ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama memo hits Edwards, Clinton

Posted: Saturday, December 29, 2007 12:51 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
The Obama campaign today released a memo hitting Clinton and Edwards parts for an influx of support from outside groups into Iowa. The only one not benefiting is Obama, as he’s largely been going it alone.

”These latest revelations make it clear why Edwards was able to announce that he could accept public funds while still spending all he needed to spend in Iowa,” Obama Campaign Manager David Plouffe writes. “His campaign simply exploited the biggest loophole in the campaign finance system in order to get public matching funds while arranging through allies to benefit from a 527. That’s how they avoided the spending limits that are a condition of the public matching funds.”

On Clinton, Plouffe denounces an anti-Obama AFSCME mailer. Notably, a pro-Edwards 527, funded largely by local SEIUs, is up with positive ads in Iowa for Edwards. AFSCME and the American Federation of Teachers have been out with mailers for Clinton. Clinton has not shied away from interest groups’ money, even defending them as real people at this summer’s YearlyKos convention. Edwards has campaigned hard on a platform against Washington interest group money, and has had to balance denouncing the 527 and embracing the support of the SEIU.

These are groups Obama lobbied, and they ultimately chose Edwards and Clinton. How would Obama have handled the situation differently if these groups had endorsed him?

Here’s the full memo:

TO:     Interested Parties

FR:     David Plouffe, Campaign Manager, Obama for America

RE:     Flood of Washington Money In Iowa

DA:     December 29, 2007


Heading into the final stretch before the Iowa caucuses, millions of dollars in third party spending are pouring into the state in an unprecedented attempt to benefit the campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.  For Clinton, AFSCME, EMILY’s List and the AFT have spent over $2.6 million to assist her campaign – even as AFSCME attacks Obama for a position on health care mandates that they themselves have.  The groups supporting Edwards have spent over $2 million including efforts organized by one “independent” organization run by one of Edwards’ highest-ranking political aides which newspapers reported today received a questionable 11th-hour donation of $495,000 just days ago.

We have both the financial and organizational resources to compete aggressively in all four early states and through February 5th.  However, there is no doubt that the size of the spending and its underhanded nature deserve further scrutiny.

John Edwards
John Edwards, who is running in large part on a recently adopted campaign platform of taking on the big corporate interests in Washington, is relying on a former aide to run an unregulated 527 operating outside campaign finance limits to support his candidacy.   Even as he was decrying such influence last week, his former campaign manager was spending $750,000 on television ads in Iowa.  If Edwards can’t stand up to his own former aides how can stand up to the special interests in Washington?

Nick Baldick, who ran his campaign in 2004 and was on the campaign’s payroll as recently as June, is now running Alliance for a New America.  The Alliance for a New America has spent $1.5 million to help Edwards in Iowa, while the group Working for Working Americans, funded by the Carpenters Union, has spent more than $500,000 supporting Edwards, bringing the total spent on his behalf in Iowa to $2 million.

In their most recent financial disclosure, the Alliance for New America revealed that they had raised $495,000 from Oak Springs Farms, LLC. Oak Springs is funded through the assets of Rachel Mellon, who is 97-years old.  According to the available records, which go back to 1980, she has never donated to a political candidate until a contribution was made in her name to John Edwards this year. Mellon's involvement in the decision to donate to the Edwards campaign is unknown. The Washington Post reported yesterday that Alexander Forger, who has power for attorney for Mrs. Mellon, is a major supporter of John Edwards’ candidacy. Crain's Business Journal reported in February that Forger and "a group of prominent New York lawyers" hosted a fund-raiser for Edwards at Essex House -- the Central Park South address where his office is located. Forger has also personally donated $4,600 to Edwards' campaign, according to FEC records.   This is not the first time Forger has used Oak Springs Farms to support Edwards; in 2006, he made a $250,000 contribution to Edwards’ One America 527 group.

While Edwards has said he doesn’t want this group to run ads, he has not called his former employee and friend and asked him not run these ads.  And according to the New York Times, this group was started after consultations with Edwards’ campaign manager and other senior members of the campaign.

These latest revelations make it clear why Edwards was able to announce that he could accept public funds while still spending all he needed to spend in Iowa.  His campaign simply exploited the biggest loophole in the campaign finance system in order to get public matching funds while arranging through allies to benefit from a 527.  That’s how they avoided the spending limits that are a condition of the public matching funds.

When John Edwards applied for matching funds, he agreed to spending limits in return for the public money he is now receiving. But at that time, the Edwards campaign was actively involved in discussions about the establishment of an “independent” 527 effort, to be conducted outside the federal financing requirements.  Members of the SEIU, which is funding the 527 that has spent the vast majority of the money in IA on his behalf, described consultations with senior Edwards staff and a visit to the campaign in Iowa, all intended to assure that the project delivered “the specific sort of support they’d [the Edwards campaign] like to see from us.”

Within weeks, the Alliance for a New America, a 527 group organized just to boost Edwards' last-minute media spending in Iowa, came into existence.  The group portrays itself as an issue advertising group, able to operate outside the legal restrictions of the federal campaign finance laws.  Its goal is to help Edwards, who is specifically promoted in its advertising. Consistent with the close coordination envisioned by the planners, key individuals involved in this organization and steering its activities are close associates of the Edwards campaign.

Hillary Clinton
Of all of the candidates and interests groups participating in this campaign, the American Federal State County Municipal union (AFSCME) is running perhaps the most negative and misleading campaign. To date, they have spent $1.3 million on radio ads and direct mail – with over $300,000 spent on negative ads targeting Obama – and are reportedly readying a negative television campaign against Obama.

The ads have mischaracterized Obama’s universal health care plan. AFSCME has attacked Obama’s plan for not including an individual mandate, when it is the official position of AFSCME to oppose an individual mandate.  The President of AFSCME testified at a Congressional hearing in 2006 that “we are concerned with the direction reform efforts have taken in some states.  For example, the Massachusetts reform model attempts to achieve near universal coverage through the use of individual mandates.”

Clinton also has benefitted by spending from Emily’s List and the AFT, who have spent $485,777.43 and $799,618.59 respectively on her behalf.

This unprecedented level of outside spending could impact the outcome in Iowa and New Hampshire, and we believe voters in these states deserve to know exactly how much is being spent, where it’s coming from, and who’s benefiting.
TOTALS
CLINTON
AFSCME: $1,333,456.96 (includes $309,545.60 explicitly against Obama)
AFT: $799,618.59
Emily’s List: $485,777.43
Total: $2,618,852.98

EDWARDS
Working for Working Americans/Carpenters: $526,440.76
Alliance for a New America (SEIU): $1,530,411.77 (this includes $769,000 that has not formally posted)
Democratic Courage: $20,410.00
Total: $2,077,262.53

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

-jef ,
Edwards is a fake and a hypocrite.And everyone knows that by now.He charges to give speeches on poverty and used to work for a hedge fund that bankrupted lots of people.He had done nothing in the senate to prove his fight for the poor. Notice how he's never mentioned how exactly he's going to take power from the lobbyists and corporations. Is he going to get arrested and imprisoned? inquiring minds need to know.
He's been railing against intersets groups, yet his ex-campaign manager is running one on his behalf.
He's a complete fraud!
I wouldn't focus on the American Research Group Polls.  If I'm not mistaken, it is not only controlled by CNN which is owned by Ted who is a huge Clinton supporter, but also it's the biggest outlier out of the bunch while the rest of the polls show Obama in a slight lead but dead locked.
Obama is crying about the UNION 527s supporting Edwards, but has NOT ruled out embracing the support of 527 groups in the general election! In fact, he claims he wouldn't want to compromise the Dems' chance of winning, so he will not denounce 527s when it helps him. That is out and out hypocrisy! He's P.O.'d 'cuz they didn't support him. Edwards has the most Union support of any candidate, over 3 million strong, and Obama can't stand it.

And, can nobody see that there is a huge difference between a union group--one that represents ordinary, working-class Americans against corporate greed & power--supporting a candidate with positive, factual messages, and a 527 group financed by the wealthy and aimed at Swiftboating someone? If you folks can't understand this, that's a real problem. This is hardly a Washington "insider" special-interest group.

Barack Obama has raked in money from Wall Street, huge corporatations, and the like for his campaign and has outspent Edwards by millions in Iowa. For him to jump on Edwards for what is, I believe, about $750,000 of advertising run by an outside group is incredibly petty. And John Edwards and his campaign HAVE put out statements saying that he does not condone 527 groups. However, he cannot just "call up" the head of this group and insist they stop running these ads. The law forbids coordination or interference between a campaign and a 527 group.
Does anyone here know when Edwards began fighting for the middle class? Yeah seems like yesterday bcuz IT IS!

Does anyone here know which candidate spends $400.00 on haircuts while fighting for the middle class? Search "john feeling pretty" on youtube

Does anyone here know who denounced 527s the day before his rigged 527 began buying up ad space?

Does anyone here know that the only democrat non office holder used to be a senator?

Can someone tell me what he did for the middle class then?

Riddle me who the candidate is that will Fall flat on his face fighting big business since he has no clue how to make his friends and former workers do his bidding
I am not saying all plaintiff's lawyers will do almost anything to win a case.  Edwards talks about taking on corporations and big insurance companies.  The plaintiff, Edward's client', file a civil suit against the company or individual who the plaintiff alleges caused their injury.  I doubt if he has ever sued a insurance company as the insurance company pays for the defense of their insured-(defendant's).
Edwards did win some big cases in court.  However he was paid 40% or more from the total award plus his expenses.  The expert's he uses normally only testify for the plaintiff's side.  Testifying in civil suits is also big business for experts.
What I am saying is that Edwards has and will do whatever it takes to win.
Our nation needs a "no fault system" in the majority of our civil suits.( Automobile accidents) This would eliminate much of what is wrong with our court system now.  However, a great deal of supporters of Edwards are plaintiff's attorneys.  Don't think for one minute that they would not be looking for his help if he gets elected.  He says he does not take PAC money.  What is the difference?  It's just that Edwards sees this as not being from a lobbyist or a PAC.  He puts on his shades and looks the other way all the while claiming he will change the politics in Washington.
Yea, right.  
If Edwards does get the Democrat nomination, here is one democrat who will not be voting for "slick Johnnie".
It was obvious Obama is a lightweight by his response to Bhutto's assassination!!  Obama was shocked - shocked!!!
And while other candidates were bashing Musharraf or releasing policy wonk statements about Bhutto's death - John Edwards was talking with Musharraf!

It's doubtful Musharraf would ever call Obama since he said he'd invade Pakistan - with or without Musharraf's cooperation.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=538074

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google