ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Clinton vs. Obama

Posted: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:43 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post: “Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton defended her recent remarks on civil rights Sunday, as Sen. Barack Obama weighed in on the controversy for the first time, describing Clinton's earlier comments about the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. as ‘unfortunate’ and ‘ill-advised.’” More: “At the same time, a prominent Clinton ally, Robert L. Johnson, appeared to attempt to revive the issue of Obama's admitted past drug use. Introducing Clinton at an event in Columbia, Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television, said both Clintons ‘have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues since Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood -- and I won't say what he was doing, but he said it in his book.’” 

VIDEO: NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports the sparring between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama has heated up, including barbs about race.

“Johnson issued a statement denying that interpretation, saying he was referring to Obama's work as a community organizer,” the Los Angeles Times writes. “Obama spokesman Bill Burton did not accept Johnson's statement. "It's troubling that neither the campaign nor Sen. Clinton -- who was there as the remark was made -- is willing to condemn it, as they did when another prominent supporter recently said a similar thing," Burton said. He was referring to the then-co-chairman of Clinton's New Hampshire campaign, who quit after being criticized for discussing Obama's drug use.”

Pegged to yesterday’s furious volleys between the two campaigns -- especially Bob Johnson’s remarks -- the New York Times writes, “After staying on the sidelines in the first year of the campaign, race and to a lesser extent gender have burst into the forefront of the Democratic presidential contest, thrusting Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton into the middle of a sharp-edged social and political debate that transcends their candidacies.”

VIDEO: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.,  speaks with NBC’s Tim Russert of “Meet the Press” about the response to comments she made while on the campaign trail.

More: "Aides to both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama expressed squeamishness at the direction the conversation was heading. And publicly, the campaigns spent much of the day shadow-boxing on an issue that advisers to both of them described as volatile."

The New York Daily News: "Hoping to fend off deterioration in a key pillar of her base, Clinton spent another day trying to deflect criticism from her suggestion President Lyndon Johnson played as big a role in the civil rights movement as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr."

The New York Post: "Race took center stage in the Democratic presidential campaign yesterday as Hillary Rodham Clinton accused Barack Obama of 'deliberately distorting' her comments about Martin Luther King's impact on civil rights. One of Clinton's most prominent black supporters, meanwhile, made a thinly veiled suggestion about the Illinois senator's teenage drug use."

By the way, don't miss the fact that when given the chance, Edwards weighed in on the side of Obama over the MLK-LBJ dispute.

For more on the dispute and much more, don’t miss yesterday’s appearance by Clinton on Meet the Press.

The L.A. Times notes how this flare-up over race stepped on the rollout of Obama's economic stimulus plan. "The back-and-forth dominated a particularly bitter day on the campaign trail, as both Democrats said they felt besieged by ungrounded personal attacks, and it all but overshadowed the candidates' policy pronouncements. Obama unveiled a proposal to stimulate the economy that would be slightly more expensive than the $70-billion plan Clinton proposed Friday. The Illinois senator's $75-billion proposal focuses more on immediate tax relief to workers and retirees, whereas Clinton's would give priority to increased government spending on housing and energy assistance." 

The New York Times fact-checks the claims the Clintons have made on Hillary’s Iraq war authorization vote. “In interviews and at a recent campaign event, they have said that Mr. Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, helped draft the resolution, which they said was proof that the measure was more about urging Saddam Hussein to comply with weapons inspections, instead of authorizing combat. Mrs. Clinton repeated the claim Sunday during an interview on ‘Meet the Press,’ saying ‘Chuck Hagel, who helped to draft the resolution, said it was not a vote for war.’”

“But the talking point appears to misconstrue the facts… In the original proposal Mr. Hagel had backed, force was authorized only to secure the destruction of Iraq’s unconventional weapons, not to enforce ‘all relevant’ United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq, which was the language in the version that ultimately passed.” But: “It was the White House proposal, not Mr. Hagel’s, that Mrs. Clinton supported, explaining in an Oct. 10, 2002, speech on the Senate floor that it was time to tell Saddam Hussein that ‘this is your last chance - disarm or be disarmed.’”

Last night, Obama included this bite on the war to his stump, per NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan. "I'm running for president because I want a foreign policy that actually makes us safer. That isn't just a bunch of talk and a bunch of bluster. You know I opposed this war in Iraq from the start. But one of my opponents is trying to rewrite history. But I want everyone to be clear that every respectable news outlet will tell you that I opposed this war in 2002 when I was running for the United States Senate. I opposed in 2003, 4, 5, 6, and 7. I put forward a bill at the beginning of last year that set a timetable for withdrawal. And as president of the United States I will bring our troops home by the end of 2009. We will end this war."

What's interesting about this is that it begs for a follow-up since in a previous debate Obama wouldn't pledge to bring all the troops home from Iraq by 2013.

The Chicago Sun-Times looks at how Obama pledged to vote against Iraq war funding when running for the Senate but ended up voting for it once in the Senate.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This election is way too important to be clouded by either race or gender. Hillary Clinton had the chance to put a damper on the race aspect by repudiating Bob Johnson's slanderous remarks when he introduced her. She failed to do so. That gives cause to wonder does the Clinton camp want to see the racial divide. When all is said and done in the democratic primary there are more white then black voters.
It seems to me that it was the news media {msnbc, cnn fox etc} who injected both the race and gender card into this campaign. When Hilliary won N.H. the report was, is it the woman vote or the Bradley effect as to why she won. They completely diminished the fact that she did win, period. The spin was all about women giving her sympathy votes or people being ashamed to actually vote for the black candidate. Chris Matthew's upset Jay Severene in Massachusetts so bad that Jay lambasted Chris for calling people of Boston racists. That day talk radio was on fire with words I would rather not repeat. Bottom line, the media needs to knock off the spin, twist and misconstruing of every word that is ever uttered out of these peoples mouths. Lets get back to the issues so we can elect a president that can begin to turn this country around.
Firstly, I will like to address comments people like Bob Johnson and Charles Rangel made this week. Black community looks at two of you as old fools and has no conscience. Young Obama has run his campaign with tremendous success and has broken the racial barriers in us. Those who are attacking him are doing so because of jealousy. Obama is smart, competent, tremendous speaker and admirable senator. For Johnson to deny his speech means he is a coward and a controlled personality. Obama has impress millions of Americans young or old in this present political Diaspora. For Bill and Hillary we are not horses you can ride when you want or how you want to. I know for sure 50% or more of blacks will rather stay at home or vote for Republican candidate than to vote for you in this coming election---sorry. Enough is enough. We are watching and the world is watching as well. Let us watch and see where any democratic candidate is going in this election without black votes.
To date, Barack has ran the more efficient campaign of all the candidates; he's had the least number of people to leave or be fired, or embarrass him by making derogatory attacks against other candidates.  He has a "cabinet" of people around him who are with him; they can position him to win this thing but HE has set the tone, the pace, and the direction for the kind of campaign HE wants and so far, because they believe in him, they are delivering for him.

That's what the Clinton's really dislike.  Barack was supposed to be a joke against Hillary.  He is not supposed to possess the experience to put a cohesive "cabinet" together; he's not supposed to possess the experience to put a nation-wide grassroots campaign together; he's not supposed to possess the experience to hold himself and his family together during times of insults and the "mud slinging" typical only to well-seasoned politicians.  He was not supposed to possess the experience to put caucuses together well enough to go against and beat them in any caucus or primary race.

Well hello to Barack's experience.

Experience certainly has it's value in a persons ability to lead and make sound judgments but it has nothing to do with how much "time-in" a person has or needs.  (If they were the case, how do we explain George dubya?).

Hillary has experience to know how to fight with the Republicans if she would become president.  I believe thats one of the main things we are trying to change with this election.  In the name of our great country let's do this.  Elect Barack and let's get past a country stalled.
I find it extremely entertaining to read individuals writing about HIlary's "dirty politics".  ALL politics are dirty, just as all politicians are dirty.  Yes, even Obama.  It isn't about who seems to be "cleaner", it is about who will help our country the most.  Neither are perfect, neither fight fair, both will play the race/sex card, but at least Hilary seems to be putting forth some coherent ideas about how to better our crippled country.  Obama is simply telling us what he thinks we want to hear; most of his fantastical theories could never be substantiated.  AND, Hilary did not make Martin Luther King seem "smallish", she was simply stating a fact.  

So...  maybe we all should stop analyzing their tactics and start analyzing their proposals; the race for the Presidency is not a popularity contest, it is not about what politicians have done in their past (like Hilary 'supporting' the war- that was back in '02, after 9/11 practically everyone supported the 'war'; the point should be that she does not support it NOW), it is about who will make the best decisions for our country.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=575779

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google