ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Iowa results (D)

Posted: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:30 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

It was Obama 38%, Edwards 30%, Clinton 29%, Richardson 2%, Biden 1%, and Dodd 1%.

The big story on the Dem side was turnout. The more than 2-1 Dem to GOP advantage among caucus-goers has to have the folks at the RNC depressed, since Iowa is a swing state (which Bush won in 2004!). The New York Times: "A record number of Democrats turned out to caucus - more than 239,000, compared with fewer than 125,0000 in 2004 - producing scenes of overcrowded firehouses and schools and long lines of people waiting to register their preferences."

The Des Moines Register’s Yepsen has his final say on the Iowa caucuses. “Obama’s big victory may well slingshot him to the nomination and the White House. He comfortably beat the national frontrunner, Hillary Clinton, who finished third. She’s left reeling and the second place finisher, John Edwards, wound up exactly where he was four years ago: In second place.” More Yepsen: ‘Obama's going to be a hard guy to stop.”

Obama was wheels down at Portsmouth Air Force Base in New Hampshire at 4:31 am ET -- the winds of victory at his back, NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan reports. On the flight, Obama told reporters that his "spirits were good" and that he felt the turnout in the Democratic caucuses had vindicated what his campaign had claimed about engaging new caucus-goers, young voters, and independents.

"It really was a victory for the people of Iowa that I think it's a harbinger of what's going to happen around the country," he said. "We went to a precinct and just shook hands as people were walking out. You had high school kids that had never caucused before. You had middle-aged folks who said they'd never caucused before who said they were coming out to caucus for me. You had folks who said I'm switching my party registration in order to caucus. It was just across the board.”

Per NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, at an off-camera briefing aboard the Clinton plane, strategist Mark Penn attributed Clinton’s loss to the unprecedented turnout of younger voters. He said they got the voters they'd targeted -- but "the difference is the under 30 group turned out." He suggested they would fix that in New Hampshire "by making clear that she was about change for all generations."

How do you neutralize Obama’s message? "I think her appeal as we move forward will be broadened for all generations." Penn said they have a major debate Saturday night, and that she did very well with the older generation of women. “We have to make the argument that she represents change for all generations of women."

Before taking off at 1:30 am ET, NBC’s Mitchell adds, Clinton spokesman Jay Carson explained the loss this way: "It's going to be a long campaign. We've always known Iowa would be difficult for us. We're going to see this as an isolated example." Carson also suggested that gender explains her defeat, noting that Iowa is a state that never elected a woman to Congress or the governor’s mansion. When Mitchell followed up by noting that Obama beat Clinton among women (according to the entrance polls), he replied that older women supported Clinton. Carson quickly added,  "Look, [Obama] had a great night tonight. We're not going to take anything away from him." More: "Judging the entire nominating process on eight percent of one state is a dubious exercise."

Edwards, who took second in Iowa, said, "The status quo lost and change won. And now we move on, we move on from Iowa to New Hampshire.”

From the hometown paper, the Raleigh News & Observer: "A weakened Edwards will carry on."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I really do think that this was a victory for the American voter. It proved that our votes do matter, and that the political process can be changed.

I'm very happy with the results, and astounded at how accurante the Des Moines Resgister poll was - those folks should teach some polling classes!

Obama '08
I hope all you 'hotshot' pundits who thought that this would be a Hillary win or a Romney win are enjoying your crow big time. Every last morsel of it.

All of you have been had... you have zero cred now.

Obama is on his way to being the next President and you 'pundits' are totally clueless. But that's all right. It's about time that the traditional Washington Establishment be smashed - and Barack Obama is the man to do it.
Now is the time for all Clinton supporters to leave the Democratic Party.  We are hated on the net by the Obama people (especially on Daily Kos).  Okay, you want your 2 bit nobody media-hype Obama?  You've got him. You can have him.  I said this yesterday and I continue to call for all Clinton supporters to support whomever the Repubs select this year. The MSM have won again.  You want a vapid, inexperienced phony with a line of BS a mile wide.  Again, okay. I personally don't care what the Obama supporters think. All I know as a Dem for decades and a volunteer for my party, the party has abandoned us for an undeserving upstart who wants it all without paying his dues.  Please email me at deblasiogwae@hotmail if you will join me in this effort.  I would like to get at least 100 Clintonites to respond.  Best, Dean
It was a great night for Democrats. The explosive turnout shows that this swing state that went to Bush in 2004 just might go to the Dem nominee in 2008.

Congratulations to Senator Obama.
Dean, You're ridiculous.  We all should support the nominee whomever it is. PERIOD.  This isn't as much about Obama as it is about people wanting change. They want to be inspired by the process instead of picking the less of two evils.  You should be ashamed of yourself!!!
Dean,

Sour grapes much?  What is it that Hillary is supposedly standing for anyway?  She'd be competent, but we can do better.  Take another look at Obama.  He's not only an excellent politician - he has a shining intelellect and a strongly progressive record.

Dean, you wouldn't be Bill by any chance? Feeling a bit sore, huh?

Yeah, real good 'advice' you have there. If you are 'real' and not some bumbling idiot troll then you have exposed yourself for being a Rightwinger underneath all that BS about being a Dem. And what's this rubbish about 'having to pay dues'? Oh, you must be one of those Establishment types... no wonder you are sore over Hillary's sorry performance, right?
To some degree, I agree with Dean.  My one wish is that the press (who have screwed up the last few presidential races) would do their job.  Someone needs to tell me something I don't know about Obama and that isn't a huge challenge, as I know very little.  "He's inspiring." Big deal.
He skips important votes.  He wasn't in the senate for the Iraq vote, so we don't REALLY know how he (or IF he) would have voted!! I heard someone in the press say that 60% voted against Hillary.  Well someone needs to know, if my vote switches IT WON"T BE TO OBAMA!! NOT RIGHT NOW.  Someone in the press should pay attention and report FACTS! MSNBC has been missing the boat lately in my opinion.
OK....here is my take.  I have NOT heard a speech that well cadenced since Bobby Kennedy.  I have been saying this for over a year now.  It is NOT about who has the experience or the machine...it is about who has the CHARISMA.  Politics is a Sales Job.....

Two strategies stopped Hillary....and it was NOT the Philly Debates:

1)  When her Campaign went negative.
2)  Her inability to reach out to the masses the way
   Obama did.
Ok......someone explain to me.  Approximately 239,000 Democrats turned out in Iowa, yet the results sho Obama receiving 940 votes????  Maybe I need a lesson on the "Caucus" proccess.  Thanks, and let's STICK TOGETHER as DEMOCRATS!!!!
Dean,

Lets face it this country is screwed up, we vote for people who look good, not ones who show up in the senate and vote, or spend thier whole life in public service, women= %itches if they are strong politically
lets face it we do not want a woman in the white house, we want no experience,  again like george bush who will BS thier way to the white house,  I'm tired of hearing the " change" thing,  change will happen  because cheney is not running so anyone is a change from this, but
I'm really afraid if we want real change , then voting for Obama is not the answer, remember he is a senator,  who is now a part of washington DC!  
Clinton Supporter all the way.  She is great for our country. Obama is not good for the office.  Not that much experience.  
Maybe if Hillary would have done a rebel yell like Howard dean did, maybe the reverse would have happened, she might have picked a few more votes up.

This has been a good week for me....
Picked Obama/Edwards/Clinton in exact order
won $180 in the lottery
won $100 on the Georgia/Hawaii game....

I should be booking a flight to Vegas today.
hey first read,,, why are you always wrong.
Portsmouth does not have an air force base. it was closed over a decade ago.
Dean is a bit bitter!! There has to be a lot more behind his hatred for Obama than meets the eye!! I mean seriously, he is calling for Democrats to leave the party b/c Obama won Iowa!! That is really crazy!!! Dean take a moment and relax, deal with your own hatred feelings, Obama has never did anything to anyone, just stop and think, maybe your candidate of choice is not the best candidate!!

Barack the vote!!!
What were the actual numbers for each candidate? Listing them in percentages hides actual values and makes it look better if the turn-out wasn't really that good after all. Quit hiding things from the voters. Let us know the full score. Thank you. :-)
J Kerns, St. Joseph, MO (Sent Friday, January 04, 2008 10:01 AM)

I am sorry that you don't know much about Obama, I suggest you read either of his two books or simply go to his website www.barackobama.com. For you to admit that you don't know much and then say but you will never vote for him, what is that based on? That is truly sad. I hope that you push yourself to make an informed decision!! The fact that he was able to beat out two household names "Clinton and Edwards" should intrigue you enough to give him a second look!!! Iowa voters are said to be the most informed voters and they made a good choice!! Just get informed so you can make a good choice as well!
Nashville Fan - you said I really do think that this was a victory for the American voter. It proved that our votes do matter, and that the political process can be changed.
Tell that to the Biden, Dodd, and Richardson supporters who were forced by the arcane Iowa Dems caucus process to switch their votes to some other candidate. Richardson, in particular, was a big loser by this -- and Edwards and Obama may have had their votes inflated by as much as 10%, depending on how the Richardson votes were distributed.
Obama should have ran in Kenya(his fatherland). We need him more in Africa; with high level of corruption and zero healthcare...AFRICA NEEDS CHANGE, KENYA IN PARTICULAR.

WE have enough talents and monitors here in the US.
MIKE HUCKABEE HAS PROVED THAT THIS COUNTRY IS TIRED OF ANTI CHRIST PEOPLE, BABY KILLERS, AND MILITARY HATERS.  WE ARE NOT GOING TO PUT UP WITH IT ANY LONGER. HOPEFULLY WE WILL STOP THE BABY KILLING, PUT PRAYER BACK IN SCHOOL, AND PUNISH ANYONE THAT IS CRITICAL OF OUR ARMY DURING TIME OF WAR.
HOPEFULLY THE PEOPLE IN N H WILL NOT STOOP LOW ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR A WOMAN THAT TOOK DRUG AND CRIMINAL MONEY FOR PARDONS FROM A PERVERTED MAN WHO ASSUALTED A YOUNG INTERN WITH A CIGAR. ALSO A FAMILY THAT RENTED THE LINCOLN BEDROOM TO A DRUG DEALER.  AND A WOMAN THAT WONT REVEAL HER THESIS BECAUSE IT WAS WRITTEN ON HER PRAISE OF COMMUNISM.
For those who haven't followed the story (because the MSM has not reported it to you), Hillary is soon to be under oath in Los Angeles in the historic civil case, Paul v Clinton.  You probably don't know that the FEC ruled in Dec. 2005 that her campaign had filed three false reports and hid $720,000.  She filed a fourth false report in Jan. 2006.  The GOP has all of this info and is hoping she will get the nomination.  Discovery in the civil case is going to expose it all, including the actions of a US Attorney, who withheld important video evidence during official investigations and the criminal trial of Hillary's campaign finance chairman.
Mitt Romney wants Gun Control

In his 1994 US Senate run, Romney backed two gun-control measures strongly opposed by the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups: the Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on certain assault weapons.

"That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA,"

Mitt Romney told the Boston Herald in 1994.

At another campaign stop that year, he told reporters: "I don't line up with the NRA."
- Boston Globe, January 14, 2007  Read the article
Ok......someone explain to me.  Approximately 239,000 Democrats turned out in Iowa, yet the results sho Obama receiving 940 votes????  Maybe I need a lesson on the "Caucus" proccess.  Thanks, and let's STICK TOGETHER as DEMOCRATS!!!!

Rick, Bonifay, FL (Sent Friday, January 04, 2008 10:09 AM)

The 940 represents the equivalent number of delegates that Obama will receive for the convention. You need a certain number of delegates to win the nomination, and because Iowa has this caucus format, it requires some weird mathematical conversions.
Clinton Supporter all the way.  She is great for our country. Obama is not good for the office.  Not that much experience.  
Jason, Philadelphia (Sent Friday, January 04, 2008 10:09 AM)

Jason,

Experience doesn't mean anything if you continue to make mistakes and do not learn your lesson. You have to be willing and capable of change. Clinton is not, did you watch last night, behind her stood all old faces, that doesn't help her campaign, people want to see change. We don't want the same old style politics. I was really disappointed when Clinton last week mistakenly spoke about Pakistani President Musharraf being on the ballot, even though Presidential elections were held 6 months ago and the issue now is parliamentary elections. It really messed up her credibility on foreign policy.
Come on Dean, don't give up so easily! Let's keep on supporting Hillary all the way! Hussein Obama is worthless and annoying, Hillary will win the nomination and be the next leader of the free world! Hillary forever!
*Sigh* People say Obama is all fluff and the media is hyping him...but then you say you know next to nothing about him. Well, which is it? If the media was hyping him, wouldn't you know all the good things there are to know about him? Things like:

- In Illinois, Obama got a reform of the death penalty passed, in a majority Republican legislature, against the original wishes of the police lobby. In the end, Obama was able to bring the police lobby around and bring in bipartisan support for mandatory taping of all interrogations in possible capital cases.

- Obama pushed through an ethics reform bill, also in a Republican-controlled legislature, in one of the most corrupt state governments in the union.

- Obama has not skipped important votes. He skips votes where his vote won't make a difference, and if you're thinking about those "present" votes, you should know that those were a way to register protest or to avoid falling into those nasty political traps that are so popular in today's bitter partisan atmosphere. (There was also at least one vote, on an abortion-related issue, where a pro-choice advocacy group asked him not to vote no, even though the bill would pass either way. He really wanted to vote no, but chose instead to honor the wishes of the advocacy group.)

- He may not have been in the Senate when he denounced Iraq, but he WAS running for that seat at the time. But despite the need to get elected, he still stood up and said that Iraq was a "dumb war." He also said (to paraphrase) that Iraq would turn into a quagmire, requiring an occupation of "undetermined length."

- One of Obama's many good ideas in the Senate was the Healthcare for Hybrids bill. This bill works to solve two problems at once (GM's healthcare woes + fuel efficiency).

- Obama has fought hard on nuclear nonproliferation and securing the stores of nuclear weapons and weapons material that are unsecured (largely in Russia).

I can go on if necessary, but that would require me to actually go and find out more myself. More info is available on various websites that analyze politicians, as well as www.barackobama.com of course.

So there you have it. All the things you didn't hear from the media about Obama. Still think they're in love with him? I certainly never thought so.
To Dean, Waterbury, CT:

This is not about you sir, it is about America. We have all "paid our dues" under the Bush administration. If America decides that we don't want Hillary Clinton as President, that is not all about bringing her down. It is about who we want to lead America into the future.

Perhaps you should take your energy to help Senator Clinton win instead of abandoning the Democratic party based on one vote.
The Dem results posted are wrong!  Obama got 37.5%, Edwards got 29.8%, and Clinton got 29.5%.

Therefore, the only difference between 2d and 3d was was .3%!  Hardly a total defeat for Hillary.  

But, I will admit, it was a clear victory for Obama.  
M Wells,

Although the caucus process is not perfect, everyone knew the rules going in - and they have been the same for over 30 years.

These candidates have been running for president for MONTHS, doing national debats for MONTHS, and raising funds for MONTHS. If they have not caught fire, it is not for lack of exposure. For whatever reason, they did not attract enough support.

David Anders Pharr (from being an expert on the Constitution), ever heard of the First Amendment?  And WHOSE prayer gets said in schools?
I just simply don't understand this whole Caucus stuff.  Why do they do it?  A Primary, run like a typical election where you go to a polling place, enter a booth, vote for your candidate, and leave, is much more efficient, and provides for a better chance of voter turnout.  The Caucus process is unfair, too laborous, and no one can explain the numbers.
Keep shouting, David Anders. I can't hear you... not that your message has any merit or anything.
Rick,

As First Read alludes to, if the 220,000 votes were counted and reported like a normal election, Obama's win would have been even more astounding.  First Read estimates he would have won by 15-20%.   For those who watched the CSpan airing of the main Des Moines caucus last night (apparently picked by CSpan because it was the most representative), Obama had almost THREE times as many people standing up for him as Hillary.  It was astounding.
Barack Obama is the first candidate since Bobby Kennedy to excite young people.  As a 59 year old young person who campaigned for Bobby Kennedy in Terre Haute IN having been bussed over from Champaign IL, the same feeling is there.

Edwards is too angry, not passionate and Hillary is too 20th Century.  Barack Obama is the first candidate of the new millennium.

All I can say right now is "Make it So!"  This is transformational for the U.S. and soon the world.
What a ridiculously outdated nominations process (electoral college; caucus) we have in this country! How on Earth did "Judging the entire nominating process on eight percent of one state.." Ever seem like a logical, equitable or viable plan for democracy? How can eight percent of Iowa adequately represent the needs, concerns or preferences of New Yorker, for example? Not even %100 of Iowa could do that. Why does this small, rural, mostly christan, mostly white, mostly affluent determine the candidates fot the rest of the nation? By what authority or qualifications? Wake up: This is the #1 reason why young Americans do not turn out to vote. After all this priviledged insanity that passes for a nominations process, we don't want much to do with it. Too much has got to change SYSTEMATICALLY for us to want in.
Dear First Read;

As another commentator asked:  Obama 38%  of WHAT?--Clinton 29% of WHAT? etc., etc.
femi, wow. freedom of speech abused.
THANKS SO MUCH FOR THE EXPLANTAION!!!!
Clinton supporters,

What experience does Hillary has? Is it taking more money from corporate lobbyist than republicans themselves, is it voting to authorize war in Iraq without reading the national intelligence report, it is voting to give Bush and his NeoCons the power to authorize war in Iran even after her Iraq vote, is it not realizing that elections in Pakistan is parliamentary not for Prime Minister, is it to nominate Bill Clinton to be a Supreme Court Justice. Are you kidding me!
I'm a 52 year old woman in NY that supported Hillary when she first announced she was running for President.  After initially contributing to her campaign I was horrified to see how qiuckly she blew through 40 million as if it would be a never ending supply of money.
I have a son and nephew in the military and I haven't been happy with her vote or views on Iraq.
Instead of Bush rewarding his buddies with good jobs, contracts, etc. I think Hillary will just replace these people with her own set of wealthy friends.  I don't see any change there.
I stayed up last night to watch the Iowa caucus and I have never done that before.  I can't thank the people of Iowa enough. Right now the only possibility for real change is with Obama.
The Dem results posted are wrong!  Obama got 37.5%, Edwards got 29.8%, and Clinton got 29.5%.

Therefore, the only difference between 2d and 3d was was .3%!  Hardly a total defeat for Hillary.  

But, I will admit, it was a clear victory for Obama
....

....

Not a total defeat? Hillary had the organization, had the most money, campaigned like heck in Iowa, had one of the most popular ex-Presidents campaigning for her, had the best advisors and organizers that know how to run campaigns, just weeks ago had a huge lead in the polls, and had the most name recognition. And she lost. Couldn't even come in second. Close to a double digit loss too.

A total, and humiliating defeat.
For the Clintonistas on this blog that type of attitude and perception is exactly what has damaged the Democratic party. We are not the GOP who are still living in the past (Foxnews pundits and the GOP establishment apparently despise Huckabee), we are about progress and hope. It isn't about Obama, but sharing in the same vision. He's simply carrying the message that the Democratic party has always had. He's a great communicator, and some of you may not know him, but you will and hopefully you will be inspired like many others have been. Keep your mind open. And the Clintons are not hated it's just time to move on from the past. He's far superior to Bush at the same point he was elected..he's better than Edwards. He is prevailing against the percieved odds. That's pretty good news.
To Dean - talking about candidates paying dues -  Hillary has not paid any dues - she inherited all she is politically from Bill.  She touts her experience, but she has no accomplishments.  She was in charge of advancing education while Bill was governor of AR, but I believe AR school ratings fell from the high 40's nationally to the mid-40's while she was engaged in this endeavor.  No need to discuss her health plan leadership in the 90's.  What trials and tribulation has she overcome - nothing that many women don't face every day - a philandering husband.  Did she stay with Bill to maintain her family or her political viability?  I think the answer is obvious since they haven't lived together in eight years.

Obama - what experience did the Democratic icon JFK have when he became president that Obama doesn't.  JFK was a congressman and one-term senator (I believe)before being elected. Obama has state legislative experience and also a Senator.  They are similar in age, leadership experience and charisma at this stage in political life.  The big difference is JFK's father bought him the presidency - Obama is a self-made man and earned his political creds on streets of Chicago, in Ilinois Senate, and U.S. Senate.  If you feel that Obama does not have sufficient experience to be president, you would have to say the same for JFK.

This go-around, I'm looking for the candidate that has the most leadership ability, who is honest and straightforward with the American people, and one who can pull the American people together.  Hillary , by nature of her political history, cannot do this.  If Obama wins Democratic nomination, I will give him thoughtful consideration, instead of the usual knee-jerk vote for a particular party's presidential nominee - in my case Republican for the last 40 years. He greatly impressed me with his speech last night and if this is truly who he is, I look forward to a choice between him and the Republican nominee.
[Penn said they have a major debate Saturday night, and that she did very well with the older generation of women. “We have to make the argument that she represents change for all generations of women."]
--That is where the strategy is flawed, they need to appeal to more than just 'women'.  In my judgment, the fact that they want to appeal to 'women' voters shows that the Clinton campaign is still only focused on winning and maintaining the status quo.  We already have a President (Bush) in the WH who represents half the country who voted for him.  What we need is a President to represent America, Barack Obama is that person.  Barack Obama does so well, because he appeals to both a broad swath of voters and Democratic voters.  He is the one Democratic candidate who does.



[Dear First Read;
As another commentator asked:  Obama 38%  of WHAT?--Clinton 29% of WHAT? etc., etc.
Stu Hyvonen, Saginaw, MI ]
--My guess would out of 100%.  Te-he.
okay- trying to correctly explain this:

Iowa Democratic Caucus does not count individual votes- they count delegates:

C-span democratic caucus shown: for one Des Moines precinct:
Obama got 186 votes- equaled out to 3 delegates
Edwards got 116 votes- equaled out to 2 delegates
Clinton got 74 votes- equalted out to 1 delegate

so- what got reported by that precinct was the delegate count for each candidate
Every precinct around Iowa reported delegate #'s for each Democratic candidate-
Obama got 900+ delegates from Iowa- equaled to 38%
Edwards got 744 delegates from Iowa- equaled to 30%
Clinton got 737 delegates from Iowa- equaled to 29%

Hope that helps
Dean,
Paid dues? What dues have to be paid? Where and when did Hillary pay her dues? I recall that her senate seat is the only publicly elected seat she has ever held.(Obama was elected state senator) She was the wife of a politician for years.(Obama was a grassroots organizer in my city for years) So I guess Laura Bush has paid her dues as well, maybe she ought to run for POTUS on the "experience" and "dues paid" card.

If you are so bitter, because your horse didn't win the race, that you want to vote against the the one that won, maybe you ought to convert and be an ornery, bitter discontent republican. After all, the patented Clinton triangulation does set you on the right path to becoming a Repug. Your candidate had ample amount of time to convince a whole state to vote for her, she couldn't accomplish the task, take the blinders off and realize that there is a good reason she couldn't convince more people to caucus for her.(hint, it's not Chris Matthews, or Tim Russert's fault)
I believe the young people of Iowa has sent a clear message...your vote matters.  So I encourage all of the young people in the US to vote and let your voice be heard!  I am a Africian American woman  that is a democrat but that hasn't stopped me from looking at all the candiates that are running for President or voting outside my party (voted for Bush second term).  Do your homework on these candidates, find out what they are about and what they stand for.  Vote for who you think would run our country with us (the voters) in mind.  
Alphie Brooks, excellent point.  Mark Penn and the rest of Hillary's unctuous staff are trying their best to spin, spin, spin.  Americans of all stripes are not buying what the Crock is cooking.

In addition to the huge advantages you mentioned, don't forget:
1) Close to $100 million dollars of lobbyist money (let's not kid ourselves folks, most of her money is from lobbyists--she won't release the number of individual contributions because it'd be dwarfed by Obama)
2) Endorsements from most of the major papers who bought her "experience" schtick (shame on you "journalists," you're supposed to see through the noise)
3) A mountain of endorsements from establishment Democrats who probably don't believe in her but who were lining up for spots in what they thought was the inevitable next administration.  If she loses NH, there are going to be an awful lot of professional politicians doing some fancy tap dancing and hoping they can get back into the good graces of either Obama or Edwards.
Clearly change is the real theme for the 2008 election.  I see the article reports Bush's Approval rating in the 30% range...What about the Democratic controlled congress's approval rating???  It is worse.  The bottom line is America is sick and tired of Washington.  A good man once told me he wished Washington would remain in a state of confusion bipartisan bickering etc that way they would do nothing.  I curiously asked why and the answer was that way we won't be any worse off than we already are.  We need serious reform.  Our tax system needs to be fixed, Lawsuit happy lawyers need to be shut up and put out of business, lobbiests need to go away, poloticians need to be held accountable to the constituents.  What is the deal with Illegal aliens.  this should be a non issue.  They are "Illegal", the should be deported and if they would like to become Americans than come to the country in an offical capacity and file for citizenship.  The same way my ancestors did it.  Embrace America and become an American.  We (America) is on the down side of being a superpower.  That trend needs to change.  I believe that it needs to start with leadership and that leadership will be elected by all of us.  Unfortunately I don't see a leader that has the fortitude to truly effect change in Washington.  Ultimately they all sell out to special interest groupds who fund their campaign and makes them electable.  We need Farmer Johnson from Rural Iowa who knows nothing of the politics of this country but has the strength to say no we will do what is right in the face of overwhelming odds, and temptation to do the easy wrong.  Who is looking out for the little man?  John Edwards is a fraud.  Another high dollar lawyer who has no idea what it means to be a hard working middle class person trying to keep a good job, raise a family, own a home and secure a decent retirement for our future.  The mark of a good leader is the success of the people they lead.  Empower us to effect change and change will happen.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=547801

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google