ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Carolina cage match

Posted: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:17 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** The Carolina cage match: Watching last night’s Democratic debate was much like the first time you witnessed a fight at lunchtime in high school: It was exhilirating, memorable, and a bit horrifying at the same time. While it wasn’t akin the rumble scene in the rain in “The Outsiders,” it was easily the most heated debate to date. The candidates -- particularly Obama and Clinton -- were, well, angry and it got personal. Obama, in particular, seemed to have a lot he wanted to get off his chest. He began on the offense, but once Edwards got into the act, Obama was put on defensive, which we’re guessing wasn't the game plan. Of course, when you're the candidate under fire, it usually means you're ahead. And at least in South Carolina, that’s where Obama is.

Video: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on Hillary Clinton's and Barack Obama's squabbling during Monday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.

*** Debate 101: As we and others keep on saying, Obama has improved a lot as debater since April. Nevertheless, he consistently got caught in a debate trap by responding to every charge with an explanation. It's a stand-up thing to do, but it ends up putting him off message. And it allows for the attack to get more air time rather than the original point or message Obama meant to be heard. Clinton, by contrast, rarely answers a charge directly and instead deflects by counter-punching, which shows her discipline. Of course, that difference epitomizes their candidacies: Clinton is the disciplined political street fighter, quick to score points against the opposition; Obama, meanwhile, tries to be transparent and accountable -- even as those goals, as last night’s debate sometimes showed, aren’t always easy to achieve.

*** A more polite second half: Obama seemed to get that he got a bit too hot, because in the second part of the debate, he refused a new chance to go after Bill Clinton a second time. And in this second half, Obama was particularly strong: His answers on religion and his national security rebuttal to Clinton were very good. That strong second-half performance will blunt any potential negative backlash he received in the first part. But, overall, the campaign probably believes they showed that he's tough enough and they did want to continue to push the idea that the Clintons will say and do anything to win -- which could very well be their chief weakness. In fact, this will be the GOP narrative if Clinton wins the nomination.

*** When candidates attack: As for Clinton, she never looks good on the attack -- and she didn't last night. But because she was getting in the mud with Obama, the two neutralized each other at best. Of course, one of her goals last night was probably simply avoiding a major gaffe as she's headed out of the state and is somewhat downplaying her chances by staying out of South Carolina for three days. Another goal, as others have pointed out, might have been to bloody Obama in front of February 5th voters who were tuning in. While Obama reminded the audience that the Clintons will bend the truth to further their goals, Clinton tried to hammer home the message that Obama stands on the sidelines (those “present” votes) and isn’t as consistent as he claims he is (on Iraq and health care.) That was all new information for February 5th viewers. And will she keep it up when Clinton holds a press conference -- taking place as we publish -- in DC?

*** Edwards as Rodney King: Edwards had the easiest last night: He got to look like the above-it-all guy. That's at leaset better than being the third wheel, which to some he may ALSO have looked. When you aren't as competitive as your two opponents, it's easy to play the mediator, and he did it well. He did no damage to his favorable rating (which is generally high), but did he do enough to start climbing back above that 15% threshold he needs to keep getting delegates? On points, Edwards can call himself the winner since he got to make the easy can't-we-all just-get-along points. But the center of attention for this debate was Obama. And, ultimately, that's probably a good thing for the South Carolina front-runner.

*** The Bill Clinton factor: He's now Obama's chief challenger in South Carolina for most of this week, since candidate Clinton is doing a February 5 tour of CA., AZ, and NJ over the next two days. Short term, Bill Clinton's been an asset, but how long can candidate Clinton have her husband out there "yelling at the neighbors" for her. Does the dynastic stuff become a problem for candidate Clinton at some point the higher profile her husband takes? We've heard from quite a few GOP strategists who aren't unhappy with Bill's high profile. He's becoming less statesman-like and may just be as helpful in rallying the Republican base as some believe she will be. Still, for the primary, the use of Bill appears to be effective. Obama looked like every Republican critic of Bill Clinton over his eight years, flummoxed that he was losing to this guy.
 
*** GOP musings: And while last night’s debate has placed most of the presidential focus on the Democratic side, there are some GOP developments to keep an eye on: The GOP intelligentsia is starting to come around to the idea that McCain could be their guy; Huckabee is no longer providing transportation for his traveling press and seems to be turning his attention AWAY from Florida; and Thompson is down tending to his ill mother -- he has no public schedule today.

*** On the trail: Edwards and Obama are in South Carolina. Hillary Clinton, however, is not. Her husband makes three stops on her behalf instead in Aiken, Anderson and Greenville; Edwards hosts a town hall in Conway and then appears on The Late Show with David Letterman. Obama holds four events, including two rallies, in Greenville, Greenwood, Lexington and Orangeburg. The Republicans are in Florida for the most part: Giuliani stops in at a deli in Palm Beach Gardens; Huckabee partakes in a pro-life march in Atlanta (Georgia’s a Feb. 5 state) and then raises money in Gainesville; McCain holds two rallies in Pensacola and Fort Walton Beach, then raises money in New York City; Paul is in DC; Romney stops in Boca Raton (where he meets with the Republican Jewish Coalition), then heads to Coral Springs and Naples.

Countdown to SC Dem primary: 4 days
Countdown to Florida: 7 days
Countdown to Tsunami Tuesday: 14 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 287 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 364 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.  

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/1/22/11049/2664

FACT CHECK: Obama, His Contributor Rezko, the Slum Landlord Business

by truthteller2007, Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 01:10:49 AM EST

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engaged in a heated exchange over Obama's work for a certain Rezko during tonight's CNN-Congressional Black Caucus debate.  An assessment of their statements reveals that Barack Obama misrepresented the work he performed for Rezko, who Hillary Clinton correctly characterized as a "slum landlord" who is also one of Barack Obama's "contributors."  Clinton, however, neglected to mention that Rezko is presently under federal indictment for fraudulent schemes involving government officials and government funds.  Because this fact check is limited to statements uttered during the debate, it will not explore Rezko's involvement in the questionable scheme whereby Obama purchased his Chicago mansion.
Hillary kicked butt as usual in every area. As a female shes damned if shes too tough and damned if she appears weak. Obama is intimidated by her as he is his own wife. She is the stronger candidate by far. Edwards came in second and Obama, still lacks substance and too weak to stand up to the republicans. We don't need a "nice guy" like Kerry again.
Lock your doors and pull down the shades, South Carolinian, B Clinton is trolling for votes. He is the past, new dawn/new day.

NO MORE MELODRAMAS
NO DYNASTIC-STYLE RULE
NO MORE SMEARING THEN APOLOGIZING
NO MORE HALF-TRUTHS
NO MORE DIVISIVE POLITICS
NO MORE CONGRESSIONAL/GUBERTORIAL/LEGISLATIVE LOSSES FOR DEMS(happened in the 90's)


OBAMA08 FOR THE FIERCE URGENCY OF NOW
I think we all saw last night what the Clinton "say-anything" strategy looks like. She's a liar just like her husband was, and they'll do anything to get the White House back... even run the party through the mud.

Why anyone would want to bring The Clinton Circus back to town is beyond me.
Obama scored his biggest debate victory over Clinton this season with last night's knockout in the fiery exchange.  The crowd went in to that with 60% applauding Obama and 40% applauding Clinton, and by the end of it, 90% were booing Clinton HEAVILY.  That kind of shift is DEVASTATING for the Clinton campaign.  

Time's Mark Halperin gave Barack Obama the highest rating of the debate with an A-.  The dailykos post-debate poll has Obama ahead by double digits, at a site that has long been solid Edwards territory.  CNN Focus Groups of SC undecided voters left the debate with 50% of them planning to vote for Obama, although they also liked Edwards; notice, though, no mention of Clinton.

Although the issue parts of the debate were more balanced, with all three doing quite well for the most part, the nuclear war Clinton started with Obama blew up in her own face; she was counting that he wouldn't fight back, and he did.  All those who wanted to know if Obama could fight back hard against a GOP opponent now know that he would, and yet, with his very positive answer to the Bill Clinton as black President question among others, he ultimately left the debate hall resonating at the end with his hopeful and unifying message.

Hillary's not even running for President anymore. Bill has taken the campaign over because Hillary has screwed it up so bad. Remember her saying that she was "winning"? Not anymore.
Although it got a bit out of hand I feel it was good to finally see Obama strike back.  In the previous debates I feel he has stayed a bit too far above the fray and has come off weak.  Last night he stood up for his recorrd and the outright mis-interpretations the Clintons have made of his every statement.  Hopefully he got it out of his system and will now get back to business and to his message whic is transformative.  Edwards did a great job and was really on message and in a less preachy and heated way then he has appeared in the past, but he also got his hands dirty and played some sly tricks himself.  He definately got his jabs in.
I guess this is campaign is going to be about race after all.  I was shocked twice last night while watching MSNBC and the CNN debate and the first time was when the noted black journalist Clarence Page stated that “All blacks should be supporting Obama”.  I can only imagine if John Edwards or a white journalist said “All whites should be voting for a white candidate.  Then during the debate Obama made a statement about creating a Department of Racial Justice.  Is this going to mean that police will have to start making arrests by racial groups depending upon the makeup of the local population?  Will this mean that when the percentage of blacks or Hispanics arrested equals the local population makeup that the police will be force to only patrol white neighborhoods until the number of arrest conforms to some racial crime quota?  I found both the remark made by Page racist and the thought of a Department of Racial Justice troubling.  While many have tried to make sure this campaign wasn’t about race it’s obvious that many of the supporters of Obama think it should be.
Janis says:  Hillary's not even running for President anymore.

I agree but, why is the obvious fact that Bill is running for a 3rd term not an issue.  Why are the pundits not discussing this and why are people ignoring this.
We have had 7 years of a president who stomped on the constitution and it looks like the clintons will continue this trend if they get back in.
I cannot understand the sheer stupidity of the electorate who willingly turn a blind eye to this.
And, I also wonder if there is not something shady and wrong in having a campaign where it is not challenged that two people are running in one campaign.
This country will rue the day the Clintons have been allowed to have their way and be allowed this unchallenged mockery of our primaries and elections.
Maybe the fact that the democratic party will be coming apart at the seams if Hillary is the pretend nominee.
They left this party weak and ineffectual when they left in 2000, and will finish it off now and it will be with the help of the blind supporters who are codependents to the most destructive force in our party.  Not the republicans but, the Clintons.
One thing is clear after the debate last night: Obama is the nation's only hope to move beyond disgusting partisan politics.  Clinton will relish it, and get absolutely nothing done IF she can even manage to get elected.  Obama is our only hope.
Obama was very transparent last night showing that he is really bumfuzzled with the whole thing.  
He could not explain the present votes nor his fascination with Ronald Reagan, he hemmed and hawed but could not come up with a decent explanation.The Rezco fact that Hillary stated threw him totally off guard, Way to go Hillary Babe!
His "inexperience" and "phoniness" shone brightly through.
Let the African Americans of South Carolina give him a win in their state and that just proves that he is another black man running for president that once again does not have the intelligence and substance it takes to get the job. Hillary was playing to the country last night, not the blacks of South Carolina.
I predict though that Hillary will do well in S.C. come Saturday. There is a white population too in our state, lest you guys forget.
Senator Obama stood up for himself and stood up for America. The "Clintons" free pass to be the "bulls in the china shop" in this election just expired.

P.S. It was nice to hear Senator Clinton say the name Rezcko herself instead of just sending her minions to post it anonymously on blogs - a rare glimpse at the REAL Hillary. As an Obama supporter, I welcome the opportunity to open the "seedy supporter door" - talk about your 4 page memos.
Why have I never heard before about Hillary working on the corporate board of Walmart for 6 years??  The Clintons funded their presidential campaign in 1992 with Walmart money, and nobody knew?  
Is Bill running for President or Hillary??? She isnt a strong woman after all if she has to depend on her husband. I am impressed with Obama he is taking on both Clitons.
No we dont need a king and queen those days are gone when we were under the thumb of England...The Clinton are obsessed with the white house when they left they just about cleaned the place out, the must have forgotten something.........
Shadow, Hamden, CT (Sent Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:34 AM)

I imagine you wearing a little skirt and holding pom-poms...
My brother in law is still trying to convince me that Bill was our best president, ever.  Of course he was dumb enough to marry my sister!

I think Obama won, no contest. He was crisp and quick. Showed a great wit, as well as phenomenal debating skills on the serious issues. He was extremely effective in his challenges, as well as in his comebacks.

I want to make one other point. I am so sick and tired of the Clintons, and some in the media like Pat Buchanan, trying to "MARGINALIZE" Obama as the 'Black candidate.' Does everyone have AMNESIA and forgotten that Obama beat Hillary by TEN POINTS in IOWA which is 98% WHITE??? He also did very well in mostly white NH and Nevada. In a General Election against the GOP Obama will win his own current white supporters, like me, as well as most of the whites who supported Hillary and Edwards in the primaries. And in South Carolina, if Bill Clinton is challenging Obama as to who can get the most African-American votes - Bill has said he will go door-to-door to win them - why would this not raise the stakes? In other words, the Clintons are both extremely popular figures in the African-American community, as is Obama. So this is a real test to see who can attract more of their votes, as South Carolina has a large Black population. This contest should not be 'written off' by the pundits because of the demographics of SC. Quite the contrary. You have the 'first Black president' (Bill) and his wife,
running against the first really serious, mainstream  African-American candidate. Let's see who does better. But, please, don't fall for the Clintons' tactic of trying to "marginalize" Obama. He WON IOWA 39% to Hillary's 29% among an electorate that is 98% white.  
No we dont need a king and queen those days are gone when we were under the thumb of England...The Clinton are obsessed with the white house when they left they just about cleaned the place out, they  must have forgotten something.........
susanhu, “Barack, You’re Lying, and I’m Calling You On It,” ”MyDD”, January 21, 2008.

www.mydd.com/story/2008/1/21/213555/219
I was hoping Senator Obama would go after Senator Clinton & ex-president Bill Clinton with both guns blazing. He did.

No way, absolutely no way should Bill Clinton's attacks on Barack Obama be acceptable and left unanswered.  I don't care if media analysts assume this will hurt Barack Obama. It would hurt him more if he said nothing.
   NOTICE TO DEMOCRATS    THE REPUBLICANS WILL USE THE CLINTON CHRONICLES.COM ===SEE FREE VIDEO===SHOWS CLINTON INVOLVED IN A 11 MILLION A MOTH COCAINE OPERATION==HIS COCAINE HABIT===HIS ARKANSAS GOVERNMENT COVERING UP MURDERS AND SUICIDES, INCLUDING 2 TEENS WHO CAME UPON A COCAINE DROP, WERE KILLED AND PUT ON RAILROAD TRACK, AND WAS COVERED UP BY CLINTONS GOVT. HILLARY WAS INVOLVED==ALSO SHOWS BILLS ATTENDANCE AT SEX PARTIES ACCORDING TO WITNESS==WHY DO YOU THINK THE DRUG PARDONS===HE WAS INVOLVED
shadow, were you actually at the debate looking around at the crowd doing your precentages for applauding and booing? i streamed the whole debate and would find it quite difficult to come up with precentages since the cameras were actually on the candidates.
Chuck, I agree with assessments of the debate which gave the WIN to OBAMA. You media types just cannot be pleased. This summer you wanted a food fight. Last night you got a fight and now you claim Obama was wrong for going after the Clintons for attacking him relentlessly. But just before last night's fight, you all were crying out about how he needed to engage and take them on..,

Famous words? Gimme a break. Obama did exactly what he needed to do last night, STAND UP TO Clinton -- both Hill and Bill. His willingness to engage, telegraphed in the ABC GMA interview, and with a warning shot across the bow by Mayor Shirley Franklin, signals to Obama surrogates they can be excruciatingly tough on the Clintons now and not be perceived as "going negative." This is now the good guy getting pummeled by the bullies and the rest of the class coming to the aid -- not rescue, but aid -- of the good guy.

Plus, something that might escape your attention but was also significant: Obama took on Clinton during MLK week. Call it standing up to "slave master and his wife" if you will. His "defiance" (if you want to take it that far) plays quite well with the African Americans sitting on the fence. Plus, what also escaped your attention is his jovial relationship with John Edwards and the subtle way both he and Edwards ignored Hillary in the second half of the debate. There was no joshing back and forth between Barack and Hillary. The "coziness" between the two men is reassuring to white voters who can differentiate between dislike of Hillary as apposed to dislike like of whites. He carefully diffused what could have been portrayed at any other time as the angry black man scenario.

Hillary came off shrill and unlikable, a policy wonkish, snarky ,,, dare I say it b*tch. Plus her so-called "ethics" slap against Obama opens her Pandora's box of 35 years of trouble. Whatever Tony Rezko did pales in significance to what the Clintons did both in and out of the White House. Her sleaze factor is on display.

(The Rezko story is a non-starter. The Sun-Times and Tribune have been all over that story and have no dirt on Obama. Now will be you reporting on Bill's massive financial divestiture of funds received from a questionable financial backer? Perhaps you all need to do some "spadework" on HIllary.)

Edwards made himself relevant again and will take white votes from Hillary.

As for Super Tuesday, you all should not count your chickens before they come home to roost. Stop dusting off the Hillary crown, because voters in other states -- especially white voters -- who were waiting to see Obama engage got their wish last night. And it was not at all helpful to the "new Hillary.

I am just so sick of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Are we so unimaginative that we would pick them again to lead the country ?  Bill Clinton is a liar.  This is a fact that everyone knows because he  liedn to us all on television in 1997.  
The only debate victory was by John Edwards.  He looked Presidential and sounded more than competent.  I know First Read hates to give him much credit, but he out shined both of the others.  Obama is an orator not a debater and Hillary just sounded shrill.
It’s seems as if Bill Clinton is running for a 3rd term as president. Is Hill Clinton is George Bush and Bill Clinton is Dick Cheney?

The more she relies on Bill Clinton as her attack dog and top campaigner the more she’ll be attacked on all the negativity surrounding  the Clinton white house. Its real hard to talk about change when the republicans remind the voters about all the scandals that the Clintons were involved in.

She may be the front runner but I question her ability to win the general election. Her negatives are very high. She would rally a dormant GOP base. And she has exposed herself in a way that leaves her extremely vulnerable to the GOP.

The GOP sees her candidacy as an opportunity to put President Clinton on trial. They will remind us why we are glad that era has passed and they will tell us we’d be crazy to want to go back. I think it’s a very compelling argument. Not impossible to overcome, but extremely difficult, especially if McCain is the nominee
We FINALLY see the real OBAMA.  Just another political hack.  Where was the grand vision, change, and or no more old-style politics.  Obama is almost a "reverse racist!!"  He can say anyghing because he is half black, but others cannot.  WHAT A PILE.  
Did you notice OBAMA's cursory hand shake at the end.  POOR LOER?  
Obama, you are not ready for the big times.  Go back, and grow up and maybe in 8 year after PRESIDENT HRC!!
P. S. Clinton has slid away from good buddy playboy Ron Burkle...from the WSJ:

Former President Clinton stands to reap around $20 million -- and will sever a politically sensitive partnership tie to Dubai -- by ending his high-profile business relationship with the investment firm of billionaire friend Ron Burkle.

Mr. Clinton is negotiating to end his relationship with Mr. Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. as part of a broader effort to protect the presidential campaign of his wife, Sen. Hillary Clinton, from potential conflicts of interest. Details of Mr. Clinton's involvement in Yucaipa and his efforts to unwind it come from documents and interviews with people familiar with the matter.


The former president has had links to Yucaipa since early 2002, when Mr. Burkle -- a longtime friend and political contributor -- offered him a role there. Mr. Clinton's association with the firm began at a time when he was looking to earn large amounts of money, partly to pay heavy legal bills accumulated to defend himself and Mrs. Clinton from several investigations during his presidency.

Now, as he negotiates with Yucaipa to withdraw from the relationship, he is a wealthy man, thanks partly to tens of millions of dollars he has earned making speeches around the world..."


Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the sleaziest of them all?
Can we please get the Democrats to put Hillary away?  Why are any Dems supporting her, when it is so clear she will lose the general election for us again?  Who's coat tails would you rather ride as a Democrat, Obama or Clinton?  Wake up Dems, and vote for success.  Vote for Obama.
Ali v. Frazier.  Ouch! Let's get it on.

Did anyone hears Buchanan comments this morning on MSNBC?  Obama has become "ghettoized" and is gaining only the black vote and loosing white and hispanic vote.  Gee!  And they say race is not an issue.  LOL
• A “Confidential” May 26, 1993 Memorandum from Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) to Hillary Clinton entitled, “Health Care Reform Communications,” which criticizes the Task Force as a “secret cabal of Washington policy ‘wonks’” that has engaged in “choking off information” from the public regarding health care reform.  The memorandum suggests that Hillary Clinton “use classic opposition research” to attack those who were excluded by the Clinton Administration from Task Force deliberations and to “expose lifestyles, tactics and motives of lobbyists” in order to deflect criticism.  Senator Rockefeller also suggested news organizations “are anxious and willing to receive guidance [from the Clinton Administration] on how to time and shape their [news] coverage.”

This goes to show that Hillary Clinton will do ANYTHING to keep tabs on her enemies.  I would have liked someone to discuss the topic above last night, but Hillary made too much of a fool of herself.

One does have to question....
Is it Bill or Hillary running for president?.....
I think we got the answer last night....
Obama just kicked butt last night. He addresses the issues and concerns he has without resorting to the anger exhibited by Clinton. Obama is rational while Clinton is unhinged and incoherent. She wants to lead the free world? Not a chance with that giant chip on her shoulder.
This was no debate last night--it was a DEBACLE. I wonder how long it will be before the "Kleenex Express" featuring Hillary's "Sobbing Supporters" rides again!! Well, actually, next up should be some No-Doze for Bill--nodding off CENTER STAGE at an MLK event!! Good grief...What a pair...
READ "The end of the Obama Revolution" -  This guy has it right, just out today -
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,530129,00.html

This article is one of the best I have read regarding Obama's downfall.
The big winner last night was John McCain.  After staring out this election cycle really enthused about the Democrats and their chances to retake the White House, I've had to do a double take.

Both Clintons are reminding me of just why I did not vote for one Democrat in the 90's.  After supporting Kerry in '04, Obama came as a welcome breath of fresh air and I still will vote for him in the primary.  However, at the rate the Clintons are going, the nomination won't be worth a damn as the GOP has been handed enough ammunition to reelect Herbert Hoover.

Speaking of Hoover, the Dow opened this morning almost 500 points down after 3/4 point rate cut.  The Democrats are playing Nero while the economy burns.  The best contribution both Senators Clinton and Obama could make is to get their backsides back to D.C. and weigh in on the ecnomic stimulus package.  Will that happen?  Yeah, right!

Mc Cain's looking better and better with each passing day.
I don't know where people bought their rose colored glasses if they think Obama won the debt.  He clearly would rather fight a former President then to fight either Clinton or Edwards. He went after her on the second question fine she's a big girl and she can handle it. But, it seems like Obama and his team or should we say Former President Clinton's Advisors are crying. Please stop it, this is politics and if you don't like people looking into your record get out.
Why would we want the Clinton Circus back?  Well, because our dollar was worth more, unemployment was low and the budget was balanced.  Gee, that was so terrible compared to today, wasn't it?
Want to hear it from someone who was in the room?
Both candidates did not do themselves too much good. Most of the time (during attacks) it was a relatively small group of people applauding (not that small 10-25% of the room) except for the booing of Clinton (more than half the room). People responded to positive stuff, acknowledging in mass when they hear something they like. It was shocking the way they were going at each other. Hillary was screaming a lot; did not appear honest to me.
The winner and loser were not on the stage in my opinion. Bill Clinton was the loser and John McCain won the debate. Think about that...
You reap what you sow...
The Clintons decided to 'race bait' Obama
Let's see the results....

From the LA Times:

Racial politics ensnare Democratic campaign

By Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
January 22, 2008
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- It was to be a show of unity: The two top Democratic candidates for president were to march to a rally Monday, passing in the shadow of a Confederate flag on the statehouse grounds, to celebrate the legacy of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

But while Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama were on hand to make speeches at the rally, only Obama arrived in time to march through the streets of this Southern capital. And in a sign of how the once-cordial Democratic contest has become twisted by a debate over race, some African Americans in the audience took Clinton's absence as a snub.

Even the most routine stops on the campaign trail now are taking a combustible air. Clinton's aides said she had been delayed by "confusion" over the time her plane was to leave for South Carolina, but some in the audience said the senator from New York should have marched in the parade, joining Obama.

Thomas Bell, 45, a clergyman from Camden, S.C., said that politicians often visit when it is in their interest. "But this particular march is important to us because of what Dr. King stood for."

The tensions spilled into Monday night's Democratic presidential debate, in which Clinton and Obama -- in a forum that also included candidate John Edwards -- repeatedly squared off in bitter, sometimes personal exchanges over their policy proposals and legislative records.

A day earlier in New York, a raw moment played out after Clinton attended services at a famous black church in Harlem. As she passed out hot chocolate and coffee to the crowd in the freezing weather, one man turned away and yelled at her not to come to Harlem to "steal" the black vote from Obama.

On Saturday, racial dynamics had been at work in the Nevada caucuses. Clinton won that contest, powered by white and Latino votes. But in an illustration of the racial divide, runner-up Obama picked up 83% of the black vote.

And in another possible sign of how race is shaping the campaign, the former first lady on Monday seemed to be downgrading her role in South Carolina's primary, the next contest on the Democratic calendar and one in which black voters make up about half of the electorate.

She came to the state and left with no plans to return before Thursday. Instead of trying to boost her odds in South Carolina, Clinton will use the next few days to campaign in other states, including California, New Mexico and Arizona -- all of which vote Feb. 5 and have large Latino populations.

Her husband stayed in South Carolina to campaign on her behalf. But Bill Clinton too has been ensnared in racial politics of late.

The former president angered some African American leaders recently when he cast Obama's stance on the Iraq war as a "fairy tale." He has since tried to make amends in calls to black talk-radio stations. It is unclear whether the mea culpa has worked.

Charles Perry, a trustee of Abyssinian Baptist Church, which Hillary Clinton visited Sunday, said he found the "fairy tale" reference disrespectful.

Obama "has been a state senator. He has experience. He's been out there in the community," Perry said. He added that Clinton's comment might spur a reevaluation of the former president, with some black voters wondering whether "you were like this all the time and have been covering this up."

For much of the 2008 Democratic contest, racial politics seemed nonexistent. Obama appeared to be a candidate with cross-racial appeal. Hillary Clinton seemed positioned to scoop up a healthy share of the black vote, aided in part by her husband's popularity in the black community.

Had she attended the march here Monday, held before a rally where speeches commemorated the King holiday, Clinton would have seen a crowd that was conspicuously pro-Obama. People waved signs reading "Obama '08" and "No Clinton Dynasty." Clinton still had a solid number of supporters; Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina, had fewer. A small band of pro-Confederate flag demonstrators gathered across the street, with signs reading "NAACP Bad for Blacks" and "Flag Forever."...'

Apparently, some Clinton supporters....

It was a great debate last night.

However, the reality remains that Senator Clinton is going to get the nomination.  Women (and particularly women over 50) have shown that they are not only going to vote for her NO MATTER WHAT but that they are going to show up in huge numbers.  She has also shown that she will win the Latino vote by a large margin.  What do those 2 things add up to?  Huge wins in the biggest primary states on February 5 and the nomination.

At the end of the day?  Women over 50 will be cheering and patting each other on the back, saying "you go girls" and "we showed them."   And, America will as bitterly divided as it's been the past 4 years.  At best, she may eke out a victory in the fall--the margins will be razor thin and the Dems will likely lose House and Senate seats due to the "Clinton drag" (Hardcore Dems hate to admit it but it's true--America does not want more of this drama and there WILL be a drag when Republicans and Independents show up to vote against more of the Clintons).

So, what will a President Clinton be able to accomplish with an even smaller majority than currently exists?  She'll be able to make some modest changes in Iraq.  Think her much vaunted "universal" healthcare is going to get through Congress?  Think again.

Democrats, and particularly those women who have been flocking to her simply because they say "it's time we had a woman in the White House."  Please think about what you're giving to the country with your vote for another 4 years of bitter division.   We can do better.
I was embarassed by the behavior and disrespect I witnessed last night!
My concern is we are setting the Rep up here. With a women and a African American running will middel america go to McCain?

Most do not like to talk about it and I am not sure America will support this much change.
Despite what the pundits say, I thought Obama was fired up and showed a lot of passion. He'd make a great president. One I would be proud of.

I also thought it was interesting that on MLK day three things happened: Bill Clinton fell asleep at a MLK service, Hillary was hours late to a church service and march in SC celebrating MLK, and finally, at last night's debate, it became clear that she has given up on South Carolina because she's lost the black vote. But when you disrespect people, blatantly using them to achieve your political goals, what do you expect Hillary?  
Why are the pundits so out of touch with the electorate?  Or are they just afraid of the Clinton's and another back lash similar to their over exuberance reporting the demise of Clintons in New Hampshire.  

Obama decidedly won the debate.  What the media describes as bickering, was Obama setting the record straight on every Slander the Clinton's have been slinging.  Hillary looked really bad in that exchange and I know only die hard Hillary fans would see it in any other way.  

Obama not only won the fight, he got across his message of how he is the only Democratic candidate who has a plan to win with a majority.  Which is the only real way that the Dems will be able to make real changes in the direction of the country.
There is no way that I want Bill Clinton in the White House for a third term.  
Hillary Clinton is the best HOPE for this Country!!
Everyone get oon the wagon and vote for her!
Why anyone would vote for Obama is beyond me.
I am sick of this ngativity already, and it is still early on until we vote. I do know the HillBillies won't get my vote.
Nasty Democrats? Well, why not. The Republicans have been the nastiest since, well...Nixon (aside from Gerald Ford). America seems to have adjusted to it and now, prefers a bit of salt in its' Presidential Wanna-be. Dubya has pretty much cured them on Air-Presidents however, so Nasty is cool but Dumb Nasty is not. The next President will need to be Machiavellian-Nasty, not Elmer Fuddian-Nasty.
Anyone who watched that debate last night and thinks Obama won it must have had a littkle to much to drink. Hilary gave quick and concise answers. While Obama struggled and gave halting ones. The clinton haters will be out today. Hard to tell if they are Obama supporters or just republicans. Hard to tell the difference anymore.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=597863

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google