ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



The candidates on Bhutto

Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:01 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Here's a wrap up of the candidates' statements not mentioned on First Read so far from Obama, Clinton, McCain and Kucinich and as well as New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg:

OBAMA: "I am shocked and saddened by the death of Benazir Bhutto in this terrorist atrocity. She was a respected and resilient advocate for the democratic aspirations of the Pakistani people. We join with them in mourning her loss, and stand with them in their quest for democracy and against the terrorists who threaten the common security of the world."

CLINTON: "I am profoundly saddened and outraged by the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, a leader of tremendous political and personal courage. I came to know Mrs. Bhutto over many years, during her tenures as Prime Minister and during her years in exile. Mrs. Bhutto's concern for her country, and her family, propelled her to risk her life on behalf of the Pakistani people. She returned to Pakistan to fight for democracy despite threats and previous attempts on her life and now she has made the ultimate sacrifice. Her death is a tragedy for her country and a terrible reminder of the work that remains to bring peace, stability, and hope to regions of the globe too often paralyzed by fear, hatred, and violence.

"Let us pray that her legacy will be a brighter, more hopeful future for the people she loved and the country she served. My family and I extend our condolences and deepest sympathies to the victims and their families and to the people of Pakistan."

MCCAIN: “I was deeply saddened today to learn about the death of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto. My deepest condolences go out to the family and supporters of this remarkable woman, an individual who paid the ultimate price for her embrace of moderation and rejection of extremism. The death of Benazir Bhutto underscores yet again the grave dangers we face in the world today and particularly in countries like Pakistan, where the forces of moderation are arrayed in a fierce battle against those who embrace violent Islamic extremism.

“Given Pakistan's strategic location, the international terrorist groups that operate from its soil, and its nuclear arsenal, the future of that country has deep implications for the security of the United States and its allies. America must stand on the right side of this ongoing struggle. In my numerous visits to Pakistan -- to Islamabad, to Peshawar, even to the tribal areas of Waziristan -- I have seen first hand the many challenges that face the political leadership there, challenges so graphically portrayed by today's tragedy. There are, in Pakistan, brave individuals who seek to lead their country away from extremism and instability and into the light of a better day. America, I believe, must do all we can to support them.”

KUCINICH: "This is a very dangerous moment for the world. Benazir Bhutto represented a courageous effort to bring principles of liberty to Pakistan. She was truly dedicated to the people of Pakistan. The United States must change its policy direction in the region. It must stop adding fuel to the fire. Kucinich met with Bhutto several times over the years in both Washington, D.C. and New York City."

BLOOMBERG: "Today all New Yorkers, including the more than 100,000 who can trace their heritage to Pakistan, are saddened to learn about the assassination of Pakistan's Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Hers was a voice for democracy, and the silencing of it -- by such brutal means - is a shock to us all. Ms. Bhutto's death -- and the deaths of the many other Pakistanis who were killed today simply for expressing their views - is a great loss for friends of democracy and for everyone who is united in the fight against terror. It's also a grim reminder that many people consider the freedoms we cherish a threat. The perpetrators of this violent act must be brought to justice, and it is my hope that President Musharraf will follow through on free and fair elections in January as a testament to Ms. Bhutto's legacy."

*** UPDATE *** RICHARDSON: "Benazir Bhutto was a courageous woman. Her death, and the deaths of so many of her supporters, is more than just a tragedy. It is a testament to the will of the Pakistani people to see democracy restored. My thoughts and prayers are with the families of those who died today. Ms. Bhutto knew the dangers to her safety. But she would not be intimidated. We also must not be intimidated. A leader has died, but democracy must live. The United States government cannot stand by and allow Pakistan's return to democracy to be derailed or delayed by violence.

"We must use our diplomatic leverage and force the enemies of democracy to yield: President Bush should press Musharraf to step aside, and a broad-based coalition government, consisting of all the democratic parties, should be formed immediately. Until this happens, we should suspend military aid to the Pakistani government. Free and fair elections must also be held as soon as possible. It is in the interests of the US that there be a democratic Pakistan that relentlessly hunts down terrorists. Musharraf has failed, and his attempts to cling to power are destabilizing his country. He must go."

*** UPDATE 2*** BIDEN: "This is a terrible day. My heart goes out to Benazir Bhutto's family, friends and followers. Like her father before her, Benazir Bhutto worked her whole life - and gave her life - to help Pakistan become a democratic, secular and modern Muslim country. She was a woman of extraordinary courage who returned to Pakistan in the face of death threats and even after an assassination attempt the day of her return, she did not flinch. It was a privilege to know her these many years and to call her a friend.

"I am convinced Ms. Bhutto would have won free and fair elections next week. The fact that she was by far Pakistan's most popular leader underscores the fact that there is a vast, moderate majority in Pakistan that must have a clear voice in the system. Her assassination makes it all the more urgent that Pakistan return to a democratic path. This fall, I twice urged President Musharraf to provide better security for Ms. Bhutto and other political leaders -- I wrote him before her return and after the first assassination attempt in October. The failure to protect Ms. Bhutto raises a lot of hard questions for the government and security services that must be answered.

"I know that Benazir's followers will be tempted to lash out in anger and violence. I urge them to remain calm -- and not play into the hands of the forces of destruction. I urge Pakistan's leaders to open a fully accountable and transparent investigation. We must find out who was behind this and bring those responsible to justice. And the United States should offer any assistance necessary, including investigative teams, to get to the bottom of this horror. The way to honor Benazir Bhutto is to uphold the values for which she gave her life: democracy, moderation and social justice. I join with the Pakistani people in mourning the loss of a dear friend."

HUCKABEE: "I am deeply troubled by the news accounts this morning of Pakistani opposition leader and former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's assassination in a suicide attack. This is devastating news for the people of Pakistan, and my prayers go out to them as we follow developments regarding this dire situation. 
 
"The terrible violence surrounding Pakistan's upcoming election stands in stark contrast to the peaceful transition of power that we embrace in our country through our Constitution.  On this sad day, we are reminded that while our democracy has flaws, it stands as a shining beacon of hope for nations and people around the world who seek peace and opportunity through self-government."

*** UPDATE 3*** EDWARDS: "Benazir Bhutto was a brave and historic leader for Pakistan. Her assassination is a sad and solemn event, and our hearts go out to her family and to the Pakistani people. But we will not let this contemptible, cowardly act delay the march of progress in Pakistan for a single second.

"I have seen firsthand in Pakistan, and in meetings with Prime Minister Bhutto and President Musharraf, the instability of the country and the complexity of the challenges they face. At this critical moment, America must convey both strength and principle. We should do everything in our power to help bring the perpetrators of this heinous act to justice and to ensure that Bhutto's movement toward democracy continues."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Sit down and shut up BLOOMBERG.


Mitt Romneys Criminal History!

Summary
Subject ROMNEY has been arrested on two occasions, in Massachusetts and Michigan, and, per Utah law enforcement, been verbally abusive with sheriff's deputy there. Known associates are currently under investigation for impersonating a police officer and fraud and money laundering.

Other Names and Aliases
"The Jobs Senator" (1994)2

"Team Reform" (c. 2002-2004)3

"Conservative Republican" (c. 2006-2007)4

Arrests and Other Contacts with Law Enforcement
WAYLAND, MASS. (1981) -- ARREST- DISORDERLY CONDUCT.
In June 1981, ROMNEY attempted to launch family motorboat at Cochituate State Park despite park ranger advising that he was prohibited from doing so because his boat did not display proper registration. ROMNEY was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. ROMNEY handcuffed and transported in bathing suit to Natick police station, where released on own recognizance.5 Disposition: Charges were dropped when ROMNEY threatened to sue the state for false arrest; case dismissed at Natick District Court in February 1982. ROMNEY successfully petitioned that the files be sealed.6

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MICH. (c. 1965) -- ARREST- CHARGE NOT KNOWN.
ROMNEY was arrested along with future wife Ann Davies for actions in connection with practical joke at Cranbrook Academy. Reportedly ROMNEY and several friends "bought huge blocks of ice from the local gas station, laid towels over them, and went sliding down the slopes of a nearby golf course."7

HUNTSVILLE, UTAH (2002) -- USE OF PROFANITY WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT
On February 10, 2002, while overseeing 2002 Winter Olympics, ROMNEY became extremely angry upon encountering a traffic jam at a venue and proceeded to berate two persons authorized to direct traffic there, including with obscenity laced tirades, according to a police captain at the scene and a volunteer targeted by ROMNEY. The traffic volunteer Shaun Knopp stated that ROMNEY "asked me who the f___ I was and what the f___ I was doing. We got the Olympics going on we don't need this s___ down here."8 Weber County Sheriff's Office Capt. Terry Shaw, commander of the Snowbasin venue, stated that ROMNEY twice used the F-word while also berating one of his officers, Deputy Kodi Taggart. Capt. Shaw stated that ROMNEY "was abusive" to his officer and advised, unsuccessfully, that "he needs to apologize."9 ROMNEY denied part of the allegation, insisting he hadn't used the F-word since high school -- but admitted he used a word he described as "H-E-double hockey sticks." Disposition: The Utah Department of Safety advised it had decided against initiating a "profanity probe."10

Known Associates
FABIAN, ALAN: Until August 2007, FABIAN was a national finance committee co-chair for ROMNEY. Now under federal indictment for mail fraud, money laundering, bankruptcy fraud, perjury, obstruction of justice and defrauding companies of $32 million in Maryland.11

GARRITY, JAY (a/k/a "Trooper"): Until July 2007, GARRITY provided security and advance for ROMNEY whom he codenamed "LXX"; GARRITY now under investigation in Massachusetts and New Hampshire for impersonating a police officer and other charges.12

HEALEY, KERRY MURPHY (a/k/a "SHERRY" 13): HEALEY recruited by ROMNEY as accomplice for 2002 Governor's race; subsequently relegated to background role.

Additional information
POSSIBLE ANIMAL CRUELTY (1983)
In 1983, ROMNEY transported the family Irish setter, SEAMUS, in a dog carrier strapped to the roof of his Chevrolet station wagon during a 12-hour drive from Boston, Mass. to Lake Huron. No complaint was made or charges filed at time. However, Massachusetts law prohibits carrying an animal "in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise, in an unnecessarily cruel or inhuman manner or in a way and manner which might endanger the animal carried thereon."14

POSSIBLE RECKLESS DRIVING (date unknown)
According to a published account, "red lights make [ROMNEY] impatient." Per the report, at a red light at an intersection in Boston, "There was a truck in front of him but no other traffic anywhere in sight... .So [ROMNEY] pulled out around the truck -- to the left of the truck and then right in front of it -- and made a right turn. Then, at the next intersection, where again there was no traffic, he stopped and then went straight on through a red light. And then, suddenly, a policeman appeared out of nowhere.15

ALLEGED BRUSH WITH INTRUDER (c. MID 1960s)
Subject ROMNEY maintains that while a high school student at Cranbrook School in Michigan he encountered an intruder in his dorm: ROMNEY, who says, "I figured I was dead for sure," states he escaped the unknown intruder by jumping out a ground-floor window and running for help.16


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 People Magazine, 5/13/02

2 Boston Globe, 10/20/94

3 Quincy Patriot-Ledger, 5/26/04

4 Fox News, 2/26/06

5 Boston Herald, 5/5/94

6 Boston Globe, 5/5/94

7 Fortune Magazine, 7/9/07; Boston Globe 6/12/05

8 Standard-Examiner, 2/14/02

9 Standard-Examiner, 2/14/02 and Associated Press 2/14/02

10 Salt Lake Tribune, 2/15/02; Boston Globe, 8/11/02

11 Boston Globe, 8/12/07

12 Boston Globe, 6/22/07; 6/23/07

13 Boston Herald, 9/17/02

14 Boston Globe, 6/30/07

15 Deseret Morning News, 7/6/00

16 Boston Herald, 8/1/94
Now politics of fear begins .....
And Richardson goes for the jugular in his statement, which in this case is dead on accurate. Of them all, his is the one I find that stands out as a true statement of outrage at this attack and those behind it (Musharraf).
Any post attempting to politicize what happened to Bhutto in a way to disparage Hillary Clinton, are so tasteless, disgusting, and moronic, there's nothing else to be said.
In a way this helps Ron Paul. The US can't really understand Pakistan. If you get into situations where everyone ends up feeling bad, then what? Keep doing what you've been doing? Every politician who says what we want out of this, what our ideal is, ultimately has to say how we get there. And that seems terribly difficult. If Pakistan is in a kind of civil war, what actions can we take? What are the limits of American power, especially with a sometime and dubious ally like Pakistan? There seem to be elements of wishful thinking in what the candidates are saying.
Any post attempting to politicize what happened to Bhutto in a way to disparage Hillary Clinton, are so tasteless, disgusting, and moronic, there's nothing else to be said.

Pat Huntington NY (Sent Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:22 AM)

Is there are particular reason that you singled out Clinton? Is it ok to use it against others?
Bhutto’s death is a tragedy. She was a very brave and courageous woman. Another blog was talking about how Hillary might benefit from this. I guess there is a way for Hillary to spin this to her advantage, but this is a twist of events that might not benefit her because Bhutto is a woman. Political leaders lives are at risk  when they run their countries. JFK was assassinated. An attempt was made on Regan's life. This stuff happens. While this country is ready for a woman president, I don't think it is ready for the potential that a woman may die by violence in office. I hope this never happens here, but Bhutto was (as leaders go) a relatively young, beautiful woman and it happened to her.
once agian obama called a spade a spade, in calling out musharuf.
Bhutto's death is all Bush's fault. All republicans have blood on their hands for this.
A very sad and unfortunate incident. Even more sad that the repubs will use it as a tool for more fear and war mongering.
I love how the Clinton supporter came in to go after the non-existent political attackers in this thread, which seems clearly intended to imply that supporters of other candidates are likely to do such a thing (in other words, it's a veiled attack on Edwards and Obama supporters).

That said, all of the candidates' responses are very appropriate. There is nothing to criticize in any of them (unless you disagree with Richardson's proposal, though I think it sounded pretty good).

Why must the best, most charismatic leaders face such violent opposition? Lincoln, MLK, JFK, RFK, Bhutto...They never wanted anything more than peace and prosperity, so how can there be people so diametrically opposed to their ideas as to use violence?

It speaks to the weakness of these people's positions that they must resort to such tactics. It's time to take up the banner of love again, and bring the violence on. It's time again to show the kind of courage it took to face firehoses and police dogs with only picket signs. It's time to show the kind of courage it takes to tour a country filled with violent extremists to advocate for freedom.

Never mind the election, it's almost immaterial compared to this. Racism in America is not gone, so who will take up the banner of peaceful protest once again? Extremism (obviously) lives on, so who will now take up the mantle of justice, peace and moderation?

Any takers?


Joe Biden for President 2008


Bhutto's Reaction To Obama's Comment on Military Force

QUESTIONER: You may have covered that, what I was going to ask you next, but let me try it anyhow.

We had quite an interesting, and indeed still are, mini-debate here politically between two — initially two of the Democratic aspirants for presidents, and it spread now across party lines. And Barack Obama kicked it off by saying, "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will." That's a direct quote from a recent speech of his. What is your reaction to that?

BHUTTO: Well, I wouldn't like the United States to violate Pakistan's sovereignty with unauthorized military operations. But the issue that I would like to stress is that Barack Obama also said, if Pakistan won't act. And that's the critical issue, that the government has to act. And the government has to act to protect Pakistan's own serenity and integrity, its own respect, and to understand that if it creates a vacuum, then others aren't going to just twiddle their thumbs while militants freely move across the border.
is it not funny how all the candidates are now saying (like rudy) that they were supporting more military action in afganistan and inbetween pakistan . I,ll give u one guess who started that issue and what they said about him when he brougt it up. first geuss
The death of Bhutto is sad for all parties. Making her death a political speech worng. I understand that the Clintons are counted in the number to have her go back to Pakistan. Now if that is true what does that say about the Bill and Hill show? As you read Hill's remarks you can see that she is really trying to use this to bolster her imiage.
With Mr. Bush's previous international actions, the fear is not only within Pakistan, but also what he might do to make things worse.  We need reasonable, informed, and world respected leadership.
Considering all candidates, I put my faith in Biden.
Elizabeth -
What in the world is that for? I don't think Bloomberg said anything out of the line...Wow, you did!
It is so very important for us to remember that each of the candidates is truly reacting to her death as they should be. Hillary has a more personal approach because she knew the woman. Bidden's comments were also appropriately more personal. The other candidates have not been in the same position, but are still very concerned, saddened and very aware that there are major implications in this event for each American presidential candidate to be aware of.

Now we need to focus on not letting her death be in vain. We should all remember that she was killed in the name of freedom and democracy in a region where the majority was behind her. Those who silenced her are as much our enemies as they were hers.
Is there are particular reason that you singled out Clinton? Is it ok to use it against others?

CitizenJ (Sent Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:36 AM)

I think that person realized along with many others here that Mrs. Clinton is always the one to receive extremely unfair attacks and as such is the most likely to be given unfair attacks here as well.

Moving on, I was extremely saddened when I heard this news on CNN today. I remember a few months ago, watching Ms. Bhutto's interview with Wolf Blitzer and I was struck by her poise and courage. This truly is a big loss to not only Pakistan but to the world as a whole.
I think that person realized along with many others here that Mrs. Clinton is always the one to receive extremely unfair attacks and as such is the most likely to be given unfair attacks here as well.

Moving on, I was extremely saddened when I heard this news on CNN today. I remember a few months ago, watching Ms. Bhutto's interview with Wolf Blitzer and I was struck by her poise and courage. This truly is a big loss to not only Pakistan but to the world as a whole.

Ernest, MIA, FL (Sent Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:16 PM)

I guess that answers half the question, leaving the most important half unanswered.
Jorgensen, what does Romney's alleged criminal history have to do with this article? Nothing. Stick to the topic. There have been some great comments about the "handling" or "response" to the Bhutto situation.

To all else: the candidates are in a lose-lose situation. If (when) they comment on Bhutto the naysayers will accuse them of politcizing the unfortunate events. If they do not comment (in a timely fashion) on Bhutto other naysayers will accuse them of a lack of readiness to act in International affairs. Either way, some will find a negative about a candidate, real or perceived, and use that to tear down one while trying to build up another.

As posters, we too are caught in the middle. What happened to Bhutto, those killed/injured in the attack, and the negative implications that have and will occur in Pakistan, the Middle East, and throughout the world, are incredibly unfortunate. Wayne
Kuncinch's statement: "Who's Bhutto?"
Frankly, I think it is in very poor taste for commentators, candidates' aides, or candidates themselves to try to exploit this tragedy for political gain. This was a courageous, vibrant leader who believed so much in her country's future, that she willingly risked her life, and sadly, paid the ultimate sacrifice. For candidates to try and capitalize on this horrific event in any way is utterly disgraceful, in my opinion.  
This is all Hillary Clinton's fault. She and her husband have blood on their hands.
The post above on Romney is very interesting.  I always thought he was a shady charactor.   ALSO the murder of Benazir Bhutto was a needless tragedy.  President Musharraf did not give her adequate security, and in my opinion he was probably in on it.  I don't care how public the areas are that she appears in.  If her security was conducted properly, her murder could have been prevented.  HOW COULD THAT GUNMAN GET THAT CLOSE TO HER?  HE WAS ABLE TO SHOOT HER THREE TIMES AT CLOSE RANGE.  I think it was an inside job.  So Sad.  What a waste of a Great Person.
The death of Bhutto is sad for all parties. Making her death a political speech worng. I understand that the Clintons are counted in the number to have her go back to Pakistan. Now if that is true what does that say about the Bill and Hill show? As you read Hill's remarks you can see that she is really trying to use this to bolster her imiage.
CC, boston, ma (Sent Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:03 PM)

I don't know if the Clintons encouraged her to go back to Pakistan or not, but she is a grown woman - a strong woman - who can certainly make up her own mind about these things.  More likely, she felt that her presence was needed in her home country - that her people needed to return to more moderate policies.  She is not the first leader to return to a politically unstable, dangerous country with hopes of bringing about reform.  To insinuate that Bill or Hillary is in any way responsible for this tragedy is completely and utterly ignorant.
THE REAL OBAMA RESPONSE:

Benazir Bhutto deserved what she got.  As a muslim women, she had no place in politics.  No self respecting muslim nation should be lead by women. They desicrate the Quran when they try to educate themselves and act like men.  
When Barack said we need to put pressure on Pakistan because of the violent factions that are there everyone said it was naive...wow great judgement on his part...maybe if we all were more naive we would start making better judgement...

I vote for the naive one!

Obama '08
Everyone forgets a few debates back when Biden changed the topic from Iran to Pakistan. This changed the playing field. It will hurt Obama, Huckabee, and Edwards. America needs to realize the importance of electing Biden. Hopefully, now they will.
Biden's remarks speak to his experience, both with Bhutto herself and with that region of the world.  His words are what I would like to hear from my president when a tragedy such as this happens.  Respectful, yet reproachful of those who caused her death (directly and indirectly), and optimistic that the changes she worked so hard for will come someday soon.

Biden is the total package.
b. moore , man thats cold.
It's all well and good to compare America as a beacon of stability to other countries when this kind of thing happens. But we are not stain-free. Leon Czolgosz, John Wilkes Booth, and Lee Harvey Oswald, are names that can be brought up to remind us that we also, have assassins in our society, as perfect as we somtimes imagine it to be.
Pat in huntington: you are a knucklehead.

First you rail against politicizing it. Then you do exactly that.

If this has any political effect, it helps Biden, Clinton, McCain and Giuliani.
Robert Jorgenson, Salt Lake City, Utah. You spent way to much time saying nothing. I've been pulled over twice I would go into detail explaining it all, but it would probably be more interesting that what you put up there and I don't want to have to show you up. Seriously, you need a life. Atleast, report on something interesting about a candidate killed someone or stole something. That would be more interesting that Mitt Romney sliding down the hill on ice cream and getting arrested for it. There are way to many retards on MSNBC for real.
Yeah Democratic allies in the WAR ON TERROR.

That was one brave woman who lost her life in one cowardly world.
go look at bhutto's record in wikipedia regarding corruption charges and laundering money. im sorry she died, but she isnt this great leader they make her out to be
thank you pat in Huntington for being a loyal Clinton worker bee and explaining the rules for all of us to abide by...unless you are a Clinton supporter.  

BTW...let's count how many times she uses the word's "I"  or "my" (as in experience) in the next fews days when referring to this tragedy.  
Bhutto's death is all Pat Huntington NY's fault. All idiots who post here have blood on their hands for this.

See how stupid it sounds?
OBAMA = HOPE + UNITY + RESTORING OUR BELIEVE IN THIS GRAET NATION + EXTENDING OUR PEACE TO THE WORLD AT LARGE = CHANGE

I'm not suprised to see so many trying to shoot down this rare talent with their hateful, unthoughtful and fanatical spews.

OBAMA = HOPE + UNITY + RESTORING OUR BELIEVE IN THIS GRAET NATION = CHANGE

I'm not suprised to see so many trying to shoot down this rare talent with their
hateful, unthoughtful and fanatical spews.

(BEWARE OF HILL CLINTON'S INTERNET THUGS, THEY ARE ON EVERY MAJOR POLITICAL
WEBSITES AND BLOGS....7 WERE OUTED ON A NH NEWSPAPER SITE)
Bhutto's death is all Bush's fault. All republicans have blood on their hands for this.
Pat Huntington NY (Sent Thursday,

Pat you are a fool! Bush's fault, give it a rest,as a republican, I dont have any blood on my hands. This was the act of terrorists!! Please Pat do us all a favor and go put your head back in the sand.
Ignorant comments from people like you will be the downfall of us all.    
This is a real tragedy for Pakistan and its people.  Edwards and Biden have it right, find the people who did this and bring them to justice, allow for healing and proceed with the elections.  Richardson is overreacting.  We can't afford to destablize the entire country and reform it in the middle of what is certain to be martial law if riots ensue.  Especially with nuclear weapons security at risk.
B. Hessein Obama, Illinois, you are one sick puppy. Watch out, Hillary might fire you for those comments.  In either case, she wanted me to tell you the check is in the mail.
Hope.  Change.  Do either of these political buzzwords mean anything when you look at a tragedy like this?  I'm so afraid of what will happen if one of the front-running celebrity Democrats is nominated.  All of their promises are meaningless if they don't know how to help fix what is broken in this world.  I'm so thankful that Joe Biden is in this race and that Iowa voters are really listening to what he's got to say -- and more important, looking at what he's done.
Bruce NV, I was being somewhat sarcastic.  However, one wonders how successful our efforts have been in getting Pakistan to take care of the muslim extremeists, al Qaeda, and the Taliban operating from the tribal lands bordering Afghanistan, despite all the billions of dollars sent over there from us.  Throwing bad money after bad money doesn't seem helpful.  She might be alive today if the Bush administration's efforts in this regard were successful. Of course, that's not the same as placing 100% blame on Bush.  It's a legitimate question.
There is a blog earlier addressing the pros and cons of politicians remarking on tragedies, like today. I would just like to express that I agree. If you are the first to respond, it can very well sound from the heart. If you are the 15th individual to respond, you are jumping on the wagon to be heard, and it looks tacky.

I feel that I am pretty educated, not a genius by any means, but would someone please explain how every Republican should have blood on their hands for this assasination? I just cannot figure this out.

Personally, blamming a horrific act like this, in any degree, in such a blanket format is shameless and self serving. If I may make an assumption, if there is anything else wrong in this individual's life, someone else is to blame, and they are probably a Republican.
Obama's statement - once again - reveals his immaturity.  Its the kind of thing to say if you are a local politician.

Hillary is right.  No one knows what can happen day to day.  We may want change in Washington but what we need is change in the world.  

To do that, we really need someone who knows first hand how to get in there with the bad boys of this world.  Hillary is a maybe - only because of Bill.  He has relationships with all these difficult countries.  

I wish Biden was doing better - but maybe we can hope that Hillary will bring him into the cabinet.

Maybe when the world is a little more gentle - we can afford a president Obama.
So much for Bush's war on terror and friendship with Musharraf of Pakistan .. Musharraf is no friend of the US ...never has been ...never will be ...both he and Bush have blood on their hands this morning ...
Is it true that Jerry from Corpus Christi TX has been vacationing in Pakistan? Maybe he thought a female Prime Minister in Pakistan would result in a female US President and wanted to put an end to that....just a thought.
While Bush and the rest of the warmongering GOP have been trying to scare the daylights out of  the American public about the nonexistent "threat" of  Iranian  nukes, the real threat has been growing in Pakistan. It's a nation with real nuclear weapons  that could really fall into the hands of Islamic extremists who would use them any way they could if they got their hands on them.  But Bush has been too busy destroying Iraq to worry about Bin Laden, whom Bush said at one point he didn't even bother to think about anymore (not that he thinks much about anything).  Somebody ought to start thinking about Bin Laden again.






SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=534853

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google