, the magistrate over the employed, the educated over the unlettered, the experienced over the confiding, even the clever over the silly; the forbearing and inoffensive use of all this power and authority, or the total abstinence from it, when the case admits it, will show the gentleman in a plain light. The gentleman does not needlessly and unnecessarily remind an offender of a wrong he may have committed against him. He can only forgive; he can forget; and he strives for that nobleness of self and mildness of character which imparts sufficient strength to let the past be put the past."

— General Robert E. Lee

Obama is a true gentleman.  Believe that there are a lot of nasty things out there Hilary clinton can be attacked on.  Yet, Obama true to his character has chosen to take the higher moral ground instead of wrestling in the mud with Hilary.  he has the ability and power to call Bill and Hilary Clinton character into question --and rightly so-- but he chose not to.  Now, tell me that this is not some extraordinary display of restrain.  By using racial and religious prejudice to attack a gentleman requesting nothing but the honor to save his country, Hilary demonstrates that she is beneath the dignity of the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America.  

it's time to bring leadership with character, dignity, and honor back to the White House.  Hilary and Bill's history demonstrate that they are not in a position to deliver on this.
Sour grapes...BOO HOO, Obama is opposed to 527's not for lofty pious reasons but because he got in late and didn 't pick any up.

Obama does NOT fool me!
I'm personally opposed to 527's buy until there is legislation, we and especially the SWIFT BOATING REPUBLICANS are going to go at the Dem candidate with both barrels of 527's, so although it would be "lovely" not to have them, it's a fact of life right now.

What's Obama going to do in the GE?  

The Rep. will laugh him under the table and run over his "let's hold hand and have hope" campaign.

I want a strong candidate who is ready to lead and who can do what is necessary in the climate today to win.  We MUST have a Dem in the White House to clean up all this Bush/Rep mess.

Obama is not strong enough.  
blah, blah, blah....he get's indignent when it's to his advantage....where's his outrage over his planted questions the press deemed wasn't a story, where's his outrage over his Punjab-D memo against Hillary......

All fluff and no substance.  He's quick to criticize Hillary on her Iran vote, yet was too busy campaigning for President - a job he said just 2 years ago he was woefully underqualified for - he should have stuck with his instincts and stayed out of the race until 2016.

Talk is cheap - it's action we need! We don't need an orator - we need a effective legislator!

HILLARY '08
Everyone should read Jonathan Alter's article in Newsweek.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/80882
If Obama truly believed in Public Fianacing, he would have done what Edwards did and accept limits on his campaign spending.  His comments show that he is all talk and no action.  Edwards talks the talk and walks the walk.  We need a man of action, not merely a man of words.
Go Barry !
It's time for America to Rise and Shine again.
Obama '08

.... and Merry Christmas to all.
So far as I remember, it was only a few days ago, media said Obama was the top candidate spent over 13 million dollars. He always say something different from himself.
Hope is hopeless
Oh please, his holier than thou mantra is wearing painfully thin....where is his outrage over his campaigns D-Punjab memo against Hillary.

He is such a hypocrite and neophyte - I was such a supporter of his after the 2004 speach - now I see he is nothing more than an arrogant, egotistical opportunist.  What a shame....the agent of "change" ends up being a puppet.

His inexperience only confirms the fact he is woefully underqualified.  He uses the excuse he'll surround himself with great advisors.  Sorry, but heard that same empty BS from George Bush and look where that got us.

When you get some real experience try again Barack, but for now you are absolutely useless!

HILLARY '08
No wonder many unions wouldn't endorse Obama!  He's a walking hypocrite!  He wants energy reform - and sponsored a coal to liquids bill this year!!  
Obama is looking more and more like another "Music Man" peddling hope in Iowa while dialing for dollars on Wall Street.
IOW - he's a con.
I believe Obama would reinstate environmental laws eliminated by the Bush administration and provide subsidies for companies who improve environmental standards.  Senator Obama believes in uniting people towards a common ground to develop solutions, and as President he would likely listen to the best scientific minds to develop the highest recommendations.  Because of his leadership 60 foreign policy experts in our country endorsed him for President today. With that kind of support Senator Obama will do extraordinary things to restore our country and make it safe.
Obama has been backed by special interests groups his whole (pitifully short) political career.  Who does he think he's fooling?  He's playing right into the Repug hands yet again--no wonder why George Will and Karl Rove love him so much--by criticizing 527's. The Republicans hate 527's and after the last presidential campaign stated as such because they thought they gave the Dems an unfair advantage.  Obama is really showing his lack of experience here.
Take a deep breath Bruce from NV. The car companies have been telling us for 35 years if this is passed or that is passed the price will go up blah blah. I'll bet you think nothing about adding 1000's to your car by adding worthless goodies. get a life will you
"It is tempting any time things seem quieter for a minute on the international front to think that we don't need a president who is up to speed on foreign affairs and military matters," Clinton said.

"Well, that's the kind of logic that got us George Bush in the first place," she said to laughter from her friendly audience at a high school auditorium. "Experience in foreign affairs is critical for ending the war in Iraq, averting war in Iran, negotiating a Middle East peace and dealing with North Korea."

And Obama spokesman Bill Burton plays what the campaign still thinks is their trump card: Iraq.

While Senator Clinton takes a break from her ‘likeability tour’ to go back on the attack, Senator Obama, the only major candidate who opposed both the Iraq war and the rush to war in Iran, will continue to demonstrate why he has the judgment to turn the page on the Bush-Cheney foreign policy.

Chicago, IL -- Over sixty foreign policy experts, with experience ranging from the State Department and the Pentagon, to the White House and the U.S. Congress, today announced their endorsement of Senator Barack Obama for President.

The group, which includes individuals who have served under every President since John F. Kennedy, said that Obama has the judgment to lead America at this pivotal moment in history, and the ability to take on unconventional threats and restore America's security and standing in the world.

"On the most important foreign policy decision of the last twenty years, Barack Obama made the right judgment in opposing the war in Iraq. His combination of sound judgment, global understanding, and bold and detailed policy proposals is exactly what America needs in a President at this critical moment in our history," said Larry Korb, Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan Administration.

Their endorsement came as Obama held a Foreign Policy Forum in Des Moines, Iowa, where he and several of his top foreign policy advisors engaged in a n open dialogue with Iowa residents on the challenges America faces and how Obama would address them as President. At the event, Obama discussed his specific plans to end the war in Iraq, renew American diplomacy, pursue aggressive diplomacy with Iran, fight terrorism and extremism, and lead the world against the threats of the 21st century.

Further details on Obama's foreign policy agenda can be found here: http://barackobama.com/foreignpolicy.


National Security Experts Endorsing Obama Today


Clifford Alexander, former Secretary of the Army

Ambassador Jeffrey Bader, Former Assistant US Trade Representative for Asia; Ambassador to Namibia

Professor Henri Barkey, Lehigh University, former member, State Dept. Policy Planning

Mr. Tom Bernstein, Human Rights Expert

Ambassador David Birenbaum, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. for Management and Reform

Dr. Esther Brimmer, former staff member State Department Policy Planning

Mr. Art Brown, former National Intelligence Officer for East Asia and Chief of CIA's East Asian Operations Division

Dr. Mark Brzezinski, former Director, European Affairs, National Security Council

Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Adviser under President Carter

Rep. Brad Carson, former Member of Congress; Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense

Dr. Joseph Cirincione, Author and Nonproliferation Expert

Ms. Bonnie Cohen, former Undersecretary of State for Management

Mr. Greg Craig, former Assistant to the President and Director of Policy Planning, State Department

Dr. Ivo Daalder, former Director, European Affairs, National Security Council

General (ret.) Tom Daniels, Texas Air National Guard

Mr. Richard Danzig, former Secretary of the Navy

Senator Tom Daschle, former U.S. Senate Majority Leader

Ambassador Alice Dear, former U.S. Executive Director, African Development Bank

Mr. Michael Froman, Chief of Staff, Department of Treasury; Deputy Assistant Secretary, Dept. of Treasury; National Security Council Staff Member

Mr. Tony Gambino, former Mission Director, USAID, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Dr. Tobi Gati, former Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research; Senior Director for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasian Affairs, National Security Council

Ambassador Robert Gelbard, former Presidential Envoy for the Balkans; Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement; Ambassador to Indonesia; Ambassador to Bolivia

Dr. Matthew Goodman, Former Director for Asian Affairs, National Security Council

Dr. Philip Gordon, former Director, European Affairs, National Security Council

Dr. Scott Gould, former Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Management

General (ret.) Scott Gration, former Director for Strategy, Policy and Planning, U.S. European Command

Adm. Don Guter, former Judge Advocate General of the Navy

General (ret.) Richard Hearney, Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps

Mr. Eric Holder, former Deputy Attorney General

Mr. John Holum, Former Director of ACDA and Undersecretary State for Arms Control and International Security

Ambassador Vicki Huddleston, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and Ambassador to Mali and Madagascar, Chief of Mission to Cuba and Ethiopia

Admiral (ret.) John Hutson, former Judge Advocate General of the Navy

Mr. Jeh Johnson, former General Counsel, U.S. Air Force

Mr. Brian Katulis, Author and Middle East expert

Mr. Noel Koch, former Special Assistant to President Nixon; former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs

Mr. Larry Korb, Assistant Secretary of Defense

Mr. Anthony Lake, former National Security Adviser to President Bill Clinton

Mr. David Lipton, former Under Secretary of Treasury for International Affairs

Mr. Robert Litt, former Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General; US Attorney

Mr. Jan Lodal, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense

Mr. Frank Loy, former Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs

General (ret.) Lester L. Lyles, former Vice Chief of Staff USAF 1999-2000

Governor Raymond Mabus, former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia; Governor of Mississippi

Dr. Michael McFaul, Professor, Political Science, Stanford University

General Tony McPeak, former Chief of Staff of the Air Force

The Honorable Abner Mikva, former White House Counsel under President Clinton; Chief Judge, DC Court of Appeals, Member of Congress (D-Ill)

Ambassador Donald McHenry, former US Permanent Representative to the United Nations


Ambassador Al Moses, former Ambassador to Romania

Professor Michael Nacht, Dean, School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley

Admiral (ret.) John Nathman, former Director of Navy Operations and Plans


Prof. Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs, Department of Geosciences and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs

F. Whitten Peters, former Secretary of the Air Force

Professor Samantha Power, Professor, Harvard University - Pulitzer Prize Winner

Ambassador Nick Rey, former Ambassador to Poland

Dr. Susan Rice, former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs; former Senior Director for African Affairs, National Security Council

Prof. Riordan Roett, Director of Western Hemisphere Studies and the Latin American Studies Program, SAIS, Johns Hopkins University

Dr. Barnett Rubin, Director of Studies and Senior Fellow, Center on International Cooperation, NY University

Ambassador David Scheffer, former Ambassador at Large for War Crimes

Dr. Witney Schneidman, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs

Ms. Sarah Sewell, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense

Mr. Dan Shapiro, former Director, National Security Council

Representative Adam Smith, House Armed Services Committee, Chairman, Terrorism, Unconventional Threats, and Capabilities Subcommittee

Ms. Gayle Smith, Special Assistant to the President, National Security Council

General (ret.) James Smith, former Deputy Commander, Joint Warfare Center, US Joint Forces Command

Ms. Tara Sonenshine, former Special Assistant to the President, National Security Council

Mr. Theodore "Ted" Sorensen, former Special Counsel to President John F. Kennedy

Ms. Mona Sutphen, former Special Assistant to the National Security Advisor

Dr. Jim Vermillion, former Mission Director, USAID, Nicaragua

Professor David Victor, Stanford Law School

The Honorable Pat Wald, Chief Judge, DC Circuit, US Court of Appeals, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs, International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, Iraq Intelligence Commission

Professor Celeste Wallender, Georgetown University

Senator Harris Wofford, former CEO Corporation for National Service (Americorps), United States Senator

Representative/Dr. Howard Wolpe, Former Member of Congress and Presidential Special Envoy for the Great Lakes Region of Central Africa

I have always believed Obama was a better person that all of the people running for president. The rest are part of the good ole boys &girls network. He is honest and up front about anything thats happened in his life (cant say that for most of the front runners) and all the garbage about him being a muslim that came from the Clinton campaign is just that garbage. She is famous for her husbands dirty tricks and putting garbage in peoples head  about him
This story has some substance to it.  I liked the part about making candidates less dependent on money from special interest groups. I don't know if public financing for campaigns will ever become a reality, but it is an intriguing concept.  Would such action create a more level playing field?

Good job, Mark Murray.
I hope MSNBC posts the new Zogby general election poll.  It shows Obama rocking the house with tallies over 50% for each match-up except McCain.  Clinton's numbers are not only far worse, but she fails to reach 50% and loses to Giuliani and McCain.  She almost loses to Mitt "saw doesn't mean see" Romney.

Clinton's negativity is causing her numbers to collapse against the GOP.
Hearing Morning Joe refer to "HER ROYAL SILLYNESS" as the Tonya Harding(skater) of politics is amusing and so true. She is trying to pull a 'kneecap' job on him. Her surrogates need to save their time and money in Iowa. Hey unions, the 90's were not all that great for you. Get with the guy who right after college, went to a poor neighborhood in Chicago to help its citizens organize and gain a voice after steel plant closings. I understand the pressure that the Clinton's wield. They(she) will toss you guys under the bus when politically feasible.
factcheck---http://www.barackobama.com/factcheck/category/

DHA
http://desperatehillaryattacks.com/

Testimony of Gerald W. McEntee for the Hearing on Living without Health Insurance back in April

http://www.afscme.org/legislation-politics/14062.cfm


Robert Reich -- the nation's 22nd Secretary of Labor under BC----Why is HRC Stooping So Low?
(quote)
I’m becoming increasingly concerned about the stridency and inaccuracy of charges in Iowa -- especially coming from my old friend. While I’m as hard-boiled as they come about what’s said in campaigns, I just don’t think Dems should stoop to this. First, HRC attacked O's plan for keep Social Security solvent. Social Security doesn’t need a whole lot to keep it going – it’s in far better shape than Medicare – but everyone who’s looked at it agrees it will need bolstering (I was a trustee of the Social Security Trust Fund ten years ago, and I can vouch for this). Obama wants to do it by lifting the cap on the percent of income subject to Social Security payroll taxes, which strikes me as sensible. That cap is now close to $98,000 (it’s indexed), and the result is highly regressive. (Bill Gates satisfies his yearly Social Security obligations a few minutes past midnight on January 1 every year.) The cap doesn’t have to be lifted all that much to keep Social Security solvent – maybe to $115,00. That’s a progressive solution to the problem. HRC wants to refer Social Security to a commission. That's avoiding the issue, and it's irresponsible: A commission will likely call either for raising the retirement age (that’s what Greenspan’s Social Security commission came up with in the 1980s) or increasing the payroll tax on all Americans. So when HRC charges that Obama’s plan would “raise taxes” and her plan wouldn’t, she’s simply not telling the truth.

I’m equally concerned about her attack on his health care plan. She says his would insure fewer people than hers. I’ve compared the two plans in detail. Both of them are big advances over what we have now. But in my view Obama’s would insure more people, not fewer, than HRC’s. That’s because Obama’s puts more money up front and contains sufficient subsidies to insure everyone who’s likely to need help – including all children and young adults up to 25 years old. Hers requires that everyone insure themselves. Yet we know from experience with mandated auto insurance – and we’re learning from what’s happening in Massachusetts where health insurance is now being mandated – that mandates still leave out a lot of people at the lower end who can’t afford to insure themselves even when they’re required to do so. HRC doesn’t indicate how she’d enforce her mandate, and I can’t find enough money in HRC’s plan to help all those who won’t be able to afford to buy it. I’m also impressed by the up-front investments in information technology in O’s plan, and the reinsurance mechanism for coping with the costs of catastrophic illness. HRC is far less specific on both counts. In short: They’re both advances, but O’s is the better of the two. HRC has no grounds for alleging that O’s would leave out 15 million people.

Yesterday, HRC suggested O lacks courage. "There's a big difference between our courage and our convictions, what we believe and what we're willing to fight for," she told reporters in Iowa, saying Iowa voters will have a choice "between someone who talks the talk, and somebody who's walked the walk." Then asked whether she intended to raise questions about O’s character, she said: "It's beginning to look a lot like that."

I just don’t get it. If there’s anyone in the race whose history shows unique courage and character, it's Barack Obama. HRC’s campaign, by contrast, is singularly lacking in conviction about anything. Her pollster, Mark Penn, has advised her to take no bold positions and continuously seek the political center, which is exactly what she’s been doing.

All is fair in love, war, and politics. But this series of slurs doesn't serve HRC well. It will turn off voters in Iowa, as in the rest of the country. If she's worried her polls are dropping, this is not the way to build them back up.
527s are not that important right now, we have real issues that affect all of us, bitching about the process at this stage is more whining than winning.
How come this was not an issue for you till you were running?

Bruce NV,
I TRUST THAT YOUR 2ND paragraph IS SINCERE. Barack Obama taught constitutional law for about 10 years. I trust him. What you suggested will not happen. Do not be ruled by fear.  
Go to these sites for answers:

(top of page under 'ISSUES OR LEARN'. Videos also available on Homepage.
http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

Factcheck
http://www.barackobama.com/factcheck/category/

DHA
http://desperatehillaryattacks.com/


senate(ON THE ISSUES)
http://obama.senate.gov/
DEAN ,IF YOU DONT KNOW POLITICS DONT OPEN YOUR MOUTH . 527S ARE A WELL KNOW REPUBLICAN TOOL I.E. SWIFTBOATING. PEOPLE LIKE SHEAN HANITY AND OTHERS CALL IT AND STRIKE AGINST FREE SPEACH  TO BAN THEM, MOST DEMS OPPOSE . BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM A CLINTON SUPPORTER , UNIFORMED !
All I can say is MOST PEOPLE ARE DOWN ON WHAT THEY ARE NOT UP ON....
It is discouraging to read (liberal I'm sure) statements attacking our leaders.  Americans have such short memories...how does this country survive?
It sounds like a bitter, I'm mad because I lost, custody battle.  Healthy differences of opinion and process is no longer tolerated, we must attack them as foreign aggressors....get a life!!
All I can say is MOST PEOPLE ARE DOWN ON WHAT THEY ARE NOT UP ON....
It is discouraging to read (liberal I'm sure) statements attacking our leaders.  Americans have such short memories...how does this country survive?
It sounds like a bitter, I'm mad because I lost, custody battle.  Healthy differences of opinion and process is no longer tolerated, we must attack them as foreign aggressors....get a life!!
I can't believe people are still bringing up D-Punjab memo.  That seems desperate.  Let's see... over half a year ago the oppo research of Obama released a memo criticizing Clinton's foreign ties without his authorization.  Big story?  Guess what, her and her husband's ties to foreign interests should be examined more closely and criticized.  Just as her ties to lobbyists and corporate interests should be criticized.  These are issue related, not personal character attacks.  Obama hasn't stooped to her level or even come close to it.  Obviously, he has more respect for the Democratic party than the Clinton's do.  

People talk about his ego, ridiculous.  He believes in himself, you want a president to be self confident.  Does Hillary's panic in the past few weeks indicate that she is the strong and confident leader she is pretending to be?  The Clinton's don't respect the Democratic party, they think they are the democratic party.  They don't respect democratic voters, that's why they pander on issues and sink to the lowest common denominator.  They lead and gather endorsements through intimidation.

Let's show them at the ballot box that they are very mistaken.
I keep hearing - er, reading - about how the media gave a pass to Obama regarding these supposed "non-stories" that Clinton would never get away with doing.  Since I am a blatant Obamaniac, I admit I don't see the connection.

But, I'd like to turn around this argument for a moment.  Let's not forget that a while back some reporters from LA went to New York to investigate some strange campaign donations by immigrant Chinese dishwashers, and found a lot of the information was inaccurate, at best.  In my opinion, HER CAMPAIGN WAS CAUGHT BREAKING FEC LAW, BUT NO ONE HAS BOTHERED TO LEGALLY INVESTIGATE THIS!  I believe she got a big pass on this, and even those who support her have nothing to say about it.

I understand that no one likes bad news, and the same article can be critiqued at the same time (and I've read the comments) for being biased by both sides.

The take-home lesson is this: let's not get carried away with the whole media bias whining.  Both Obama and Clinton have had some easy moments and some obviously biased reporting.  But, at least they're TALKING about these candidates.  I can't recall the last time I read anything about Gravel or Kuchinich in the MSM, especially something positive...

The second take-home point is this: don't read or support unfair reporting.  People DO vote with their web browser, and the less "hits" an article gets, the less credible the author becomes.
The only reason Obama is attacking 527s is because he doesn't have any that support him. He doesn't have ANY national union support or endorsements from large interest groups that would run these types of ads. But I'll bet he would love to have them.

In the meantime, he certainly has no problems with accepting money from lobbyists wives, their networks, or even employing them in his campaign at the same time they work for their firms that are lobbying Congress right now.

Its really hard to take his rhetoric seriously at times.
josh, go lie somewhere els please .
Josh - you just made his point "interest groups"  All he is trying to say here is that there should be more accountability for these interest groups, so people know who's attacking who.  There is a reason there is a dollar limit on how much a person can contribute to a campaign.  So that wealthy interests can not buy elections.  These 527's need some regulation is his point.

Someone made the point that he should have accepted public financing like John Edwards, if he really believes in campaign finance reform.  John Edwards accepted it, because he couldn't raise enough money to be competitive on his own.  But both Obama and John are leading the way, on trying to bring political power back to the American people.  I don't live in Iowa or New Hampshire, but I would be surpised if the dirtiness of 527's isn't ruining their Christmas spirits.
I's a Republican, but this year I will register as a Democrat so I can vote for OBAMA in my state's primary. If OBAMA doesn't win his party's nomination then I will vote for McCain. But the one thing, I'm ABSOLUTELY SURE I will NEVER do is vote for Hillary Clinton. Her husband turned the White House into a sexual and financial whorehouse. I really wish she/he would just go away.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=528835

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google