ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



SC voting problems

Posted: Saturday, January 19, 2008 6:05 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro and NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Up to 1,500 votes may be cast on paper ballots in the Republican primary today in Horry County, S.C., which includes Myrtle Beach, because of voting machine problems due to human error on the part of county election commission staff, who failed to properly prepare the machines, state and county election officials said. After being tested, the machines should have been reset in preparation for election day, but that did not happen prior to this morning.
 
"There were about one or two machines in each of 80 to 90 percent of the precincts that were affected," said Lisa Bourcier, spokeswoman for the Horry County Election Commission. The majority of the 118 precincts have three machines in them, she said; a minority have as low as one or two machines or as high as four or five.
 
Horry County, with 127,000 voters in the northeastern corner of the state, bordering North Carolina and the coast, had been expected to turnout strongly for McCain. McCain’s strength here is the coast, and reports of voting irregularities have stoked fears in the McCain campaign, which is locked in a tight battle with Huckabee in this all-important early state primary.

Underscoring that fear, the campaign sent out a release this afternoon that said, in part, that “voters are being turned away from the polls because electronic voting machines are not working and paper ballots are not available. Some voters say they are being instructed to return at a later time. We are disturbed by these reports and hope that this issue is resolved immediately."

Huckabee also has to contend with the potential of depressed voter turnout among his consituents, because of inclement weather in the northwestern portions of the state, areas dominated by socially conservative voters.

There are still four precincts in Horry where machines are not yet functional which "we are working on now," Bourcier said, adding that they have "brought on extra people to help."
 
"One thing to be thankful for is it's Saturday," she said. "There was no mad rush before work" like there would have been had there been a traditional Tuesday election here.
 
Voters are backing up at some locations, Bourcier said. "We will open up the courthouse next door," she said.

The Columbia State reported that napkins and paper towels were being used to record votes. The protocol is to use pre-printed paper ballots, State Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said. But if those aren't available when voters are there, "In the meantime, they should use whatever means necessary to record the voters ballot," Whitmire added. Each precinct is equipped with a ballot lockbox, so the vote would be written down and dropped in the box and later counted.

Horry County Republican Party Chairman Robert Rabon says a handful of paper ballots are routinely distributed to polling locations in advance in case of emergency, but that some precincts began to run out of their stock once the problem was discovered. County police immediately began running extra paper ballots out to those locations.

He says, anecdotally, that when he went to one polling location to drop off extra paper ballots, two people were exiting who had been turned away and told to return later. He gave those two individuals paper ballots, and they were able to cast their votes, bringing the total number of people unable to vote at that location down to three. The implication here is that the actual number of people unable to vote because of this problem is likely small.

Rabon added that the problem of broken machines was "widespread" but that the paper ballot shortage was quickly resolved. Five crews of technicians were dispatched to polling locations to fix the programming. By mid-afternoon, he said, all precincts had "either got all the ballots they need or the machines were running."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Democrats --- Demand Paper Ballots
Stand Tall America!

As you know Mitt Romney is a Flip Flopper this is  Blog where you can post the Flip Flops of Mitt Romney
http://mittromneyflipflopper.blogspot.com/

Come Join Us!
Domenico........When you write "fix the programming" what exactly does "Fix" mean in this instance.

Fire Eater(hoping McCain get a flag pole enema)
Democrates must know, America and the Republican smear machine will tear Obama apart if elected as their cadidate with the middle name Hussain.  
Democrates must know, America and the Republican smear machine will tear Obama apart if elected as their cadidate with the middle name Hussain.  
iVotronic is paperless. This was used in SC.
The constitution states:
ARTICLE II.

RIGHT OF SUFFRAGE

SECTION 1. Elections to be by secret ballot; protection of right of suffrage.

All elections by the people shall be by secret ballot, but the ballots shall not be counted in secret. The right of suffrage, as regulated in this Constitution, shall be protected by laws regulating elections and prohibiting, under adequate penalties, all undue influence from power, bribery, tumult, or improper conduct.

Based on the SC Elections committee web site, the votes are stored in 3 memory locations "inside the machine"
http://www.scvotes.org/voter_frequently_asked_questions/after_i_cast_my_ballot_where_do_my_votes_go
After I cast my ballot, where do my votes go?

Election results are stored in three independent memory locations within the voting machine. Additionally there is a removable storage card locked inside the voting unit that records internal audit information.

So the votes are counted in Secret, no paper, the voting machine is the only place this gets stored. So by your own admission, the SC votes are done in secret, un-auditable and generally...Secret.
Read all about the real story of the problems on Brad Blog (BradBlog.com). The recount in New Hampshire is turning up shocking evidence of problems or tampering and nobody in the mainstream media seems to be paying attention at all. What's up with this? Don't we want our elections to be counted cleanly and fairly? Doesn't this stuff have to be beyond even the "appearance of impropriety"? C'mon people. This is bad.
Did you miss the really big news that came out about South Carolina last week? South Carolina Elections Are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!?!

Somehow, the corporate media overlooked this major story.  It was mentioned on the Voice of the Voters radio show, the Vote Rescue Radio show, the Rule of Law Radio show, and the Ron Paul Revolution radio show.  

This news could have helped SC avoid the problems that the Republican voters experienced on January 19, 2008, if a Presidential candidate had taken action to enforce the fundamental right to know that our votes are counted.

See, Scoop – Top Scoop January 19, 2008 - Appeal to Edwards - Take a Stand for Voting Rights by Michael Collins
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0801/S00151.htm

Read the top story published on OpEdNews.com on January 17, 2008 - An Open Letter to Senator John Edwards: The Constitution Prohibits Secret Vote Counting!  Will You Take Action?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_mark_a___080117_an_open_letter_to_se.htm

Read the top story published on OpEdNews.com on January 14, 2008 - South Carolina Elections Are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!?!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_mark_a___080114_south_carolina_elect.htm

Briefly:

Article II, § 1 of the Constitution of South Carolina states, “the ballots shall not be counted in secret.”  Computers count inside their case, with no oversight, just like they are told to do, unless of course, they malfunction or are hacked. Computers count votes in secret.  No one can see a computer count, and therefore, using computers to count votes in secret violates South Carolina’s Constitution!  

This is the election integrity jackpot, a Constitutional provision prohibiting counting votes in secret! No more need to refer to case law, evidence, or logic to argue against secret vote counting, at least in South Carolina.

Senator Edwards, you have courageously spoken out against touch screen voting.  Will you take action to require South Carolina to follow the law?  How about another Presidential candidate?  

Please help us make sure that the votes are counted accurately. GO TO http://www.votecount2008.org/ and JOIN NOW!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=592019

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google