ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama camp pushes back on Yucca

Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:39 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
In a conference call, the Obama campaign pushed back on attack ads by the Clinton campaign that questioned the candidate’s opposition to Nevada’s Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste dump, a designation most state residents strongly oppose.

Nevada State Sen. Steven Horsford called the attacks "text-book Washington politics" and promised that Obama's campaign would vigorously respond to any attacks made against Obama and his record on nuclear power.

The ad by the Clinton campaign accused Obama of having close ties to the nuclear power industry.

"And Barack Obama? The Las Vegas Review Journal said Obama was -- quote "hip deep in financial ties" to one of America's biggest Yucca mountain promoters... nuclear giant Exelon," the ad says.

According to a release by the Clinton campaign, Exelon employees have donated over $269,100 to Obama's federal campaigns and over $194,750 in 2008. Exelon has spent millions of dollars on lobbying the federal government on nuclear waste management.

However, Bob Fullerson, the former director of Citizen Alert which helped turn Nevada into an anti-dumping state for nuclear waste, claimed the attacks on Obama's record were unfair.

"It's completely ludicrous and disingenuous to say that he is soft on Yucca Mountain," Fullerson said on the conference call.

But Obama does support the expansion of nuclear power plants, if there is better technology to handle nuclear waste. He was the only candidate to take that position at the Democratic debate this past Tuesday in Las Vegas. The issue of nuclear waste and power is a prickly one for the candidate, since Illinois is one of the largest generators of nuclear waste in the country.

Obama's campaign released a fact sheet today quoting Obama saying that he believes every state should handle their own nuclear waste, rather than shipping it outside their own borders. Obama also joined fellow Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin in writing a letter in 2006 to Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) that said no regional nuclear waste sites should be created without local populations having veto power over the site.

Horsford said the Obama campaign would respond to the attack by Clinton, but wasn't able to expand on how the campaign planned to respond -- whether it be through direct mail, radio or television ads.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This is what I mean..the Clinton saga continues.
more double talk from obama...he is in favor of nuclear power if...and here you can fill in the blank...there is a "safe" way to store waste in the middle of where its used...this means he is against nuclear power because that is an impossible standard for every state to meet and he knows it...more doody from the doodyhead
Exelon employees have donated over $269,100 to Obama's federal campaigns and over $194,750 in 2008. Exelon has spent millions of dollars on lobbying the federal government on nuclear waste management.

Can you imagine if this was Hillary taking this money.   The Edwards and Obama supporter's heads would be spinning around like the girl in the exorcist.  Can we all agree now that all the candidates take money from lobbyist, even if they want to call it something else.  Edwards with the Assc. of Trial Lawyers(Was in the top 6 in money spent lobbying congress last year)  Let's all get real.  Hillary is no more corporate than anyone else.  She just chooses not to lie about it while the other candidates do.  Just because these institutions are not called an a official lobbying firm, they still lobby giving millions to Congress.  
Obama is in the tank for Exelon.  They don't give him all that large cash because they think he is a swell guy.  They want him to be their man in DC and he has been.  HE is a big support of coal, which they also dabble in, and he supports new nuke plants.
Typical Clinton attack. They don't need facts to attack, they only need to present their lies as facts. Yucca Mountain entire could not contain all the radioactive lies that Bill and Hillary make daily.

Vote for someone you can believe and in whom you can believe: Obama 2008.
Dear Friends:
I posted an earlier message and was not given my constitutional rights of Freedom of speech. Where is it?   Too hot for the up coming  Super Lotto of Election 2008?

Print it man!!!   I have rights you opened this to all comments.   Discrimination ain't right!!!

Women, Veterans, Ecologists, Clean Air, Autobaun Society Speak out!!!!  


More Clinton tricks!!!
Dear Friends:
where is my comment?  Constitutional rights is it my color or race or gender?     Equality,  Freedom of Speech,  get it on the internet.

Caucasians are becoming the minority!!! Right Candidates?
Here goes "Killary" once again lying to get what she wants. This is exactly the kind of politics we hate and want to move away from. She is so much of the washington DC machine that she cannot help herself. It's in her blood and it will tear America apart even more if she is the nominee.
HRC's campaign is deceiving the voters:


KNOW THE FACTS
http://factcheck.barackobama.com/


The Judgment to Lead 10/12/07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwgjYMw310U

Obama On Yucca Mountain:  http://www.wifr.com/home/headlines/10916081.html


OBAMA HAS CONSISTENTLY OPPOSED USING YUCCA FOR PERMANENT NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE

Obama Sent A Letter With Durbin Saying That There Should Be Local Veto Power For Nuclear Waste Dumping. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported, “When he was in Las Vegas in March for a health care forum, Obama told The Associated Press he opposed the repository and would look to regional storage as a solution. Surely that could not have meant keeping the stuff in Illinois, where much of the nation's commercial nuclear waste is generated. On June 30, 2006, Obama and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., wrote a letter to Sen. Pete Domenici, D-N.M., who at the time chaired a key energy subcommittee. ‘Senator Obama and I want to make it clear to the chairman that any plan to create regional nuclear waste sites without any local veto power is unacceptable,’ Durbin said at the time. ‘Illinois must not become a dumping ground -- even a temporary one -- for nuclear waste brought in from other states.’” [Las Vegas Review-Journal, 5/15/07]
If the facts are correct I do not see any reason for calling them attack ads. Everyone seems to get into it. I think the person they are speaking about in the ad should be the one to respond. THis also shows that Obama is not lilly white. More and more will come out as time goes on. Obama needs to grow a thicker skin. He is in the real world now.
As reported in Newsweek online...

CAMPAIGN 2008
Obama's Creative Clippings
The ad may be new, but we've seen this tactic, from this candidate, before.

By Justin Bank | factcheck.org
Jan 17, 2008 | Updated: 2:34  p.m. ET Jan 17, 2008


Once again, the campaign uses a quote from a news story to say Obama's health plan would offer universal coverage. But the story doesn't even contain the sentence that flashes on the screen. And the full article points out that his plan "does not guarantee" full coverage and cites an expert who says as much.

The ad also shows a clip saying that Obama has been against the war in Iraq since the beginning. True enough, but the story also chastises him for making too much of the boldness of his early stance.
                               
This is the second time in as many weeks that we've written about Democratic candidate Barack Obama's misleading use of quotes pulled from newspapers. This ad is running in Nevada in advance of Saturday's caucus.

You can see the wohole article at www.newsweek.com

The Clintons are re-showing their true colors. Those liars need to get out of town. I can't believe anyone in their right might would want to send them back to the White House. The democratic party establishment is absolutely insane to back her nomination.It's simply outrageous!
It is so typical of Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign that she would stoop to lies and innuendoes in order to win an election, or in this case, a caucus.

It only serves to underscore the REAL issue in this campaign, character.  Issues come and issues go.  In the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon first debate, one of the major issues raised was about the islands of Quemoy and Matsu.  An hour after the debate, those place names disappeared like so much fog.  But the character of the candidates will be with us for as long as they hold the office they seek.

Hillary and Bill Clinton have demonstrated that they are nothing more than Democratic Karl Roves; ready willing and quite able to do anything to advance their cause, even if it means to impugn the character and positions of an honorable man.  We've had enough of this politics, it's time for a CHANGE!!!
OK, you fanatic Obama supporters... before you annoint him as the next Messiah, check out Newsweek's latest article pointing out how HE uses "text book Washington tactics" in his TV ads in Nevada.  Oh, my God!!!  Obama acting like a Chicago politician?????  I am so SHOCKED!!!!!  Here's the headline and the link to the article in Newsweek, for you Obama supporters who truly care about the truth as much as you say you do:

Obama's Creative Clippings

The ad may be new, but we've seen this tactic, from this candidate, before.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/94900/page/1
Who cares where individual campaign donors work.  It is a completely moot point and someone should call Hillary out on her misleading.  I think I understand her strategy, throw so much mud around that you can't tell what's really mud and what's really $%#&.  
Truth hurts, does not it?
This again proves that Hussein Obama is untrustworthy, divisive and calculated. Vote for Clinton - she is clever, warm and honest and will be the best president America ever had!

Clinton is Cool!
This again proves that Hussein Obama is untrustworthy, divisive and calculated. Vote for Clinton - she is clever, warm and honest and will be the best president America ever had!

Clinton is Cool!
Hey Hillary supporters it's not to late to change sides!! LOL


Hillary keep killing your campaign

Barack keep shining your light on the nation

I guess Mr Perfect takes money from the company that pushes for Yucca, but he is against their policies?

Contradictory?
Obama is soft when it comes to Yucca...there is no doubt.
Ok for him to play loose with the truth on his ads but someone says something about him it is an attack.He is such a little whiner. Vote for anyone but him.
Rob in Nevada- that article you referenced was ridiculous.  All candidates use positive clips about them.  The fact is the commercial is not misleading.  Obama does have a plan to offer affordable healthcare to American and he has always opposed the Iraq war.

However, Hillary so often misrepresents her own record and the record of her oppenents, that reporting on it would fill every newscast.
Liberals think we should power the country with windmills.
Kelly from PA... I didn't write the Newsweek article... Newsweek did.  So now you're saying Hillary lies, and Newsweek lies?  My, this is some convoluted conspiracy against Obama, isn't it?  Or is it possible, just POSSIBLE, that Obama is as much a machine politician as those you dislike so much???  Grow up, everyone.  The man got to the US Senate from the south side of Chicago!!!  He didn't do it by being Mr. Clean Jeans!!!  And we're not electing Captain Kangaroo, either!!!
Dear Stan - I believe you are referring to wind turbines. They generate electric power. Windmills grind grain. Just as Obama's campaign doesn't always get it right when it comes to understanding the energy needs of our country - neither do folks like you understand the importance of using a broad range of energy producing options. Nuclear power is extremely expensive. So many people use the environment as a shield or excuse when the reality of why we haven't moved forward with nuclear power in many years is because without significant taxpayer subsidies, it isn't worth it for the big energy companies like Exelon to build one. You know, Exelon -the big contributor to Obama's campaign. Why do you think he voted for the lousy 2005 energy bill. It was a disaster for the American people, but a real boon to the large utilities and oil and gas companies. I hope you feel good about subsidizing all these big companies with your paycheck while your energy costs continues to climb. We need a President who understands energy issues - not one who does follows the lead of his "advisors" in the energy industry.
dear mary h decator ga,

 Please get your facts straight along with other idiots that stand my hillry clinton. I think you better study your facts before bring them to the comment section here.

 Mrs Clinton has taken money from all kinds of electric and others during the past 8 or so years she has been in the sinate. Its called studing the facts before you and many others come up with facts you cant back up. This all is a Clinton game they have played for the past 14 or so years. They have the habbit of having others throw the snow balls they make which bill clinton is famous for.

  He is playing the bad cop and she the good cop in this entire election cycle and they are the best team at doing it. They have their hands in everything thats put out by others and stand back and scream and holler "we had nothing to do with it". It's now getting old with their crap and its about time people stand up to the truth. They are dirty and they are just like carl rove when it comes to dirty tricks. Its easy to throw out little tid bits and have their hinchmen run with it just to make her look good, and for the former pres. his beheavor is unspeakable. Never in the history as a former pres. done what he has done this time around. He wont beable to get away with it if she is the winner of the primaries.

  I used to like bill clinton but cant stand to listen to him speak anymore and I voted for him each time he ran for president. And for him to call Obama a kid is unreal since he and obama are the same age when they ran for president. I no longer respect him and no use for the clintons and their bull shit and wouldnt vote for her to be dog catcher.

  SO MARY GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU START SAYING THINGS THAT ARE NOT TRUE. THRERE ARE RECORDS TO READ TO FIND THE TRUTH ABOUT HOW OBAMA VOTED AS WELL AS CLINTON AND THERE ARE RECORDS ABOUT EXCEPTING CAMPAIGN MONIES ON BOTH PEOPLE.
For Democrats, Obama is the Candidate of Confidence, Clinton the Candidate of Fear

As Democrats debate on this campaign and on the future of our party, the tone among Clinton supporters has come to differ sharply from that of Obama supporters. While Obama supporters exude confidence, excitement, and the will to win, Clinton supporters seem increasingly defensive; increasingly gripped by the fear that, in debating as we are now, we are fragmenting the party and playing into the hands of the Republicans. Clinton supporters cast Obama as a dangerous interloper who threatens to rip the Democratic Party apart, as an irresponsible dreamer, as a pied piper who is leading the children away to certain disaster. His supporters are cast as misguided idealists, as starry-eyed adolescents who need to give up their "false hopes" of something better than politics as usual and face dull, mediocre "reality." Surely our unruly behavior is already putting the Democratic campaign at serious risk. Surely even now the Republicans must be watching and grinning as we divide so that they can conquer. "Shhhh...," we are told by Clintonistas, "Be careful what you say.... The Republicans are licking their lips right now."

I say if they're licking their lips now they'll be eating crow come November. For any Republican who might be tempted to put tongue to lip, think again: I and other Obama supporters will vote for Hillary Clinton in November if she wins the Democratic nomination, as I should expect Clinton supporters will do in kind if Obama is the nominee, because we intend to win. The United States and the world can't stand another four-to-eight years of Republican insanity. Hillary Clinton is not my first choice among Democrats, but she beats any Republican by far. In the meantime, let the debate continue: Debate is, after all, the essence of that clever little Greek idea for which our party is named. We have the advantage; we can afford a healthy debate. With a field of candidates such as ours compared to the assortment of flawed specimens running for the Republican nomination, and with our enthusiasm compared to the mood of bitterness and gloom among Republicans, I'd say it is we Democrats who should be licking our lips.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=585257

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google