ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Bloomberg does the economy

Posted: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:31 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Chuck Todd
Potential indie presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg heads to DC later today to give a speech on the economy. His office released prepared text of his remarks. As you'll read, Bloomberg doesn't mince words when it comes to Washington and Congress' attempts to stimulate the economy.

"From where I sit, having spent 35 years in the private sector, the debate in Washington is missing the point.

“Tax rebates, more generous unemployment benefits, home heating oil credits- these measures could modestly benefit Americans, and there is some value in that.  Cutting taxes and increasing spending to stimulate demand is the standard Keynesian response. But there’s just one problem -- it’s not going to make much of a difference, because we’ve already been running huge deficits.

“John F. Kennedy told us, ‘The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining.’ That’s what many of us in this room did. We used the good times to save for the future and pay down debt. And when the storm clouds started gathering last year, we tightened our belts. In New York, we put $2.5 billion into a trust fund, beginning in 2006. Last year, we began cutting agency spending by 2.5 percent and we instituted a hiring freeze. But in Washington, they did exactly the opposite. 

“They spent most of this decade running up bills with reckless abandon and when the economy started heading for the ditch, the special interest give-always got even bigger. They ate the seed corn without worrying about the next year’s harvest. Well, the next year is here, and the seed corn is gone. All we’ve got is a barn full of I.O.U.s."

Clearly, Bloomberg is making the competency case when it comes to the economy. What's interesting is that this pitch from Bloomberg actually sounds similar to the rhetoric Romney's using on the trail lately. Washington is broken, we need new people to fix it.

As for a solution on the economy, Bloomberg takes a page from FDR. But he also counsels against giving folks a tax rebate. Instead, he thinks the cities ought to do the following:

"In some cases that will mean financial counseling. In others, it will mean ensuring that lenders make good on their promises to modify loans and make them affordable. And in some cases, it may also mean offering families trapped in bad mortgages a subsidized loan before their interest rates shoot up. This approach would provide immediate relief that would help stabilize both the national economy and strengthen local neighborhoods.

“Second, I believe - and I know a lot of mayors agree - that the best way to pump money into the economy in the short-term and get something out of it in the long-term is to finance immediate infrastructure projects that cities and states can’t afford. I’m sure all of us have a list a mile long - bridges and roads and mass transit systems that need repair. Why not put people to work on these projects right now? Remember, the public works of the New Deal didn’t just create jobs. They built a foundation that allowed America to experience unprecedented growth in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s."

Another jobs proposal is on the manufacturing front: "Demand is growing in every industry for materials that make products better, lighter, faster, cheaper and greener. That’s especially true of green energy, biotechnology, life sciences, computer technology. These industries are going to create millions of jobs.  But whether those jobs are American or foreign will depend largely on the economic climate we create."

Finally, Bloomberg pushes one thing from the right, the elimination of the so-called "marriage penalty."

“Expanding the earned-income tax credit and eliminating its marriage penalty would be a more effective way of getting money into people’s hands than a rebate - and, unlike extending unemployment insurance, it would incentivize work. To help Americans stretch their dollar further, we should also use the downturn to begin getting serious about finding ways to control health-care costs, and reforming policies that add hundreds of dollars to every family’s grocery bill. But the single-most important thing we can do to raise real income in the years ahead is to invest more - and more wisely - in education and job training."

All in all, Bloomberg's prescription for the economy appears to ideologically come more from the left than the right, but the tone of Bloomberg's speech is definitely one that is attempting to find the middle ground -- to come at this problem from an independent point of view. Clearly, this speech is designed to get Bloomberg's economic ideas into the national debate. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Why do you trolls salivate over every twitch by this moneyed dwarf? Didn't you learn anything from your crush on FRED? Why do I even ask?
Obama/Bloomberg ?   Bloomberg/Obama  ?
Wow -
It didn't realize how much I agree with him. I am all for making incentives for people to work - that is the supply/demand principle our economy is based on. Lets get paid for the hard work we do, not penalize us for the hard things we endure (marriage and family) - and yes, that is sarcasm - and get my generation back to the real world where we realize that a)the government doesn't owe us anything more than we are willing to put into it and b)you reap what you sow. Good plan! As long as we are willing to do the work our economy will grow; however, if we continue to be lazy and expect the government to hand us an extra dollar so we can get out and spend it our jobs will continue to be outsourced and our economy will continue to feel the squeeze.
Finally someone speaks with knowledge and does not bring the baggage of the religious right and the political correctness of the far left. He would have my vote in a minute.  We can spend billions in Iraq, but not one dime for Americans.
" ...these measures could modestly benefit Americans, and there is some value in that."
--What Congress is proposing sounds to me more like an insurance policy to help alleviate the pain of a recession than a stimulus plan to prevent a recession.


" ...that the best way to pump money into the economy in the short-term and get something out of it in the long-term is to finance immediate infrastructure projects that cities and states can’t afford. Why not put people to work on these projects right now?"
--Conservatives hate the New Deal, and I'm actually not quite sure why.  The current bi-partisan proposal sounds like a hand-out to me, whereas what Bloomberg proposes actually creates jobs, makes people earn money and plans for the future.
woot woot! obama/bloomberg 08! <b> BECAUSE POLITICS SHOULD BE ABOUT TRANSFORMATIONS RATHER THAN TRANSITIONS, OR FAIRYTALES INTO THE PAST (read Billary).
The fact that these fools keep hyping this Bloomberg nobody shows me that the will do anything to keep a Democrat from winning.
Sounds like Bloomie is going to run, which is a shame.  The only way the Pubs can win in 2008 is if someone like Bloomie saps the Demo vote.  The Pubs aren't going to vote for him, especially if the ticket is McCain-Romney (what a love fest that would be!), and Clinton-Richardson or Clinton-Graham will have a hell of a time getting as many votes as the Pub nominee.

So it looks like Bloomie will go down in history, not only as a brilliant and successful billionaire, but also as Ross Perot II, the spoiler candidate who tossed an unwinnable election to the Pubs.  So, if he runs this time the Pubs won't even have to steal it!
Bloomberg will run if Clinton wins the nomination. If he does, then Bloomberg should ask Obama to join him on the ticket. Obama will properly have the chance to be on the Clinton ticket, but he should refuse.
A Bloomber/Obama ticket can beat anyone - including  Clinton.
Way to go!

If Obama or McCain are the candidates and one of them wins the election,Bloomberg should become Treasury Secretary.

If Obama is president, he should offer Hillary chief of staff role as she seem to be eager to organize Obama's paperwork and keep track of him.

If Hillary is candidate, I will be happy as lifelong Republican.  
Hillary Clinton Wal-Mart's Corporate Lawyers ----- While Wal-Mart Discriminates Against Women
The glass ceiling at Wal-Mart showed cracks last month when a sex discrimination lawsuit by six California women who work or have worked for the $256 billion retail giant received class action status. In a case that began last year, the workers charged Wal-Mart with systematically discriminating against women in pay and promotions.

Two thirds of Wal-Mart's 1.2 million U.S. workers are women.

On June 22, U.S. District Court Judge Martin Jenkins certified the gender-bias lawsuit, Dukes v. Wal-Mart, to cover more than 1.6 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart's 3,586 U.S. retail stores back to Dec. 26, 1998. The ruling includes its discount stores, super centers, neighborhood stores and Sam's Clubs.

"I'm in this for the long haul. I have no fear in my spirit at all of Wal-Mart," lead plaintiff Betty Dukes told the New York Times. (June 23) Dukes, a 54-year-old African-American woman and an ordained Missionary Baptist minister, decided to take action after seeing men promoted over her during 10 years at Wal-Mart in Pittsburgh, Calif.

The workers' lawyers say this is the biggest class action ever certified against a private employer. The historic legal action by women workers could force Wal-Mart to award more than $1 billion in back pay alone--the difference between what Wal-Mart underpaid the women and what they should have earned since 1998.

Systematic gender bias

Statistics supporting the gender-bias lawsuit--available at www.walmartclass. com and www.walmartvswomen.com--show a systematic pattern of discrimination by Wal-Mart against women workers.

Women were regularly paid less than men for the same work--from 5 to 15 percent less in similar positions. Although 65 percent of Wal-Mart's hourly workers are women, only one-third of its managers are female--well below industry norms. Men hold 90 percent of Wal-Mart store manager positions.

Wal-Mart tried to argue that it had no national policy against women. But expert testimony in the case showed gender-based wage disparities exist in every region in which Wal-Mart operates.

Wal-Mart's practices are so anti-woman that the National Organization for Women dubbed Wal-Mart its "Merchant of Shame" in its Women Friendly Work place campaign in 2002. (www.now.org)

Labor, women and communities unite

Hillary Clinton Wal-Mart's Corporate Lawyer, while Wal-Mart was Discrimnate Against Women

The gender-bias class action lawsuit comes on the heels of a number of labor and community campaigns and legal actions against the anti-union behemoth.

Women workers sue Wal-Mart:
Wal-Mart pays workers a miserly $8 an hour on average--without benefits--while topping the Fortune 500 as the biggest private employer in the United States.

In February, a Portland, Ore., federal jury found that Wal-Mart owed 70 store managers overtime pay after forcing them to clock out and then work for free. Similar cases are pending in 31 states.

Federal raids last year, which forced hundreds of undocumented workers from their jobs, revealed that Wal-Mart used cleaning subcontractors that exploited immigrant workers.

The Food and Commercial Workers union is continuing efforts to organize Wal-Mart workers in the United States and Canada--where workers at a Wey burn, Saskatchewan, Wal-Mart recently signed up to join the union.

"An organized voice for workers is the solution for the problems--from low pay to inadequate health care, from high turnover to discrimination--at Wal-Mart. The Dukes case is an inspiration for all other Wal-Mart workers that, acting together, they, too, can bring change to the work place," said Food and Commercial Workers President Joe Hansen.

The union also joined community groups in Chicago and in Inglewood, Calif., to prevent Wal-Mart from setting up low-wage, big-box stores in those cities. And it is publicizing the women's gender-bias case on its web site at www.ufcw.org.

In June the Service Employees union joined the fight, pledging $1 million at its annual convention to "work with national and local groups to pressure Wal-Mart to improve wages and working conditions and to be a better neighbor."

Meanwhile, the gender-bias case against Wal-Mart is making an impact on working-class shoppers like Debra Enah of Minneapolis-St. Paul. "I don't want to be part of a store that doesn't have a heart for women," she told the Star Tribune. "Women do most of the shopping here. They could lose a great deal of customers."
If it's Hillary vs McCain. I'm voting for Bloomberg.
We Need Michael Bloomberg for President.

www.DraftMichael.com
Here is your new messiah Sierra, slobber over this one too.
No third party winner, no VP slot for Bloomberg no news here, move on.
Just another rich guy throwing his billions around and trying to buy the power he could NEVER get had he run in the republican primaries. He would have had to run against Rudy, the guy from his own party and his own state.
Looks like Mike is the only candidate who thinks like me.  I'll vote for him if he runs - even if the pollsters tell everyon he can't win.
Michael Bloomberg is arguably New York City's greatest mayor.  No mayor has ever been promoted to the presidency, but if there is any election that has defied conventional thinking, it is this one.  The stars will align in his favor by late February;  Clinton vs. Romney will give him the opening he needs.  Bloomberg can get the 35% of the popular vote, but needs to confirm that 270 electoral votes are within reach (hence the sophisticated research).
Vs. Clinton-Romney, I'd put his chances of winning at 20%.
Vs. Clinton-McCain, he will have a hard time securing the 270, and probably won't run.



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=602598

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google