ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



My journey with Edwards

Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:22 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Tricia Miller
As John Edwards was fond of saying, after we cast our votes in November, he will be fine. So will Barack and Hillary. But will America be fine?

As Edwards ended his presidential bid in New Orleans last Wednesday, it seemed the first would be true. He packed up after three days of large rallies at union halls in Feb. 5 states, his campaign still bringing in donations weeks after his hope for success dimmed. His family, apparently as healthy as ever, provided a solemn backdrop for his announcement. They would return together to their big Chapel Hill home, once the source of so much grief, now a haven from lingering questions about what went wrong. Meanwhile, Edwards' rivals began praising his campaign and rumors circulated that he would be offered a position in either of their administrations.

As a member of Edwards’ traveling press corps for five months (I’m only the silver medalist --  one reporter had been traveling with him full-time for longer), I saw the two-time presidential candidate on good days and bad. In his last days, Edwards finally got the cold that had already made its way through his traveling press corps. (When I got it in South Carolina, my counterpart from Fox handed me a pack of throat lozenges she had gotten from the New York Times reporter.) The cold was a late consequence for the long days we had all experienced. Even before the first 36-hour campaign swing in Iowa, we were exhausted. No one can say that the former North Carolina senator didn’t give the race his all.

In a campaign during which he often complained that the media had decided on a race between two history-making candidates -- frequently pointing to us in the back of the room as he made his point -- Edwards decided to outwork the hype. While his rivals stayed near Des Moines and Iowa City, Edwards headed north, south, east, and west, covering all 99 counties of Iowa (plus a brief stop in Omaha, Neb.) by the end of October. At the final stop in tiny Coulter, Iowa, on the morning of Oct. 28, we waited for the Ann Coulter jokes. None came, and the campaign cheerfully trudged on. One highlight for me came when Edwards started a campaign swing on a Sunday morning in my hometown. The editor of my local newspaper, which I had worked for a few years earlier, dutifully recorded the visit. The five-day-a-week paper put him on the front page above the fold on Monday and me on the front page below the fold on Tuesday. I heard about it for weeks afterwards.

Even as he put the Hawkeye State behind him and cable news analysts largely left him out of the post-Iowa analysis, Edwards drove hard through another 36-hour tour of New Hampshire toward the expected third-place finish. I was off the road then, but my producer and correspondent split duties covering it -- both unable to keep up with the Energizer candidate. From the beginning, Edwards’ campaign had a four-state strategy, and we had gotten used to the back-and-forth between Iowa and New Hampshire. I racked up frequent-flier miles on a Northwest Airlines flight from Des Moines that passed through Detroit on its way to Manchester, NH. It didn’t come as a shock when he lost Nevada; he had seldom traveled west of the Missouri River after I started covering him.

The culmination of a second-place finish in Iowa and third-place finishes in New Hampshire and Nevada took the air out of the campaign. Edwards flew to his home state of South Carolina and campaigned there with the same vigor, but at fewer events and without taking audience questions. Used to schedules that regularly included five events a day at far-flung Iowa towns, we slowly adjusted to days that included no more than three events. That would have been a brutal switch for our colleagues covering Fred Thompson, but for us it was a welcome respite. While Edwards strategized with his South Carolina staff and submitted to local interviews, we finally got a chance to see Charleston and to sit down for seafood dinners along the coast.

By this point, the traveling press corps was dwindling. A few of us had become fixtures on the campaign trail, traveling with press staffers in mini-vans full-time since September. When we arrived at events, we greeted staffers by name and were no longer asked to sign in. As more joined by December, we packed into a full-size van. After Christmas it was two full-size vans, where cozy conditions led to friction between overworked and cranky reporters. Finally, the group swelled enough to justify a bus for Edwards’ 36-hour tour. The largest group of scribes and photogs traveling with the campaign came about halfway through that tour, when some people didn’t have the desired two seats to themselves.

It was all downhill from there. The South Carolina staff generously let the 10 or so remaining reporters and photogs continue to be charged to ride in a bus, leading to much less tension and -- at least in my case -- the motivation to file posts or video after almost every event. (That had been close to impossible in Iowa and New Hampshire, and not rewarding either.) By the time the campaign drew to a close in New Orleans, only five people were along for the ride: reporters from ABC and CBS, a producer and cameraman from CNN, and me.

The end came as a surprise. We had been riding on Edwards’ chartered plane since his loss in South Carolina, making stops in Georgia, Tennessee, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Minnesota -- all Feb. 5 states where the Edwards campaign thought they could pick up delegates. The campaign held a conference call touting record fundraising online and released ads in key primary states. I had been routinely batting away calls from bosses in New York and Washington asking when the campaign would end. No one was interested in much else from me as Edwards’ impact on the race steadily diminished. When an event in Fargo was canceled and we were rerouted to New Orleans (in Louisiana, a state with a Feb. 9 primary), Edwards’ traveling spokesman told us it was for a speech on poverty because the president had not addressed it in his State of the Union.

By the time we slogged through the mud at Musicians Village, meeting crews and correspondents who had flown in frantically once the news broke that morning, it was over. Edwards staffers had quit answering their phones, instead opting to e-mail glowing articles about the senator leading the policy debate in the Democratic nomination. In stark contrast to Rudy Giuliani’s final concession later in the day, we were driven as usual to the site. Staffers flew in with Edwards’ family from Chapel Hill to see the end, as they had the beginning. Reporters who needed it were driven to the airport afterward.

So as Edwards lent his celebrity to Habitat for Humanity once again and analysts began bickering over which candidate he would eventually endorse -- or whether he would endorse at all -- those who had left their lives behind to cover this man made a big decision: whether to catch a flight home or to stay for that night’s Mardi Gras celebration. It was quickly evident, in fact, that America would be fine.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Thank you, John! Best wishes to you and your family.
America will not be fine if we are forced to put another Republican in the White House because independents pushed Barrack Obama on the Democratic party.
...and Obama will lose if he is the nominee.
Change is the residue of design, and design is the by-product of experience.
Let's elect a candidate who can lead this country off of the bridge to nowhere, and back onto that bridge to the 21st century that her husband did so well directing us to.

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2008!
The difference between a Southerner and a Yankee. Edwards did not leave the reporters without a ride.
Bain capital bought Clear Channel communication November 2006. Clear Channel owns multiple media outlets across the United States. Clear Channel owns Premiere Radio Networks. Premiere is the distributor of the Rush Limbaugh and Dr Laura Show. Rush and Dr Laura are the biggest Romney supporters among radio talk show host. Clear Channel also carries the Sean Hannity Show. Clear Channel has been and still is one of the biggest proponents of media consolidation in the US. I think there is more to uncover in the relations between Mitt Romney, Bain capital and Clear Channel
Vandersloot seemed like a nice guy
I could not really connect with his message...but I so admired Edwards' resilience and that of Elizabeth Edwards.  He did have an uphill battle b/c he was not glamorous and therefore not as newsworthy as his main rivals.  His message lives on in the campaign of Sen. Obama so all was not in vain.
OBAMA can't BS about nothing for 8 months.

demos.
I am a senior citizen and I have lived thru JFK, RFK, and MLK assasinations and that was sad indeed.  To me it is even sadder to see John Edwards suspending his dream as POTUS.  I saw first hand how hard JRE and Elizabeth worked as well as their staffers.  

Without John Edwards to lead, I feel January 30, 2008 was/is the saddest day I will ever feel.  This wonderful person who cares for the poor and the hungry, the middle class working family has his quest stolen from the likes of Clinton and Obama.  John was first to lead with his visions for a better, united America.  Then in steps Obama, next Hillary and all of a sudden they are hyped as the two who will vie for the nomination as president.  I do feel that the DNC is partly responsible for this with endorsements coming from the "politically elites" such as the Kennedys.

This does nothing for me except leave a void in my heart and a determination to write JRE's name on my Iowa ballot in November.  I urge all supporters of John Edwards to do the same.  You say we are throwing our vote away, I think not.  No difference between Hillary or Obama and the Republican party.

Become an Independent or try to get a Third Party going because DNC is not listening to the voices of America, but doing what they want done.  Bah humbug
Wrong TEC-spirng-tx...

Bain capital HAS NOT purchased Clear Channel - so maybe you and your whiny buddy Huckabee can go back to crying about something ELSE you've made up.
Edwards is a class act. What a shame that the majority of the media treated him like dirt.
I feel like this piece is more about the "service" of the journos than it is about the Edwards campaign.  

Seriously, MSNBC?  You're a for-profit company paying people to do a job just like the rest of America.  This isn't a civic duty or service like the positions these people are campaigning for, and it's ridiculous to see folks in the media trying to get us to put them on a pedestal through stories like this which make it seem like they sacrifice everything just to bring us the news.  There's no need for you to make us try and feel sorry for the people "who had left their lives behind to cover this man".  I mean, seriously... there are MILLIONS -- if not most -- Americans who make far greater sacrifices for what they do on a daily basis than folks who get paid to ask questions, shoot video, enjoy leisurely lunches at seafood places along the coast, work from a laptop on a bus, and get put up in hotels all on the company dime.  These "average" Americans do so without all of the self-aggrandizement we see here.  These average folks -- the ones making sacrifices daily -- are the ones MAKING the news that you get paid to cover.  It's a shame to see you spending time focusing on the sacrifices of the media to bring us the news, as opposed to the day-in-and-day-out sacrifices of those who give you things to report on in the first place.
###alert### LIVE TOWN HALL MEETING "TONIGHT" ON HALLMARK CHANNEL OR GO TO hillaryclinton.com. "9 P.M. E.S.T."
DON'T MISS IT ! TONIGHT 9 P.M. E.S.T. HALLMARK CHANNEL OR GO TO HILLARYCLINTON.COM .
The day John Edwards suspended his campaign was one of the sadest days for me, in a year of cumulative bad days.  He was our best real hope for the future of this country.  A man who truly cares about people in America and around the world.  Now the choice is between 2 candidates, neither of whom can hold a candle to John Edwards.  Poor America!
Excellent article, the kind of behind-the-scenes reporting that would never have justified print space before the web.  First Read is candy for political junkies.
I was heartbroken when Edwards dropped out so early, esp. since he vowed to hang in there all the way to the convention in Denver. However, even though I already planned to vote for Edwards in the California primary, I held on to my absentee ballot. It was becoming increasingly evident that Edwards--sad to say--was looking to be a non-factor in the Democratic race. I'm glad I didn't throw away my vote, since we Californians are now choosing between Barack or Hillary. Even as I cast my vote for Clinton, I felt sorry the for my fellow absentee voters who mailed in their ballots early with a now wasted vote for Edwards. Boo Hoo. He might very well pick up 10% of the CA vote due to absentee voters who mailed in their ballots prior to the New Orleans speech.
I am still broken-hearted over John Edwards suspending his campaign. I do not appreciate being railroaded into voting for Obama or Clinton. The DNC and the media do not speak for me. I'm sick of it!!  
EDWARDS HAS SUSPENDED NOT ENDED!  You can still vote for Edwards!  He can still gain delegates.  I urge NBC not to write up news stories as if Edwards wasn't on the ballot still.  He IS on the ballot still and Edwards votes STILL COUNT.
I guess you at MSNBC are all relieved now, from the beginning the only two people you wanted to cover were the two people who remain in the race for the democratic nominee.  Giving Americans no choice so far as I am concerned.  You ran the debates and
picked the question you wanted to ask.  Started trouble between the candidates, all for media rating.  It didn't do your ratings much good, as crazy O'Reilly from Fox says, you are way behind them in ratings.

I hope you are happy with the do nothing Senator Obama
and the former first lady, last debate from CNN was
extremely boring, at least the parts I heard reported. I certainly did not watch, only John Edwards made the debates worth watching. Now maybe
one of the republican war mongers will win the election in November and it was MSNBC plan in the long run.  
You have done this country a great disservice, by not
covering John Edwards from the beginning, because he was the only candidate with original ideas and plans from the beginning, the others just followed along.
Repeating his words, without really meaning what they
say, and making promises they have no intentions of keeping. Looks like the next four years will be more
of same.  Continued occupation of the middle east, where we have no business being.  No Universal healthcare, poor education policies, high college
tuitions, poor choices of jobs.
As I thought, a co-worker (Republican) is voting for Obama tomorrow because he thinks it will be easier to beat the no experienced liberal over Hillary. How many other supposed Republican converts are voting for Obama?  We can only blame ourselves.
This article is interesting as a back piece on the life of a reporter, but the last line was jarring.

Just because your life as a reporter for a major network will seem fine (don't lose that health coverage by the way or "fine" could be a distant memory) now that you can get back to your comfy bed and regular schedule doesn't mean America will be fine.

The 200,000 homeless vets are still homeless, and who is speaking for them now?

37 million Americans are still living in poverty, and who is speaking for them now?

47 million Americans still lack basic health care coverage, and while Clinton and Obama have proposals, neither is as detailed or as strong as Edwards's was, so who is speaking for these Americans now?

Middle class wages are still stagnate, Clinton and Obama still favor trade agreements that favor multinational corporations, and the millions of people living in rural America have lost the only candidate who ever advocated for them.  So who is speaking out on these issues now?

Great, Tricia Miller is fine.  But don't conflate your current socioeconomic position with the condition of this country.  Right now, America is not fine.
$400.00 haircuts = out of touch with reality.  Good riddance.
It's about time First Read wrote something as classy as this. Let's hope you don't take forever to do this again.
America will be fine? A bit glib. You might have found a more generous last line (oh, I know, obligatory to echo the lead sentence). It is interesting to me how very little sympathy Edwards evoked among members of the traveling (terminally trivial) press. Now the answer is apparent. Yes, unlike Clinton and Obama, he regularly took questions from the press. But covering him was so inconveniently tiring....
Keith Sanfred, South Bend, Indiana
http://www.clearchannel.com/Corporate/PressRelease.aspx?PressReleaseID=1824
In progress deal has yet to close but is probably a done deal.
Tricia, it sure would have been nice if you had given Edwards this much space while he was still in the campaign. But then this article really isn't about Edwards, is it?
David - yes - this piece is all about journalists - not Edwards.
And once again - MSNBC lives up to their anti-Edwards position.
WHy hasn't Edwards made an endorement yet?  Are He and Richardson playing the fence for jobs?   That is hypocritical of them.  Typical politicians.  Why not speak up for who you think would be the best
My CA vote is well placed voting absentee ballot.  A Democracy means I vote for who I feel would be our best President; if the current "flavor of the month" party favorites leave me with no feeling, no vision, no real direction for our future, I vote my conscience, make another choice, a better choice.

No vote is ever wasted...ever.

I think John Edwards deserves to hear from the Nation, not a sampling of States.  IMO, his campaign was the best in decades.
Edwards and Hillary won RED Florida counties!
Obama won in university-area counties.

The media has given Obama a pass from the gitgo - and are delivering Obama on a silver platter.
The media did the same with Bush in 2000.

Obamabots are the new Bushies!

JRE was what americans needed today, now, not tomorrow.  I think JRE had the best plans and knew the way to get things done.  It is the country's loss that they did not realize what a great mind JRE has.  He came up with the solutions to the problems we are facing every day.  I also think that JRE is the one that would have gotten universal health care passed.  Democrats have lost again.
Don't worry he'll get even one day leading the class action lawsuit against GE for the mercury in compact fluorescent light bulbs. Wonder if he'll close down the poverty center now? That 72% Administration cost is as bad as some these bogus vet charities.
"America will be fine?" I'm not so sure. This reminds me of what I felt watching Meet The Press this Sunday. Tim Russert and his round table of pundits yucking it up as if the primaries were something as superficial as the Super Bowl. In sports, a team loses and they come back next year to play again. In politics, we elect the wrong guy and airplanes crash into buildings, cities disappear into floods, billions of dollars are misspent and the world's Super Power tanks. Big difference, folks. Please cover politics as if our lives depend on it. Adios Mr. Edwards, and thank you for talking about povery in America.
John Edwards is a good and caring person. I hope that he will be chosen as the running mate for either Hilary or Obama. I hope that Hilary gets the nomination. I don't believe that Obama has the necessary experience to clean up Bush's mess.
John Edwards was a great candidate and I admire his admiration for the working middle class.  He would be my second choice next to Hillary Clinton.  I just thought that his candidacy was caught in the wrong election season where a first viable woman presidential candidate and a first viable African-American presidential candidate were at play.  

Im a registered Democrat but I also like John McCain and Ron Paul. Should Hillary Clinton lose the nomination, I would have to think about John McCain. Im not sure... Im prolife - but the war in Iraq is not worth fighting for - with respect to men and women in uniform, and the war needs to be ended.  I don't think  the word "winning" the war in Iraq would mean anything after the bloodshed of many US troops and Iraqi civilian. I wish Ron Paul was in the higher up race.  

Barack Obama is articulate and some say inspirational but I don't see really it. Anyone of these candidates can and will make change in the country, however, experience is what most counts. Okay, Obama didn't vote for the war and now what? And it annoys me that Hillary Clinton still doesn't want to admit that she made a mistake by voting for the war - but its time to move on.  Its time to find solutions and figure out how we're going to fix all that mess in Iraq.

I wouldn't be surprised if John Edwards becomes the US Attorney General, I think he would be great.

I wish Hillary Clinton many luck, I believe for what she stands for and I think she will make the real change that this country needs.



     
OBAMA'S IRAQ VOTE SPEECH
OCTOBER 2002
Unedited Original Transcript

"Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances.

The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don't oppose all wars.

My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton's army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain.

I don't oppose all wars.

After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.

I don't oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income - to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

Now let me be clear - I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not - we will not - travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain."

John is a fine man with great vision. He could have brought change. Hopefully change is on the way.

http://www.dipdive.com/
If you need some help deciding this primary season.
I'm so glad some one else knows that Bain Capital doesn't own Clear Channel!!  Thank you Keith!  

And even if they did, what would that have to do with Mitt Romney?  He hasn't worked for Bain Capital since 1999!  I think maybe you should do some homework TEC.
History is funny,especially presidential history. you never really know  what presidents is like until after they are elected. This time however I felt like I knew John Edwards. He was a man of the people for the people down to the poorest of us. He understood us better than anyone runing. We stood a much better chance with him to get the programs that we need to make our lives better than with anyone else runing. We will miss John Edwards.
Thanks to Tricia Miller -- although I do not share her confidence that America will be fine -- for such a caring and appreciative report on what the journalists in the field were doing.  Edwards' advocacy for structural, progressive reforms in housing, poverty, global warming, universal healthcare, are what America is already missing.  The C&O horserace is mostly about identity politics and style, which the moneyed political players would much prefer to dominate than allowing serious discussion during the horse-race of Edwards -- and Kucinich, as well as others' -- vital concerns.
American will NOT be fine. I too lived through JFK, RFK AND MLK. I have not been inspired since they have been gone. John Edwards inspired me. I will be writing in John Edwards in November. Obama and Clinton are just the same thing we have had for the last 28 years. I went to Iowa and worked for John Edwards, on my own dime, because he is the only voice for workin American. The media has let us down again. We have to stand up for ONE AMERICA. VOTE FOR JOHN EDWARDS!!
A light of hope for the working class went out with the end of John Edwards' campaign. He spoke to my heart, he heard my voice, he had my back. We have lost our champion. He made me believe again, in the America I grew up in, with liberty and justice for all. The media's prominent attention to Senators Clinton and Obama's historic candidancy excluded the best candidate, due to his gender/ethnicity.Perhaps we're not so progressive after all. Thank you, Senator Edwards for restoring my hope for a brief, shining moment. I hope you will accept a VP slot, and then run again in 8 years. America needs you.
Thank you, FJR in LA!  Much appreciated as I had not yet the oportunity to read Obama's first speech re: Iraq war.
Edwards is the only Democratic candidate who is smart, honest, compassionate, and not bought and paid for by corporate America.  Look at the who is paying for Obama's and Hillary's campaigns:  oil, HMOs, nuclear power, coal, drug companies, etc.  I will not vote for corporate hack A or corporate hack B.  Edwards will have my vote on February 5th and again in November.
My heart and prayers go out to John Edwards and his family, especially his wife, Elizabeth.

On another note, I am now one of those independents pushing Senator Obama on the democratic party.  I suppose you have not considered how wonderful it would be to control both houses of Congress and have a President elected with much more than 47-48 percent of the vote.  I also suppose you have forgotten that unless a third party candidate gets into this thing, democrats cannot win with 47-48 percent of the vote.

I may be an independent, but I love my country and my fellow Americans.  I want universal health care.  I want the quagmire in Iraq to end.  I want a President who can speak and inspire his country and the world.  I belong on your side of the table.  If you must reject me just because I don't wear your particular label, by all means vote for Senator Clinton.
I am voting (and volunteering) for Senator Obama.

However, please know if Senator Clinton wins, I will not support her because my biggest issue is campaign finance reform -- one that Senator Edwards also holds dear.  Specifically, it is critical that we remove the hold over Washington that special interest PACS and lobbyists have.   Senator McCain is on my side of that issue.  Since the future of America is at stake on that issue more than any other, I would have to gloss over all of the other concerns I have to cross over to his side should Senator Clinton be the nominee.  I might also add that Senator McCain will not reject my support.

Obama '08.  He wants to bring us together so that we can stand united, instead falling down divided.

On a side note-- my fiance has been a democrat all of his life and he, too, is voting (and volunteering) for Senator Obama.  I suppose you will reject his support, however, probably saying something as absurd as he is so undemocratic as to marry an independent.  By the way, neither of us could be called (or mistaken for) young people and both of us are of European descent.  This is NOT a banana republic, we are all Americans.  We can do this, YES WE CAN!
This country is indeed as shallow and empty as it portrays by endorsing candidates just because of race and gender on the one hand. This election time is a terrible farce and I am sad to say the majority of people are so brainwashed that they are buying all this hogwash that will leave us all standing in the end and looking at each other asking what was that all about? I can only hope they will wake up and recognize that they missed their only opportunity of voting John Edwards in as the only chance of "change and integrity" but by then it will too late.
Still voting for Edwards February 5, why settle for second best, he is still on the ballot!
I think John needs to endorse Hillary and get her word on the Health Care Plan. I think this is the single most important thing John can still achieve. he and Obama are really different on this so here is your chance to make history John and bring Health care to all American..DO it now John
 
        Thank you John.  You are the best there is, and always will be.
   You will be fine, but America will not be fine without you.

       Thank you again.

                      Susan Lewis
John, you are a smarmy, unctious charlatan.  Go back to your mansion, consult for hedge funds, and chase a few ambulances for fun.  You were able to fool ignorant jurors in North Carolina, but most Americans could see you for what you are, which is as I have stated above.  I hope you disappear from the public eye for ever.  Good riddance!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=636609

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google