ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



First thoughts: One day to Iowa

Posted: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:27 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
DES MOINES, IA -- One day until the caucuses… As we've noted before, everyone in Iowa is a prisoner of anecdotes right now, because what else do we have to go on? The Des Moines Register poll? Um, no. Anyway, one thing that we picked up yesterday while watching the candidates: Clinton, Obama, and Romney seem a heckuva lot more comfortable on the trail than Edwards and Huckabee. Perhaps that makes a lot of sense because both Edwards and Huckabee HAVE to do well here to take off, while the other three have the resources to reboot their campaign in another state. Obviously, not doing well here will be a problem for Clinton, Obama and Romney -- but not nearly as lethal as doing poorly here would do to Edwards and Huckabee. No wonder the two are pressing.

*** If you haven’t seen enough ads… : And as far as final pitches go, Hillary airs her two-minute appeal on local Iowa TV tonight, and in its she says, " I know you've waited a long time for a president who can see you and hear you, and I would like to be that president. So I ask you to caucus for me tomorrow. Put on your coats, call up a friend, and help me change America.  If you stand with me for one night, I will stand up for you every day as your president.  I'll work my heart out to bring the country we love the new beginning it needs.  And I will be ready to start on day one. " Obama and Edwards also have bought time on Iowa TV to air their closing pitches.

*** Was Mike Henry right? While Clinton does have the resources to reboot her campaign if she loses here, the Politico’s Roger Simon asks a question that we’ve wondered as well: “Should Hillary Clinton have skipped Iowa? If she loses the caucus here Thursday, will her campaign wish it had listened to the advice it got last May to take a hike on the Hawkeye state? Back then, Clinton’s deputy campaign manager, Mike Henry, wrote a 1,500-word internal memo saying Iowa was not worth the effort. ‘My recommendation is to pull completely out of Iowa and spend the money and Senator Clinton’s time on other states,’ Henry wrote. ‘If she walks away from Iowa she will devalue Iowa - our consistently weakest state.’ Henry’s advice was never accepted.” By the way, one thing we'd like to consider: Had Obama, and not Clinton received the Des Moines Register endorsement, would the Clinton campaign started pivoting sooner to talking about a national campaign? And the Clinton camp begins the pivoting today with a conference call about the Feb. 5 Georgia primary, not coincidentally, the first primary Bill Clinton won in 1992.

*** John’s back, but where is Rudy? McCain comes back to Iowa. With pretty much every political reporter in the world here -- and looking for a fresh story to write or air -- expect McCain's return to Iowa to get major coverage, perhaps even surge-like coverage. A strong third place finish (even if it's 10 points behind second) could be enough to boomerang McCain in New Hampshire. But where's Rudy? We should have made more of this yesterday, but the candidate took two days off the trail -- two days! -- with less than a week to go before New Hampshire. He returns to the trail today to stump in New Hampshire, where he will unveil a new Afghanistan policy that calls for an Iraq-like military surge.

*** Here’s Huck… : Up until the last month or so, we’ve always wondered if Huckabee REALLY wants to win the GOP nomination. After all, it’s probably not incorrect to note that he’s met with members of the press more than with actual voters. And now, the AP writes, Huckabee is headed to California after a couple of Iowa events this morning to appear on Leno. This coming ONE DAY before the caucuses. “It's just an incredible opportunity to be there, particularly the very first night he's back from the writer's strike," Huckabee said. "Besides, if all else fails and this whole process doesn't work out, maybe he needs a sidekick and I'll be auditioning tomorrow." The Leno gambit might get some big play, but it might also reinforce the image that Huckabee is more interested in getting press than winning the presidency. 

*** Weather update: It is currently 2-degrees outside -- yes, it is THAT cold here -- and it is supposed to warm up to 15 degrees today. But Caucus Day will seem balmy by comparison: It’s expected to be mostly sunny in the Des Moines area on Thursday, with a high of 31 and a low of 21. And the weather in the rest of the state will be similar. 

*** On the trail: The final day of campaigning before the caucuses… Biden visits Burlington, Ottuwmwa, Oskaloosa, Coralville, and Cedar Rapids; Clinton stops in Indianola, Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Ottumwa, and Des Moines; Edwards campaigns in 12 different cities and towns, ending with a rally in West Des Moines featuring John Mellencamp; Huckabee hits Fort Dodge and Mason City; McCain returns to Iowa, visiting Dubuque, Davenport, and Urbandale; Obama is Davenport, Coralville, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo, and Des Moines; Paul -- welcome back to Iowa! -- spends his day in Des Moines; Romney stops in Bettendorf, Cedar Rapids, Clear Lake, and West Des Moines; and Thompson Mason City, Waterloo, Cedar Rapids, and Davenport; and Bill Clinton campaigns in Burlington, Dubuque, Waterloo, Mason City, and Des Moines.

Countdown to Iowa: 1 day
Countdown to New Hampshire: 6 days
Countdown to Michigan: 13 days
Countdown to Nevada and SC GOP primary: 17 days
Countdown to SC Dem primary: 24 days
Countdown to Florida: 27 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 34 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 307 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 384 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary Clinton IS ready to lead from day one.

She's a hard worker, down to earth and very smart.

Hillary Clinton will be a great president.  She will work hard for we middle working class people.

Hillary tells us exactly HOW she will change the present mess.  

What a waste of resources. MANBC has one of the best most secure polling tools anywhere, the CANDIDATES + ISSUES MATRIX http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21116732

And yet these "reporters" say things like,
"As we've noted before, everyone in Iowa is a prisoner of anecdotes right now, because what else do we have to go on? The Des Moines Register poll? Um, no."

You have a tamper proof-issue based-thought demanding polling tool and you ignore it. You don't promote it.
Is it because Ron Paul is once again soundly beating every other candidate - in both parties?
Iowa back Hillary for president
Clinton’s deputy campaign manager, Mike Henry, wrote a 1,500-word internal memo saying Iowa was not worth the effort.

While Hillary continues to fight in Iowa, the other people on her campaign team seem to have tried and derail her whether she wanted to or not.  It seems that the only person on the Hillary team that wants to do well in Iowa is Hillary.

Obama and Edwards also have bought time on Iowa TV to air their closing pitches.

Just think.....
After Thursday night, people in Iowa can go back to be the forgotten people....
A state known only for corn and meat and corn dogs...
I was all for the hope, change, the time is now message of Barack Obama.

But when it really comes down to it, I have changed my mind.  In the end, I have to go with Hillary Clinton.  With Pakistan and other hot spots, I have realized that America needs a strong, experienced leader to keep us safe.

Hope and hype sound great but in reality, I want hope, strength and leadership for change.

It's all wrapped up in one person  


Hillary Clinton
Barack the vote!!! Barack has stayed on message, it is unhealthy for any Democratic nation to have a dynasty. Change is good!!! We need change!! We need Barack!!! Let's show the WORLD that we are capable of change!!!
Mitt Romney,

Or should I say Flip Flopper Romney!
 
Mitt Romney's  Flip Flop Record

ABORTION

From the Left:

Romney ran against Senator Edward M. Kennedy in 1994. During a debate, Romney declared: "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it."
- Boston Globe, March 2, 2006

"I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose."
-2002 Questionnaire for the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL)
Boston Globe, July 3, 2005

From the Right:

"I am pro-life. I believe that abortion is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. I wish the people of America agreed, and that the laws of our nation could reflect that view. But while the nation remains so divided over abortion, I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate."
- Boston Globe, Op-Ed, July 26, 2005

More from the Right:

"Every decision I have made as Governor in a very liberal state has been on the side of favoring life." – Governor Romney

- Robert Behre, "Romney Gets S.C. Support," Charleston Post-Courier, January 30, 2007

STEM CELL RESEARCH

From the Left:

"Romney has decided to support experimentation on surplus frozen embryos from in-vitro fertilization procedures."
- National Review Online, February 11, 2005

"At a campaign appearance at Brandeis University in June 2002, Romney strongly endorsed stem cell research."
- Boston Globe, December 17, 2006  Read the article

From the Center:

"Governor Mitt Romney set off a storm of criticism yesterday after he declared in a published interview that he favored banning a specific type of stem cell research. Scientists and the leader of the state Senate accused him of trying to block a promising avenue of research, even as antiabortion groups assailed him for declaring that he did not object to stem cell research involving embryos from fertility clinics."
- Boston Globe, February 11, 2005  Read the article

From the Right:

"I studied the issue for many months, and entered into conversation with experts from across the nation who were looking for consensus solutions, like Stanford's Dr. William Hurlbut.  In the end, I became persuaded that the stem-cell debate was grounded in a false premise, and that the way through it was around it: by the use of scientific techniques that could produce the equivalent of embryonic stem cells but without cloning, creating, harming, or destroying developing human lives."
- Governor Mitt Romney, Op-Ed, "A Stem-Cell Solution," National Review Online, June 15, 2007

EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION

From the Left:

"When he ran for governor in 2002, Romney said he supported expanding access to the emergency contraception pill, a high dose of hormones that women can take to prevent pregnancy up to five days after sex . . . On a questionnaire Planned Parenthood gave to the gubernatorial candidates in 2002, Romney answered 'yes' to the question, 'Do you support efforts to increase access to emergency contraception?' "
- Boston Globe, July 7, 2005

From the Right:

"Yesterday I vetoed a bill that the Legislature forwarded to my desk. Though described by its sponsors as a measure relating to contraception, there is more to it than that. The bill does not involve only the prevention of conception: The drug it authorizes would also terminate life after conception."
- Governor Mitt Romney, Op-Ed, "Why I Vetoed The Contraception Bill," Boston Globe, July 26, 2005  Read the article

GAY RIGHTS

From the Left:

"All citizens deserve equal rights, regardless of their sexual orientation. While he does not support gay marriage, Mitt Romney believes domestic partnership status should be recognized in a way that includes the potential for health benefits and rights of survivorship."
- Romney's 2002 campaign website

"Mitt and Kerry Wish You a Great Pride Weekend! All citizens deserve equal rights, regardless of their sexual preference"
- A flier handed out at "Gay Pride" by the Romney/Healey Campaign  See the flier here

"We have discussed a number of important issues such as the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which I have agreed to co-sponsor, and if possible broaden to include housing and credit, and a bill to create a federal panel to find ways to reduce gay and lesbian youth suicide, which I also support. One issue I want to clarify concerns [grammar in context] President Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue" military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation's military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share…"
- Governor Romney letter to Log Cabin Republicans, October 6, 1994  Read the letter here

From the Right:

Lopez: "And what about the 1994 letter to the Log Cabin Republicans where you indicated you would support the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and seemed open to changing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the military? Are those your positions today?

Gov. Romney: "No. I don't see the need for new or special legislation. My experience over the past several years as governor has convinced me that ENDA would be an overly broad law that would open a litigation floodgate and unfairly penalize employers at the hands of activist judges...As for military policy and the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy, I trust the counsel of those in uniform who have set these policies over a dozen years ago. I agree with President Bush's decision to maintain this policy and I would do the same."
- Interview with National Review, December 14, 2006  Read the interview

MARRIAGE AMENDMENT

From the Left:

In 2002, before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court declared same-sex marriage protected by the Constitution, Romney denounced as "too extreme" the effort by pro-family groups to enact a preemptive state Marriage Protection Amendment prohibiting homosexual marriage, civil unions and same-sex public employee benefits.
- Boston Phoenix, May 14-20, 2004

From the Right:

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough: "Do you support a national constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage?"

Governor Romney: "Boy, I sure do. You know, that's a topic that's really, I think, very important to the country because marriage is not just about adults. Marriage is about the development and nurturing of kids, and in my view, the development of a child is enhanced by having a mom and dad. And so, I think it's very important that we have a national standard because marriage is a status. You get married in one place and then you move to another, you're still married at least in the eyes of the community and the children and the benefits may not follow you, but ultimately we're going to have one standard of marriage in this country and that standard ought to be one man and one woman."
- MSNBC's "Morning Joe" September 17, 2007

GUN RIGHTS

From the Left:

"He [Romney] is a supporter of the federal assault weapons ban."
- Romney 2002 campaign website

More from the Left:

In his 1994 US Senate run, Romney backed two gun-control measures strongly opposed by the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups: the Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on certain assault weapons.

"That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA," Romney told the Boston Herald in 1994.

At another campaign stop that year, he told reporters: "I don't line up with the NRA."
- Boston Globe, January 14, 2007  Read the article

From the Right:

"Americans should have the right to own and possess firearms as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution," said Governor Romney. "I'm proud to be among the many decent, law-abiding men and women who safely use firearms."
- Governor Romney, News Release, January 12, 2007

WAITING PERIODS FOR GUNS

From the Left:

Regarding the Brady Bill which required waiting periods to buy a handgun, Romney stated, "I don't think [the waiting period] will have a massive effect on crime but I think it will have a positive effect."
- Boston Herald, August 1, 1994

From the Right:

"Romney says he still backs the ban on assault weapons, but he won't say whether he stands by the Brady Bill.  And after the gun show tour, his campaign declined to say whether he would still describe himself as a supporter of tough gun laws."
- Boston Globe, January 14, 2007  Read the article

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE

From the Left:

"The minimum wage is important to our economy and Mitt Romney supports minimum wage increase, at least in line with inflation."
- Romney 2002 campaign website

From the Right:

Governor Mitt Romney yesterday rejected the Legislature's plan to raise the state minimum wage to $8 an hour over two years, angering Democratic lawmakers and advocates who accused him of abandoning a 2002 campaign pledge to significantly boost the pay of low-wage workers.
- Boston Globe, July 22, 2006  Read the article

EDUCATION

During his 1994 campaign for Senate he continually called for the abolishment of the Department of Education.
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

Governor Romney now supports the No Child Left Behind Act.
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

IMMIGRATION

From the Left:

In a November 2005 interview with the Boston Globe, Romney described immigration proposals by McCain and others as "quite different" from amnesty, because they required illegal immigrants to register with the government, work for years, pay taxes, not take public benefits, and pay a fine before applying for citizenship.

"That's very different than amnesty, where you literally say, 'OK, everybody here gets to stay,' " Romney said in the interview. "It's saying you could work your way into becoming a legal resident of the country by working here without taking benefits and then applying and then paying a fine."

Romney did not specifically endorse McCain's bill, saying he had not yet formulated a full position on immigration. But he did speak approvingly of efforts by McCain and Bush to solve the nation's immigration crisis, calling them "reasonable proposals."

Romney also said in the interview that it was not "practical or economic for the country" to deport the estimated 12 million immigrants living in the US illegally. "These people contribute in many cases to our economy and to our society," he said. "In some cases, they do not. But that's a whole group we're going to have to determine how to deal with."
- Boston Globe, March 16, 2007  Read the article

From the Right:

In his appeals to conservative voters, Romney has made the Arizona senator's work on immigration one of his favorite targets. When McCain and other senators unveiled the latest reform bill two weeks ago, Romney called it the "wrong approach" and immediately launched a television ad slamming "amnesty" for illegal immigrants.
- Boston Globe, June 1, 2007  Read the article

TAXES

From the Left:

"Governor Romney…imposed a slew of fee hikes and tax 'loophole' closures….The largest of these was $259 million worth of fee hikes in FY 2004, the bulk of which came from higher Registry of Deeds fees.  Smaller fee hikes, including higher charges for boaters and golfers, we imposed in FY 2003 and FY 2005.  Romney also sought $128 million worth of so-called tax loophole closures for FY 2004; $70 million for FY 2005; and $170 million for FY 2006, which were later reduced to $85 million due to backlash from business leaders."
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

"Romney continues to oppose the flat tax with harsh language, calling the tax 'unfair.'"
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

Romney didn't support President Bush's tax cuts in 2003.  That earned him praise from liberal Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)  
- Boston Globe, April 11, 2003.

From the Right:

"I said no to a tax hike; raising taxes hurts working people and scares away jobs. I also said no to more borrowing; borrowing just shifts our problems to the backs of our kids...Instead, I went after waste, inefficiency, duplication, and patronage."
- Governor Romney, Boston Globe, October 24, 2005

NO NEW TAXES PLEDGE

From the Left:

In 2002, Romney broke with his predecessor, Jane Swift, and Republican governors before her by declining to sign a written vow not to raise taxes once in office.

- Boston Globe, January 5, 2007  Read the article

From the Right:

Almost five years after he refused to sign a "no new taxes" pledge during his campaign for governor, Mitt Romney announced yesterday that he had done just that, as his campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination began in earnest.
- Boston Globe, January 5, 2007  Read the article

CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS

From the Left:

Governor Romney has changed his position on key campaign finance reform issues several times during public life. During his 1994 Senate campaign, he held far left positions that advocated for abolishing PACs and creating strict campaign spending limits.

- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

From the Right:

As he runs for President, Romney abandoned his previous stance and has come out as a harsh critic of McCain-Feingold, and those presidential candidates who support it. His transformation has even propelled him to call for the legislation's repeal.
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

ON HIS FAVORITE BOOK

From the Left:

He told Fox News his favorite book is L. Ron Hubbard's "Battlefield Earth"

From the Right:

He also told Fox news his favorite book is the The Bible

Or

Who Knows:

His MySpace page said his favorite book is "Huckleberry Finn"

Read more news articles on Mitt Romney's Record
Watch a video from Mitt Romney's 1994 debate with Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA
Why is MSNBC so fascinated with Clinton? The first two paragraphs of this article are about Clinton's campaign, the picture on the main page, is of Hilary. When you go to MSNBC's political section, surprise, there is a picture with a row of Clinton yard banners. I understand big business liking her, with the greed that is associated with rich CEO's severance packages and everything. (People loose their house and people on wall street get's bonuses)... Gesh, this country needs a change! Not the same old pacification of big business and their groupies (*cough* Clinton), we see where that took us (NAFTA, CAFTA, and HAVTA find a job in another country). Also time for a new "New's" outlet to get my news from...
The only clear choice is Barack Obama!! Review his policies, review his record!!

www.barackobama.com
*** Was Mike Henry right?--The answer of course is no.  The situation/people running is/are different.  Additionally, Clinton had to do two things: stress inevitability and keep Obama in the gates.  If she skipped Iowa, she couldn't have done either.  She hasn't lost yet, why the worry?

*** Weather update: Eastcoast Wussies!

Wow, Kucinich supporting Obama (Iowa only), I did not see that coming.  I've always found him to be the left wing of the Democratic party--adds more anti-war credentials to Obama.  So much for the argument that Democrats won't support Obama, which we knew not to be true to begin with.
I've flip flopped.  I admit it.

I was for Obama all through the summer and fall.
He was new and his early speeches were exciting.
Hope sounded great after George Bush.

But in the end, I'm for Clinton.  Experience and leadership won out.  

I just can't vote only on unspecific hope.
What's with the kid on CNN who said that Obama is busing thousands of kids in from Illinois to caucus for Obama.

If I lived in Iowa, I'd be mad as hell.  So Illinois is going to decide IOWA'S presidental nominee?

What if Edwards bussed in all those kids to his neighboring state South Carolina or Clinton bussed in kids to NH from NY.

Put that way, doesn't seem fair does it?

Don't think I would vote for a candidate who pulled those sneaky tricks.  It may be just barely legal but it is still dirty politics.
I'm surprised her loudest theme in these final hours before Iowa is that she will be ready "on day one."  Has anyone asked her exactly what she means by saying that?  Oh that's right, she doesn't take questions... unfortunate.  How could she so confidently make such a claim?  Yes, she did sleep in the same room with our former President while he was running the country, but I don't understand how that translates into her being ready on day one.  If you ask me, no one is truly ready to start on day one of their first term.  I want a candidates who can adapt quickly, not a candidate who has a set mentality about how things should be, this is the mentality which will render Clinton ineffective should she get the White House.  Bullheadedness.
Ronald B proclaims / 'Hillary tells us exactly HOW she will change the present mess.'

ronald I have been watching this campaign very closely for months and seem to have missed where hillary explained 'exactly' how she intends to do anything, do tell, enlighten me, I'm all ears
Fellow Democrats especially th first time voters regardless of the outcome of this caucus and the primaries do not lose your zeal for politics I am 82 years old and have voted for the lesser of two evils several times in my lifetime. If your candidate doesn't win the nomination and you stay home on election day 08 then you have no right to gripe about the outcome of the election. VOTE FOR THE NOMINEE IN NOVEMBER 08.
Hope, strength, and leadership for a change has been Senator Obama's message from day one.

And as Oprah said, "he is the one"!
Please leave all the Flip Flopping to me Mitt Romney this is something I do real good.
Hillary can't be elected. Anyone with almost 50% negative ratings is not going to be able to win over enough Independents and Republicans in order to win next November.

And the NY Times made a mockery of her claims that she was almost a co-president in the 1990s. And we all know how successful her health care reform policy was!

Her experience is one word - Bill. If she weren't still married to Bill Clinton, NO ONE would consider her a viable candidate.

I want Barack Obama to be our nominee. He shows he is the best suited to lead the Democrats as he is the ONLY candidate who had the wisdom and foresight to oppose the war in Iraq back in 2002. He has eleven years of legislative experience - more than Abraham Lincoln had in 1860 when he ran. (each had eight years in the Illinois State Legislature - but Lincoln served one two year term in the US House, while Obama will have completed four years in the US Senate) Obama was very successful at both the state and national level in reaching across party lines to effect real change. Prior to his legislative career he was a Chicago community organizer as well as a Constitutional Law professor. And the polls show he is the one Democrat who can win over every Republican.

Democrats - We want to win this year! We need to win this year! Please choose the best candidate! Please choose Barack Obama!
Kym

I have reviewed Barack Obama's policies.

That's why I'm voting for Hillary Clinton
Jerry has now resorted to lying about things he knows nothing about...typical republican slime bag from Texas....making up lies in the final moments of desparation.
More flip Flopping from Mitt Romney, do you really want a scumbag like this.

Governor Romney…imposed a slew of fee hikes and tax 'loophole' closures….The largest of these was $259 million worth of fee hikes in FY 2004, the bulk of which came from higher Registry of Deeds fees.  Smaller fee hikes, including higher charges for boaters and golfers, we imposed in FY 2003 and FY 2005.  Romney also sought $128 million worth of so-called tax loophole closures for FY 2004; $70 million for FY 2005; and $170 million for FY 2006, which were later reduced to $85 million due to backlash from business leaders."
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

"Romney continues to oppose the flat tax with harsh language, calling the tax 'unfair.'"
- Club for Growth's White Paper on Mitt Romney

The Governor would also seek to raise $128 million in revenue by closing corporate tax loopholes (Rick Klein, “Massachusetts Governor’s Proposed Budget Includes Layoffs, New Fees”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 2/27/2003)

Despite the governor's pledge of no new taxes, his proposal does increase some taxes and fees: The administration says it can collect an additional $70 million by "closing loopholes" in corporate and sales tax rules (Scott Greenberger, “Massachusetts Governor Sets $22.98 Billion Budget Blueprint”, Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, 1/29/2004)



“…business groups objected so strongly to a proposed $170 million tax increase that Romney snuffed the idea and proposed $85 million instead.” (Alexander Bolton, “Romney’s Tax Record Gets A Closer Look,”  The Hill, 3/27/2007)



Governor Romney even raised taxes on some New Hampshire residents who worked in Massachusetts, taxing their income and their pensions.  Learn more

At the start, I was for Hillary. It is about time this country elects a woman to be President. Let me say, I was really excited to have a woman of Hillary's quality be the one to finally break through and win. As time went on though, and I started to pay attention to what she said and who she is, second thoughts began to pop up. Just what does Hillary stand for? After all the campaigning, all the debates, and all the stump speeches, apparently Hillary stands for nothing. She seems to be nothing more then a hollow remnant of her husbands administration. For the life of me, I can't tell what Hillary stands for, what she has done, or what she will do if elected. I find this distressing because I was so certain that Hillary understood what she stood for, and would be able to communicate those beliefs to all of us. It hasn't happened. So, on the eve of the caucus, I'm one of those independents so many people talk about. I want to go with Hillary, but it my heart of hearts, I see myself being swayed to other candidates. It won't take much for me to move to either Edwards or Biden. Obama, while very popular, and from the next state over, still looks too young and inexperienced for me. My choice has now moved to John or Joe.
Hillary Clinton IS ready to lead from day one.

She's a hard worker, down to earth and very smart.

Hillary Clinton will be a great president.  She will work hard for we middle working class people.

Hillary tells us exactly HOW she will change the present mess.  

Ronald B (Sent Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:56 AM)

Sigh.....

Let's take Ronald B's words here one at a time....

Ready to lead.....
Who?  Her or Bill?

A Hard Worker.....
considering all the bipartisan commissions she has planned to fix whatever is wrong with this country, one has to wonder who will carry the load?

Down to Earth.....
considering you might be buried in the earth if you try and cross swords with her, that argument doesn't make any sense at all.

Very Smart...
That answer (one of five) she gave on drivers licenses shows she is about a yard shy of the first down.

Work hard for the middle class.....
Bill promised that too, that never materialized either.  Still waiting for that middle class tax cut you promised back in 1992 Bill....

Tells us how she will change the mess we are in....
Still waiting for that answer Ronald...

The answer is clear
Hillary is not the answer.....
U are one lying hack, Sam...
U have never been a supporter of Obama... U are probably from the clinton campaign... The only positive thing U've said about Obama, is on occasions, calling his name out right! Shame on U! U haven't done anything but distord the message of Obama for Hillary's gain! Hillary is NO GOOD... Her husband believes that she would be a great president because she has made mistakes. So maybe we should give Bush a third term, because by following tat logic, some might come to think that Bush would make one heck of a president on his #third# term; that is when Laura will run... The notion that Hillary's bid is even considered seriously is ridiculous!

OBAMA '08

friend of a rep0X
MKMO

Tell me exactly HOW in specifics HOW Obama is going to change, hope, and all his other rhetoric?  He's the one who talks about how he's the change agent, etc.

When I listen to him or his wife, they talk about the problems in this country, they talk about hope and the time is now.

What does that mean?  HOW are they going to change and what are they going to change and hope for to solve the problems they talk about.

Hillary does not spout lofty rhetoric.  

Did you listen to Clinton at a rally recently?  The problems from education to health care to the mortage mess were laid out with plans to solve them, not just with hope and hype but actual plans.


In the end, I just can't vote for the unknown.  This country did that with George Bush and we know how that worked for America.




I'm amused by the several posters on here who claim to have been for Obama but are changing their minds to support Hillary now. These are obviously planted remarks generated by the Clinton's Dirty Tricks Department. My gut tells me that not only will Obama take the caucuses by a wide margin tomorrow, but Hillary will come in a distant third. And that would make me very happy.
It's 24 hours until the Iowa caucuses and the Hillary supporters are out in full force to plant seeds of doubt about Obama's viability.  It's funny to see the Obama "supporters" suddenly switch to Hillary supporters a day before the caucuses.  Another ploy by Hillary supporters to pose as disenchanted Obama supporters.
Those supporting Hillary should know they're supporting a person who will govern by polls, not principle.  She is a reactionary, partisan  candidate.
Rufus Gibbons, DC
"Fellow Democrats especially th first time voters regardless of the outcome of this caucus and the primaries do not lose your zeal for politics I am 82 years old and have voted for the lesser of two evils several times in my lifetime. If your candidate doesn't win the nomination and you stay home on election day 08 then you have no right to gripe about the outcome of the election. VOTE FOR THE NOMINEE IN NOVEMBER 08. "

------------------------------------------------------

Rufus, U're right and I agree with U... Democrats are willing to vote for the nominee, as long as it's not CLINTON!
The rustling sound you hear is the dims running off the cliff with obama...this nation is not going to elect someone else with such a sparse record.

We may not elect another bush/clinton/bush/clinton but we sure won't take obama with his non record on the issues.

Besides who wants to hear about reparations for the next 4 years anyway?
It is distressing to me that the media coverage seems so heavily weighted to the "top tier" candidates. I read hardly anything at all about Joe Biden or Bill Richardson. Is the media going to elect the next President? To me, the coverage has at the least been unfair to other democratic candidates simply because they have not covered them. All the candidates deserve equal coverage. To cover only a few is unfair and dishonest.
Please don't let Clinton win this thing.  If she's the Democratic candidate in the fall then I will vote for some random third-party candidate, as I in good conscious could vote for neither Clinton nor any of the current crop of Republicans.

Iowans and New Hampshirians, please give us Obama or Biden.
The partisan gridliock and Bush/Clinton dynasty will be over when Iowa stands up for Obama Thursday evening.  Thank you Iowa for supporting Barack Obama and letting your voice chang the world.
Hillary's Experience???

First Lady - Domestic Experience - Botched Health
            Care Reform


            Foreign Policy Exp - No Security
            Clearance; Did NOT attend National
            Security meetings; Did NOT receive
            daily Intelligence briefings  
         
           
Senator - Voted to support George Bush's Iraq War
       - Voted to support George Bush's Iran policy

She is not the "Experience" candidate. She is not the "Change" candidate. She should not BE the candidate because she cannot win the general election. There is NO WAY she will attract Independents and Republicans. She is a polarizing figure - even among Democrats.

Barack Obama will win in November! Go, Obama!!
It was below Zero last night, so I let the Malamute sleep inside, even though he likes the cold and has a hi-tech insulated Dog House. When I let him out this morning, he ran to the Dog House and started barking at it. I looked inside it and found two reporters, jamming on their laptops. They asked me if I'd seen any candidates yet. I said no. They thanked me for the use of the Kennel, and were on their way. Thursday can't get here soon enough.
GO OBAMA!
Hillary Clinton is ready to lead from day one.

    *  Experience

    *  Well thought out policies

    *  Plans ready to go

    *  Already been there and has seen up close
       how things work and how to get things done

    *  Learned from past experiences

    *  Has the best advisor who led the country to
         prosperty...Bill

    *  Can and has adapted quicklky but know where
          she is going and how to get there

    *  Does NOT live on lofty rhetoric...has
          specific plans

    *  Is presidental.  Look at the way she handled
          the recent death of Bhutto

To Rufus Gibbons, I will vote republican before I vote for Hilary. It's not about the Team, it's about the players. If Hilary ends up elected, I can then point and laugh with a smug "I told ya so". Kind of like how my unpatriotic butt points out her vote on Iraq and Iran. lol, moron for president in '08
Wow it's nice to see all the Clinton Staffers "ahem" sorry, Clinton Supporters here. America doesn't need political dynasties. The Bush family worked out so well for us. Vote for anybody but Hillary. Obama is my preference but Edwards, Biden, Kucinich any or all of them would be better than here. She's a corporate shill and she waffles and triangulates more than Romney. Vote for a real democrat!! Anyone but Hillary!!!
Leo, you can't caucus in IA unless you claim residency there. Out of state college kids who attend school in IA are considered residents at the time. Since the caucusing is so close to Christmas break,it is well known that Obama is offering to provide travel help, if needed, for any of these students who want to come back in time to caucus for him. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
Blake, Denver, Colorado: '...I'm surprised her loudest theme in these final hours before Iowa is that she will be ready "on day one."  Has anyone asked her exactly what she means by saying that?

Thank you, Blake !!
If you remember Slick Willie, he WASN'T READY from day one !!
Slick Willie stumbled and fumbled his first year and turned Democratic majorities into Republican majorities

Ditzy, disorganized Hillary can't run her own campaign !!
She has to bring back her husband
What's her message, now ?
inevitable ?
experienced ?
lovable ?
don't roll the dice ?
the smear machine ?

How can this incompetent, corrupt, scandal-prone con woman lead this nation ?

She's only good at the 'politics of personal destruction'

Look at all the smears she's been throwing at Obama
The ones on this blog take the cake !!

TURN THE PAGE !!

THROW THE BUMS OUT !
DON'T BRING THE BUMS BACK !!
Iowa back Hillary for president
marvel (Sent Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:01 AM)

-----------

I really don't see how they do. Even with the backing of the state's most influential newspaper, the Des Moines Register, she can't gain any sort of solid traction in the state and seems to be moving backwards to Obama. If the poll by the Register is to be trusted (and every political talking head says it is the most accurate), even if you factor in margin of error, Obama wins. Face it, she has too much baggage to overcome and people want change and not the "experience" (and I am still waiting for one of the Clinton supporters on here to tell me how being First Lady of either Arkansas OR the US constitutes "experience") and Obama is the person most say can bring about the change needed at this time.
Clinton is not my first choice but I did attend the New Years Eve event at Capital Square in Des Moines, both for the free concert and to check out the candidate.  I have to say the energy in the room was absolutely amazing.  Her supporters are highly motivated and Clinton in person is a whole different and better vibe than Clinton on TV.
Clinton’s deputy campaign manager, Mike Henry, wrote a 1,500-word internal memo saying Iowa was not worth the effort.

While Hillary continues to fight in Iowa, the other people on her campaign team seem to have tried and derail her whether she wanted to or not.  It seems that the only person on the Hillary team that wants to do well in Iowa is Hillary.

Obama and Edwards also have bought time on Iowa TV to air their closing pitches.

Just think.....
After Thursday night, people in Iowa can go back to be the forgotten people....
A state known only for corn and meat and corn dogs...
jerry/corpus christi texas (Sent Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:01 AM)

----------------

And some of the most educated people in the country. The colleges and universities there pump out some of the highest levels of post-grad degreed people in the country. They also pump out a HUGE number of the teachers teaching our children across the country. While I left, I was educated at the college level there, and highly respect the level of intelligence of many of the people I met.

I trust them to get it right.
GO JOE GO!!!  I am sorry that the media decided not to pay any attention to you since you were not considered a "sexy, revenue generating candidate"... I guess it does not matter that you are the only one with true brilliance in foreign affairs, something the majority of people in this country are too ignorant to realize they need for more then ever.  I find most Americans have come down to two main groups … Those who feel we should just bomb anyone who we don’t like because we are "the most powerful country in the world - don’t mess with us" and  those who are happy to keep putting their " head in the sand" and elect someone because they seem cool, fun, or my favorite "they are like the average  Joe".  People, you do NOT WANT the average person as President!!!  (Look what happened the last 8 years!) you need someone who is a true leader, who stands out,  who has knowledge and command of the laws and political process,  experience  far above the average "George" -- Hoping for a Miracle!
I was all for the hope, change, the time is now message of Barack Obama.

But when it really comes down to it, I have changed my mind.  In the end, I have to go with Hillary Clinton.  With Pakistan and other hot spots, I have realized that America needs a strong, experienced leader to keep us safe.

Hope and hype sound great but in reality, I want hope, strength and leadership for change.

It's all wrapped up in one person  


Hillary Clinton
Sam (Sent Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:01 AM)

-----------

Please give me detailed examples of her supposed "leadership"?
Happy New Year to everyone on this site!  God help me but I am still wavering on picking my Democratic Candidate and my FL primary is on January 29th...  Thanks to all the media coverage and all of your comments, I can now see why a lot of Iowans will NOT make up their minds until tomorrow night.  I still cannot understand why Biden Dodd and Richardson are not higher in the polling numbers in Iowa.  As I said...because of the three of them, I am now undecided.
Barack Obama is about to win Iowa !

Good for you Iowa !

Good for America !
Wow Jerry from Corpus Christi - you sure are flying that racist flag proudly! I think it is interesting that your comments are about bashing Democrats, instead of touting a Republican.  When all is said and done, I would proudly vote for any of the Democratic nominees!  Can the same be said of the sad bunch on the other side??
Look up the word Huckster in the dictionary. It describes Huckabee and his appearance on the tonight show perfectly. It will also explain why he actually has the nickname.
Ronald wrote "MKMO

Tell me exactly HOW in specifics HOW Obama is going to change, hope, and all his other rhetoric?  He's the one who talks about how he's the change agent, etc.

When I listen to him or his wife, they talk about the problems in this country, they talk about hope and the time is now.

What does that mean?  HOW are they going to change and what are they going to change and hope for to solve the problems they talk about.

Hillary does not spout lofty rhetoric.  

Did you listen to Clinton at a rally recently?  The problems from education to health care to the mortage mess were laid out with plans to solve them, not just with hope and hype but actual plans."


In the end, I just can't vote for the unknown.  This country did that with George Bush and we know how that worked for America."
------------------------------------------------------

U claim to have listened to Obama's speeches and still ask us how he would bring about change. U would obviously know by now, if U had actually listened...

CLinton is merely trying to sound like Obama recently, with the "blank checks", "change" (Now "New beginning" rhetoric. She leaves out the lobbyists part, because they represent U and me...

U are right, U shouldn't vote for the unknown Ronald... This was done for Bush back in the 2000 electoions.. But guess what? Barack is not unknown to U (since U acknowledge him as a big threat to Clinton)!
Bush was elected for his last name; that is why he was even taken seriously. In 2008, Ronald, U are taking Hillary Clinton seriously because of her last name! Don't try to act smart, when U keep on making the same mistakes and expecting different results!

Happy new year btw, my friend(s)!



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=543329

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google