ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama says he's the most electable Democrat

Posted: Saturday, December 29, 2007 6:14 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan and NBC's Mark Murray
FORT MADISON, IA -- Obama pushed his electability argument a step further at his second stop here today, highlighting Clinton's unfavorable ratings -- while claiming that he could win enough Republican support to create a coalition for governing if he were to win the presidency.

"There's one Democrat who beats every Republican potential opponent, and that's me. I beat Giuliani, I beat McCain, I beat Thompson, I beat Huckabee -- I beat whoever else they are planning to throw at me," he said.

Obama added, "And the reason that I beat them all -- and Hillary doesn't and Edwards doesn't -- is because I get more support from independents and I even get some Republican support, despite the fact that I've got the most progressive track record on many issues of any of the candidates."

Obama went a step further, contrasting his favorability ratings with Hillary Clinton's unfavorable ones nationally and played on the fears of Democrats that the election in 2008 could be a repeat of the one in 2004.

Obama paused before he drew his contrast, conscious of how his words would come off. "We cant win an election with a candidate... Let me say it this way, because I want to be fair…" He went on to say, "We are less likely to win an election that starts off with half the country not wanting to vote for that candidate." And in what seemed to be a dig at Edwards, he said, "We are less likely also to win an election with somebody who had one set of positions four years ago and has almost entirely different positions four years later. We've been through that."

In the most recent national NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, both Obama and Clinton bested their potential GOP rivals, yet Obama did so by larger margins than Clinton did. Clinton also had net-negative favorability rating in the survey.

Making a reference to the attacks leveled against Senator John Kerry in 2004 for being a flip-flopper, Obama added, "It's a problem, and so if you are concerned with electability having somebody who has been consistent, who has opposed the war from the start so the opponent cant say he was for the war just like I was." (Of course, Obama's rivals would likely point to his own changes on issues -- like the death penalty, gun control, and health care -- from the 1990s.)

At his next town hall in Keokuk, Obama appeared more comfortable making clearer distinctions, singling out Edwards and Clinton by name. "Part of the problem John would have in a general election is the issues he's taken on now are not the issues or the things that he said four years ago, which always causes problems in general elections," Obama said of Edwards, referring to his vote for the bankruptcy bill and the trade deal with China.

Regarding Clinton, he said, "And Senator Clinton doesn't beat all five of them because you start off with half of the country not wanting to vote for her."  

Though the conventional wisdom in Iowa is that a candidate tries to stay above the fray in the week leading up the caucuses, Obama's willingness to target the other candidates in the race may reflect the incredibly tight race in Iowa and recent polls that show both Edwards and Clinton rising in recent weeks.

A spokesman for a rival campaign said of Obama's attacks, "The Los Angeles Times [poll] was the second in a week to show him sinking to third place in Iowa. Is it mere coincidence that he's going negative or turning up the heat and retooling his stump speech as his numbers began to sink?"

To stress its electability argument, Obama's campaign released a series of poll numbers that showed him leading Republicans in a two-way race in a general election.

But even Obama acknowledged that for a progressive Democrats to win wide margins among conservative Republicans may be a pipe dream. "I understand that there are going to be Republican operatives that don't want to know what I'm going to say. I'm not trying to persuade Rush Limbaugh that I'm going to be a good president; you know I know he's not voting for me. I'm not trying to you know persuade the chief lobbyist for Exxon mobile about why we need to free ourselves from the dependence on foreign oil. He's not going to be persuaded," Obama said.

In talking about the power of hope, Obama also stepped outside of himself to take a look at his own candidacy in which his race could be a handicap if he were to run as the first African-American president.

"I'm a black guy running for president named Barack Obama. I must be hopeful."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

7 out of 10 of my republican friends said they would vote for Obama.  Need I say more?
The guy is nuts! Other than Kuchini he is the least electable of the bunch with Hillary a close second. Most electable? Joe Biden!
I was a republican, now I am an independent, just because I cannot handle politics anymore.  But I will vote for Obama come the day, just cause I do not want Hilary to win the nomination
Obama hopes he will win because his wife won't let him run again. Right this is who I want for President!I guess she will tell him how to do his job too. They are both the 2 most arrogant people I have ever seen.The speech the 2 of them gave was like a threat to vote for him now or never. Get real. I vote never.
All are just WORDS. Yes, they are very appealing, but they are just words. Too much unknown there and it is too risk to give someone our heart based on just the words. Cool down and think. This is the country's future we are talking about. He may be a great leader, but he needs to show his capacity by his actions, but not just his attractive words. Lilly, MI.
Let's set a few things straight. Most Dems think that all of the Dems and leaning Independents will automatically vote for the nominee regardless.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  As many people won't vote for Obama as won't vote for Hillary. And let's not forget that this guy has yet to take a punch...period. Hillary jabbed him one time at one of the debates and he was off for 3 days.

But the worst thing about Obama is he is running the most cynical campaign ever. All of the hopeful rhetoric and messianic poses in the advertising is now giving way to the girlish sniping from Mr. "New Kind of Politics."  He doesn't help anyone down the ticket....something he shrugs off while talking about his new kind of politics.

If he wins, in a squeaker with no coattails, he will give th Republicans more of what they want than Pelosi and Reid have.  But he will still be the first Black President...which is the goal for him.  What he does after he's sworn in doesn't matter much to him.

Support a guy who wants to accomplish something other than getting elected like BHO and HRC. Dodd isn't moving, and Biden is a plagiarist, so Edwards is the guy.

I won't support Obama or anyone who supports him.
The Republicans want Obama as the nominee because they are just waiting to exploit his race, his Muslim father, and his juvenile record. Don't think they won't.
Republicans will do to Obama what they did to Harold Ford.

It doesn't matter Obama is losing Iowa.  More so by the day.

3 ads in 2 days?  That spells trouble for Obama with a capital 'T'.

They are either message testing via phone, or focus group testing and not getting responses they like.

They are in a tailspin, they rush a new ad up only to find it isn't pushing the right buttons and they try again.

Obama has to feel like he is running in his barefeet in sand, as Edwards and Clinton sprint away from him in their Nikes on hard pavement.
A vote for Obama is a wasted vote. He can out-do MTV with all the Hollywood hype & spin on his website, and try to make himself out to be the next JFK, but in reality, he doesn’t have the gravitas, or the power to lead the world’s only super power. Besides, a guy name Barack Hussein Osama has as much chance of becoming President of the United States, as a guy name Hitler would ever have becoming the leader of Austria or Germany. It's never going to happen in a nation of sound-bites, so don't waste your votes.

One day, a more qualified, truly African-American brother will become president, but it’s never going to be Barack … because he is white at the core.
It's true that Obama comes out better in the polls against any Republican candidate. I can't figure out why Hillary is claiming she is more electable when he clearly does better in the polls.  She just thinks she is owed the presidency for some reason.  Maybe for putting up with Bill as a husband all those years.  I don't want another stupid president like Bush and I don't want another soap opera like the Clinton administration.  I have confidence that Obama’s intelligence and judgment will prove him to be the best choice for president.
Obama is right in what he's saying. I am an independant who supports him, but I know a lot of Republicans who like him also and see him as the best choice. The people I know and myself will never vote for Clinton. How she even gets the amount of support she has is beyond me. She claims experience, ok then Laura Bush is qualified to be president. Being in the senate and being wrong on important votes shouldn't give anayone the confidence she'll get it right in the future. Edwards did nothing in the senate to fight corporations or lobbyists, so why should anyone think he'll do it in the future?
My brotherS and sisters , Obama is the guy to look for.  And I can bet that he will be  the nominee for the democratic party
Edwards supporters complain that he doesn't get enough media attention but to the extent he does get attention, he'll go down in the polls.  Whats the percentage of the public that knows he just built a 28,000 sq. ft. house?  Probably not 10%.  That kind of stuff is poison.  

40% will get out and vote just to stop Clinton so she only has 60% of the electorate to campaign to and the Republican candidate only needs to carve out less than a fifth of that; if he gets a quarter of it, its a landslide Republican win.  God willing, they'll get out in the primaries to stop her and end the suspense.  
I'm a democrat--and proud of it.  I will vote for the democratic nominee in November.  All of the candidates are well-reasoned, well-intentioned individuals--each with strengths and weaknesses.
That being said--the world stage is a few breaths away from imploding, and I listen to what each candidate is saying and I've got to tell ya---Senator Clinton has presented herself in a manner that I believe is most in-touch with the larger implications and global positioning.  Cup of tea or not, the lady was prescient in her concerns regarding Pakistan. And as much as I abhor the war, I agree that though her decision to support the war was "ill-advised" she is right to never apoloize.  Courage means never having to say your sorry!  She is the one I will caucus for.  HRC is the toughest, most prepared of the lot!    
Whatever ...  We the people vote for JOHN EDWARDS.
Wake up you Obama loving sychophants, he can never be elected president of the United States.  He does not represent the common man.  He went to a posh high school in Hawaii and Harvard.  His history prior to this election has shown him to be a corporate lackey and supported by his Harvard elitist friends.  He does not represent the common man.  If he did, he  would have received more endorsements from Unions.  He crys about the 527s because they are funded by Union dollars.  His attacks against 527s are an attack against the working men and women in the unions themselves.  You Obama lovers look at him and think becuase he is black he had a tough life.  Wake up!  Did he work through high school and college in a mill town?  No-- he was using dope on the beaches of Hawaii and living the high life at Harvard.  He does not represent the common man.  The only one who represents the common man is John Edwards.  Obama is a darling of corporate America and Harvard elitists.
Obama isn't afraid to cite the statistics we care about, and he isn't lying.  As much as Edwards and Clinton supporters hate it, Obama is the most electable Democrat.  He has the support, he has the record, it's time to stand up.  Let's not watch Huckabee, Romney, or Giuliani take the White House again.  Let's vote for a candidate who will win the general election.

Obama '08
........all peopel smile in the same language.

VOTE - HILLARY CLINTON - THE CHANGE MACHINE FOR 2008.

HILLARY is experienced and she is ready to do the Presidential duties on day one.

HILLARY is well educated and she can get the job done.

HILLARY is a very hard worker and she will work for change for America.

HILLARY will do great things for America - she is truly commited.

HILLARY IS THE CHANGE MACHINE FOR AMERICA AND
HILLARY IS READY TO GET THE WHEELS OF CHANGE ROLLING FOR ALL AS PRESIDENT.

YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!
YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!
YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!

~~~~~~~~Who Let The Dogs Out~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~Who Let The Dogs Out~~~~~~~~~

YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!
YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!
YOU  GO  GIRL!!!!!!!!!!
I am an independent that has always voted Democrat.I have followed this campain very very closely , and i do know one thing for sure...........I would cross party lines to vote against Hillary Clinton.The more i have seen of her , the less i trust her , and the less i like her,i see her as a very Dishonest person that doesn't know how to give a simple straight answer to ANYTHING.

Obama is without a doubt the best option for the Democrats , and i really think he is the only one that has a very good chance of winning the White House.

Edwards just doesn't have what it takes to go all the way , and we already know that to be true from the last time. But i would vote for Edwards if he was to be the nominee.

If Hillary Clinton does get the nomination this country will have a record voter turn out to keep her out of the White House , and there will be countless people crossing party lines to stop her.

I have never voted Republican in my life , but i surely will this time if Clinton wins the nomination.
Are we talking of Obama who proudly refers to his grandmother living in a hut in Kenya while promoting family values and fighting poverty.Is this the arrogant self serving politician that thinks he will get a piece of the Republican vote? Peddle your snake oil to the Democrats they tend to believe in the tooth fairy and such things as your and Clinton silliness.
We've been at this winnowing process for nearly a year and we still have people thinking Hillary has more experience to run the Executive Branch than the other candidates, supposedly because she's spent more time in the White House?  She's had a couple extra years as a Senator; doing what?  What major legislative work has she authored, in seven years.  

Many of we Dems would love to see a woman President, that's not the issue.  What is at issue is that two years after her husband won the Presidency, we lost control of Congress, and we didn't get it back for 12 years.  Then, about 6.5 years into the 8, he loses all common sense and the Republicans have a hay day, dragging we Dems through the muck.  They catch Bill in a lie, drag him through an impeachment process where he narrowly escapes (by a mere 5 votes in the Senate), or he would have been run out of town on a rail.  Now Hillary claims some kind of superior experience because she was his wife during THIS time?  That she even stayed his wife shows begs the question of why, but that's not even the point -- the point is she saying that these 8 years of helping to plan dinners, pick the color of the drapes, and work for two years on a health care initiative that failed gives her "Presidential experience" is like my wife saying she knows how to sell Real Estate because we've been married for 8 years, or me manage associations.  That is outright goofy!  Of all 5 Dem candidates, she is the LEAST likely to win the general election!  

Dems -- if you loved that impeachment process, remember that the Repubs would like to finish it -- on Hillary.  She energizes their base.  If she wins the nomination, kiss the Oval Office good-bye for four more years.  To think otherwise is to remain, in a word, ignorant of the facts.  Kind of a Bush-light.  Obama & Edwards points, and they are right.  
Talk is cheap. Show me the money. What has Obama done? I can not believe that we Democrats would throw our support on a wish and a prayer - or HOPE! I'm listening. Convince me. I think Republicans would love to see Obama as the Democratic candidate. They will mop the floor with him during the election campaign. Why? Because Republicans are organized and they support their own. Democrats are too wishy-washy. If we don't like the choices, we just stay homw on election day. We will give the Republicans exactly what they want. As soon as the going gets tough, we turn tail and run. I'm sorry. I'm not wasting my vote on someone who spent his only year in the senate running for president. What record? He has none.
Barrack Obama will be electable if he can serve the Senate he was elected to do at least for one term and establish a record of achievement. His considered to have honesty and integrity because he can talk well and portray others as worse than him? To some of us he comes across as phony given his too many 'present' votes, skipping the vote on Iran and being silent about it until he was sure how the wind was blowing (after all he had sponsored similar legislation himself) and just not doing his Senate duties fully(missing many of his Veteran sub committee votes). If you want to assure another 4 years of Republican rule in the foot steps of George W vote for Mr Obama in this primary!
Barrack Obama will be electable if he can serve the Senate he was elected to do at least for one term and establish a record of achievement. His considered to have honesty and integrity because he can talk well and portray others as worse than him? To some of us he comes across as phony given his too many 'present' votes, skipping the vote on Iran and being silent about it until he was sure how the wind was blowing (after all he had sponsored similar legislation himself) and just not doing his Senate duties fully(missing many of his Veteran sub committee votes). If you want to assure another 4 years of Republican rule in the foot steps of George W vote for Mr Obama in this primary!
Perhaps (and hopefully) I'm just being overly cynical, but I believe if Obama ends up the nominee, he'd better hope things are going well overseas in November '08, as otherwise, the GOP nominee can easily play the fear, or better yet, "this guy has no foreign policy experience" card. Unlike Hillary, who has put herself in such centrist, cautious position that she can veer pro-war/anti-war as she wishes; politics as usual, but ultimately, it's pitch-perfect thinking for the generals.
Here is why he should be President:  He brings people together.  You will not get legislation passed by the U.S. Congress when half the country cannot stand you.  That is Hillary's greatest problem.  We need a leader who can reconcile people's differences to address substantive problems.  I'm proudly voting for an African American candidate who bridges the racial divide.  May the citizens of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and the rest of the nation join me.
To the poster who keeps saying Obama did not vote or he voted 'present' I ask you, is a president required to vote on anything? No, he VETOS!!! At this ponit Obama is making a case for his electability at the general election not for democratic nomination.
To Rita Morgan,  
The question you should ask yourself at this point is what do you think of him as a person? Does he appeal to non-democrats as well? That is what you should be thinking as a democrat going in to vote. You agree that he was against the war yet you cite that he would have voted for it if he were in the Senate at the time? What do you really want as a democrat?
I thought democrats were 'against' the war or is that just a meaningless posturing? Is that why your colleagues in the Senate and House keep giving Bush what he wants to continue this war? What are your personal convictions of any issue? The republicans are winning o the issue of the war why? CONVICTIONS!!
What about you, o democrat?
Rita Morgan,
You did not hear about it because he was an unknown at the time when the war was a popular choice.
As a lifelong dem and sometime student of history I find many of the above remarks to be surprising at least.  Having worked for two very progressive U.S. Senators I certainly recognize the double talk we get from Sen. Clinton and her entire campaign.  Let's look one more time at her experience:

Arkansas:  disconcerting years in the practice of law
          First Lady to Govenor Bill Clinton

Washington DC:  First Lady to President Bill Clinton
               Portfolio:  Universal Health Care (the next time she talks about the scars she has to show for her efforts in this regard...someone needs to remind her that the Nation is still suffering from scars she inflicted on all of us and the damage she inflicted on this important cause -- Hillary set this cause back 14 to 15 years at the very least.  Is this truly the kind of experience we are looking for in our next President?

I have said it before and I'll say it again:  If you are looking to send a steak back to the White House kitchen...then talk to Hillary!  Or if you need to better understand the protocals of serving tea to visiting foreign heads of state or decorate the White House for Christmas...then Hillary is your girl!  

This nation is desperately in need of inspiring leadership and vision;  this nation is aching for leadership which will bring the parties back to the table to work collectively to advance the interests of this nation and the world; this nation stands in need of a president who will truly lead us into this yet new century with dignity and grace.  We need Barack Obama!
I had the opportunity to hear Senator Obama in Seattle on December 11.  I've been to a number of political events in my time, but at the Generation Obama concert, his speech was electrifying.  When he said that when he was President, the first thing that he would do is go to the United Nations and say, "America's Back", that was the first time in a Long time that I was proud to be an American.

The differences between Obama, Clinton and Edwards on policy are not materially significant in comparision to the general divide between the parties on policy; however, what Obama brings to the table is an ability to inspire everyone -- Democrat, Republican and Independent -- to come together and solve the big issues our country faces at the beginning of this 21st century.
Rita,

Don't believe the Clinton message on Obama.

As a member of the minority party of the Senate for six of his eight years, Obama accomplished the following:

   * He expanded healthcare to include 154,000 people in Illinois (including 70,000 children which was an additional 20,000 over the previous plan)
   * Legislation mandating videotaping of homicide interrogations
   * A law to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they stopped
   * A welfare reform law
   * An earned-income-tax-credit law for working-poor families
   * Death penalty reform that passed unanimously
   * Worked with both Democrats and Republicans in drafting successful legislation on ethics and health care reform
   * Promoted increased subsidies for child care
   * During his last two years in the majority, he sponsored 780 bills, 280 of which became law

----

While in the US Senate Obama has worked on the following legislation:

   * Lugar-Obama, a bill that expands the Nunn-Lugar cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons, including shoulder-fired missiles and anti-personnel mines
   * "Coburn-Obama Transparency Act" provides for a web site, managed by the Office of Management and Budget, listing all organizations receiving Federal funds from 2007 onward, and providing breakdowns by the agency allocating the funds, the dollar amount given, and the purpose of the grant or contract
   * "Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act," which had his name on it as the first sponsor
   * “Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007” with Sen.  Russ Feingold (D-WI) in strengthening restrictions on travel in corporate jets to Senators
   * An amendment to the “2008 Defense Authorization Act” with Kit Bond (R-MO) adding safeguards for personality disorder military discharges, and calling for a review by the Government Accounting Office following reports that the procedure had been used inappropriately to reduce government costs
   * "Iran Sanctions Enabling Act" supporting divestment of state pension funds from Iran's oil and gas industry,
   * Legislation to prevent nuclear terrorism with Chuck Hagel (R-NE)
   * Senate amendment to the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to provide one year of job protection for family members caring for soldiers with combat-related injuries
   * Reintroduced the “Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act” helping veterans transition from the DOD health system to the VA system by extending the window in which new veterans can get mental health care from two years to five years.
   * Authored “Sheltering All Veterans Everywhere Act (SAVE Act)” to strengthen and expand federal homeless veteran programs that serve over 100,000 homeless veterans annually
   * Led the fight on "Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act", which has passed the House of Representatives and the Senate Judiciary Committee, will enable investigations into deceptive and fraudulent practices
Fellow Democrats,

Pragmatics:

1) Hillary has a consistent 50% negative rating

2) A negative rating is an indicator of of two things: how well you are known and how much people like you.  Once set, negative ratings are very very hard to change.

3) Many, many polls show string dislike for Hillary among persons of every party

Please don't throw your vote away to nostalgia.

Pragmatics, pragmatics, pragmatics.
Tom Newport Beach I have heard the expression "Damned by faint praise" all my life your post for Obama is a good example he is good but not as good as Fred Thompson.
I just watched Barack on Meet the Press this Morning , and the Message was " New , Fresh " , and I really liked the part where he said he would Run the Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups out the Door on a Rail , and Get the Policy of Whats Good for the Majority back in the Business of the American People , so for Me thats better than hearing Hillary Clinton say she was all For talking Lobbyist Money , and didn't see a problem there . Thats means More of the Same Double Standard In Washington , The same old Cave-in methods , thats the Experience the Clintons are talking about , and by the way did they get the " S " on the Clintons new stationary thats says , " Presidents Clintons " this time , because I heard on Meet the Press this Morning Bill Clinton talking on the Charlie Rose show , and it sounded like he was Touting his and Hillarys presidency experience back in the 1990s as better than a roll of the dies on Barack , and I was wondering if we are going to be getting that " Double Standard Stationary " again if the Presidences Clintons get back in again ????
America needs a New Direction in Washington , not the same Lobbyists in bed with the same Politicians over and Over , if the American Dream has a chance to survive. how many were living the dream back in 1999 and 2000 ???? as the Dot Com Bubble went down , but did it effect any of those who are running for President today ????? I wonder if the Special Interest and Lobbyist Groups lost their livings during that time , that basically was a Booking Cooking going on that lasted just long enough for the Presidences Clintons to get out of Washington before the market collapsed in 2001
Rita Morgan-Robinson Oregonia, Ohio 45054

You posted that three times. Do you think if you click your heels, your OPINION becomes fact?

Geeez
Obama is the candidate that can bring true change, he is honest and fresh it is time for a new direction. Hillary is too calculating, being a former first lady doesnt make more qualified just as being the wife of a doctor doesnt make you a doctor
Somehow I'm reminded of the 1960 campain for the Dems nomination for president. The candidates were
Adlai Stevenson, Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon Johnson,
Ross Barnett, Pat Brown, Wayne Morse, Stuart Symington and John Kenedy; to mention a few. As I
remember it was the guy with the least experience and the most vision that won. Support Obama!
where are these polls that show Obama the only one beating all the republicans.

Cnn did a poll that showed him in statistical ties with almost all of them and a dead heat with Mcain.

Sorry yall, Edwards is it. Face facts and dont believe the hype
The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.

This is what's happening to YOUR house. All the 'money' and 'equity' you though you had saved - eliminated! The equtiy through falling house prices - and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you're reading about gets created by printing money  and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less - where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think  you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He's the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.
Given the present state of the United States, the "Inconvenienth Truth" of our global environment ('the Global Warming problem')and detiorating reputation Worldwide of the American Adminstration, is voting for Obama the best choice that posible can be. The argument about his inexperience is not valid. Obama has more experience now, than when Bill Clinton was ellected in 1992.

Question 1: Will be a difference between a Bill and a Hillary Clinton's administration? I think none. In those days Hillary has always been the 'back-office' of Bill's administration. She has always been the invisable director behind the skirts, besides the moments of Bill's 'inappropriated relationship' with 'Monica Lewinsky'in office. This became know as the 'Lewinksy Scandal'.

Question 2: Does Hillary gone save Washington of Scandals? I don't think so. Should I named the complete row of scandals, for example 'White Water'? I don't think so. Voting for Hillary is getting the same of Bill Clinton past Adminstrations with one big difference, Hillary will be this time at the 'front-office' and not at the 'back-office'. In other words, they are 'trading places' or they make a comeback of the past. Is this what the USA and the World is waiting for? I don't think so.


Vote Obama for President of USA
It's really time for Real Change.
People outside Chicago don't see what a typical sleazy Chicago Democrat Barack Hussein Rezkobama is. Obama is corrupt and has taken money from numerous special interests. Rezmar Corp, New Kenwood LLC, the insurance lobby, sweetheart stock deals in SkyTerra and AVI Biopharma, on and on... Look it up!
I have spent my whole life in Chicago, the most corrupt city in the most corrupt county (Cook) in America. Barrack Hussein Rezkobama is a bought and paid for crooked Chicago Democrat. If Rezkobama is so honest let him come clean about the $200000+ in donations from indicted Chicago slumlord Antoin "Tony" Rezko. In June 2005, Obama bought a mansion on the South Side for $1.65 million,$300,000 less than the asking price. On the same day, Rezko's wife, Rita Rezko, bought the vacant lot next door from the same seller. The owner had listed the properties for sale together. He sold the house to Obama for $300,000 below the asking price but got his asking price on the lot from Rezko's wife.

Last year, Rita Rezko sold a strip of that vacant lot to Obama for $104,500 -- a deal Obama later apologized for, acknowledging that people might think he got a favor from Rezko. Obama called the episode "boneheaded" and a "mistake." So much for your "brilliant" Obama, and this is the man you want with his finger on the nuclear button!

Obama claims he worked as a community organizer but here is what he really did- Rezko's New Kenwood LLC got letters of support from Obama, who represented a nearby Senate district. "I am writing in support of the New Kenwood LLC's proposal to build a ninety-seven unit apartment building at 48th and Cottage Grove for senior citizens," Obama wrote in separate letters, each dated Oct. 28, 1998, to city and state housing officials. "This project will provide much needed housing for Fourth Ward citizens." At the time he wrote the letters, Obama was also a lawyer with Miner Barnhill & Galland, the law firm Davis formerly headed. Among the firm's clients were several companies owned by Davis and Rezko (Rezmar Corporation, look it up!). Davis and Rezko hired Daley & George, the law firm of the Chicago Mayor Richard Daley's brother Michael, to help them get $3.1 million from bonds issued by the city of Chicago. Rezko and Davis paid the city $1 for the land and spent more than $100,000 to clean it up, including the removal of an underground storage tank. Some tainted land was left behind, but state environmental officials approved construction after Rezko and Davis agreed to cover the polluted areas with parking lots, sidewalks or three feet of dirt, records show. You see how Rezkobama is deeply concerned about the environment! The $14.6 million Cottage View Terrace was funded entirely by city, state and federal taxpayers. The project included $855,000 in development fees for New Kenwood. Records don't show how Davis and Rezko split the money. Davis owned 51 percent of New Kenwood, Rezko 49 percent, according to the records. For more details look it up in the Chicago Sun Times newspaper!

Barack Hussein Rezkobama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko's successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens. The deal included $855,000 in development fees for Rezko and his partner, Allison S. Davis, Obama's former boss, according to records from the project, which was four blocks outside Obama's state Senate district. Obama's letters, written nearly nine years ago, for the first time show the Democratic presidential hopeful did a political favor for Rezko -- a longtime friend, campaign fund-raiser and client of the law firm where Obama worked -- who was indicted last fall on federal charges that accuse him of demanding kickbacks from companies seeking state business under Illinois Democratic Governor Blagojevich. In addition to a land deal, Sen. Barack Obama's ties to indicted dealmaker Antoin "Tony" Rezko include an internship the senator provided the son of a contributor at the request of Rezko, an Obama spokesman confirmed Saturday. John Aramanda served as an intern for Obama in 2005, said Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs. His father is Joseph Aramanda, a Rezko business associate who was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal corruption case against Rezko. Aramanda has contributed $11,500 to Obama since 2000, Gibbs said.


The Democrats bemoan the high cost of healthcare and claim it is due to the greed of insurance and pharmaceutical firms, then perhaps Barrack Hussein Rezkobama can explain how the University of Chicago Hospitals can afford to pay Michelle Obama a $316,962-a-year position as vice president for community and external affairs. I guess you can't run a hospital without a VP of Community Affairs and those jobs require at least $300K+ salary. Perhaps this would be better spent on patient care! The U of C Hospitals are right in Obama's Hyde Park neighborhood, how convenient! Who got Michelle Obama the job? Did Tony Rezko pull some strings?

WAKE UP! The Democrats are left-wing socialists. Democrats like to cry about stolen elections because they are the experts on that subject- there has not been a Republican mayor of Chicago for over 80 years! That is not the will of the people, that is one party rule where pawns on bloated patronage payrolls owe their jobs to the Democrats!

Vote Early and Vote Often!

Big Al
Obama is absolutely NOT electable.  His Muslim heritage is the reason.
In terms of electability in November, Obama has a huge advantage over Hillary. In theory, she would probably be a decent president, but she is far too polarizing to ever win a general election. If Hillary is having this much trouble against her Democratic opponents, it does not bode well for her fortunes in an election where she will facing a huge smear campaign that Republicans are itching to unload on her if she's on the ballot. It's fascinating how the Republican candidates love to mention Hillary as a way of turning out voters but they will seldom speak Obama's name. You could argue that she's more of a lightning rod than abortion or gay marriage.

For a party that is having difficulty mobilizing their base, the GOP's job would become much easier if Hillary were the Democratic nominee. Even if the pro-life "family values" Christian voters have reservations about the Republican nominee (whoever it may be), they would show up in droves just to vote against her. However, if Obama is on the ballot in November, many of the anti-Hillary conservatives will simply stay home and complain about what the world is coming to. Many Democratic voters are either unaware of this or they are so loyal to Clinton that they turn a blind eye to her general election weaknesses.

Anyone whose had any exposure to conservative political circles knows that a huge chunk of the country has hated Hillary for decades and they always will regardless of what she has done or said since her husband left office. Obama has far less baggage and GOP smear campaign fodder. Some Christian conservatives are genuinely intrigued by him because he seems more authentic and coherent when talking about his faith as opposed to Hillary who sounds mechanical and pre-programmed whenever she tries to discuss anything related to religion.

The GOP candidates won't admit it, but they strongly prefer to run against Hillary. She's an easy target and their best hope to keep the White House in Republican hands until 2012. You'll have a hard time finding any religious conservative over 35 who could be persuaded vote for Hillary. However, many of them have still not made up their minds about Obama which opens up the possibility for him to win their support in a long election season.

Bottom line: Clinton could still get the nomination, but she can't win in November. Obama's biggest challenge is beating Hillary in the primaries, but if he does, Obama has the chance to unite the country in favor of true change and win the general election comfortably.
I don't know what it is, but I just don't think people can connnect with Hillary. There is no doubt she is an intelligent woman, but she comes off too scripted and too ingenuine. I want to give her a fair chance, but something just doesnt sit well with me. She is too polarizing and I dont think we can take that chance in the general election...
I AM a staunch Republican. BUT if Obama wins (and I HOPE he does) he WILL get my vote.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=538522

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google