ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Edwards: Message not money

Posted: Monday, December 31, 2007 6:17 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Tricia Miller
EMMETSBURG, Iowa -- In Edwards' third event of the day, a caucus-goer at the Pizza Ranch here asked a question that has been on everyone's mind: How can Edwards win the presidency within the limits of public financing?

The man said he had heard from other campaigns, specifically naming Michelle Obama, that Edwards would not have the finances to sustain his candidacy. David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, hosted a conference call and sent out a related spreadsheet this morning. Part of the spreadsheet crunched Edwards' campaign funding numbers, explaining that because the former North Carolina senator accepted public financing and its limitations, he would not have the funding to sustain his candidacy through the Democratic National Convention on Aug. 25.

Edwards jumped at the chance to counter.

"We have plenty of money to run a serious campaign,” he said, “but I just want to say how unbelievably weak it is to be arguing that you should be the candidate because you have more money than the other candidate. I mean, really -- does that convince anybody that that's who you should caucus for? You shouldn't even be here if that's what you're looking for!

“I mean, we could all just have our campaign fundraising events, send the totals in, the elections are over before you ever cast a vote! I don't think that's the way this works. I think you get to actually decide who you think is strongest, who has the fight, who has the ideas, and who's ready to be President of the United States. And I think that's exactly what's going to happen on Thursday night when you go to caucus."

Pressed further by reporters after the event, Edwards elaborated.

"If we are able to win the nomination,” he said, “and we're obviously moving in very strong right now, then what that means is, I will have beaten two celebrity candidates who between them have spent $200-250 million because of the strength of this message of stopping corporate greed, restoring the middle class, making the promise of America available to every American in a very personal way.

“It's because that message will have driven right through all of that money. And once you -- once I'm the nominee, if I've beaten them, having been outspent in ways that I just spoke about, taking on the Republican who's carrying George Bush's baggage will be a piece of cake. And I will have plenty of money, and I will have the bully pulpit, and I will have principled, convicted stands, which is what you need to be able to win the presidency."

But note this from a Sept. 28 Washington Post article: "While leading Howard Dean's campaign for the Democratic nomination in 2003, [Edwards adviser Joe] Trippi told The Washington Post that this 'campaign believes that any Democratic campaign that opted into the matching-funds system has given up on the general election,' Trippi said. 'There is absolutely no way you can sustain the hits that are going to come from now until August with a $45 million limit.'"

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Mitt Romney and the Man Boy Love Association I could never vote for a man that has that support.
"Message not money"? But Edwards has neither. Time for Liz to strike up another conversation with Ann Coulter.
Money indeed does matter........it matters WHO"S money they are accepting......as that tells all of us WHO they are truly working for. If you take special interests money....your working for them....if you take the media's money...your going to get their news coverage but expect to have to pay back once your in office!......if you take only public financing....your truly working for the people, you only OWE the people...you stand for change FOR the people...the rest are just like all the rest......open your eyes and see the difference make up your own minds based on real facts...look at history........don't be spoon fed your opinions....take those O'rose and HIllarose colored blinders off!
Deborah, Iowa--Deborah, Iowa (Sent Tuesday, January 01, 2008 11:47 AM)
**Thank you for making the point that it does matter who's money you are accepting.  Both Clinton--to a degree and Obama are relying on small donors (at least in large part), so they are also working for the people and standing for change for the people.  The honesty of the matter is that Edwards accepted public financing because he had to in order to compete.  It is spin that he accepted the money to step on a soap box about what is right in politics, pure spin.
Edwards is the candidate that is telling it like it is. I believe he will fight for the middle class. Corporate greed is killing the American Dream. If you're a middle class American, you have to know its time to do something about health care in this Country. Edwards has the best plan and has given the most detailed plan. His message is right on. It's up to us to hear it.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=541188

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google