ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Remember Obama v. McCain

Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:08 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Chris Donovan
If the headlines out of New Hampshire are "Obama, McCain,"  it is interesting to remember the letter McCain sent to Obama two years ago back on Feb. 6, 2006 (and which he posted on his Web site) while working on the lobbying reform bill. It had some pretty strong language which you can read again below.

Two days later, they appeared together at a Senate hearing and seemed to call a truce, calling each other "pen pals," with McCain saying they were "moving on."  But the back and forth will certainly be brought up again if they are their respective parties' nominees. A few clips and the letters are below.
 
And here are three interesting lines from McCain's letter (full text of letter follows):
- “But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party's effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn't always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.”

- “I'm embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble. Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won't make the same mistake again.”

- “I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere."

Here is their exchange of letters:

Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain Exchange Letters on Ethics Reform
Monday, February 6, 2006
February 2, 2006

The Honorable John McCain
United States Senate
241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear John:

    Thank you for inviting me to participate in the meeting yesterday to discuss lobbying and ethics reform proposals currently before the Senate. I appreciate your willingness to reach out to me and several other Senate Democrats to discuss what should be done to restore public confidence in the way that Congress conducts its business. The discussion clearly underscored the difficult challenge facing Congress.

    You and many in the Democratic Caucus have played a major role in reform efforts in the Senate. In fact, the Indian Affairs Committee hearings you led were instrumental in promoting public awareness of the culture of corruption that has permeated the nation's capital.

    As you know, Senator Harry Reid and others in the Democratic Caucus have taken an important step by introducing S. 2180, the Honest Leadership Act, which imposes many of the same disclosure requirements for lobbyists that you have proposed, while also strengthening enforcement, eliminating "pay to play" schemes, and imposing more restrictive rules on meals, gifts, and travel that Members and their staff can receive from special interests that advocate before Congress. This bill, which now has the support of 40 members of the Democratic Caucus, represents a significant step in addressing many of the worst aspects of corruption that have come to light as a result of the Justice Department investigation of Jack Abramoff.

    I know you have expressed an interest in creating a task force to further study and discuss these matters, but I and others in the Democratic Caucus believe the more effective and timely course is to allow the committees of jurisdiction to roll up their sleeves and get to work on writing ethics and lobbying reform legislation that a majority of the Senate can support. Committee consideration of these matters through the normal course will ensure that these issues are discussed in a public forum and that those within Congress, as well as those on the outside, can express their views, ensuring a thorough review of this matter.

    Given the state of affairs in Washington, we have a historic opportunity to make fundamental changes in the way our government operates so that the actions we take as public officials are responsive and transparent to the American people. Thank you again for your interest in this important matter.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama
United States Senator


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 6, 2006

The Honorable Barack Obama
United States Senate
SH-713
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Obama:

    I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere. When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership's preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable. Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions. I'm embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble. Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won't make the same mistake again.

    As you know, the Majority Leader has asked Chairman Collins to hold hearings and mark up a bill for floor consideration in early March. I fully support such timely action and I am confident that, together with Senator Lieberman, the Committee on Governmental Affairs will report out a meaningful, bipartisan bill.

    You commented in your letter about my "interest in creating a task force to further study" this issue, as if to suggest I support delaying the consideration of much-needed reforms rather than allowing the committees of jurisdiction to hold hearings on the matter. Nothing could be further from the truth. The timely findings of a bipartisan working group could be very helpful to the committee in formulating legislation that will be reported to the full Senate. Since you are new to the Senate, you may not be aware of the fact that I have always supported fully the regular committee and legislative process in the Senate, and routinely urge Committee Chairmen to hold hearings on important issues. In fact, I urged Senator Collins to schedule a hearing upon the Senate's return in January.

    Furthermore, I have consistently maintained that any lobbying reform proposal be bipartisan. The bill Senators Joe Lieberman and Bill Nelson and I have introduced is evidence of that commitment as is my insistence that members of both parties be included in meetings to develop the legislation that will ultimately be considered on the Senate floor. As I explained in a recent letter to Senator Reid, and have publicly said many times, the American people do not see this as just a Republican problem or just a Democratic problem. They see it as yet another run-of-the-mill Washington scandal, and they expect it will generate just another round of partisan gamesmanship and posturing. Senator Lieberman and I, and many other members of this body, hope to exceed the public's low expectations. We view this as an opportunity to bring transparency and accountability to the Congress, and, most importantly, to show the public that both parties will work together to address our failings.

    As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party's effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn't always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.

Sincerely,

John McCain
United States Senate


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


February 6, 2006

The Honorable John McCain
United States Senate
241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear John:

    During my short time in the U.S. Senate, one of the aspects about this institution that I have come to value most is the collegiality and the willingness to put aside partisan differences to work on issues that help the American people. It was in this spirit that I approached you to work on ethics reform, and it was in this spirit that I agreed to attend your bipartisan meeting last week. I appreciated then - and still do appreciate - your willingness to reach out to me and several other Democrats.

    For this reason, I am puzzled by your response to my recent letter. Last Wednesday morning, you called to invite me to your meeting that afternoon. I changed my schedule so I could attend the meeting. Afterwards, you thanked me several times for attending the meeting, and we left pledging to work together.

    As you will recall, I told everyone present at the meeting that my caucus insisted that the consideration of any ethics reform proposal go through the regular committee process. You didn't indicate any opposition to this position at the time, and I wrote the letter to reiterate this point, as well as the fact that I thought S. 2180 should be the basis for a bipartisan solution.

    I confess that I have no idea what has prompted your response. But let me assure you that I am not interested in typical partisan rhetoric or posturing. The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity and my desire to put aside politics for the public interest is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you nor my willingness to find a bipartisan solution to this problem.


Sincerely,

Barack Obama
United States Senator

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

That was a very low point for McCain.  It came out of nowhere and really showed him to be a mean-spirited person.  I bet he regrets it if he has to face Obama
McCain's ltr: unprovoked, mean & disrespectful. Condescending, too. Obama's response appropriate. Shows the differences and doesn't put McCain in a very good light.
Wow!  What was that?  No wonder Obama is having such a run.  Mr. McCain came across as condescending, and as he called Mr. Obama, disingenuous, not to mention confused.  
Yes I would say that it is interesting that the old guard always seems to resent new blood and instead of reaching out and helping the new senators with a handshake and saying come on up its nice up here, they play king of the mountain and kick them back down. They were both sent there by their constituents with the same credentials.  
I think this does show a meanesss in Senator McCain and I don't think he can be trusted.  This seemed to come out of nowhere.  Sen. Obama is the bigger person and handeled it with dignity and respect.
I am sure there is more that went on here.  Once again the American people are led by what the media has brought forth.  Maybe we will see if there is more here than meets the eye, if and when these two meet in a head to head presidential run.
hmmm.... strong stuff indeed, something Obama did obviously REALLY ticked off McCain.
Between McC & anyone else tho (incl. Obama, i guess), who is the one more likely to be party-pressured & strongarmed into something, anything; let alone likely to succumb to pressure; or to political game-playing, for that matter.
Not impossible, but rather hard to believe it's JMcC...
Really displays a contrast in diplomacy ... makes you wonder how McCain might deal with other countries, when he has trouble dealing with his own colleagues.
Wow!  That's pretty pathetic on McCain's part, and he's a man I've generally had respect for.  That's extremely disappointing.
They're trying to make McCain look as being "strong" and able to beat Obama. Barack Obama is a man of integrity. If anything, McCain's the partisan. I'm a Republican and would never support McCain.
The reason for the letter was because Obama took a lobbyist as chairmen of his campaign thus betraying the very reforms he swore he was interested in making. Funny how facts like that get left out.
I would take the experience and geniusness of Sen McCain to say to Sen O'Bamna that "our country needs
a leader" not someone who waffles like you. If our
Country is ignorant enough to elect a liberal Democrat
to the White House, shame on US! Go back to the Clinton's because you will all sleep with the fish!
I believe he was testing Obama.  Trying to get a feel for him and because he is not willing to play the game as usual, that is what disappoints him.
This exposes McCain as a Dr. Jeckle, Mr. Hyde type personality that should be revealed to the American people for exactly what he is: A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing!  McCain is definitely not the person that should be leading our country!  Obama is the real deal! He sincerely wants to put forth his best efforts for the American people. McCain comes across as jealous hater trying to quash the illumination of a rising star.  "Dreams come in all sizes, but cream always rises to the top!!!"  Obama is the cream of the crop.  Go BAMA!
"If our Country is ignorant enough to elect a liberal Democrat to the White House, shame on US"

And a nation rolls its eyes.
Oh, please!! All who still think this country is in high standing (diminishing economy-our dollar is worth less than canadian for christ sake, lack of care for enviromental crisis, STILL claiming War on Irag is needed and sending much needed $$$ and our boys&girls, dads&moms, sons&daughters to defend it) is ludicrous. It was obvious McCain was out for his own position and domination....Enough said.
I guess this exchange between these two senators underscores the age of McCain.  If he really wants to continue serving his country, he should just drop out of the running for the presidency.  America has had seven years of being embarrassed and damaged by its slickly packaged chosen leadership; we can't afford a continuation of that sort of blatant incompetence in the White House.
I think that both men (boys) were trying to pull a fast one on each other and they both showed who and what they are.  One's too old, and the other is to young. Boys will be boys who will play their political games anyway.  We'd better get someone with some smarts,experience,etc. with the Bush mess hitting them right in the face as soonas they take office. VOTE DEMOCRAT -REPUBLICANs made this mess.
Interesting because it really reflects on the lack of interest in solving the problem.  Really is a reflection of ego and self interest. Politics as usual, slimey slithering into postion of power at the cost of the taxpayers. Ugh!
If you read Obama's letter, it is clear that he is trying to use the issue to gain partisan advantage.  Why else would he talk of a task force when it was already clearly arranged that this process should work its way through the standard committee process.  Obama clearly broke his word to McCain, and McCain responded forcefully.

I would hope and expect that he take this tact within his own party and with other countries if elected.  

Ask yourself, has McCain ever sought partisan advantage - or even credit for that matter?  No, and he is right to slap Obama in the face for trying this obvious end-around.  If Obama was innocent as far as intention, at least this woke him up to Reid's using him - Reid is always seeking partisan advantage.
Obviously a great insight...I am interested to see that Obama does indeed talk the 'change', 'bipartisan' talk, but actually brings in his own agenda. That is the very thing that we see all over Wahington. That makes me realize that he is not at all transparant - he says what you want to hear. Now I think we should ALL demand to know what his true intent is for this country before we put him in the position to unveil his agenda from the White House lawn.
What is wrong with being mean. Did McCain hurt Obama's feelings, how sad. Maybe Barack should not of gone to the meeting to spy on the bipartisan bill if he was already making a dem version. I applaud John McCain, he has always been honest and forthright to people and he expects the same in return.
Obama is a rat.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=561165

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google