ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Oh-eight (D): RFK’s kids step it up

Posted: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

CLINTON: Clinton was in Massachusetts and Connecticut yesterday. “Clinton used her platforms -- gymnasiums in Springfield and Hartford packed with energized voters -- to criticize President Bush in advance of last night's State of the Union address. She barely alluded to her heated struggle with Barack Obama, who trounced her on Saturday in South Carolina's primary, and in Springfield she ignored the endorsement Senator Edward M. Kennedy was bestowing upon the Illinois senator about the same hour in Washington.”

The day after Ted Kennedy backed Obama, three of RFK's children: Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, RFK Jr. and Kerry Kennedy pen a supportive op-ed for Clinton in today's Los Angeles Times.

The New York Times’ David Brooks writes, "Last week there was the widespread revulsion at the Clintons’ toxic attempts to ghettoize Barack Obama. In private and occasionally in public, leading Democrats lost patience with the hyperpartisan style of politics -- the distortion of facts, the demonizing of foes, the secret admiration for brass-knuckle brawling and the ever-present assumption that it’s necessary to pollute the public sphere to win. All the suppressed suspicions of Clintonian narcissism came back to the fore. Are these people really serving the larger cause of the Democratic Party, or are they using the party as a vehicle for themselves?"

“The Rev. Al Sharpton Monday joined the chorus of Democrats telling Bill Clinton to zip it. ‘As one of the most outspoken people in America, I think there's a time to shut up. That time has come,’ Sharpton said,” per the New York Daily News. “Whether he thinks it's the press distorting him or not, his making these statements is polarizing the country."

EDWARDS: The campaign appears to have decided to become a movement candidate who worries as much about the platform fights at the convention (or more importantly, becomes the kingmaker between Clinton and Obama). “‘We’re still hoping that John is the nominee,’ said David Bonior, the national campaign manager. ‘But with a chunk of delegates, you can leverage what you’ve been fighting for and standing for. You can raise these issues to where they should be on the Democratic agenda. We’re running for those two reasons: to get the nomination and to have his voice heard on his issues.’”

More: "Edwards is keeping up a relentless schedule, this week in Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota and Tennessee, all states that will vote on Feb. 5, and he is running television advertisements in 10 states.”

“Money is still not a problem, his aides insisted. Though Mr. Edwards has raised significantly less than Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Obama has raised, his campaign has been on a budget of $1.2 million a month and has enough to go through the primaries. He has raised more than $3 million this month, in part because of liberal bloggers, who recently organized a one-day fund-raiser that brought in more than $300,000."

OBAMA: Per the campaign, Obama will deliver a speech in El Dorado, Kansas (the former hometown of his grandparents) before heading to Kansas City, MO for a rally.

 “A federal judge here revoked bond on Monday and ordered Antoin Rezko, once a major fund-raiser for Senator Barack Obama, held in jail after prosecutors accused him of lying to the court about his finances,” the New York Times writes. “Mr. Rezko, who had been free on bond after being indicted in 2006 on charges of business fraud and influence peddling, was arrested early Monday at his home in Wilmette, a North Shore suburb… The disclosures about Mr. Rezko could fuel efforts by Mr. Obama’s opponents in the presidential race to make Mr. Obama’s relationship with him an issue.”

The Boston Globe on yesterday’s Ted Kennedy endorsement:  “In casting Barack Obama as a contemporary John F. Kennedy, a parade of Kennedys and Obama himself yesterday evoked Franklin D. Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr., and even Edward M. Kennedy's famous 1980 convention speech in paying tribute to their party's age-old commitment to the future.”

More: “For a candidate running on a promise to change Washington, aligning with a 45-year veteran of Capitol Hill might seem contradictory, analysts and elected officials said. But they said the Kennedy stamp of approval helps Obama with what has been his biggest vulnerability: a worry among Democrats that he can't win.”

Per the AP, “Democratic U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona is endorsing Barack Obama after earlier backing John Edwards in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. Grijalva cited Obama's electability and his intention to "fundamentally change the rules of the game" in Washington, according to a statement obtained by The Associated Press in advance of a planned Tuesday conference call with reporters.”

The New York Daily News writing about last night’s State of the Union: “Barack Obama entered the House chamber Monday night like he was there to deliver a State of the Union address, not listen to one. A crush of well-wishers, from teenage pages to grizzled lawmakers, caused a logjam as he walked in, leaving Hillary Clinton to wait outside for a political eternity. Clinton edged her way in at 8:45 p.m., trailing the glitter twins of Obama and new backer Sen. Ted Kennedy.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary will win anyway, Teds endorsement is wastet. Obama is just empty rhetoric, nobody knows his politics - if he has any.

Hillary 08!!!
Hillary will win anyway, Teds endorsement is wastet. Obama is just empty rhetoric, nobody knows his politics - if he has any.

Hillary 08!!!
This primary cycle has been one of the most disenchanting, disillusioning political events I have ever been through. Since race has been of such sensitivity and importance lately let me offer that I am a brown, naturalized citizen - a Democrat.

The cruelty with which Media has slammed the Clintons for their strong but valid criticisms of Obama has disappointed me greatly. That a person who has nothing - NOTHING - to show for achievements except for some anti-war speech he could easily make outside the jingoistic, pressure cooker that the congress of 2002/3 was, should now be considered such an inspiring, revolutionary figure, mystifies me. It really does.

The manner in which we Democrats have gone about hounding and maligning the one good thing - Bill Clinton - that happened to us in the last 40 years is disheartening. The manner of it looks almost cannibalistic. This person who was once Blacker than Black is now a confirmed racist. For what? How did this start? Bill Clinton tried to say Obama's claim as the guy with sound judgment (with respect to Iraq war) is one big fairy tale. Donna Brazile construed this to be a racist statement. Then Hillary Clinton says: MLK had to get LBJ's assistance to pass the Civil Rights Law. The Obama camp - The New Politician camp - The Change Politician camp - insinuated this statement had racist tones. Afterwards, Hillary angrily claimed during Meet the Press that Obama's camp had very successfully precipitated the perception that Clintons were playing the race card. In the following Nevada debate, Tim Russert, our well-meaning political accountant/bookkeeper, confronted Obama with a four-page document, put together by his camp, that talked about synthesizing different Clinton statements to suggest they were playing the race card. What did Obama do? He did not deny the charge. He accepted responsibility for it. In full view. Yet, somehow, today, Clintons who were the darlings of the Black community are now racist.

Obama regales us with talk of bringing the country together. This is naivety befitting one who has no experience. Either that, or mildly shrewd politicking from one who knows it makes the public tingle. Does any political leader go in thinking I am going to pick a fight with everyone and make my life miserable?

I pity the Clintons. They got skewered by the Republicans over 8 years for having the audacity to be in the white house. Look what they did to Hillary for trying to get us Universal Healthcare. Instead of standing by her for that, we have found her too tainted by such fights to lead us. Isn't that an encouragement for politicians to avoid anything that might politically damage them?! To try and persuade the other party, but on failing, to give up rather than pick a fight? Aren't we saying - fight for us but not too badly because we might find you divisive?! Isn't the cyclical/ironical stupidity of all this apparent? Do we know what we want? Do we want someone who will stand their ground and fight for our rights or do we want someone who will compromise? Because that will be the choice we will be faced with. Don't hope, star-struck people, that Republicans will, with loving generosity, line up behind a Democratic president. Political parties, remember, are, after all, in the business of being in power.

Anyway, if we have to go in a different direction, if we must turn the page on Clintons, then fine. But let's not destroy our own. Let's understand, it is natural for Bill Clinton to get ticked off when Obama goes to an editorial board and dismisses the Clinton years. Let's not call one, who was called Blacker than Black by someone who knows a thing or two about Blackness, a racist now.


Ah, the Kennedys, the Kennedys! Once again, Headliners.  David Brooks had a column today about the "Kennedy Mystique." My question is why, with so many more interesting families out there, is the Kennedy Mystique sustained so regularly?  The mystery may be as simple as "it pays the bills."  Ever since Honey Fitz and the Boston Machine, the Kennedy Clan has worked the voters and people worldwide with a public relations strategy yet to be equaled. Donald Trump tries, but he's nonpolitical and only one person. I get the feeling sometimes that the Kennedy Mystique is still with us as a faux political force for perhaps one or two prevailing reasons: Media Talking Heads Group I and Group II.

Group I fear and loath the Kennedys and feel compelled to express their contempt every time a Clan member makes a public appearance about anything; Group II love and worship the Kennedys, and don't seem to have a reason to say so any time they have the chance to do so. Objectivity does not play a part in either event.

My observation is, like so many of prominent celebrity no longer in power or on the front pages, is that they have to try to make a comeback anytime the opportunity affords it. Mohammad Ali kept coming back and back, not because he needed the money, so much as he needed the life. Does anyone still remember Harold Stassen of the Eisenhower Era?

The Kennedys also suffer from the disease of never-ending unrequited need for public attention. Since they can no longer produce family members who are electable presidential candidates to represent the Clan in the 21st Century, they still feel compelled to go public to let us know who their candidate should be, in the absence a Kennedy heir. Are there any other families of Former Presidents out there who possess similar conceits?

Republicans want another Reagan, and now Caroline Kennedy wants someone like her father. Many of us may agree that we need such men today. But weren't they Presidents for their times?  Things are much more complicated now. Yeah, the Soviet Union is gone, Jimmy Hoffa can't be found, and who remembers the  local Savings & Loan offering low interest loans at fixed rates for families who want to move on up to a more politically/socially correct neighborhood. Life now should be uncomplicated, right?  But if we believe the stories ripped from today's headlines, we now live in the worst of times.

Now it's Caroline Kennedy who wants a President like her father.   An admirable statement by an admirable woman.  She writes that her father changed peoples lives, inspired them to enter public service. I was one of those who did so.  I dont regret it.  If  my experience of the civil rights movement, the War on Poverty and the Viet Nam War, the sexual revolution and anti-war crusades interspersed  by scary days of the Bay of Pigs, the Berlin Wall,   the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the political assassinations of our Best taught me anything it was dont look back, something might be gaining on you.  I dont want a President like John Kennedy. Ronald Reagan wannabes should Rest In Peace. I want a President who wont repeat mistakes of the past, whose leadership focuses on the Public Good and the Public Interest; whose accomplishments will be immune from the penchants of future leaders who believe in the good old days that never were and the eradication of the memory of a successful opposition.

The Reagan Days of Reform and Revolution are now Legend, a product of Republican MythMakers and their fellow travelers of Print and Electronic Media.  The Days of Camelot are over, they too never were, despite the claims by authorized (and unauthorized) "historians." I know that to be true, as do most of you. Like so many of us, for good or bad, I was there, at the Creation of the Myth.  

Sabagio Mauraeno, Home alone in Decatur Georgia
Wow, Clintonistas, how much are Hillary and Bill paying you to post such race-based comments filled with hatred and untruths?   You sure are out in droves today.  Your hateful, racist comments tell us just what kind of people you are! BIGOTS!!

Hillary and Bill are corrupt:  GOOGLE "THE CLINTON CHRONICLES" audio on the net.  Their years in the White House brought us scandal after scandal, they lied, spinned, distorted, and coveredup.  They do NOT belong in the White House, maybe they want to go back there to finish stealing what they were unable to take when they left White House?  Maybe they have a longer list this time?  The Clintons are contemptible and corrupt!

If Mr. Obama wasn't running for President, we would not have the huge number of voter turnouts; he has energized the democratic field and there is no question about that, period!  

Hillary is down in Florida giving a rally, guess she's down there to thank her supporters.  She gets NO delegates from Florida.  Watch, she is going to do everything she can to get the DNC to reverse its ruling.  I can only hope the DNC doesn't cave in to her!!!  She is a power hungry troll and has used and continues to use any dirty trick to try to win the Presidency.  I am saddened and ashamed to see how many smart Americans continue to support her inspite of her corruption.  Makes me wonder if we the people have become so corrupt that we do not recognize corruption in full bloom when we see it.  Very sad, indeed.

         "THE CLINTON CHRONICLES" AUDIO
            IS FREE ON THE INTERNET  



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=617316

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google