ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Richardson Addresses Pakistani Turmoil

Posted: Friday, December 28, 2007 4:11 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann
DES MOINES, IOWA -- Rawalpindi, the city in Pakistan where Benazir Bhutto was assassinated yesterday, is more than 7,000 miles from Des Moines. But some Democratic and Republican candidates here are hoping that the reverberations from the death of the former Pakistani prime minister will continue to shake the snowy political ground halfway across the world in the first-in-the-nation caucuses state.

At the top of the list of candidates trying to catch the news wave is Richardson, who gave a policy address today in Des Moines about the churning turmoil in Pakistan. Richardson, the only candidate to have called for Pervez Musharraf to step down, told supporters that his Democratic rivals have "misplaced faith" in the existing government in the country, adding that America has "subsidized oppression for too long" by supporting its current president.

His campaign message? "We cannot afford another president who is a foreign policy novice," he said today. "The American people should not settle for untested leadership."

Speaking to the press after the well-attended speech, Richardson mostly tried avoided reporters' efforts to make him single his competitors out by name. But he accused his fellow Democrats of "bland" responses to yesterday's events. "What I hear from the other candidates is that they basically want to do nothing," he said.

Just how much is the crisis in Pakistan influencing the decision-making of Iowa caucus goers? Joan Price, a Richardson supporter from Ankeny, says that -- for the first time this political season -- she's been getting phone calls from friends and neighbors, who are anxious about the consequences of the assassination.

"I got about six phone calls from people last night wondering how this could affect the election," she said. "This is big news to all of us."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary once met Bhutto - that's why she should be President!
Something tells me that Obama is feeling like somebody let all of the air out of his inauguration balloons right about now. Maybe at least we can see Obama without his constant arrogant smirk.
B. Richardson does make some, ahhh, interesting points.  But does Gov. Richardson have any follow-up plan should P. Musharraf step down?  Should that happen, how would they get any stability, much less democracy?  I don't understand that.  I look to Time's 'Person of the Year' V. Putin.  Establishing stability first has worked for Russia (now, if they could only get democracy to follow).  I don't know and I'm obviously no expert, plunging the country with nuclear weapons into chaos doesn't seem like the best plan to me, especially when we would be the ones required to 'nation build' once again, which has worked oh-so well in the past.  I'm glad he is not a major candidate.

Once again, Gov. Richardson is a shining example of how experience does not necessarily lead to better judgment.  There are two other very experienced candidates in this Dem. race who also exhibit judgment, that is what we need.
Something tells me that Obama is feeling like somebody let all of the air out of his inauguration balloons right about now. Maybe at least we can see Obama without his constant arrogant smirk.

Rob, Phoenix, AZ (Sent Friday, December 28, 2007 4:37 PM)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this thread is about Richardson addressing the Pakistani turmoil.
I say this with all due respect:  Richardson obviously has some foreign policy experience which I think is important, but he just doesn't have the judgment or insight the some of the other experienced candidates have.  He reminds me of the chess player who can only think one move ahead while people like Biden and Dodd are thinking 10 moves ahead.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this thread is about Richardson addressing the Pakistani turmoil.
CitizenJ (Sent Friday, December 28, 2007 4:54 PM)

J, how come you don't make similar comments when people slam Hillary in threads that have nothing to do with her?
CitizenJ, my comment was in response to Governor Richardson's comments and First Read obviously new this. My point was that since Richardson is stating that this is no time for a "novice" the implication can be drawn that he is talking about Obama given his lack of experience. Really and truly, it does seem that things are shifting and Obama has hit a wall and he must be a little worried right now about Iowa next week.
Obama is right again.  He was right on Iraq.  He has the most comprehensive and clear foreign policy vision of ANY person running.  If we really want to CHANGE the world, if we REALLY want to make America BETTER again, we NEED Barack's judgment.  Think of it this way: some people have been artists for 30 years.  That doesn't take away from the raw talent and skill of an artist, who paints infinitely better, who is vastly superior to the "old pro"...  Right now, we can't afford the old pro based on experience.  We need someone with talent, with a real vision, with real judgment.  We need someone who can not only repaint America, we need someone who can work a -masterpiece-.
J, how come you don't make similar comments when people slam Hillary in threads that have nothing to do with her?
Carrie, Eastern Iowa (Sent Friday, December 28, 2007 5:16 PM)

I don't recall many threads that don't have anything to do with her.
CitizenJ, my comment was in response to Governor Richardson's comments and First Read obviously new this. My point was that since Richardson is stating that this is no time for a "novice" the implication can be drawn that he is talking about Obama given his lack of experience. Really and truly, it does seem that things are shifting and Obama has hit a wall and he must be a little worried right now about Iowa next week.
Rob, Phoenix, AZ (Sent Friday, December 28, 2007 5:17 PM)

I guess I misinterpreted it. My apologies.
Rn, Tx...He has the most comprehensive and clear foreign policy vision of ANY person running...
------------------------------------------------

I would be interested in reading specifics--about things he would do in the future, not what he got right or what other candidates got wrong in past.

Thanks.
I suggest those criticizing Richardson's call listen to the news.  Reports of attacks by the general population on symbols of the pakistani government.  Not against fundamentalists but against the government.  Who the people blames seems clear.  THere is a reason anchors are asking their reporters if they think he can retain power.  The answer being if the military stays behind him.

A planned managed transfer of power away from Musharaf is the right call.  Musharaf is a devil we know but you are guaranteed to get a better finger on their nuclear button through a managed transfer than at the risk of moderate pakistani's joining with fundamentalist against Musharaf.  Or worse yet the fundamentalist factions of the military taking action unilaterally counting on disatisfaction with Musharaf to enable a lasting result.

It's not like there aren't more than enough strong military leaders to ensure no power vacume is created by his departure from the scene.  We want to make sure the right leaders for our interests are those rising not falling.  

Removing Musharaf is removing a polarizing symbol that stands a real risk of unifying moderates and extremists in a common cause against him.  Let's not let an enemy of my enemy dynamic take shape in pakistan.

Indeed if al quaida did the attack that would be the likley strategic objective of it.  

Musharaf should go and go now.  Hopefully he will do so in a managed way so as to ensure there isn't an unmanaged way leading to completely unpredictable results.

People act like he's everything.  He's not, but right now he is a powerful symbol to rally opposition against inside pakistan.  Militaries are designed to seamlessly replace leaders he can go without creating any vacume.

Richardson is the one playing chess here.  Short term musharaf can likely hold but the longer we let him sit and fester there the less likely we are to be able to pull of a succesful managed transition that doesn't result in a government openly hostile to our interests.

His own military being seen by moderates pushing musharaf out for Richardsons proposed interim technocrat governement authorized under the pakistani constituion.  Now that would insulate the military from Musharaf and hopefully pacify moderates in pakistan.

Or we can gamble the dictator we know will continue to hold the factions of the military together and extremist factions working with fundamentalists and now moderates won't depose him by force.

Short term dictators look like good gambles.  Everyone remember the shah in Iran.  Long term putting all your eggs in that basket can have real damning consequences.  Lets not forget that in pakistan.  It's time for us to push change there so we can ensure the change is managed and not from chaos.
Yeah, Richardson! Let's take away any last support of stability in that country and just get on out of there. Oh wait, there are no coalitions. Oh wait, we got rid of a key figure in the investigation. Oh wait, they have nukes. Ok, now what?

Biden's plan makes more sense. And his long term plan is great: http://www.joebiden.com/getinformed/speeches?id=0090
Rn, Tx...He has the most comprehensive and clear foreign policy vision of ANY person running...
------------------------------------------------

I would be interested in reading specifics--about things he would do in the future, not what he got right or what other candidates got wrong in past.

Thanks.
Dot, Illinois (Sent Friday, December 28, 2007 5:50 PM)


What he got right in the past was once his future policy.  What he's getting right on Pakistan is the same thing he's said before.  He laid a revolutionary new approach to foreign policy two months ago in a NY Times article
Here is Iran and General foreign policy
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/us/politics/02obama.html?hp

Here is his Pakistan approach, which becomes all the more relevant day by day.  He's held the same approach to Pakistan and Afghanistan for a long time.  The problems now are merely offsets of the Iraq War distraction.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7590.html

"The War We Need to Win" also on Pakistan, back in August.  It's a bit long, but if you want information, it sure has information.  VERY detailed.
http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/remarks_of_senator_obama_the_w_1.php
Wow, Adam in Sacrcamento, BULLS EYE!!!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=537165

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google